Published systems

BAC's XES15E-1218-11HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 468 nominal tons (2059 kW): rated to cool 1410 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-1222-13K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VFL-024-22J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 24 nominal tons (105 kW): rated to cool 72 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S884A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3807 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1131B-1036N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1119-1236N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6797 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1212N-6D1ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 231 nominal tons (1016 kW): rated to cool 696 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES15E-1218-11JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 534 nominal tons (2348 kW): rated to cool 1608 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-1222-13L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 618 nominal tons (2716 kW): rated to cool 1860 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VFL-024-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 26 nominal tons (114 kW): rated to cool 78 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S932A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4015 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1175B-1236N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7126 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1125-1240N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6834 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 110.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1218N-2D1DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 165 nominal tons (727 kW): rated to cool 498 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES15E-1218-12EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-1222-13M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 676 nominal tons (2971 kW): rated to cool 2034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VFL-024-32J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 30 nominal tons (131 kW): rated to cool 90 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S972A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4187 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1198B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7266 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1128-2418N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1218N-2D2DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 171 nominal tons (754 kW): rated to cool 516 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES15E-1218-12FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 360 nominal tons (1582 kW): rated to cool 1083 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-1222-13N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 725 nominal tons (3185 kW): rated to cool 2181 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VFL-036-22K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 35 nominal tons (153 kW): rated to cool 105 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.