992 listing(s) in HVAC Builder's catalog from EVAPCO's published data and 992 system(s) modelled on it — 0 built by hand and 992 derived from the listings themselves — selectable in the builder and solved with the catalog's own figures. This page is listed by HVAC Builder from published data; EVAPCO has not claimed it.
Claim this page from the app's Company page: register as a supplier (company name and contact email), open the Profile sub-tab and claim the brand. The page and its listings are then yours — attributed to your company, quote requests for designs that use them reach whoever you name with the design attached, and any listing is yours to edit or withdraw. No charge, no commission. Open the Company page
Showing 985–992 of 992
Cooling tower — 19256 kW rejected, water 35.0 to 29.4 °C at a 25.6 °C wet bulb, 400.0 m³/s of air.
Cooling tower — 21057 kW rejected, water 35.0 to 29.4 °C at a 25.6 °C wet bulb, 437.5 m³/s of air.
Cooling tower — 22525 kW rejected, water 35.0 to 29.4 °C at a 25.6 °C wet bulb, 468.8 m³/s of air.
Cooling tower — 16658 kW rejected, water 35.0 to 29.4 °C at a 25.6 °C wet bulb, 352.4 m³/s of air.
Cooling tower — 17920 kW rejected, water 35.0 to 29.4 °C at a 25.6 °C wet bulb, 378.1 m³/s of air.
Cooling tower — 18993 kW rejected, water 35.0 to 29.4 °C at a 25.6 °C wet bulb, 400.3 m³/s of air.
Cooling tower — 20781 kW rejected, water 35.0 to 29.4 °C at a 25.6 °C wet bulb, 437.9 m³/s of air.
Cooling tower — 22236 kW rejected, water 35.0 to 29.4 °C at a 25.6 °C wet bulb, 469.3 m³/s of air.
| Cooling-tower model, zero fitted parameters | 856 | mean −0.03 K, RMS 0.064 K, worst 0.24 K — NTU from the vendor's own Eurovent column, the shipped default exponent (−0.7, the joint minimum with Marley's table) |
| Cooling-tower model against a fourth maker's whole open-tower range, nothing fitted to it | 45 945 over 992 machines | mean −0.083 K, RMS 0.220 K, worst 1.89 K on leaving water. 0.098 K at the 78 °F rating wet bulb, where the NTU is derived, rising to 0.283 and 0.288 K at 50 and 90 °F. The fill's loading exponent was swept on either half of the range and the shipped default (−0.7, the joint minimum of EVAPCO's own LPT bulletin and Marley's table) is the minimum for this range too, so it carries no constant of its own — unlike BAC's five, which wanted −0.9 to −1.3 |
From the validation page; every row is held by a test.
Listed from published data with the source named on every entry; a listing's figures are the manufacturer's, the model that runs them is ours. Solver results never depend on who has claimed what.