• Fans — 57

Are you CaptiveAire?

Claim this page from the app's Company page: register as a supplier (company name and contact email), open the Profile sub-tab and claim the brand. We confirm each claim by hand before it takes effect; from then the page and its listings are yours — attributed to your company, quote requests for designs that use them reach whoever you name with the design attached, and any listing is yours to edit or withdraw. No charge, no commission. Open the Company page

Listings

Search

Showing 49–57 of 57

How the model reads against CaptiveAire's data

Fan power through the fan laws, one curve per fan from a US multi-rating table	2 813 cells over 57 fans; 49 withheld by name	every held cell's BHP within 2 % plus the half-hundredth it is printed to (the worst at 0.984 of that band; one cell from 0.5 BHP past a bare 2 %, at 2.4 %) and its speed within 0.95 %, read back by the solver's own fan-law solve; RMS 0.41 % on power over the 1 845 cells from 0.5 BHP up. Withheld: 41 cells at the high-static end of a low-flow row, left of the wheel's pressure peak; 6 off the fan laws; 2 printed slips (a 1 in. cell repeating its row's 0 in. figures, a 2.25 in. cell 168 rpm under the 2 in. one). The stainless copies print 71 of their sizes' cells a second time, all within rounding. The SIF9DD and its copy are not listed: their best static efficiency is under 0.2. Each rating lies on its curve (the curve's static at the design flow within 1.00 % of the design static), and the efficiency a listing states is the curves' read there — DU10HFA's best printed cell, 0.02 BHP, would claim 0.383 on input power where its curve reaches 0.353
R454B's saturation line — the properties every R454B map in the catalog runs on — against a maker's printed pressure–temperature table	40 temperatures × 2 lines, −40 to 155 °F (160–170 °F lie past the top of the backend's R454B line, 71 °C)	one offset, not scatter: at every temperature the backend's dew point is 0.05–0.15 K under the printed one (its dew pressure 0.2–0.5 % over) and its bubble point 0.26–0.33 K under (0.5–1.3 %), so its glide is about 0.2 K wider than the table's. The table does not say whose equation of state it prints, so the offset is held as a bracket on that side, not fitted

From the validation page; every row is held by a test.

Listed from published data with the source named on every entry; a listing's figures are the manufacturer's, the model that runs them is ours. Solver results never depend on who has claimed what.