HVAC Builder

Everything HVAC Builder publishes on HVAC Builder — complete systems, components and accessories, each with its own spec page and a quote request that needs no account.

Systems

NameCategoryCapacityMarketsOpen in the builder
Air conditioner with a heat-pump hot-water booster on its hot gas Example
An air conditioner that makes hot water from the heat it would otherwise throw away, the way a hot-water booster does it: a second, R134a heat pump whose evaporator is a plate exchanger on the A/C's hot gas. The A/C is a 20 kW-class split drawn from a supplier's own selection — coil faces, rows, fins, circuits and airflows, 7.5 K superheat and 5 K subcooling — on a Mitsubishi Electric LNB53 inverter rotary at its 60 rps rating speed. Between its compressor and its air condenser sits a **cascade exchanger**: the booster takes what the saturation difference across the plate drives, the air condenser rejects the rest, and the A/C condenses cooler for it. The booster's compressor is a catalog R134a heat-pump water-heater scroll standing in for the Mitsubishi SBB172, whose map is not published; its condenser heats water from 55 to 62 °C. The plate and the water side are an example's, not a maker's.
Split system18–22 kWEUOpen in the builder
Air-to-water heat pump plant, 15 kW class Example
The same machine as the one with radiators, with the radiators taken off: an outdoor coil taking heat from the air, a scroll compressor and a coaxial condenser, holding its leaving water for whatever draws on it. This is the shape a plant takes in a building — it serves no room, it holds a temperature, and the flats or the fan coils that drink from it are their own blocks. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Plant / central10–20 kWEUOpen in the builder
Air-to-water heat pump with radiators, 15 kW class Example
The plant a European house runs on: an outdoor coil taking heat from 7 °C air, a scroll compressor, a coaxial condenser heating a water loop, a circulator, and radiators giving it to the room. The radiators are a **hydronic emitter** — rated the way EN 442 rates one, an output at 75/65/20 °C and a characteristic exponent, with no geometry, because that is what a radiator maker publishes. They are deliberately oversized, which is what a heat-pump installer does: 34 kW at the EN 442 rating, more than twice the 14.7 kW the machine puts into them, so it settles at 52 °C flow (42 °C return) and a COP of 3.37 at the compressor instead of the 59 °C and 2.78 that boiler-sized radiators of 24 kW would have forced. A sixth of the running cost, bought with nothing but bigger radiators. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Plant / central12–18 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0709B-J cooling tower (130 tons, 571 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
A crossflow, axial-fan, forced-draft tower from the middle of BAC's FXT range, rated to cool 390 USGPM from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.1 m³/s of air. The fan sits ahead of the fill, so its motor heat is in the air the fill sees — which is how BAC builds an FXT and how this model wires it. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection450–700 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-09LN cooling tower (253 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
A crossflow, induced-draft tower — the fan pulls through the fill and its motor heat is added after, which is how this model wires it. Rated to cool 759 USGPM from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.9 m³/s of air; a 15 hp fan motor. Series 1500 is BAC's induced-draft crossflow range from 92 to 747 nominal tons a cell. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection900–1350 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-06N cooling tower (471 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's largest crossflow induced-draft range, here at 471 nominal tons: 1 413 USGPM cooled from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.7 m³/s of air behind a 25 hp fan. At this size the tower is the plant's largest single air mover, and the fan motor is the figure that decides the condenser loop's part-load cost. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1700–2500 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-016 evaporative condenser (69 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
The smallest evaporative condenser BAC publishes, drawn as a condensing unit: an R-22 Copeland ZR125KF scroll — 33 kW of cooling, sized under the condenser the way a unit with margin is — rejecting into a tube bundle under a recirculating spray, no fins, the air leaving saturated. Rated by its own sheet at 68.9 kW of base heat rejection on 3.32 m³/s of air — a condition the Series V EC sheet states, 105 °F condensing at a 78 °F wet bulb — and run as the evaporative wet coil with an isothermal tube side, the coil's share of the approach set where the maker's whole range derives. An open suction: couple any evaporator to it. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Condensing unit25–45 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VFL-036-32M closed-circuit cooler (56 tons, 246 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
A closed-circuit cooler from BAC's Series V range: the loop fluid runs inside a coil under a recirculating spray and never touches the air, which is what a process loop or a heat-pump condenser loop wants. Rated on the same basis as the open towers — 168 USGPM cooled from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb — on 13.8 m³/s of air from a centrifugal fan, with a 1 hp spray pump and 111 gal of coil. Run as an evaporative wet coil: air against the falling spray, the fluid against the air, the two conductances derived from the rating at the split and fluid-side flow exponent BAC's own Series V closed-circuit performance table picks — 4 and −0.6, the spray film outside the tube being much of the fluid side's resistance. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection200–300 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VT0-12-E cooling tower (12 tons, 53 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
The smallest tower BAC publishes: a counterflow, centrifugal-fan, forced-draft unit rated to cool 36 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb. Drawn at the maker's own printed airflow (2.35 m³/s) and that rated water flow, this model reproduces the certified leaving-water temperature at the rated point exactly — the tower's NTU is derived from it. A centrifugal fan is what lets a Series V sit indoors or behind ductwork. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection40–65 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VT1-600-P cooling tower (600 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
A 600-ton counterflow Series V — centrifugal fans, forced draft, 1 800 USGPM cooled from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air. Its liquid-to-gas ratio of about 1.6 is the highest of the five published here, which is why its derived NTU is the highest too: a counterflow tower works its fill harder per unit of air than a crossflow one. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2200–3200 kWEUOpen in the builder
Campus AHU, 8 m³/s, boiler heat Example
A chilled-water air handler for a campus building: outside-air damper with an economiser and a DCV floor, a chilled-water coil fed from the plant, a hot-water coil drawn as a gas boiler stand-in (fuel reported as gas at 85 %), a supply fan holding duct static. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Air handler120–280 kWEUOpen in the builder
Air-cooled chiller, 90 kW class (nine modules) Example
A modular air-cooled chiller making chilled water: nine 14 kW-class inverter scroll modules on a pipe-in-pipe evaporator, rejecting through an air-cooled coil behind a two-fan bank. In the example building it serves no room — it holds 7 °C leaving water for the chilled-water air handler, coupled block to block. Published as an example; the figures below come from the solver, not from a datasheet.
Chiller80–100 kWEUOpen in the builder
Cleanroom AHU, 5.6 m³/s, RadiPac bank Example
A recirculating cleanroom handler at twenty air changes: 5 % outside air, a chilled-water coil in face-and-bypass — the damper holds the humidity ceiling by mixing room air back, not an electric reheat — a winter heater, and three ebm-papst RadiPac K3G450 modules on the vendor's own pressure and power curves against 800 Pa of HEPA and duct static. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Air handler60–130 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-102-0806-7.5 evaporative condenser (618 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-102-0806-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 618 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection464–773 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1027-1236-45 evaporative condenser (6.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1027-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6222 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 112.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4666–7777 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1049-1236-45 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1049-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6355 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 111.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4766–7944 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1049-1236-60 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1049-1236-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6355 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 125.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4766–7944 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-106-0806-3 evaporative condenser (642 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-106-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 642 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection482–803 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1089-1236-60 evaporative condenser (6.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1089-1236-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6598 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4948–8247 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-111-0806-10 evaporative condenser (673 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-111-0806-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 673 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection504–841 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-113-0809-3 evaporative condenser (685 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-113-0809-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 685 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection513–856 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1134-1236-75 evaporative condenser (6.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1134-1236-75 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6870 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 133.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5153–8588 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1161-1236-75 evaporative condenser (7.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1161-1236-75 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7034 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 131.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5275–8792 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-117-0806-5 evaporative condenser (709 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-117-0806-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 709 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection532–886 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1202-1236-90 evaporative condenser (7.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1202-1236-90 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7282 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 140.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5462–9103 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-123-0806-10 evaporative condenser (745 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-123-0806-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 745 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection559–932 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-124-0809-5 evaporative condenser (751 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-124-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 751 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection563–939 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1257-1236-120 evaporative condenser (7.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1257-1236-120 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7615 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 156.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5712–9519 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-126-0809-3 evaporative condenser (763 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-126-0809-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 763 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 12.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection573–954 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1287-1236-120 evaporative condenser (7.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1287-1236-120 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7797 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 154.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5848–9746 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-134-0809-7.5 evaporative condenser (812 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-134-0809-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 812 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection609–1015 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-137-0806-15 evaporative condenser (830 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-137-0806-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 830 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 18.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection622–1037 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-138-0809-3 evaporative condenser (836 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-138-0809-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 836 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection627–1045 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-138-0809-5 evaporative condenser (836 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-138-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 836 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection627–1045 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-144-0809-7.5 evaporative condenser (872 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-144-0809-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 872 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection654–1091 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-152-0809-5 evaporative condenser (921 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-152-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 921 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection691–1151 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-158-0809-5 evaporative condenser (957 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-158-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 957 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection718–1196 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-163-0809-7.5 evaporative condenser (988 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-163-0809-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 988 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection741–1235 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-172-0812-7.5 evaporative condenser (1.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-172-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1042 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection782–1303 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-190-0809-15 evaporative condenser (1.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-190-0809-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1151 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 24.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection863–1439 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-195-0812-10 evaporative condenser (1.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-195-0812-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 27.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection886–1477 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-204-0812-7.5 evaporative condenser (1.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-204-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1236 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 21.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection927–1545 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-207-0809-20 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-207-0809-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1254 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection941–1568 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-207-0812-15 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-207-0812-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1254 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection941–1568 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-216-0812-7.5 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-216-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1309 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 24.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection981–1636 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-217-0812-15 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-217-0812-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1315 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection986–1643 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-221-0812-7.5 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-221-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1339 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 24.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1004–1674 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-227-0812-20 evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-227-0812-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1375 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1032–1719 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-237-0812-10 evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-237-0812-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1436 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1077–1795 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-237-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-237-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1436 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1077–1795 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-238-0812-15 evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-238-0812-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1442 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1081–1802 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-241-0812-10 evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-241-0812-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1460 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1095–1825 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-248-0818-15 evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-248-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1127–1878 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-259-0812-20 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-259-0812-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1569 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1177–1961 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-264-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-264-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1599 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1199–1999 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-268-0818-15 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-268-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1218–2030 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-270-0812-25 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-270-0812-25 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1636 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1227–2045 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-281-0818-15 evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-281-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1702 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1277–2128 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-284-0812-30 evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-284-0812-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1721 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1290–2151 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-285-1212-15 evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-285-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1727 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1295–2158 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-297-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-297-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1799 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1350–2249 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-299-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-299-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1359–2264 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-302-1212-20 evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-302-1212-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1830 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1372–2287 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-306-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-306-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1854 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1390–2317 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-310-0818-15 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-310-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1878 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1409–2348 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-314-1212-15 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-314-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1902 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 37.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1427–2378 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-315-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-315-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1908 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1431–2386 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-321-0818-15 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-321-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1945 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1459–2431 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-327-0818-15 evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-327-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1981 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1486–2476 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-327-1212-15 evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-327-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1981 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 37.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1486–2476 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-341-1212-15 evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-341-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2066 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1549–2582 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-341-1212-20 evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-341-1212-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2066 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1549–2582 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-342-0818-15 evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-342-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2072 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1554–2590 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-345-0818-30 evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-345-0818-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2090 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1568–2613 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-355-1212-25 evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-355-1212-25 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2151 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1613–2689 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-357-0818-22.5 evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-357-0818-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2163 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1622–2704 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-360-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-360-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1636–2726 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-370-1212-25 evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-370-1212-25 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2242 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1681–2802 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-373-0818-30 evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-373-0818-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2260 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1695–2825 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-381-1212-30 evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-381-1212-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2308 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1731–2885 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-387-0818-30 evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-387-0818-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2345 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1758–2931 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-393-1212-30 evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-393-1212-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2381 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1786–2976 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-403-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-403-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2442 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1831–3052 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-409-0818-45 evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-409-0818-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2478 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 58.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1858–3097 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-411-1212-40 evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-411-1212-40 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2490 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1867–3112 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-437-1218-22.5 evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-437-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2648 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 58.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1986–3310 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-444-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-444-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2690 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2017–3362 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-457-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-457-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2769 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2076–3461 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-459-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-459-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2781 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2085–3476 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-467-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-467-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2829 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2122–3537 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-473-1224-20 evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-473-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2866 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2149–3582 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-482-1218-22.5 evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-482-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2920 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2190–3650 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-483-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-483-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2926 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2195–3658 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-513-1218-22.5 evaporative condenser (3.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-513-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3108 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2331–3885 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-525-1218-22.5 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-525-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 55.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2386–3976 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-525-1218-30 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-525-1218-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 62.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2386–3976 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-528-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-528-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3199 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2399–3999 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-545-1218-30 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-545-1218-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3302 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2476–4127 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-567-1218-37.5 evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-567-1218-37.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3435 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2576–4294 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-571-1224-30 evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-571-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3459 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2595–4324 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-581-1218-37.5 evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-581-1218-37.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2640–4400 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-595-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-595-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3605 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2704–4506 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-598-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-598-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3623 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2717–4529 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-601-1218-45 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-601-1218-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2731–4551 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-604-1224-40 evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-604-1224-40 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3659 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2744–4574 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-612-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-612-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3708 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2781–4635 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-628-1218-60 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-628-1218-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3805 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 78.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2853–4756 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-629-1224-30 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-629-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 75.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2858–4764 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-630-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-630-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3817 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2862–4771 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-643-1218-60 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-643-1218-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3896 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2922–4869 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-655-1224-30 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-655-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3968 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2976–4960 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-682-1224-30 evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-682-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4132 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3099–5165 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-682-1224-40 evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-682-1224-40 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4132 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3099–5165 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-711-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-711-1224-50 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4308 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3231–5384 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-719-1236-30 evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-719-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4356 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 102.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3267–5445 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-739-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-739-1224-50 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4477 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3358–5597 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-75-0806-3 evaporative condenser (454 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-75-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 454 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 10.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection341–568 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-762-1224-60 evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-762-1224-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4616 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3462–5771 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-786-1224-60 evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-786-1224-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4762 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3571–5952 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-806-1236-30 evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-806-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4883 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 102.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3662–6104 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-821-1224-80 evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-821-1224-80 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4974 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3731–6218 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-87-0806-3 evaporative condenser (527 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-87-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 527 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection395–659 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-875-1236-45 evaporative condenser (5.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-875-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5301 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 116.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3976–6626 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-888-1236-30 evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-888-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5380 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4035–6725 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-914-1236-30 evaporative condenser (5.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-914-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5537 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4153–6922 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-918-1236-30 evaporative condenser (5.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-918-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5562 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4171–6952 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-933-1236-30 evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-933-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5652 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4239–7066 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-94-0806-3 evaporative condenser (569 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-94-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 569 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 9.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection427–712 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-95-0806-5 evaporative condenser (576 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-95-0806-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 576 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection432–719 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-964-1236-45 evaporative condenser (5.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-964-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5840 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 113.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4380–7300 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-966-1236-30 evaporative condenser (5.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-966-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4389–7315 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1005-1426-75 evaporative condenser (6.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1005-1426-75 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 6107 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 114.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4580–7634 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1057-1426-75 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1057-1426-75 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 6422 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 112.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4817–8028 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1234-2424-30 evaporative condenser (7.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1234-2424-30 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 7496 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5622–9370 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1300-2424-40 evaporative condenser (7.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1300-2424-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 7897 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 135.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5923–9871 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1352-2424-50 evaporative condenser (8.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1352-2424-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8213 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 146.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6160–10266 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1400-2424-80 evaporative condenser (8.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1400-2424-80 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8504 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 172.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6378–10630 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1424-2826-40 evaporative condenser (8.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1424-2826-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8650 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 148.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6487–10812 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1462-2424-100 evaporative condenser (8.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1462-2424-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8881 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 185.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6660–11101 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1482-2826-50 evaporative condenser (9.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1482-2826-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9002 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 160.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6752–11253 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1508-2424-120 evaporative condenser (9.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1508-2424-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9160 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6870–11450 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1532-2826-60 evaporative condenser (9.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1532-2826-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9306 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 170.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6979–11632 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1556-2424-100 evaporative condenser (9.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1556-2424-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9452 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 184.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7089–11815 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1614-2826-80 evaporative condenser (9.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1614-2826-80 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9804 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 187.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7353–12255 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1626-2424-100 evaporative condenser (9.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1626-2424-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9877 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 184.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7408–12346 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1686-2424-120 evaporative condenser (10.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1686-2424-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10241 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7681–12802 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1688-2826-100 evaporative condenser (10.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1688-2826-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10254 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 201.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7690–12817 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1774-2424-120 evaporative condenser (10.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1774-2424-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10776 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 191.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8082–13470 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1788-2826-100 evaporative condenser (10.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1788-2826-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 200.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8146–13576 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1866-2826-100 evaporative condenser (11.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1866-2826-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 11335 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 200.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8501–14169 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1930-2826-120 evaporative condenser (11.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1930-2826-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 11723 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 213.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8793–14654 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-2010-2826-150 evaporative condenser (12.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-2010-2826-150 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 12210 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 229.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9157–15262 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-2114-2826-150 evaporative condenser (12.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-2114-2826-150 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 12841 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 225.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9631–16052 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-617-1224-15 evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-617-1224-15 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 3746 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2810–4683 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-650-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-650-1224-20 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 3946 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2959–4932 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-676-1224-25 evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-676-1224-25 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4107 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3080–5134 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-700-1224-40 evaporative condenser (4.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-700-1224-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4250 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 86.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3188–5313 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-712-1426-20 evaporative condenser (4.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-712-1426-20 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4326 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3245–5408 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-731-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-731-1224-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4443 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 92.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3332–5553 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-741-1426-25 evaporative condenser (4.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-741-1426-25 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3377–5629 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-754-1224-60 evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-754-1224-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4579 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3434–5724 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-766-1426-30 evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-766-1426-30 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4654 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 85.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3490–5817 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-778-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-778-1224-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4728 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 92.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3546–5909 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-807-1426-40 evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-807-1426-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4901 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3676–6126 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-813-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-813-1224-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4936 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 92.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3702–6170 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-843-1224-60 evaporative condenser (5.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-843-1224-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5124 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3843–6405 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-844-1426-50 evaporative condenser (5.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-844-1426-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5124 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3843–6405 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-887-1224-60 evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-887-1224-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5388 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 95.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4041–6736 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-894-1426-50 evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-894-1426-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5428 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4071–6785 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-933-1426-50 evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-933-1426-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5667 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4250–7084 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-965-1426-60 evaporative condenser (5.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-965-1426-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 106.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4396–7326 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0046-0406N003 evaporative condenser (279 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0046-0406N003 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 279 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 6.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection209–349 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0048-0406N005 evaporative condenser (292 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0048-0406N005 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 292 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection219–365 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0067-0406N7.5 evaporative condenser (407 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0067-0406N7.5 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 407 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection305–509 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0078-0412N006 evaporative condenser (474 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0078-0412N006 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 474 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 4.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection355–592 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0090-0412N010 evaporative condenser (547 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0090-0412N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 547 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection410–683 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0106-0412N010 evaporative condenser (644 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0106-0412N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 644 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 0.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection483–805 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0113-0709N010 evaporative condenser (686 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0113-0709N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 686 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection515–858 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0117-0709N7.5 evaporative condenser (711 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0117-0709N7.5 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 711 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection533–888 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0118-0412N010 evaporative condenser (717 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0118-0412N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 717 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 0.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection538–896 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0122-0709N7.5 evaporative condenser (741 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0122-0709N7.5 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 741 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection556–926 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0128-0412N015 evaporative condenser (778 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0128-0412N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 778 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection583–972 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0130-0709N7.5 evaporative condenser (790 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0130-0709N7.5 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 790 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection592–987 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0134-0412N015 evaporative condenser (814 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0134-0412N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 814 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection610–1017 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0142-0709N015 evaporative condenser (863 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0142-0709N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 863 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection647–1078 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0154-0709N015 evaporative condenser (935 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0154-0709N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 935 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection702–1169 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0160-0709N020 evaporative condenser (972 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0160-0709N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 972 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection729–1215 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0166-0709N020 evaporative condenser (1.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0166-0709N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1008 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection756–1261 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0175-0709N020 evaporative condenser (1.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0175-0709N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1063 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection797–1329 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0177-0718N010 evaporative condenser (1.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0177-0718N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1075 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection806–1344 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0184-0709N020 evaporative condenser (1.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0184-0709N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1118 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection838–1397 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0208-1012N010 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0208-1012N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1263 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 27.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection948–1579 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0214-0718N020 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0214-0718N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1300 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 39.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection975–1625 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0222-0718N015 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0222-0718N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1348 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1011–1686 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0232-0718N015 evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0232-0718N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1409 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1057–1762 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0233-1012N015 evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0233-1012N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1415 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1061–1769 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0246-1012N010 evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0246-1012N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1494 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1121–1868 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0249-1212N010 evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0249-1212N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1513 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1134–1891 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0265-1212N015 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0265-1212N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1610 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1207–2012 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0267-0718N030 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0267-0718N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1622 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1216–2027 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0269-1012N030 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0269-1012N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1634 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1225–2042 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0272-1012N020 evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0272-1012N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1652 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1239–2065 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0278-0718N030 evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0278-0718N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1689 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1267–2111 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0281-1012N025 evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0281-1012N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1707 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1280–2134 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0293-1212N015 evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0293-1212N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1780 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1335–2225 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0295-1012N030 evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0295-1012N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1792 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 37.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1344–2240 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0300-0718N040 evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0300-0718N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1822 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1367–2278 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0309-1212N020 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0309-1212N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1877 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1408–2346 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0315-1012N040 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0315-1012N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1913 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 43.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1435–2392 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0323-1012N030 evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0323-1012N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1962 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1472–2453 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0324-0718N020 evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0324-0718N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1968 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1476–2460 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0328-1012N030 evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0328-1012N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1992 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1494–2490 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0330-1212N025 evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0330-1212N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2005 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1503–2506 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0346-1212N025 evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0346-1212N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2102 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1576–2627 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0349-0718N020 evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0349-0718N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2120 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1590–2650 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0355-1212N025 evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0355-1212N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2156 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1617–2696 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0365-1212N030 evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0365-1212N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2217 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1663–2771 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0375-1212N030 evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0375-1212N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2278 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1708–2847 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0381-1218N015 evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0381-1218N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2314 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1736–2893 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0395-1212N040 evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0395-1212N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2399 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1800–2999 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0396-1212N040 evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0396-1212N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2406 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1804–3007 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0406-1212N040 evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0406-1212N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2466 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 39.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1850–3083 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0416-1024N020 evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0416-1024N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2527 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1895–3159 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0416-2012N020 evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0416-2012N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2527 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1895–3159 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0431-1220N015 evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0431-1220N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2618 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1964–3273 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0441-1218N020 evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0441-1218N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2679 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2009–3348 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0466-1024N030 evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0466-1024N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2831 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2123–3538 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0466-2012N030 evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0466-2012N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2831 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2123–3538 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0469-1218N020 evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0469-1218N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2849 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2137–3561 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0491-1220N020 evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0491-1220N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2983 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2237–3728 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0492-1024N020 evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0492-1024N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2988 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2241–3736 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0492-2012N020 evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0492-2012N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2988 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2241–3736 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0494-1218N040 evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0494-1218N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3001 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2251–3751 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0498-1224N020 evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0498-1224N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3025 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2269–3781 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0498-2412N020 evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0498-2412N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3025 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2269–3781 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0517-1218N030 evaporative condenser (3.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0517-1218N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3141 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2355–3926 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0519-1220N020 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0519-1220N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3153 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2364–3941 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0530-1224N030 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0530-1224N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3219 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2415–4024 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0530-2412N030 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0530-2412N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3219 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2415–4024 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0531-1218N040 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0531-1218N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3226 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2419–4032 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0538-1024N060 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0538-1024N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3268 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2451–4085 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0538-2012N060 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0538-2012N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3268 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2451–4085 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0540-1220N030 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0540-1220N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3280 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2460–4100 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0541-1218N040 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0541-1218N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3286 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2465–4108 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0544-1024N040 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0544-1024N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3304 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2478–4130 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0544-1220N040 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0544-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3304 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2478–4130 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0544-2012N040 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0544-2012N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3304 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2478–4130 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0557-1220N025 evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0557-1220N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3384 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2538–4229 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0562-1024N050 evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0562-1024N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3414 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2560–4267 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0562-2012N050 evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0562-2012N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3414 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2560–4267 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0564-1218N050 evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0564-1218N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2570–4283 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0567-1220N030 evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0567-1220N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3444 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 55.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2583–4305 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0572-1218N040 evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0572-1218N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3475 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2606–4343 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0580-1220N030 evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0580-1220N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3523 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2642–4404 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0581-1220N040 evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0581-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3529 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2647–4411 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0586-1224N030 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0586-1224N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3560 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2670–4450 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0586-2412N030 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0586-2412N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3560 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2670–4450 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0590-1024N060 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0590-1024N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3584 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2688–4480 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0590-1218N050 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0590-1218N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3584 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2688–4480 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0590-2012N060 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0590-2012N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3584 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2688–4480 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0591-1220N040 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0591-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3590 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2692–4487 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0609-1218N050 evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0609-1218N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3699 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 58.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2774–4624 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0614-1220N050 evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0614-1220N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3730 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 68.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2797–4662 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0618-1224N040 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0618-1224N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3754 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2815–4692 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0618-2412N040 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0618-2412N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3754 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2815–4692 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0622-1220N040 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0622-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3778 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2834–4723 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0630-1024N080 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0630-1024N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 87.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2870–4784 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0630-2012N080 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0630-2012N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 87.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2870–4784 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0639-1218N060 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0639-1218N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3881 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2911–4852 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0640-1220N050 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0640-1220N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3888 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2916–4859 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0646-1024N060 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0646-1024N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3924 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2943–4905 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0646-2012N060 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0646-2012N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3924 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2943–4905 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0656-1024N060 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0656-1024N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3985 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2989–4981 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0656-2012N060 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0656-2012N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3985 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2989–4981 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0659-1220N050 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0659-1220N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4003 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3002–5004 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0660-1224N050 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0660-1224N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4009 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3007–5011 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0660-2412N050 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0660-2412N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4009 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3007–5011 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0689-1220N060 evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0689-1220N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4185 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3139–5231 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0692-1224N050 evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0692-1224N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4204 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3153–5254 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0692-2412N050 evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0692-2412N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4204 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3153–5254 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0710-1224N050 evaporative condenser (4.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0710-1224N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4313 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3235–5391 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0710-2412N050 evaporative condenser (4.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0710-2412N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4313 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3235–5391 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0730-1224N060 evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0730-1224N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4434 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3326–5543 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0730-2412N060 evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0730-2412N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4434 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3326–5543 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0750-1224N060 evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0750-1224N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3417–5695 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0750-2412N060 evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0750-2412N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3417–5695 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0756-1236N030 evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0756-1236N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4592 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3444–5740 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0762-2418N030 evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0762-2418N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4629 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3472–5786 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0790-1224N080 evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0790-1224N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4799 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3599–5998 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0790-2412N080 evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0790-2412N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4799 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3599–5998 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0792-1224N080 evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0792-1224N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3608–6013 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0792-2412N080 evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0792-2412N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3608–6013 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0812-1224N080 evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0812-1224N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4932 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 79.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3699–6165 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0812-2412N080 evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0812-2412N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4932 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 79.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3699–6165 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0855-1240N030 evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0855-1240N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5194 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3896–6493 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0862-2420N030 evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0862-2420N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5236 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3927–6545 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0875-1236N040 evaporative condenser (5.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0875-1236N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5315 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3986–6644 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0882-2418N040 evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0882-2418N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5358 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4018–6697 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0931-1236N040 evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0931-1236N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5652 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 91.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4239–7066 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0938-2418N040 evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0938-2418N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5698 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 91.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4273–7122 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0974-1240N040 evaporative condenser (5.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0974-1240N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5918 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4438–7397 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0980-1236N080 evaporative condenser (6.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0980-1236N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5954 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4465–7442 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0982-2420N040 evaporative condenser (6.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0982-2420N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5965 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4474–7456 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0988-2418N080 evaporative condenser (6.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0988-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6002 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4501–7502 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0996-2424N040 evaporative condenser (6.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0996-2424N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6050 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4537–7562 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1026-1236N060 evaporative condenser (6.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1026-1236N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4673–7789 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1030-1240N040 evaporative condenser (6.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1030-1240N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6255 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4691–7819 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1034-2418N060 evaporative condenser (6.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1034-2418N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6281 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4711–7851 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1038-2420N040 evaporative condenser (6.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1038-2420N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6305 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4729–7881 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1054-1236N080 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1054-1236N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6400 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4800–8000 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1060-2424N060 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1060-2424N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6439 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 141.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4829–8048 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1062-2418N080 evaporative condenser (6.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1062-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6451 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4838–8063 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1071-1240N060 evaporative condenser (6.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1071-1240N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6508 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 117.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4881–8135 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1073-1236N080 evaporative condenser (6.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1073-1236N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4890–8150 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1079-1240N080 evaporative condenser (6.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1079-1240N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 138.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4917–8195 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1080-2420N060 evaporative condenser (6.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1080-2420N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6560 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 117.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4920–8201 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1082-2418N080 evaporative condenser (6.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1082-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6572 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4929–8216 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1088-2420N080 evaporative condenser (6.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1088-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6609 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 138.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4957–8261 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1105-1240N050 evaporative condenser (6.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1105-1240N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6713 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5035–8391 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1114-2420N050 evaporative condenser (6.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1114-2420N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6767 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5075–8458 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1119-1236N100 evaporative condenser (6.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1119-1236N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6797 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5098–8497 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1125-1240N060 evaporative condenser (6.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1125-1240N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6834 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 110.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5125–8542 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1128-2418N100 evaporative condenser (6.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1128-2418N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5139–8565 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1134-2420N060 evaporative condenser (6.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1134-2420N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6888 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 110.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5166–8610 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1135-1236N080 evaporative condenser (6.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1135-1236N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6894 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5170–8617 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1144-2418N080 evaporative condenser (6.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1144-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6949 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5212–8686 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1151-1240N060 evaporative condenser (7.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1151-1240N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6990 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 105.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5243–8738 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1153-1240N080 evaporative condenser (7.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1153-1240N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7002 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5252–8753 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1160-2420N060 evaporative condenser (7.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1160-2420N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7046 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 105.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5285–8808 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1162-2420N080 evaporative condenser (7.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1162-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7058 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5294–8823 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1171-1236N100 evaporative condenser (7.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1171-1236N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7111 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5333–8888 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1172-2424N060 evaporative condenser (7.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1172-2424N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7119 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5339–8899 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1173-1240N080 evaporative condenser (7.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1173-1240N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 127.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5342–8904 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1180-2418N100 evaporative condenser (7.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1180-2418N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7168 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5376–8960 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1182-2420N080 evaporative condenser (7.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1182-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7180 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 127.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5385–8975 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1208-1236N100 evaporative condenser (7.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1208-1236N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7340 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5505–9175 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1218-1240N100 evaporative condenser (7.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1218-1240N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7400 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 137.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5550–9250 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1218-2418N100 evaporative condenser (7.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1218-2418N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7399 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5549–9248 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1228-2420N100 evaporative condenser (7.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1228-2420N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7459 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 137.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5594–9324 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1234-1240N080 evaporative condenser (7.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1234-1240N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7496 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5622–9371 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1236-2424N080 evaporative condenser (7.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1236-2424N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7508 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 144.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5631–9385 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1244-2420N080 evaporative condenser (7.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1244-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7557 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5667–9446 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1268-1236N120 evaporative condenser (7.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1268-1236N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7701 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 122.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5776–9627 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1270-1240N100 evaporative condenser (7.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1270-1240N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7713 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5785–9642 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1278-2418N120 evaporative condenser (7.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1278-2418N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7763 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 122.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5822–9704 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1280-2420N100 evaporative condenser (7.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1280-2420N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7775 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5831–9719 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1308-1240N100 evaporative condenser (7.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1308-1240N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7942 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5957–9928 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1318-2420N100 evaporative condenser (8.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1318-2420N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8006 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6004–10007 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1320-2424N100 evaporative condenser (8.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1320-2424N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8018 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 153.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6014–10023 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1367-1240N120 evaporative condenser (8.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1367-1240N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8304 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 130.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6228–10380 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1378-2420N120 evaporative condenser (8.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1378-2420N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8370 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 130.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6278–10463 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1384-2424N100 evaporative condenser (8.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1384-2424N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8407 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 145.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6305–10508 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1420-2424N100 evaporative condenser (8.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1420-2424N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8625 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 138.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6469–10782 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1460-2424N120 evaporative condenser (8.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1460-2424N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8869 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 153.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6651–11086 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1500-2424N120 evaporative condenser (9.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1500-2424N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9112 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 146.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6834–11389 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1501-2436N060 evaporative condenser (9.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1501-2436N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9120 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6840–11400 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1580-2424N160 evaporative condenser (9.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1580-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9597 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 166.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7198–11997 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1584-2424N160 evaporative condenser (9.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1584-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9622 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 167.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7216–12027 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1624-2424N160 evaporative condenser (9.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1624-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9865 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 159.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7399–12331 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1710-2440N060 evaporative condenser (10.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1710-2440N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 10389 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 209.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7792–12986 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1738-2436N080 evaporative condenser (10.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1738-2436N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 10556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7917–13195 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1848-2436N080 evaporative condenser (11.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1848-2436N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11226 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 183.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8420–14033 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1947-2436N160 evaporative condenser (11.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1947-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11825 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 259.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8869–14781 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-1948-2440N080 evaporative condenser (11.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1948-2440N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11835 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 208.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8876–14794 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2037-2436N120 evaporative condenser (12.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2037-2436N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12375 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 207.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9281–15469 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2060-2440N080 evaporative condenser (12.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2060-2440N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12510 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 195.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9383–15638 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2092-2436N160 evaporative condenser (12.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2092-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12710 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 241.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9533–15888 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2132-2436N160 evaporative condenser (12.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2132-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12950 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 240.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9712–16187 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2143-2440N120 evaporative condenser (13.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2143-2440N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13016 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 235.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9762–16270 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2159-2440N160 evaporative condenser (13.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2159-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13113 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 276.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9834–16391 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2210-2440N100 evaporative condenser (13.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2210-2440N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 199.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10070–16783 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2223-2436N200 evaporative condenser (13.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2223-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13500 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 258.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10125–16875 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2250-2440N120 evaporative condenser (13.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2250-2440N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13667 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 220.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10250–17084 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2254-2436N160 evaporative condenser (13.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2254-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13692 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 217.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10269–17115 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2302-2440N120 evaporative condenser (14.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2302-2440N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13980 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 211.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10485–17475 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2306-2440N160 evaporative condenser (14.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2306-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14005 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 257.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10504–17506 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2325-2436N200 evaporative condenser (14.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2325-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 241.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10592–17654 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2345-2440N160 evaporative condenser (14.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2345-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14246 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 255.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10684–17807 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2400-2436N200 evaporative condenser (14.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2400-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14578 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 231.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10933–18222 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2436-2440N200 evaporative condenser (14.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2436-2440N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14800 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 275.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection11100–18500 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2468-2440N160 evaporative condenser (15.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2468-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14993 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 230.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection11245–18741 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2518-2436N240 evaporative condenser (15.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2518-2436N240 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 15296 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 244.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 179.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection11472–19120 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2540-2440N200 evaporative condenser (15.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2540-2440N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 15427 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 257.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection11570–19283 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2615-2440N200 evaporative condenser (15.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2615-2440N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 15885 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 246.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection11914–19856 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-2734-2440N240 evaporative condenser (16.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2734-2440N240 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 16608 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 260.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 179.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection12456–20760 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1010A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1010A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4351 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3263–5439 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1020A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1020A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3296–5493 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1024A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1024A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4412 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3309–5515 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1026A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1026A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4420 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3315–5525 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1052A evaporative condenser (4.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1052A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4532 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3399–5665 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1062A evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1062A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4575 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3431–5719 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1075A evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1075A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4631 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3474–5789 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1082A evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1082A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4661 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3496–5827 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1086A evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1086A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4679 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3509–5848 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1120A evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1120A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4825 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 90.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3619–6031 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1160A evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1160A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4997 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3748–6247 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1162A evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1162A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5006 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 96.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3754–6257 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1169A evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1169A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5041 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3780–6301 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1170A evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1170A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5041 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3780–6301 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1200A evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1200A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5170 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3877–6462 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1204A evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1204A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5187 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3890–6484 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1218A evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1218A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5247 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3936–6559 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-122A evaporative condenser (525 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-122A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 525 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection394–657 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1240A evaporative condenser (5.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1240A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5342 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4007–6678 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1246A evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1246A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5368 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 106.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4026–6710 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1252A evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1252A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4045–6742 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1284A evaporative condenser (5.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1284A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5532 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4149–6915 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1306A evaporative condenser (5.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1306A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5626 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 85.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4220–7033 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1321A evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1321A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5691 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 86.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4268–7114 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1327A evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1327A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5717 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 91.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4288–7146 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1376A evaporative condenser (5.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1376A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5928 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4446–7410 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-138A evaporative condenser (595 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-138A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 595 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 12.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection446–743 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1414A evaporative condenser (6.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1414A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6092 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4569–7615 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1422A evaporative condenser (6.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1422A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6126 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 101.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4595–7658 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1501A evaporative condenser (6.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1501A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6467 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4850–8083 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-150A evaporative condenser (646 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-150A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 646 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection485–808 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1558A evaporative condenser (6.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1558A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6712 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 101.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5034–8390 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1570A evaporative condenser (6.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1570A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6764 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5073–8455 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-161A evaporative condenser (694 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-161A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 694 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection520–867 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1654A evaporative condenser (7.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1654A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 7126 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5344–8907 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-170A evaporative condenser (732 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-170A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 732 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection549–915 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-174A evaporative condenser (750 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-174A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 750 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection562–937 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1774A evaporative condenser (7.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1774A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 7643 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 127.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5732–9553 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-178A evaporative condenser (767 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-178A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 767 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 12.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection575–959 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1790A evaporative condenser (7.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1790A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 7712 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5784–9639 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-182A evaporative condenser (784 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-182A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 784 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection588–980 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1914A evaporative condenser (8.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1914A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 8246 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 119.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6184–10307 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-191A evaporative condenser (823 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-191A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 823 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection617–1029 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-192A evaporative condenser (827 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-192A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection620–1034 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-2019A evaporative condenser (8.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-2019A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 8698 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6524–10873 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-206A evaporative condenser (887 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-206A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 887 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 18.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection666–1109 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-215A evaporative condenser (926 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-215A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 926 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection695–1158 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-227A evaporative condenser (978 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-227A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 978 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 21.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection733–1222 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-235A evaporative condenser (1.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-235A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1013 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 18.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection759–1266 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-259A evaporative condenser (1.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-259A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1116 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 21.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection837–1395 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-261A evaporative condenser (1.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-261A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1125 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection843–1406 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-288A evaporative condenser (1.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-288A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1241 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection931–1551 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-300A evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-300A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1292 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection969–1616 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-301A evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-301A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1297 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection973–1621 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-302A evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-302A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1301 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 4.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection976–1626 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-308A evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-308A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1327 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection995–1659 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-322A evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-322A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1387 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1040–1734 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-323A evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-323A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1392 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 27.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1044–1739 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-331A evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-331A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1070–1783 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-340A evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-340A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1465 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1099–1831 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-342A evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-342A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1473 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1105–1842 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-356A evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-356A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1534 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1150–1917 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-375A evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-375A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1616 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1212–2020 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-377A evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-377A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1218–2030 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-381A evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-381A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1231–2052 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-382A evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-382A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1231–2052 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-393A evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-393A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1693 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1270–2116 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-401A evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-401A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1728 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1296–2160 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-402A evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-402A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1732 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1299–2165 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-404A evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-404A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1741 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1305–2176 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-407A evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-407A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1753 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1315–2192 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-416A evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-416A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1792 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1344–2240 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-420A evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-420A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1809 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1357–2262 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-424A evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-424A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1370–2283 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-429A evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-429A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1848 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1386–2310 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-433A evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-433A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1865 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1399–2332 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-446A evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-446A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1921 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1441–2402 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-451A evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-451A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1943 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1457–2429 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-460A evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-460A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1982 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1486–2477 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-464A evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-464A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1999 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1499–2499 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-471A evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-471A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2029 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1522–2537 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-473A evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-473A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2038 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1528–2547 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-488A evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-488A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2102 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 6.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1577–2628 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-491A evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-491A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2115 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1587–2644 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-507A evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-507A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2184 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1638–2730 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-510A evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-510A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2197 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1648–2746 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-512A evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-512A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2206 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1654–2757 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-513A evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-513A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2210 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1658–2763 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-526A evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-526A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2266 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1700–2833 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-537A evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-537A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2314 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1735–2892 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-541A evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-541A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2331 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1748–2913 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-543A evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-543A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2339 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1754–2924 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-560A evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-560A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2413 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1809–3016 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-580A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-580A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2499 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1874–3123 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-581A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-581A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1877–3129 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-582A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-582A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2507 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1880–3134 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-584A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-584A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1890–3151 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-585A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-585A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1890–3151 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-600A evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-600A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2585 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1939–3231 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-602A evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-602A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2593 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1945–3242 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-605A evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-605A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2607 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 8.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1955–3258 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-609A evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-609A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1968–3279 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-620A evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-620A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2671 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2003–3339 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-623A evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-623A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2684 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2013–3355 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-626A evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-626A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2697 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2023–3371 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-642A evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-642A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2766 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2074–3457 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-653A evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-653A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2813 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2110–3516 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-661A evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-661A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2848 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 43.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2136–3560 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-662A evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-662A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2139–3565 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-664A evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-664A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2146–3576 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-680A evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-680A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2930 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2197–3662 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-684A evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-684A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2947 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2210–3684 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-688A evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-688A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2964 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2223–3705 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-707A evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-707A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3046 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2284–3807 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-711A evaporative condenser (3.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-711A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3063 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2297–3829 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-750A evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-750A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2423–4039 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-751A evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-751A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2423–4039 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-754A evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-754A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3248 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2436–4061 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-760A evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-760A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3274 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2456–4093 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-762A evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-762A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3283 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2462–4103 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-779A evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-779A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3356 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2517–4195 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-785A evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-785A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3382 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2537–4228 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-804A evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-804A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3464 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2598–4330 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-808A evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-808A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3481 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2611–4351 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-814A evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-814A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3507 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2630–4384 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-827A evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-827A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3563 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2672–4454 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-840A evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-840A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3619 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2714–4524 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-858A evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-858A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3697 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2772–4621 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-866A evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-866A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3731 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2798–4663 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-879A evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-879A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3787 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2840–4733 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-887A evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-887A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3821 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2866–4777 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-895A evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-895A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3856 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2892–4820 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-902A evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-902A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3886 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2914–4857 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-920A evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-920A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3963 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2973–4954 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-928A evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-928A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3998 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2999–4998 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-930A evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-930A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4007 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 13.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3005–5008 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-942A evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-942A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4058 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3044–5073 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-946A evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-946A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4075 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3057–5094 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-957A evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-957A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3092–5154 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-982A evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-982A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4230 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3173–5288 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S1019A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S1019A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4390 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3292–5487 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S1071A evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S1071A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4614 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3461–5768 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S1124A evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S1124A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4842 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3632–6053 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S1204A evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S1204A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5187 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3890–6484 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S700A evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S700A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3017 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2263–3772 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S828A evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S828A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3568 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2676–4459 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S838A evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S838A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3612 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2709–4515 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S870A evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S870A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3748 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2811–4685 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S884A evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S884A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3807 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2855–4759 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S932A evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S932A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4015 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3011–5019 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-S972A evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S972A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4187 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3141–5234 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-016 evaporative condenser (69 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-016 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 69 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 0.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection52–86 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-019 evaporative condenser (82 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-019 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 82 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 1.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection61–102 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-029 evaporative condenser (125 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-029 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 125 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 1.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection94–156 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-035 evaporative condenser (151 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-035 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 151 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection113–189 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-038 evaporative condenser (164 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-038 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 164 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 6.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection123–205 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-044 evaporative condenser (190 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-044 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 190 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 6.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 1.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection142–237 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-048 evaporative condenser (207 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-048 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 207 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 6.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection155–259 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-054 evaporative condenser (233 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-054 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 233 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection175–291 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-065 evaporative condenser (280 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-065 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 280 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection210–350 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-073 evaporative condenser (314 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-073 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 314 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection236–393 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-079 evaporative condenser (340 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-079 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 340 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection255–425 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-087 evaporative condenser (375 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-087 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 375 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 9.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection281–469 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-096 evaporative condenser (414 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-096 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 414 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 10.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection310–517 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-102 evaporative condenser (439 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-102 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 439 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection329–549 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-115 evaporative condenser (496 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-115 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 496 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 10.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection372–619 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-120 evaporative condenser (517 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-120 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 517 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 10.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection388–646 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-134 evaporative condenser (577 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-134 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 577 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection433–722 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-155 evaporative condenser (668 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-155 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 668 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection501–835 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-167 evaporative condenser (719 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-167 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 719 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection540–899 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-185 evaporative condenser (797 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-185 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 797 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection598–996 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-223 evaporative condenser (961 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-223 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 961 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection721–1201 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-234 evaporative condenser (1.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-234 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1008 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection756–1260 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-257 evaporative condenser (1.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-257 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1107 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection830–1384 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-271 evaporative condenser (1.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-271 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1168 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection876–1460 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-299 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-299 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1288 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection966–1610 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0213B-1012N-HA evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0213B-1012N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1292 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection969–1616 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0214B-1212N-GA evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0214B-1212N-GA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1301 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 4.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection976–1626 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0235B-1012N-JA evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0235B-1012N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1070–1783 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0242B-1012N-HA evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0242B-1012N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1465 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1099–1831 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0243B-1212N-HA evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0243B-1212N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1473 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1105–1842 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0266B-1012N-JA evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0266B-1012N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1616 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1212–2020 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0268B-1212N-JA evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0268B-1212N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1218–2030 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0269B-1012N-HB evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0269B-1012N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1632 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 39.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1224–2040 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0271B-1212N-HA evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0271B-1212N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1231–2052 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0279B-1012N-HA evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0279B-1012N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1693 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1270–2116 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0285B-1012N-KA evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0285B-1012N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1732 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1299–2165 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0286B-1012N-JA evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0286B-1012N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1728 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1296–2160 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0287B-1212N-KA evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0287B-1212N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1741 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1305–2176 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0297B-1012N-JB evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0297B-1012N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1804 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1353–2255 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0298B-1212N-JA evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0298B-1212N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1809 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1357–2262 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0301B-1012N-HB evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0301B-1012N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1824 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1368–2280 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0305B-1012N-KA evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0305B-1012N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1848 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1386–2310 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0307B-1012N-JA evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0307B-1012N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1865 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1399–2332 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0314B-1212N-HB evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0314B-1212N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1905 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1429–2381 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0320B-1212N-KA evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0320B-1212N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1943 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1457–2429 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0323B-1012N-HB evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0323B-1012N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1955 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1466–2444 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0327B-1018N-HA evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0327B-1018N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1982 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1486–2477 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0330B-1012N-KA evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0330B-1012N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1999 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1499–2499 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0332B-1012N-JB evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0332B-1012N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2016 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1512–2520 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0336B-1012N-LA evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0336B-1012N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2038 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1528–2547 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0346B-1012N-HB evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0346B-1012N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2101 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1576–2626 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0347B-1018N-GA evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0347B-1018N-GA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2102 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 6.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1577–2628 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0347B-1212N-HB evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0347B-1212N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2105 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1578–2631 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0348B-1212N-JB evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0348B-1212N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2105 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1579–2632 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0349B-1212N-KA evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0349B-1212N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2115 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1587–2644 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0356B-1012N-JB evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0356B-1012N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2161 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1621–2702 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0360B-1018N-JA evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0360B-1018N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2184 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1638–2730 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0362B-1018N-HA evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0362B-1018N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2197 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1648–2746 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0364B-1012N-LA evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0364B-1012N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2206 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1654–2757 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0374B-1218N-HA evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0374B-1218N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2266 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1700–2833 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0378B-1212N-HB evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0378B-1212N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2292 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1719–2864 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0381B-1212N-KA evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0381B-1212N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2314 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1735–2892 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0383B-1012N-JB evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0383B-1012N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2323 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1742–2903 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0383B-1212N-JB evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0383B-1212N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2326 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1745–2908 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0384B-1212N-LA evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0384B-1212N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2331 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1748–2913 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0386B-1018N-KA evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0386B-1018N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2339 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1754–2924 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0399B-1018N-HB evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0399B-1018N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2419 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1814–3024 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0399B-1018N-JA evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0399B-1018N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2413 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1809–3016 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0405B-1212N-HB evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0405B-1212N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2457 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1843–3071 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0412B-1212N-MA evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0412B-1212N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2499 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1874–3123 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0413B-1218N-JA evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0413B-1218N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1877–3129 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0414B-1218N-HA evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0414B-1218N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2507 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1880–3134 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0415B-1212N-LA evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0415B-1212N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1890–3151 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0418B-1212N-JB evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0418B-1212N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2533 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1900–3166 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0427B-1018N-KA evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0427B-1018N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2585 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1939–3231 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0429B-1224N-GA evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0429B-1224N-GA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2602 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 8.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1951–3252 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0432B-1018N-JA evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0432B-1018N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1968–3279 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0435B-1018N-HB evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0435B-1018N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1980–3301 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0441B-1018N-JB evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0441B-1018N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2675 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 62.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2006–3344 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0442B-1218N-KA evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0442B-1218N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2684 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2013–3355 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0445B-1212N-MA evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0445B-1212N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2697 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2023–3371 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0448B-1212N-JB evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0448B-1212N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2716 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 39.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2037–3395 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0456B-1218N-JA evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0456B-1218N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2766 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2074–3457 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0464B-1018N-KA evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0464B-1018N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2813 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2110–3516 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0467B-1218N-HB evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0467B-1218N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2829 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2122–3536 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0469B-1212N-NA evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0469B-1212N-NA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2848 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 43.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2136–3560 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0470B-1024N-JA evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0470B-1024N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2139–3565 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0476B-1018N-HB evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0476B-1018N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2886 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2165–3608 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0481B-1018N-JB evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0481B-1018N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2920 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 58.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2190–3649 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0484B-1024N-HA evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0484B-1024N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2930 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2197–3662 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0486B-1224N-HA evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0486B-1224N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2947 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2210–3683 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0489B-1218N-KA evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0489B-1218N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2964 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2223–3705 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0502B-1018N-KA evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0502B-1018N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3046 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2284–3807 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0510B-1218N-HB evaporative condenser (3.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0510B-1218N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3093 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2320–3866 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0511B-1018N-HB evaporative condenser (3.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0511B-1018N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3102 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2327–3878 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0516B-1218N-JB evaporative condenser (3.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0516B-1218N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3126 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2345–3908 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0526B-1018N-JB evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0526B-1018N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3191 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2393–3989 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0533B-1024N-JA evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0533B-1024N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2424–4039 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0533B-1218N-KA evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0533B-1218N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2423–4039 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0535B-1224N-JA evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0535B-1224N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3248 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2436–4061 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0538B-1024N-HB evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0538B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3264 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 78.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2448–4080 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0541B-1224N-HA evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0541B-1224N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3283 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2462–4104 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0553B-1018N-LA evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0553B-1018N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3356 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2517–4195 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0555B-1218N-HB evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0555B-1218N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3369 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2526–4211 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0564B-1218N-JB evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0564B-1218N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3419 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2564–4273 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0565B-1018N-JB evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0565B-1018N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3430 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2573–4288 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0571B-1024N-KA evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0571B-1024N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3464 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2598–4329 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0574B-1224N-KA evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0574B-1224N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3481 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2611–4351 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0587B-1218N-LA evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0587B-1218N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3563 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2672–4454 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0595B-1024N-JB evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0595B-1024N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3608 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 91.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2706–4510 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0597B-1224N-JA evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0597B-1224N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3619 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2714–4524 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0599B-1218N-HB evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0599B-1218N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3633 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2725–4541 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0601B-1024N-HB evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0601B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3648 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2736–4560 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0609B-1024N-KA evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0609B-1024N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3696 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2772–4620 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0614B-1218N-JB evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0614B-1218N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3723 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2792–4654 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0615B-1024N-JA evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0615B-1024N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3731 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2798–4663 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0628B-1224N-HB evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0628B-1224N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3810 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2857–4762 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0630B-1218N-MA evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0630B-1218N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3821 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2866–4777 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0636B-1218N-LA evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0636B-1218N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3856 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2892–4820 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0641B-1224N-KA evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0641B-1224N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3886 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2915–4858 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0646B-1024N-HB evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0646B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3910 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2933–4888 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0653B-1036N-HA evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0653B-1036N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3963 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2973–4954 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0659B-1024N-KA evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0659B-1024N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3998 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2999–4998 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0661B-1236N-GA evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0661B-1236N-GA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4008 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 13.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3006–5010 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0662B-1218N-JB evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0662B-1218N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4015 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3012–5019 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0665B-1024N-JB evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0665B-1024N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4032 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3024–5040 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0672B-1024N-LA evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0672B-1024N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4075 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3057–5094 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0680B-1218N-MA evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0680B-1218N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3092–5154 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0693B-1024N-HB evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0693B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4202 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3152–5253 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0694B-1224N-HB evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0694B-1224N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4209 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3157–5261 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0695B-1224N-JB evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0695B-1224N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4211 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3158–5264 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0697B-1224N-KA evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0697B-1224N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3173–5288 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0713B-1024N-JB evaporative condenser (4.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0713B-1024N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4323 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 68.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3242–5404 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0717B-1218N-NA evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0717B-1218N-NA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4351 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3263–5439 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0724B-1036N-HA evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0724B-1036N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3296–5493 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0727B-1024N-LA evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0727B-1024N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4411 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3308–5514 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0747B-1236N-HA evaporative condenser (4.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0747B-1236N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4532 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3399–5665 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0755B-1224N-HB evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0755B-1224N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4583 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3437–5728 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0763B-1224N-KA evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0763B-1224N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4627 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3470–5784 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0766B-1024N-JB evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0766B-1024N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4645 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3484–5807 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0767B-1224N-JB evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0767B-1224N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4653 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 89.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3490–5816 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0768B-1224N-LA evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0768B-1224N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4662 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3496–5827 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0771B-1036N-KA evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0771B-1036N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4679 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3509–5848 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0796B-1036N-JA evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0796B-1036N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4825 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 90.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3619–6031 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0798B-1036N-HB evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0798B-1036N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4838 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3629–6048 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0810B-1224N-HB evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0810B-1224N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4914 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3686–6143 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0824B-1224N-MA evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0824B-1224N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4997 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3748–6247 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0825B-1236N-JA evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0825B-1236N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5006 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 96.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3755–6258 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0831B-1224N-LA evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0831B-1224N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5041 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3781–6301 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0835B-1224N-JB evaporative condenser (5.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0835B-1224N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5066 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3800–6333 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0853B-1036N-KA evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0853B-1036N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5170 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3877–6462 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0865B-1036N-JA evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0865B-1036N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5247 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3935–6559 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0871B-1036N-HB evaporative condenser (5.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0871B-1036N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5281 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3961–6601 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0882B-1036N-JB evaporative condenser (5.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0882B-1036N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5350 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 125.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4012–6687 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0885B-1236N-KA evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0885B-1236N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5368 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 106.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4026–6710 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0889B-1224N-MA evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0889B-1224N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4045–6742 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0895B-1224N-JB evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0895B-1224N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5432 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 78.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4074–6790 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0912B-1236N-JA evaporative condenser (5.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0912B-1236N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5531 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4149–6914 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0927B-1036N-KA evaporative condenser (5.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0927B-1036N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5626 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 85.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4220–7033 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0934B-1236N-HB evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0934B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5658 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 113.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4243–7072 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0939B-1224N-NA evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0939B-1224N-NA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5696 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 86.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4272–7119 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0952B-1036N-HB evaporative condenser (5.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0952B-1036N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5773 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4330–7217 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0963B-1036N-JB evaporative condenser (5.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0963B-1036N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5839 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 116.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4380–7299 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0977B-1236N-KA evaporative condenser (5.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0977B-1236N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5928 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4446–7410 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1004B-1036N-KA evaporative condenser (6.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1004B-1036N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6092 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4569–7615 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1020B-1236N-HB evaporative condenser (6.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1020B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6186 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4640–7733 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1023B-1036N-HB evaporative condenser (6.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1023B-1036N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6205 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4654–7756 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1032B-1236N-JB evaporative condenser (6.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1032B-1236N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6253 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 131.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4690–7816 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1052B-1036N-JB evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1052B-1036N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6383 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 95.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4787–7978 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1065B-1236N-KA evaporative condenser (6.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1065B-1236N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6462 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4847–8078 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1106B-1036N-LA evaporative condenser (6.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1106B-1036N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6712 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 101.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5034–8390 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1111B-1236N-HB evaporative condenser (6.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1111B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6737 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 102.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5053–8422 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1127B-1236N-JB evaporative condenser (6.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1127B-1236N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6837 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 126.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5128–8546 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1131B-1036N-JB evaporative condenser (6.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1131B-1036N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5146–8576 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1175B-1236N-LA evaporative condenser (7.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1175B-1236N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7126 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5344–8907 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1198B-1236N-HB evaporative condenser (7.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1198B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7266 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5450–9083 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1227B-1236N-JB evaporative condenser (7.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1227B-1236N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7446 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 119.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5585–9308 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1260B-1236N-MA evaporative condenser (7.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1260B-1236N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7643 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 127.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5732–9553 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1271B-1236N-LA evaporative condenser (7.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1271B-1236N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7712 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5784–9640 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1324B-1236N-JB evaporative condenser (8.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1324B-1236N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 8031 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 109.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6023–10038 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1359B-1236N-MA evaporative condenser (8.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1359B-1236N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 8246 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 119.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6184–10307 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-1434B-1236N-NA evaporative condenser (8.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1434B-1236N-NA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 8702 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6527–10878 kWEUOpen in the builder
Condensing unit, 12 kW class Example
The outdoor half of a split on its own: scroll compressor, air-cooled coil and a two-fan bank, with an open suction and liquid line. In a building it pairs with an indoor DX unit block — the refrigerant coupling pins what its suction carries every hour. Published as an example; solved live at a declared suction load.
Condensing unit10–14 kWEUOpen in the builder
CRAH, 8 m³/s chilled water Example
A computer-room air handler: a deep chilled-water coil and a draw-through plug fan, no outside air, no heater — a data hall is cooled all year. In the example data centre it breathes two halls' return air and takes 14 °C water from the chiller block; the design point here is at 14 °C too. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model, not copied from a datasheet.
Air handler60–120 kWEUOpen in the builder
Outside-air unit with heat recovery, 0.45 m³/s Example
A dedicated outside-air unit for a densely occupied room: an exhaust-air plate core, a wrap-around heat pipe around the chilled-water coil, winter heating and a supply fan. Published as an example — the figures below are solved from this model, not copied from a datasheet.
Heat recovery / DOAS4–20 kWEUOpen in the builder
Supermarket outside-air unit, 2.7 m³/s Example
A dedicated outside-air unit for a store: a sorption wheel between the exhaust and the outside air (humidity efficiency 65 %), a wrap-around heat pipe around a chilled-water coil, a gas reheat and a supply fan — the outside air dried where it enters, most of its moisture handed back to the exhaust before the coil sees it, so the rooftops can recirculate. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Heat recovery / DOAS30–150 kWEUOpen in the builder
Drake PAC360D3 (30 HP air-cooled scroll chiller, R407C) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Drake Chillers' 30 HP packaged air-cooled chiller in its R407C build, as this model runs it: its own two Copeland ZB114KCE scrolls — the catalog's maps of the compressors its data sheet names — a stainless brazed-plate evaporator, and an air-cooled condenser under four fans. At 45 °F leaving water on a 95 °F day it makes the published 22.1 tons on 29.4 kW of compressor power — the sheet's EER of 8.44, on total power, less the fans — the two figures its evaporator and condenser are sized to; across the sheet's 45 °F row, 80 to 105 °F outdoors, it holds the published tons within 1.9 % and the compressor power within −2.8 to 0 %. The sheet holds its evaporator at one approach at every leaving temperature — it says the evaporator is selected upon requirements — so this fixed one makes up to 11 % more at 35 °F and about 14 % less at 65 °F. The PAC360D6 is the same machine on R404A. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Chiller70–86 kWNAOpen in the builder
Drake PAC360D6 (30 HP air-cooled scroll chiller, R404A) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Drake Chillers' 30 HP packaged air-cooled chiller in its R404A build, as this model runs it: the PAC360D3's evaporator and condenser, sized on its R407C table, with Copeland's own map of the same two ZB114KCE scrolls on R404A in place of the R407C one. At 40 °F leaving water on a 95 °F day it makes 21.2 tons against the published 21.7, on 4 % more compressor power than the sheet's EER leaves for it. At 55 °F, the one leaving temperature both of the sheet's tables print, its capacity over the R407C build's is the sheet's within 3 % and its power 5 to 9 % higher: the model holds a condensing refrigerant at its dew point, which credits R407C with about half of its 4.7 K glide, and so sizes the shared condenser short for R404A, which has almost none. The sheet's 0 to 25 °F rows want glycol, which this model does not carry. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Chiller68–85 kWNAOpen in the builder
Heat-pump dryer, 20 kW class Example
A closed-loop heat-pump dryer: a DX coil that takes the water out of the drying chamber's own 55 °C air, the condenser in the same stream reheating it, a circulation fan — on a Copeland ZWD81KBC digital scroll (R134a, rated to 85 °C condensing) with its 10–100 % modulation declared. Nothing leaves but condensate. Run humidity-led in a building: steered on the chamber's humidity ceiling alone. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Air handler14–26 kWEUOpen in the builder
Indoor DX unit, 12 kW class Example
The indoor half of a split: an outside-air damper with an economiser, a return damper, supply fan and a DX coil with open refrigerant ports. In a building it pairs with a condensing-unit block, which feeds its liquid line; on its own it solves at a declared feed. Published as an example; the figures below come from the solver.
Split system10–14 kWEUOpen in the builder
DX split, 12 kW class Example
A direct-expansion split — indoor fan and coil, scroll compressor, and an outdoor coil behind a two-fan bank that stages down to hold head pressure in cool weather. Published as an example of what a supplier's system page looks like; its performance below is solved live from this model.
Split system12–16 kWEUOpen in the builder
Two-stage evaporative unit, 5 m³/s Example
Indirect-direct evaporative cooling: outside air over a water coil cooled by a small tower pack, then through a wetted pad, out through a supply fan; one pump round the loop. The dry-climate machine — two fans and a pump for a supply near the wet bulb. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Evaporative air cooler30–60 kWEUOpen in the builder
Fan-coil wing, 1.2 m³/s chilled water Example
A wing of guest-room fan coils run as one machine: a fan and a two-pipe chilled-water coil, breathing the rooms' own air. In the example hotel three such wings and the outside-air unit share one chiller through a water manifold. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Fan coil / terminal14–26 kWEUOpen in the builder
Fan coil with electric heat, 0.6 m³/s Example
A two-pipe fan coil on chilled water with an 8 kW electric heater: cooling from the loop, heat of its own — the smallest room unit that does both. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Fan coil / terminal5–16 kWEUOpen in the builder
Flat: radiators, 12 kW at ΔT 50 Example
One dwelling's radiators, fed from a plant across a water coupling. It is a single component and that is the point: a radiator is rated, not modelled — the EN 442 output at 75/65/20 °C and a characteristic exponent, with no geometry. Twelve kilowatts at that rating carries a 2.6 kW flat on 40 °C water, which is the low flow temperature a heat pump wants. That four-to-one multiple is the whole cost of a low-temperature retrofit: the same flat on a 70 °C boiler needs a third of the radiator. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Fan coil / terminal2–4 kWEUOpen in the builder
Gree GMV5 GMV-168WM/B (14 ton, 49 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Gree's 14-ton GMV5 outdoor unit as this model runs it: the validated 20 HP machine scaled to the frame in every dimension — catalog R410A inverter scrolls behind an air-cooled condenser — modulated to the rated 168 kBtu/h (49.2 kW) the way the control runs it, holding Gree's published power input within −4 to +1 % from 25 to 39 °C outdoor at the 100 % combination ratio, capacity falling past 35 °C as Gree publishes it. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
VRF / multi-split48–70 kWEUOpen in the builder
Hitachi Set Free RAS-20FSXN (20 HP, 56 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Hitachi's 20 HP Set Free outdoor unit as this model runs it: two catalog R410A inverter scrolls behind an air-cooled condenser, modulated to the rated 56.0 kW the way the control runs it. Hitachi publishes the capacity grid — 56.0 kW from 25 to 35 °C outdoor, 52.7 at 40 — and the power input at the rating point only, 15.64 kW (EER 3.58), which this machine draws within 1 %; the capacity is reached at every published temperature. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
VRF / multi-split55–80 kWEUOpen in the builder
Operating-suite AHU, 4 m³/s Example
An operating-suite air handler: 40 % outside air, a chilled-water coil, an electric heater, a steam humidifier on boiler steam steered to the rooms' humidity floor, and a supply fan against HEPA static. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Air handler30–90 kWEUOpen in the builder
Immersion cooling tank on an evaporative cooler (45 kW) Example
A liquid-cooled IT load and nothing but water between it and the outside: an immersion tank whose dielectric fluid is cooled by a coil-and-plate exchanger fed straight from a small evaporative cooling tower — no chiller, no air handler, no refrigerant, the arrangement the tank makers sell for data centres. The tank is a **liquid-cooled load**: 45 kW of servers declared as the load, the exchanger between the fluid and the water rated at a point the way a coaxial condenser is, and the solution reports the dielectric temperature the servers sit in — here 39 °C on a 35 °C / 25.6 °C wet-bulb design day, under the 45 °C limit declared. The tower is BAC's VT0-12-E at its published rating. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Plant / central30–53 kWEUOpen in the builder
KeepRite Refrigeration KEZA009H8 scroll condensing unit (Copeland ZB08KAE, R448A) — modelled Example modelled from published data
KeepRite's KEZA009H8, a one-fan air-cooled scroll condensing unit for a walk-in cooler, as this model runs it: the Copeland ZB08KAE its manual names — the catalog's own map — on R448A, an air-cooled condenser on the cabinet's face, its fins louvered for the enhanced tube and fin the manual names, and the 100 W EC fan that draws air through it. The condenser's airflow is the one figure fitted, on the manual's R404A cell nearest AHRI 1250's rating point (25 °F suction on a 95 °F day, 9 780 Btu/h): 823 cfm, air the printed fan could move through that coil. That same condenser holds all 216 cells the manual prints for this unit on R404A, R407A, R448A and R407C within −4.4 to +3.8 % (RMS 1.7 %). At 25 °F suction on a 95 °F day it gives 2.83 kW on R448A, against the 9 840 Btu/h (2.88 kW) printed. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Condensing unit2–4 kWNAOpen in the builder
KeepRite Refrigeration KEZA050H8 scroll condensing unit (Copeland ZB38KCE, R448A) — modelled Example modelled from published data
KeepRite's KEZA050H8, a one-fan air-cooled scroll condensing unit for walk-in coolers and small cases, as this model runs it: the Copeland ZB38KCE its manual names — the catalog's own map — on R448A, an air-cooled condenser on the cabinet's face, its fins louvered for the enhanced tube and fin the manual names, and the 400 W fan that draws air through it. The condenser's airflow is the one figure fitted, on the manual's R404A cell nearest AHRI 1250's rating point (25 °F suction on a 95 °F day, 43 400 Btu/h), and it stands for the condenser's conductance, not for air: the 4 280 cfm it comes to takes about twice the air power the printed fan could give through that coil, so the fan could not move it — read at the compressor's own rating basis, the tables ask more of the condenser than this model's coil gives behind that fan. That same condenser holds all 214 cells the manual prints for this unit on R404A, R407A, R448A and R407C within −5.1 to +6.7 % (RMS 2.5 %). At 25 °F suction on a 95 °F day it gives 12.68 kW on R448A, against the 44 100 Btu/h (12.92 kW) printed. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Condensing unit10–16 kWNAOpen in the builder
KeepRite Refrigeration KEZA150H8 scroll condensing unit (Copeland ZB114K5E, R448A) — modelled Example modelled from published data
KeepRite's KEZA150H8, the largest unit of its KEZ cooler range — a two-fan air-cooled scroll condensing unit — as this model runs it: the Copeland ZB114K5E its manual names — the catalog's own map — on R448A, an air-cooled condenser on the cabinet's face, its fins louvered for the enhanced tube and fin the manual names, and the two fans (1 560 W) that draw air through it. The condenser's airflow is the one figure fitted, on the manual's R404A cell nearest AHRI 1250's rating point (25 °F suction on a 95 °F day, 135 000 Btu/h), and it stands for the condenser's conductance, not for air: the 16 450 cfm it comes to takes about four times the air power the printed fans could give through that coil, so the fans could not move it — read at the compressor's own rating basis, the tables ask more of the condenser than this model's coil gives behind those fans. That same condenser holds all 214 cells the manual prints for this unit on R404A, R407A, R448A and R407C within −6.9 to +5.7 % (RMS 2.4 %). At 25 °F suction on a 95 °F day it gives 38.22 kW on R448A, against the 135 000 Btu/h (39.56 kW) printed. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Condensing unit30–48 kWNAOpen in the builder
KeepRite Refrigeration KEZA150L8 low-temperature scroll condensing unit (Copeland ZF49K5E, R448A) — modelled Example modelled from published data
KeepRite's KEZA150L8, a two-fan air-cooled scroll condensing unit for a walk-in freezer, as this model runs it: the Copeland ZF49K5E its manual names — the catalog's own map, the low-temperature scroll the example freezer unit runs — on R448A, an air-cooled condenser on the cabinet's face, its fins louvered for the enhanced tube and fin the manual names, and the two fans (800 W) that draw air through it. The condenser's airflow is the one figure fitted, on the manual's R404A cell nearest AHRI 1250's freezer rating point (−20 °F suction on a 95 °F day, 53 100 Btu/h), and it stands for the condenser's conductance, not for air: the 10 080 cfm it comes to takes about three times the air power the printed fans could give through that coil, so the fans could not move it — read at the compressor's own rating basis, the tables ask more of the condenser than this model's coil gives behind those fans, as nearly every freezer table in the manual does. That same condenser holds all 162 cells the manual prints for this unit on R404A, R407A and R448A within −5.3 to +2.8 % (RMS 2.5 %). At −20 °F suction on a 95 °F day it gives 14.40 kW on R448A, against the 50 900 Btu/h (14.92 kW) printed. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Condensing unit11–18 kWNAOpen in the builder
Low-temperature condensing unit, R404A Example
A remote condensing unit on a Copeland ZF49K5E low-temperature scroll (R404A) with an air-cooled condenser and its fan: an open suction and liquid line, the load declared under boundary.refLoads (a unit cooler's, pinned hourly in a building). Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Condensing unit7–18 kWEUOpen in the builder
Unit cooler, −20 °C store Example
A frozen-store unit cooler: a fan and a 6 fpi DX coil with both refrigerant ports open, fed by a remote low-temperature condensing unit (boundary.refFeeds on its own page; the pair pinned hourly in a building). Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Unit cooler / refrigeration7–18 kWEUOpen in the builder
Midea MDV-D252W/DN1 (8 HP, 25 kW, V4+) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Midea's 8 HP V4+ outdoor unit as this model runs it — the first small frame: not the 20 HP machine scaled but a condenser declared from the frame's own cabinet (980 × 1630 × 800 mm, a coil wrapping three sides) and its published 11 500 m³/h, with the catalog inverter scroll at the frame's share of the 20 HP pair. Modulated to the rated 25.2 kW the way the control runs it, it draws Midea's own selection software's power input within −2 to +1 % from 25 to 39 °C outdoor at the 100 % combination ratio, capacity falling past 35 °C as the grid does. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
VRF / multi-split24–45 kWEUOpen in the builder
Midea V6 MV6-560WV2GN1 (20 HP, 56 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Midea's 20 HP V6 outdoor unit as this model runs it: two catalog R410A inverter scrolls behind an air-cooled condenser, modulated to the rated 56.0 kW the way the control runs it, within +0.5 to +3.6 % of Midea's published power input from 25 to 35 °C outdoor at the 100 % combination ratio. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
VRF / multi-split55–80 kWEUOpen in the builder
Office floor: radiators, 30 kW at ΔT 50 Example
One office floor's radiators, fed from a plant across a water coupling — the flats' emitter at an office's size, rated the way EN 442 rates one. Thirty kilowatts at the rating carries 15 kW on 54 °C water, the flow temperature a heat pump on a warm source reaches comfortably. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Fan coil / terminal12–18 kWEUOpen in the builder
Pool-hall dehumidifier, 5 m³/s Example
A heat-pump dehumidifier for a pool hall: an eight-row DX coil that takes the water out of the hall's air, a reclaim condenser on the pool water that puts the heat the pool lost back into it first, the condenser in the air stream reheating with the rest — the hot-gas reheat every pool unit dries with — and a supply fan, on eight inverter scroll modules. Run humidity-led in a building: steered on the hall's humidity ceiling alone, the hall's temperature and outside air another machine's. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Air handler90–135 kWEUOpen in the builder
Packaged rooftop with gas furnace, 3 m³/s Example
A packaged rooftop unit: outside-air damper with an economiser, DX coil on four scroll compressors, a gas duct furnace at 80 % and a supply fan, on a two-fan air-cooled condenser. Its heat is gas — reported as fuel, never as electricity — which is what separates a rooftop's winter from a heat pump's. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Rooftop / packaged45–65 kWEUOpen in the builder
Recirculating gas rooftop, 3 m³/s Example
The gas rooftop without its outside-air damper: a DX coil on a scroll, a gas furnace downstream of it for heat and reheat, a supply fan, a two-fan condenser — for a floor whose outside air comes from a dedicated unit. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Rooftop / packaged25–60 kWEUOpen in the builder
Samsung DVM S AM200FXVAGH/EU (20 HP, 56 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Samsung's 20 HP DVM S outdoor unit as this model runs it: two catalog R410A inverter scrolls behind an air-cooled condenser, modulated to the rated 56.0 kW the way the control runs it, holding Samsung's published power input within 6 % from 25 to 39 °C outdoor at the 100 % combination ratio, capacity falling past 35 °C as Samsung publishes it. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
VRF / multi-split55–80 kWEUOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-106E cooling tower (112 tons, 491 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-106E — an ACC cooling tower, 112 nominal tons (491 kW): rated to cool 336 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection368–613 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-106F cooling tower (128 tons, 561 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-106F — an ACC cooling tower, 128 nominal tons (561 kW): rated to cool 384 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection421–701 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-45B cooling tower (24 tons, 105 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-45B — an ACC cooling tower, 24 nominal tons (105 kW): rated to cool 72 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection79–131 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-45C cooling tower (31 tons, 136 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-45C — an ACC cooling tower, 31 nominal tons (136 kW): rated to cool 93 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection102–170 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-65C cooling tower (43 tons, 188 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-65C — an ACC cooling tower, 43 nominal tons (188 kW): rated to cool 129 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection141–235 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-65D cooling tower (50 tons, 219 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-65D — an ACC cooling tower, 50 nominal tons (219 kW): rated to cool 150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 9.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection164–274 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-66C cooling tower (55 tons, 241 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-66C — an ACC cooling tower, 55 nominal tons (241 kW): rated to cool 165 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 9.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection181–301 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-66D cooling tower (62 tons, 272 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-66D — an ACC cooling tower, 62 nominal tons (272 kW): rated to cool 186 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection204–340 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-66E cooling tower (74 tons, 324 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-66E — an ACC cooling tower, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection243–405 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-86E cooling tower (95 tons, 416 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-86E — an ACC cooling tower, 95 nominal tons (416 kW): rated to cool 285 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection312–520 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACC-86F cooling tower (108 tons, 473 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38E-25R00) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACC-86F — an ACC cooling tower, 108 nominal tons (473 kW): rated to cool 324 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection355–591 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1011-1 cooling tower (102 tons, 447 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1011-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 102 nominal tons (447 kW): rated to cool 306 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection335–559 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1012-1 cooling tower (117 tons, 513 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1012-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 117 nominal tons (513 kW): rated to cool 351 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection384–641 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1013-1 cooling tower (139 tons, 609 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1013-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 139 nominal tons (609 kW): rated to cool 417 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection457–761 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1014-1 cooling tower (158 tons, 697 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1014-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 158 nominal tons (697 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection522–871 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1015-1 cooling tower (174 tons, 767 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1015-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 174 nominal tons (767 kW): rated to cool 525 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection575–958 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1016-1 cooling tower (199 tons, 876 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1016-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 199 nominal tons (876 kW): rated to cool 600 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection657–1095 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1020-1 cooling tower (141 tons, 618 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1020-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 141 nominal tons (618 kW): rated to cool 423 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection463–772 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1021-1 cooling tower (167 tons, 736 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1021-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 167 nominal tons (736 kW): rated to cool 504 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection552–920 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1022-1 cooling tower (191 tons, 841 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1022-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 191 nominal tons (841 kW): rated to cool 576 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection631–1052 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1023-1 cooling tower (210 tons, 924 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1023-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 633 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection693–1156 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1024-1 cooling tower (240 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1024-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 240 nominal tons (1056 kW): rated to cool 723 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection792–1320 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1025-1 cooling tower (265 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1025-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection874–1457 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1030-1 cooling tower (173 tons, 762 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1030-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection572–953 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1031-1 cooling tower (205 tons, 903 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1031-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 205 nominal tons (903 kW): rated to cool 618 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection677–1128 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1032-1 cooling tower (235 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1032-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection776–1293 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1033-1 cooling tower (259 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1033-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection854–1424 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1034-1 cooling tower (296 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1034-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection976–1627 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1035-1 cooling tower (330 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1035-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 330 nominal tons (1450 kW): rated to cool 993 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1088–1813 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1036-1 cooling tower (351 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1036-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1157–1928 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1037-1 cooling tower (373 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1037-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 373 nominal tons (1639 kW): rated to cool 1122 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1229–2048 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1038-1 cooling tower (410 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1038-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 410 nominal tons (1801 kW): rated to cool 1233 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1351–2251 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1040-1 cooling tower (304 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1040-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1002–1670 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1041-1 cooling tower (338 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1041-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 338 nominal tons (1485 kW): rated to cool 1017 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1114–1857 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1042-1 cooling tower (393 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1042-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 393 nominal tons (1726 kW): rated to cool 1182 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1295–2158 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1043-1 cooling tower (433 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1043-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 433 nominal tons (1902 kW): rated to cool 1302 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1426–2377 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1044-1 cooling tower (461 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1044-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 461 nominal tons (2029 kW): rated to cool 1389 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1521–2536 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1045-1 cooling tower (488 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1045-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 488 nominal tons (2147 kW): rated to cool 1470 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1610–2684 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1046-1 cooling tower (535 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1046-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 535 nominal tons (2353 kW): rated to cool 1611 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1765–2941 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1047-1 cooling tower (566 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1047-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 566 nominal tons (2489 kW): rated to cool 1704 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1866–3111 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1050-1 cooling tower (299 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1050-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 299 nominal tons (1314 kW): rated to cool 900 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection986–1643 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1051-1 cooling tower (342 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1051-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 342 nominal tons (1503 kW): rated to cool 1029 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1127–1879 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1052-1 cooling tower (377 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1052-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 377 nominal tons (1656 kW): rated to cool 1134 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1242–2070 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1053-1 cooling tower (431 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1053-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 431 nominal tons (1893 kW): rated to cool 1296 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1420–2366 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1054-1 cooling tower (473 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1054-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 473 nominal tons (2081 kW): rated to cool 1425 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1561–2601 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1055-1 cooling tower (510 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1055-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 510 nominal tons (2243 kW): rated to cool 1536 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1682–2804 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1056-1 cooling tower (542 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1056-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 542 nominal tons (2383 kW): rated to cool 1632 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1788–2979 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1057-1 cooling tower (596 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1057-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 596 nominal tons (2620 kW): rated to cool 1794 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1965–3275 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1058-1 cooling tower (643 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1058-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 643 nominal tons (2826 kW): rated to cool 1935 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2119–3532 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1059-1 cooling tower (683 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1059-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 683 nominal tons (3001 kW): rated to cool 2055 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2251–3752 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1060-1 cooling tower (433 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1060-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 433 nominal tons (1902 kW): rated to cool 1302 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1426–2377 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1061-1 cooling tower (494 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1061-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 494 nominal tons (2173 kW): rated to cool 1488 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1630–2716 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1062-1 cooling tower (542 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1062-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 542 nominal tons (2383 kW): rated to cool 1632 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1788–2979 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1063-1 cooling tower (584 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1063-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 584 nominal tons (2567 kW): rated to cool 1758 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1926–3209 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1064-1 cooling tower (620 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1064-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 620 nominal tons (2725 kW): rated to cool 1866 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2044–3407 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1065-1 cooling tower (682 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1065-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 682 nominal tons (2997 kW): rated to cool 2052 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2248–3746 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1066-1 cooling tower (735 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1066-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 735 nominal tons (3229 kW): rated to cool 2211 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2422–4036 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1067-1 cooling tower (780 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1067-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 780 nominal tons (3431 kW): rated to cool 2349 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 96.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2573–4288 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1068-1 cooling tower (838 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1068-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 838 nominal tons (3685 kW): rated to cool 2523 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2764–4606 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2070-1 cooling tower (539 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2070-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 539 nominal tons (2370 kW): rated to cool 1623 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1778–2963 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2071-1 cooling tower (594 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2071-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 594 nominal tons (2611 kW): rated to cool 1788 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1958–3264 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2072-1 cooling tower (639 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2072-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 639 nominal tons (2808 kW): rated to cool 1923 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2106–3511 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2073-1 cooling tower (679 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2073-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 679 nominal tons (2984 kW): rated to cool 2043 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2238–3730 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2074-1 cooling tower (748 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2074-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 748 nominal tons (3286 kW): rated to cool 2250 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2465–4108 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2075-1 cooling tower (804 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2075-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 804 nominal tons (3536 kW): rated to cool 2421 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 96.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2652–4420 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2076-1 cooling tower (854 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2076-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 854 nominal tons (3755 kW): rated to cool 2571 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2816–4694 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2077-1 cooling tower (920 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2077-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 920 nominal tons (4044 kW): rated to cool 2769 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3033–5055 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2080-1 cooling tower (605 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2080-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 605 nominal tons (2659 kW): rated to cool 1821 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1995–3324 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2081-1 cooling tower (666 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2081-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 666 nominal tons (2927 kW): rated to cool 2004 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2195–3658 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2082-1 cooling tower (717 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2082-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 717 nominal tons (3150 kW): rated to cool 2157 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2363–3938 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2083-1 cooling tower (761 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2083-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 761 nominal tons (3347 kW): rated to cool 2292 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2511–4184 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2084-1 cooling tower (837 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2084-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2760–4600 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2085-1 cooling tower (902 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2085-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 902 nominal tons (3965 kW): rated to cool 2715 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 107.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2974–4956 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2086-1 cooling tower (958 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2086-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 958 nominal tons (4211 kW): rated to cool 2883 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3158–5263 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2087-1 cooling tower (1032 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2087-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 1032 nominal tons (4535 kW): rated to cool 3105 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3401–5668 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2088-1 cooling tower (1134 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2088-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 1134 nominal tons (4986 kW): rated to cool 3414 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3740–6233 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2090-1 cooling tower (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2090-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1922–3204 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2091-1 cooling tower (641 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2091-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 641 nominal tons (2817 kW): rated to cool 1929 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2113–3522 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2092-1 cooling tower (691 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2092-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 691 nominal tons (3036 kW): rated to cool 2079 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2277–3795 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2093-1 cooling tower (734 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2093-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 734 nominal tons (3225 kW): rated to cool 2208 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2419–4031 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2094-1 cooling tower (807 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2094-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 807 nominal tons (3549 kW): rated to cool 2430 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2662–4436 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2095-1 cooling tower (869 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2095-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 869 nominal tons (3821 kW): rated to cool 2616 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2865–4776 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2096-1 cooling tower (923 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2096-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 923 nominal tons (4057 kW): rated to cool 2778 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3043–5071 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2097-1 cooling tower (995 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2097-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 995 nominal tons (4373 kW): rated to cool 2994 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 117.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3279–5466 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2098-1 cooling tower (1093 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2098-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 1093 nominal tons (4806 kW): rated to cool 3291 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 128.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3605–6008 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2100-1 cooling tower (655 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2100-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 655 nominal tons (2879 kW): rated to cool 1971 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2159–3598 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2101-1 cooling tower (720 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2101-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 720 nominal tons (3163 kW): rated to cool 2166 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2373–3954 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2102-1 cooling tower (775 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2102-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 775 nominal tons (3409 kW): rated to cool 2334 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2557–4261 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2103-1 cooling tower (823 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2103-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 823 nominal tons (3619 kW): rated to cool 2478 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2714–4524 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2104-1 cooling tower (906 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2104-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 906 nominal tons (3983 kW): rated to cool 2727 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2987–4978 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2105-1 cooling tower (976 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2105-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 976 nominal tons (4289 kW): rated to cool 2937 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3217–5362 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2106-1 cooling tower (1037 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2106-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 1037 nominal tons (4557 kW): rated to cool 3120 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3417–5696 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2107-1 cooling tower (1116 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2107-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 1116 nominal tons (4907 kW): rated to cool 3360 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3680–6134 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2108-1 cooling tower (1228 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2108-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 1228 nominal tons (5398 kW): rated to cool 3696 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 144.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4048–6747 kWNAOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-2109-1 cooling tower (1323 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-2109-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 1323 nominal tons (5814 kW): rated to cool 3981 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4361–7268 kWNAOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0506A-E cooling tower (46 tons, 202 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0506A-E — an FXT cooling tower, 46 nominal tons (202 kW): rated to cool 138 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection151–252 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0506A-F cooling tower (50 tons, 219 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0506A-F — an FXT cooling tower, 50 nominal tons (219 kW): rated to cool 150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection164–274 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0506A-G cooling tower (58 tons, 254 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0506A-G — an FXT cooling tower, 58 nominal tons (254 kW): rated to cool 174 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection191–318 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0506A-H cooling tower (68 tons, 298 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0506A-H — an FXT cooling tower, 68 nominal tons (298 kW): rated to cool 204 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection223–372 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0706B-F cooling tower (64 tons, 280 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0706B-F — an FXT cooling tower, 64 nominal tons (280 kW): rated to cool 192 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection210–351 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0706B-G cooling tower (74 tons, 324 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0706B-G — an FXT cooling tower, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection243–405 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0706B-H cooling tower (87 tons, 381 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0706B-H — an FXT cooling tower, 87 nominal tons (381 kW): rated to cool 261 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection286–476 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0706B-J cooling tower (95 tons, 416 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0706B-J — an FXT cooling tower, 95 nominal tons (416 kW): rated to cool 285 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection312–520 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0709B-G cooling tower (97 tons, 425 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0709B-G — an FXT cooling tower, 97 nominal tons (425 kW): rated to cool 291 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection319–531 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0709B-H cooling tower (115 tons, 504 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0709B-H — an FXT cooling tower, 115 nominal tons (504 kW): rated to cool 345 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection378–630 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0709B-K cooling tower (136 tons, 596 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0709B-K — an FXT cooling tower, 136 nominal tons (596 kW): rated to cool 408 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection447–745 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0712B-H cooling tower (140 tons, 613 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0712B-H — an FXT cooling tower, 140 nominal tons (613 kW): rated to cool 420 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection460–767 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0712B-J cooling tower (159 tons, 701 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0712B-J — an FXT cooling tower, 159 nominal tons (701 kW): rated to cool 480 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection526–876 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0712B-K cooling tower (174 tons, 767 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0712B-K — an FXT cooling tower, 174 nominal tons (767 kW): rated to cool 525 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection575–958 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0712B-L cooling tower (191 tons, 841 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0712B-L — an FXT cooling tower, 191 nominal tons (841 kW): rated to cool 576 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection631–1052 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0712C-J cooling tower (196 tons, 863 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0712C-J — an FXT cooling tower, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection647–1079 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0712C-K cooling tower (215 tons, 946 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0712C-K — an FXT cooling tower, 215 nominal tons (946 kW): rated to cool 648 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection710–1183 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0712C-L cooling tower (239 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0712C-L — an FXT cooling tower, 239 nominal tons (1052 kW): rated to cool 720 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection789–1314 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0712C-M cooling tower (256 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0712C-M — an FXT cooling tower, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection845–1408 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806A-12D-K closed-circuit cooler (39 tons, 171 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806A-12D-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection128–214 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806A-16D-K closed-circuit cooler (47 tons, 206 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806A-16D-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 47 nominal tons (206 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection154–257 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806A-20D-K closed-circuit cooler (53 tons, 232 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806A-20D-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 53 nominal tons (232 kW): rated to cool 159 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection174–290 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806A-24D-K closed-circuit cooler (63 tons, 276 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806A-24D-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 63 nominal tons (276 kW): rated to cool 189 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection207–345 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806B-12D-L closed-circuit cooler (47 tons, 206 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806B-12D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 47 nominal tons (206 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection154–257 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806B-16D-L closed-circuit cooler (57 tons, 250 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806B-16D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 57 nominal tons (250 kW): rated to cool 171 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection187–312 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806B-20D-L closed-circuit cooler (65 tons, 285 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806B-20D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 65 nominal tons (285 kW): rated to cool 195 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection214–356 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806B-24D-L closed-circuit cooler (78 tons, 342 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806B-24D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 78 nominal tons (342 kW): rated to cool 234 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection256–427 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806B-28D-L closed-circuit cooler (83 tons, 364 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806B-28D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 83 nominal tons (364 kW): rated to cool 249 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection273–455 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806B-32D-L closed-circuit cooler (87 tons, 381 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806B-32D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 87 nominal tons (381 kW): rated to cool 261 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection286–476 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0806B-36D-L closed-circuit cooler (90 tons, 394 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0806B-36D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 90 nominal tons (394 kW): rated to cool 270 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection296–493 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809A-12D-L closed-circuit cooler (72 tons, 315 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809A-12D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 72 nominal tons (315 kW): rated to cool 216 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection237–394 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809A-16D-L closed-circuit cooler (83 tons, 364 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809A-16D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 83 nominal tons (364 kW): rated to cool 249 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection273–455 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809A-20D-L closed-circuit cooler (91 tons, 399 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809A-20D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 91 nominal tons (399 kW): rated to cool 273 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection299–498 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809A-24T-L closed-circuit cooler (97 tons, 425 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809A-24T-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 97 nominal tons (425 kW): rated to cool 291 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection319–531 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809B-16D-M closed-circuit cooler (99 tons, 434 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809B-16D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 297 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection325–542 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809B-20D-M closed-circuit cooler (109 tons, 478 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809B-20D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection358–597 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809B-24D-M closed-circuit cooler (119 tons, 521 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809B-24D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 119 nominal tons (521 kW): rated to cool 357 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection391–652 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809B-24T-M closed-circuit cooler (119 tons, 521 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809B-24T-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 119 nominal tons (521 kW): rated to cool 357 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection391–652 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809B-28D-M closed-circuit cooler (135 tons, 591 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809B-28D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 135 nominal tons (591 kW): rated to cool 405 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection444–739 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809B-30T-M closed-circuit cooler (130 tons, 570 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809B-30T-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection427–712 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809B-32D-M closed-circuit cooler (140 tons, 613 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809B-32D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 140 nominal tons (613 kW): rated to cool 420 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection460–767 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809B-36D-M closed-circuit cooler (145 tons, 635 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809B-36D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 145 nominal tons (635 kW): rated to cool 435 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection476–794 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0809B-36T-M closed-circuit cooler (138 tons, 605 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0809B-36T-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 138 nominal tons (605 kW): rated to cool 414 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection453–756 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812A-12D-M closed-circuit cooler (108 tons, 473 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812A-12D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 108 nominal tons (473 kW): rated to cool 324 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection355–591 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812A-16D-M closed-circuit cooler (122 tons, 535 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812A-16D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 122 nominal tons (535 kW): rated to cool 366 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection401–668 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812A-16Q-M closed-circuit cooler (103 tons, 451 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812A-16Q-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 103 nominal tons (451 kW): rated to cool 309 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection338–564 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812A-20D-M closed-circuit cooler (131 tons, 574 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812A-20D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 131 nominal tons (574 kW): rated to cool 393 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection430–717 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812A-23Q-M closed-circuit cooler (125 tons, 548 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812A-23Q-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 125 nominal tons (548 kW): rated to cool 375 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection411–685 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812A-23T-M closed-circuit cooler (132 tons, 578 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812A-23T-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 132 nominal tons (578 kW): rated to cool 396 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection434–723 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-12D-O closed-circuit cooler (132 tons, 578 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-12D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 132 nominal tons (578 kW): rated to cool 396 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection434–723 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-16D-O closed-circuit cooler (149 tons, 653 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-16D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 149 nominal tons (653 kW): rated to cool 447 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection490–816 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-16Q-O closed-circuit cooler (125 tons, 548 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-16Q-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 125 nominal tons (548 kW): rated to cool 375 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection411–685 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-20D-O closed-circuit cooler (162 tons, 714 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-20D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 162 nominal tons (714 kW): rated to cool 489 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection536–893 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-23Q-O closed-circuit cooler (152 tons, 670 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-23Q-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 152 nominal tons (670 kW): rated to cool 459 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection503–838 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-24D-L closed-circuit cooler (160 tons, 705 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-24D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 160 nominal tons (705 kW): rated to cool 483 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection529–882 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-24T-O closed-circuit cooler (177 tons, 780 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-24T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 177 nominal tons (780 kW): rated to cool 534 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection585–975 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-28D-K closed-circuit cooler (148 tons, 648 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-28D-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 148 nominal tons (648 kW): rated to cool 444 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection486–811 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-30T-O closed-circuit cooler (190 tons, 837 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-30T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 190 nominal tons (837 kW): rated to cool 573 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection628–1046 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-32Q-O closed-circuit cooler (186 tons, 819 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-32Q-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 186 nominal tons (819 kW): rated to cool 561 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection614–1024 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0812B-36T-O closed-circuit cooler (200 tons, 881 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0812B-36T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 200 nominal tons (881 kW): rated to cool 603 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection660–1101 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818A-12D-M closed-circuit cooler (172 tons, 758 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818A-12D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 172 nominal tons (758 kW): rated to cool 519 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection568–947 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818A-16D-K closed-circuit cooler (160 tons, 705 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818A-16D-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 160 nominal tons (705 kW): rated to cool 483 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection529–882 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818A-16Q-M closed-circuit cooler (170 tons, 749 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818A-16Q-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection562–937 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818A-23Q-M closed-circuit cooler (208 tons, 916 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818A-23Q-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection687–1145 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818A-23T-M closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818A-23T-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818A-24Q-M closed-circuit cooler (217 tons, 955 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818A-24Q-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 217 nominal tons (955 kW): rated to cool 654 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection716–1194 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818A-24T-M closed-circuit cooler (225 tons, 990 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818A-24T-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 225 nominal tons (990 kW): rated to cool 678 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection743–1238 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818A-32Q-M closed-circuit cooler (236 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818A-32Q-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 236 nominal tons (1038 kW): rated to cool 711 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection779–1298 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818A-36H-M closed-circuit cooler (232 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818A-36H-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 232 nominal tons (1021 kW): rated to cool 699 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection766–1276 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818B-12D-O closed-circuit cooler (205 tons, 903 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818B-12D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 205 nominal tons (903 kW): rated to cool 618 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection677–1128 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818B-16Q-O closed-circuit cooler (203 tons, 894 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818B-16Q-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 203 nominal tons (894 kW): rated to cool 612 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection670–1117 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818B-24Q-O closed-circuit cooler (264 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818B-24Q-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 264 nominal tons (1161 kW): rated to cool 795 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection871–1451 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818B-24T-O closed-circuit cooler (274 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818B-24T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 274 nominal tons (1205 kW): rated to cool 825 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection904–1506 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818B-30T-K closed-circuit cooler (226 tons, 995 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818B-30T-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 226 nominal tons (995 kW): rated to cool 681 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection746–1243 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818B-32Q-O closed-circuit cooler (288 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818B-32Q-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 288 nominal tons (1266 kW): rated to cool 867 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection950–1583 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-0818B-36H-O closed-circuit cooler (283 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-0818B-36H-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 283 nominal tons (1244 kW): rated to cool 852 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection933–1555 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212B-12D-O closed-circuit cooler (162 tons, 714 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212B-12D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 162 nominal tons (714 kW): rated to cool 489 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection536–893 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212B-16D-O closed-circuit cooler (184 tons, 811 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212B-16D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection608–1013 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212B-20D-O closed-circuit cooler (199 tons, 876 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212B-20D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 199 nominal tons (876 kW): rated to cool 600 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection657–1095 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212B-23Q-O closed-circuit cooler (190 tons, 837 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212B-23Q-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 190 nominal tons (837 kW): rated to cool 573 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection628–1046 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212B-23T-O closed-circuit cooler (200 tons, 881 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212B-23T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 200 nominal tons (881 kW): rated to cool 603 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection660–1101 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212B-24D-O closed-circuit cooler (229 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212B-24D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 229 nominal tons (1008 kW): rated to cool 690 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection756–1260 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212B-24T-O closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212B-24T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212B-28D-O closed-circuit cooler (240 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212B-28D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 240 nominal tons (1056 kW): rated to cool 723 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection792–1320 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-12D-P closed-circuit cooler (183 tons, 806 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-12D-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 183 nominal tons (806 kW): rated to cool 552 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection605–1008 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-16D-P closed-circuit cooler (207 tons, 911 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-16D-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 207 nominal tons (911 kW): rated to cool 624 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection683–1139 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-16Q-P closed-circuit cooler (175 tons, 771 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-16Q-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection578–964 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-20D-P closed-circuit cooler (225 tons, 990 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-20D-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 225 nominal tons (990 kW): rated to cool 678 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection743–1238 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-23Q-P closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-23Q-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-23T-P closed-circuit cooler (228 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-23T-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 228 nominal tons (1003 kW): rated to cool 687 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection753–1254 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-24D-P closed-circuit cooler (266 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-24D-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection877–1462 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-24Q-P closed-circuit cooler (238 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-24Q-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection785–1309 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-24T-P closed-circuit cooler (251 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-24T-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 251 nominal tons (1104 kW): rated to cool 756 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection828–1380 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-28D-O closed-circuit cooler (254 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-28D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 254 nominal tons (1117 kW): rated to cool 765 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection838–1397 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-30T-P closed-circuit cooler (270 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-30T-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection891–1484 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-32D-M closed-circuit cooler (234 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-32D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 234 nominal tons (1030 kW): rated to cool 705 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection772–1287 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-32Q-P closed-circuit cooler (265 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-32Q-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection874–1457 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-36D-L closed-circuit cooler (220 tons, 968 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-36D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 220 nominal tons (968 kW): rated to cool 663 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection726–1210 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-36H-P closed-circuit cooler (256 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-36H-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection845–1408 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1212C-36T-P closed-circuit cooler (284 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1212C-36T-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection937–1561 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218B-12D-O closed-circuit cooler (266 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218B-12D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection877–1462 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218B-16D-N closed-circuit cooler (281 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218B-16D-N — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 281 nominal tons (1236 kW): rated to cool 846 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection927–1544 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218B-16Q-O closed-circuit cooler (261 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218B-16Q-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 261 nominal tons (1148 kW): rated to cool 786 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection861–1435 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218B-20D-K closed-circuit cooler (230 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218B-20D-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 230 nominal tons (1012 kW): rated to cool 693 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection759–1265 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218B-23Q-O closed-circuit cooler (317 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218B-23Q-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 317 nominal tons (1393 kW): rated to cool 954 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1045–1742 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218B-23T-O closed-circuit cooler (333 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218B-23T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 333 nominal tons (1463 kW): rated to cool 1002 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1098–1829 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218B-24Q-O closed-circuit cooler (334 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218B-24Q-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 334 nominal tons (1468 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1101–1835 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218B-24T-O closed-circuit cooler (346 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218B-24T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 346 nominal tons (1520 kW): rated to cool 1041 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1140–1900 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218B-36H-O closed-circuit cooler (359 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218B-36H-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 359 nominal tons (1577 kW): rated to cool 1080 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1183–1972 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-16D-M closed-circuit cooler (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-16D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection917–1528 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-16Q-P closed-circuit cooler (295 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-16Q-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 295 nominal tons (1297 kW): rated to cool 888 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection973–1621 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-20D-K closed-circuit cooler (244 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-20D-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 244 nominal tons (1073 kW): rated to cool 735 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection805–1342 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-23Q-P closed-circuit cooler (361 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-23Q-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1190–1983 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-24Q-P closed-circuit cooler (387 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-24Q-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1275–2125 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-24T-P closed-circuit cooler (402 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-24T-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1766 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1324–2207 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-30T-O closed-circuit cooler (390 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-30T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 390 nominal tons (1713 kW): rated to cool 1173 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1285–2141 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-32Q-P closed-circuit cooler (423 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-32Q-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 423 nominal tons (1858 kW): rated to cool 1272 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1393–2322 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-36H-K closed-circuit cooler (272 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-36H-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 272 nominal tons (1196 kW): rated to cool 819 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection897–1495 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-36T-L closed-circuit cooler (332 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-36T-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 332 nominal tons (1459 kW): rated to cool 999 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1094–1824 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H1 closed-circuit cooler (20 tons, 88 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) ✓
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H1 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 20 nominal tons (88 kW): rated to cool 60 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection66–110 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H2 closed-circuit cooler (40 tons, 175 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H2 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 40 nominal tons (175 kW): rated to cool 120 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection131–219 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H3 closed-circuit cooler (60 tons, 263 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H3 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 60 nominal tons (263 kW): rated to cool 180 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection197–329 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H4 closed-circuit cooler (80 tons, 351 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H4 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 80 nominal tons (351 kW): rated to cool 240 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection263–438 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H5 closed-circuit cooler (100 tons, 438 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H5 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 100 nominal tons (438 kW): rated to cool 300 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection329–548 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H6 closed-circuit cooler (120 tons, 526 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H6 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 120 nominal tons (526 kW): rated to cool 360 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection394–657 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J1 closed-circuit cooler (30 tons, 131 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) ✓
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J1 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 30 nominal tons (131 kW): rated to cool 90 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection99–164 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J2 closed-circuit cooler (60 tons, 263 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J2 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 60 nominal tons (263 kW): rated to cool 180 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection197–329 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J3 closed-circuit cooler (90 tons, 394 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J3 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 90 nominal tons (394 kW): rated to cool 270 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection296–493 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J4 closed-circuit cooler (120 tons, 526 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J4 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 120 nominal tons (526 kW): rated to cool 360 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection394–657 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J5 closed-circuit cooler (150 tons, 657 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J5 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection493–822 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Nexus NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J6 closed-circuit cooler (179 tons, 789 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J6 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 179 nominal tons (789 kW): rated to cool 540 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection591–986 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0406N-3D1DZ-G1 closed-circuit cooler (18 tons, 79 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0406N-3D1DZ-G1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 18 nominal tons (79 kW): rated to cool 54 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection59–99 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0406N-3D1EZ-G1 closed-circuit cooler (20 tons, 88 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0406N-3D1EZ-G1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 20 nominal tons (88 kW): rated to cool 60 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection66–110 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0406N-3D3EZ-H1 closed-circuit cooler (23 tons, 101 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0406N-3D3EZ-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 23 nominal tons (101 kW): rated to cool 69 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection76–126 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0406N-4D1EZ-H1 closed-circuit cooler (27 tons, 118 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0406N-4D1EZ-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 27 nominal tons (118 kW): rated to cool 81 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection89–148 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0406N-4D2DZ-G1 closed-circuit cooler (23 tons, 101 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0406N-4D2DZ-G1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 23 nominal tons (101 kW): rated to cool 69 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection76–126 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0406N-5D1EZ-G1 closed-circuit cooler (27 tons, 118 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0406N-5D1EZ-G1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 27 nominal tons (118 kW): rated to cool 81 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection89–148 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0406N-5D4DZ-J1 closed-circuit cooler (33 tons, 145 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0406N-5D4DZ-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 33 nominal tons (145 kW): rated to cool 99 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection108–181 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0406N-6D2DZ-H1 closed-circuit cooler (32 tons, 140 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0406N-6D2DZ-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 32 nominal tons (140 kW): rated to cool 96 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection105–175 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0406N-6D2DZ-J1 closed-circuit cooler (35 tons, 153 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0406N-6D2DZ-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 35 nominal tons (153 kW): rated to cool 105 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection115–192 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-2D4DZ-G2 closed-circuit cooler (36 tons, 158 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-2D4DZ-G2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 36 nominal tons (158 kW): rated to cool 108 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection118–197 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-3D1DZ-G2 closed-circuit cooler (43 tons, 188 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-3D1DZ-G2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 43 nominal tons (188 kW): rated to cool 129 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection141–235 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-3D2DZ-H2 closed-circuit cooler (49 tons, 215 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-3D2DZ-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 49 nominal tons (215 kW): rated to cool 147 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection161–268 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-3D2EZ-G2 closed-circuit cooler (48 tons, 210 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-3D2EZ-G2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 48 nominal tons (210 kW): rated to cool 144 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection158–263 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-4D1DZ-H2 closed-circuit cooler (55 tons, 241 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-4D1DZ-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 55 nominal tons (241 kW): rated to cool 165 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection181–301 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-4D1EZ-G2 closed-circuit cooler (54 tons, 237 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-4D1EZ-G2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 54 nominal tons (237 kW): rated to cool 162 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection177–296 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-4D2EZ-J2 closed-circuit cooler (67 tons, 294 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-4D2EZ-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 67 nominal tons (294 kW): rated to cool 201 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection220–367 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-4D3EZ-H2 closed-circuit cooler (62 tons, 272 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-4D3EZ-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 62 nominal tons (272 kW): rated to cool 186 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection204–340 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-5D1EZ-J2 closed-circuit cooler (70 tons, 307 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-5D1EZ-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 70 nominal tons (307 kW): rated to cool 210 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection230–383 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-5D3EZ-G2 closed-circuit cooler (59 tons, 259 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-5D3EZ-G2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 59 nominal tons (259 kW): rated to cool 177 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection194–323 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-6D1DZ-H2 closed-circuit cooler (65 tons, 285 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-6D1DZ-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 65 nominal tons (285 kW): rated to cool 195 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection214–356 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0412N-6D1EZ-J2 closed-circuit cooler (76 tons, 333 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0412N-6D1EZ-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 76 nominal tons (333 kW): rated to cool 228 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection250–416 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-2D3DS-H1 closed-circuit cooler (39 tons, 171 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-2D3DS-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection128–214 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-3D1DS-H1 closed-circuit cooler (50 tons, 219 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D1DS-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 50 nominal tons (219 kW): rated to cool 150 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection164–274 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-3D1DS-J1 closed-circuit cooler (54 tons, 237 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D1DS-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 54 nominal tons (237 kW): rated to cool 162 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection177–296 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-3D1ES-J1 closed-circuit cooler (58 tons, 254 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D1ES-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 58 nominal tons (254 kW): rated to cool 174 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection191–318 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-3D2ES-L1 closed-circuit cooler (69 tons, 302 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 69 nominal tons (302 kW): rated to cool 207 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection227–378 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-3D3ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (74 tons, 324 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D3ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection243–405 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-3D4DS-K1 closed-circuit cooler (61 tons, 267 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D4DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 61 nominal tons (267 kW): rated to cool 183 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection200–334 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-3D4ES-J1 closed-circuit cooler (61 tons, 267 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D4ES-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 61 nominal tons (267 kW): rated to cool 183 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection200–334 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-4D2DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (81 tons, 355 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-4D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 81 nominal tons (355 kW): rated to cool 243 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection266–444 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-4D2ES-K1 closed-circuit cooler (74 tons, 324 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-4D2ES-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection243–405 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-4D3ES-J1 closed-circuit cooler (70 tons, 307 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-4D3ES-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 70 nominal tons (307 kW): rated to cool 210 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection230–383 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-4D4DS-J1 closed-circuit cooler (66 tons, 289 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-4D4DS-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 66 nominal tons (289 kW): rated to cool 198 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection217–361 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-5D1ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (91 tons, 399 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-5D1ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 91 nominal tons (399 kW): rated to cool 273 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection299–498 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-5D2DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (88 tons, 386 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-5D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 88 nominal tons (386 kW): rated to cool 264 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection289–482 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-5D3ES-L1 closed-circuit cooler (88 tons, 386 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-5D3ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 88 nominal tons (386 kW): rated to cool 264 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection289–482 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-5D4DS-K1 closed-circuit cooler (76 tons, 333 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-5D4DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 76 nominal tons (333 kW): rated to cool 228 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection250–416 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-6D1ES-K1 closed-circuit cooler (85 tons, 372 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-6D1ES-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 85 nominal tons (372 kW): rated to cool 255 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection279–466 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-6D1ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (99 tons, 434 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-6D1ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 297 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection325–542 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0709N-6D2ES-L1 closed-circuit cooler (93 tons, 407 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0709N-6D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 93 nominal tons (407 kW): rated to cool 279 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection306–509 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-2D1DS-H2 closed-circuit cooler (91 tons, 399 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D1DS-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 91 nominal tons (399 kW): rated to cool 273 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection299–498 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-2D1DS-J2 closed-circuit cooler (97 tons, 425 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 97 nominal tons (425 kW): rated to cool 291 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection319–531 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-2D3DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (110 tons, 482 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D3DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 110 nominal tons (482 kW): rated to cool 330 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection361–602 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-2D3ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (125 tons, 548 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D3ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 125 nominal tons (548 kW): rated to cool 375 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection411–685 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-2D4ES-J2 closed-circuit cooler (113 tons, 495 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D4ES-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 113 nominal tons (495 kW): rated to cool 339 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection371–619 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-2D4ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (136 tons, 596 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 136 nominal tons (596 kW): rated to cool 408 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection447–745 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-3D1DS-H2 closed-circuit cooler (115 tons, 504 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D1DS-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 115 nominal tons (504 kW): rated to cool 345 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection378–630 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-3D1DS-J2 closed-circuit cooler (124 tons, 543 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 124 nominal tons (543 kW): rated to cool 372 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection407–679 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-3D1ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (153 tons, 675 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D1ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 153 nominal tons (675 kW): rated to cool 462 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection506–843 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-3D2DS-J2 closed-circuit cooler (128 tons, 561 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D2DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 128 nominal tons (561 kW): rated to cool 384 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection421–701 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-3D2DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (136 tons, 596 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 136 nominal tons (596 kW): rated to cool 408 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection447–745 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-3D4DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (164 tons, 723 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 164 nominal tons (723 kW): rated to cool 495 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection542–904 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-4D2DS-J2 closed-circuit cooler (143 tons, 627 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D2DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 143 nominal tons (627 kW): rated to cool 429 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection470–783 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-4D2ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (179 tons, 789 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 179 nominal tons (789 kW): rated to cool 540 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection591–986 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-4D2ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (190 tons, 837 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 190 nominal tons (837 kW): rated to cool 573 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection628–1046 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-4D3DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (153 tons, 675 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D3DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 153 nominal tons (675 kW): rated to cool 462 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection506–843 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-4D4DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (173 tons, 762 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection572–953 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-4D4ES-K2 closed-circuit cooler (166 tons, 732 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D4ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 166 nominal tons (732 kW): rated to cool 501 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection549–915 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-5D1ES-K2 closed-circuit cooler (172 tons, 758 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-5D1ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 172 nominal tons (758 kW): rated to cool 519 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection568–947 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-5D1ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (187 tons, 824 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-5D1ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 187 nominal tons (824 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection618–1030 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-5D1ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (198 tons, 872 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-5D1ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection654–1090 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-5D2ES-K2 closed-circuit cooler (175 tons, 771 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-5D2ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection578–964 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-6D1DS-J2 closed-circuit cooler (158 tons, 697 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-6D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 158 nominal tons (697 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection522–871 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-6D1ES-K2 closed-circuit cooler (182 tons, 802 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-6D1ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 182 nominal tons (802 kW): rated to cool 549 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection601–1002 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-6D1ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (199 tons, 876 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-6D1ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 199 nominal tons (876 kW): rated to cool 600 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection657–1095 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-0718N-6D2ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (213 tons, 938 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-0718N-6D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 213 nominal tons (938 kW): rated to cool 642 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection703–1172 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-2D2DS-J1 closed-circuit cooler (75 tons, 329 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-2D2DS-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 75 nominal tons (329 kW): rated to cool 225 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection246–411 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-2D2ES-L1 closed-circuit cooler (90 tons, 394 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-2D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 90 nominal tons (394 kW): rated to cool 270 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection296–493 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-2D4ES-K1 closed-circuit cooler (88 tons, 386 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-2D4ES-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 88 nominal tons (386 kW): rated to cool 264 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection289–482 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-2D4ES-N1 closed-circuit cooler (106 tons, 464 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-2D4ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 106 nominal tons (464 kW): rated to cool 318 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection348–581 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-3D1DS-L1 closed-circuit cooler (109 tons, 478 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D1DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection358–597 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-3D2DS-K1 closed-circuit cooler (103 tons, 451 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D2DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 103 nominal tons (451 kW): rated to cool 309 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection338–564 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-3D2DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (119 tons, 521 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 119 nominal tons (521 kW): rated to cool 357 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection391–652 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-3D2ES-L1 closed-circuit cooler (121 tons, 530 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 121 nominal tons (530 kW): rated to cool 363 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection398–663 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-3D2ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (129 tons, 565 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D2ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 129 nominal tons (565 kW): rated to cool 387 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection424–706 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-3D2ES-O1 closed-circuit cooler (140 tons, 613 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D2ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 140 nominal tons (613 kW): rated to cool 420 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection460–767 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-3D3DS-N1 closed-circuit cooler (130 tons, 570 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D3DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection427–712 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-3D4DS-L1 closed-circuit cooler (118 tons, 517 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D4DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 118 nominal tons (517 kW): rated to cool 354 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection388–646 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-3D4DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (126 tons, 552 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D4DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 126 nominal tons (552 kW): rated to cool 378 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection414–690 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-3D4ES-O1 closed-circuit cooler (147 tons, 644 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 147 nominal tons (644 kW): rated to cool 441 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection483–805 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-4D1DS-J1 closed-circuit cooler (109 tons, 478 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D1DS-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection358–597 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-4D1DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (134 tons, 587 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D1DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 134 nominal tons (587 kW): rated to cool 402 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection440–734 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-4D1ES-J1 closed-circuit cooler (118 tons, 517 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D1ES-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 118 nominal tons (517 kW): rated to cool 354 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection388–646 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-4D1ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (145 tons, 635 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D1ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 145 nominal tons (635 kW): rated to cool 435 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection476–794 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-4D2ES-N1 closed-circuit cooler (155 tons, 683 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D2ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 155 nominal tons (683 kW): rated to cool 468 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection513–854 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-4D3ES-L1 closed-circuit cooler (142 tons, 622 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D3ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 142 nominal tons (622 kW): rated to cool 426 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection467–778 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-4D3ES-N1 closed-circuit cooler (159 tons, 701 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D3ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 159 nominal tons (701 kW): rated to cool 480 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection526–876 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-4D4ES-O1 closed-circuit cooler (167 tons, 736 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 167 nominal tons (736 kW): rated to cool 504 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection552–920 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-5D2DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (150 tons, 657 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-5D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection493–822 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-5D2DS-N1 closed-circuit cooler (157 tons, 692 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-5D2DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection519–865 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-6D1ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (168 tons, 740 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-6D1ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 168 nominal tons (740 kW): rated to cool 507 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection555–926 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-6D1ES-O1 closed-circuit cooler (185 tons, 815 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1012N-6D1ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 185 nominal tons (815 kW): rated to cool 558 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection611–1019 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-2D2DS-J2 closed-circuit cooler (150 tons, 657 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-2D2DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection493–822 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-2D2ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (178 tons, 784 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-2D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection588–980 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-2D4ES-K2 closed-circuit cooler (175 tons, 771 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-2D4ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection578–964 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-2D4ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (210 tons, 924 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 633 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection693–1156 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D1DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D1DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D2DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (206 tons, 907 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 206 nominal tons (907 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection680–1134 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D2DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (237 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 237 nominal tons (1043 kW): rated to cool 714 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection782–1303 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D2ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (242 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 242 nominal tons (1065 kW): rated to cool 729 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection799–1331 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D2ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (256 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection845–1408 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D2ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection917–1528 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D3DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (259 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D3DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection854–1424 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D4DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (235 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection776–1293 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D4DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (251 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 251 nominal tons (1104 kW): rated to cool 756 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection828–1380 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (293 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 293 nominal tons (1288 kW): rated to cool 882 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection966–1610 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-4D1DS-J2 closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-4D1DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (266 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection877–1462 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-4D1ES-J2 closed-circuit cooler (235 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D1ES-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection776–1293 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-4D1ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (289 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D1ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 289 nominal tons (1271 kW): rated to cool 870 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection953–1588 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-4D2ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (310 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D2ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 310 nominal tons (1363 kW): rated to cool 933 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1022–1703 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-4D3ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (283 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D3ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 283 nominal tons (1244 kW): rated to cool 852 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection933–1555 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-4D3ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (319 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D3ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1052–1753 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-4D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (335 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 335 nominal tons (1472 kW): rated to cool 1008 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1104–1840 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-5D2DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (298 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-5D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection983–1638 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-5D2DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (314 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-5D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1035–1725 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-6D1ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (337 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-6D1ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 337 nominal tons (1481 kW): rated to cool 1014 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1111–1851 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-6D1ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (370 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-6D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 370 nominal tons (1625 kW): rated to cool 1113 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1219–2032 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-2D4DS-K1 closed-circuit cooler (99 tons, 434 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-2D4DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 297 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection325–542 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-2D4ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (120 tons, 526 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-2D4ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 120 nominal tons (526 kW): rated to cool 360 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection394–657 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-2D4ES-N1 closed-circuit cooler (125 tons, 548 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-2D4ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 125 nominal tons (548 kW): rated to cool 375 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection411–685 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-2D4ES-O1 closed-circuit cooler (130 tons, 570 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-2D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection427–712 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D1DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (136 tons, 596 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D1DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 136 nominal tons (596 kW): rated to cool 408 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection447–745 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D1DS-N1 closed-circuit cooler (143 tons, 627 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D1DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 143 nominal tons (627 kW): rated to cool 429 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection470–783 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D1DS-P1 closed-circuit cooler (156 tons, 688 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D1DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 156 nominal tons (688 kW): rated to cool 471 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection516–860 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D2DS-K1 closed-circuit cooler (123 tons, 539 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 123 nominal tons (539 kW): rated to cool 369 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection404–674 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D2DS-L1 closed-circuit cooler (133 tons, 583 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 133 nominal tons (583 kW): rated to cool 399 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection437–728 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D2DS-N1 closed-circuit cooler (148 tons, 648 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 148 nominal tons (648 kW): rated to cool 444 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection486–811 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D2DS-O1 closed-circuit cooler (153 tons, 675 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 153 nominal tons (675 kW): rated to cool 462 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection506–843 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D2ES-L1 closed-circuit cooler (144 tons, 631 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 144 nominal tons (631 kW): rated to cool 432 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection473–789 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D2ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (152 tons, 670 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 152 nominal tons (670 kW): rated to cool 459 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection503–838 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D3ES-N1 closed-circuit cooler (161 tons, 710 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D3ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 161 nominal tons (710 kW): rated to cool 486 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection532–887 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D4DS-L1 closed-circuit cooler (138 tons, 605 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D4DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 138 nominal tons (605 kW): rated to cool 414 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection453–756 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D4ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (157 tons, 692 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D4ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection519–865 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D4ES-O1 closed-circuit cooler (172 tons, 758 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 172 nominal tons (758 kW): rated to cool 519 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection568–947 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D4ES-P1 closed-circuit cooler (183 tons, 806 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D4ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 183 nominal tons (806 kW): rated to cool 552 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection605–1008 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-4D2DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (161 tons, 710 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 161 nominal tons (710 kW): rated to cool 486 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection532–887 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-4D2DS-N1 closed-circuit cooler (170 tons, 749 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D2DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection562–937 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-4D2ES-P1 closed-circuit cooler (202 tons, 889 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D2ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection667–1112 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-4D3DS-P1 closed-circuit cooler (193 tons, 850 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D3DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 193 nominal tons (850 kW): rated to cool 582 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection637–1062 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-4D3ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (175 tons, 771 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D3ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection578–964 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-4D4ES-N1 closed-circuit cooler (187 tons, 824 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D4ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 187 nominal tons (824 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection618–1030 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-5D1DS-O1 closed-circuit cooler (187 tons, 824 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-5D1DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 187 nominal tons (824 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection618–1030 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-5D2ES-N1 closed-circuit cooler (198 tons, 872 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-5D2ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection654–1090 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-5D4DS-O1 closed-circuit cooler (196 tons, 863 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-5D4DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection647–1079 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-5D4ES-O1 closed-circuit cooler (208 tons, 916 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-5D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection687–1145 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-5D4ES-P1 closed-circuit cooler (222 tons, 977 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-5D4ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 222 nominal tons (977 kW): rated to cool 669 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection733–1221 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-6D1DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (184 tons, 811 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-6D1DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection608–1013 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-6D1ES-O1 closed-circuit cooler (217 tons, 955 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-6D1ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 217 nominal tons (955 kW): rated to cool 654 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection716–1194 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-6D1ES-P1 closed-circuit cooler (231 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-6D1ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 231 nominal tons (1016 kW): rated to cool 696 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection762–1271 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-2D1DS-N1 closed-circuit cooler (165 tons, 727 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D1DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 165 nominal tons (727 kW): rated to cool 498 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection545–909 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-2D2DS-N1 closed-circuit cooler (171 tons, 754 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D2DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 171 nominal tons (754 kW): rated to cool 516 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection565–942 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-2D2DS-O1 closed-circuit cooler (177 tons, 780 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D2DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 177 nominal tons (780 kW): rated to cool 534 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection585–975 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-2D2ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (176 tons, 776 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D2ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 176 nominal tons (776 kW): rated to cool 531 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection582–969 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-2D3DS-K1 closed-circuit cooler (148 tons, 648 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D3DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 148 nominal tons (648 kW): rated to cool 444 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection486–811 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-2D4DS-P1 closed-circuit cooler (201 tons, 885 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D4DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection664–1106 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-2D4ES-K1 closed-circuit cooler (159 tons, 701 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D4ES-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 159 nominal tons (701 kW): rated to cool 480 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection526–876 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-2D4ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (184 tons, 811 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D4ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection608–1013 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-2D4ES-N1 closed-circuit cooler (193 tons, 850 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D4ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 193 nominal tons (850 kW): rated to cool 582 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection637–1062 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-2D4ES-P1 closed-circuit cooler (212 tons, 933 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D4ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 212 nominal tons (933 kW): rated to cool 639 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection700–1167 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D1DS-L1 closed-circuit cooler (191 tons, 841 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D1DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 191 nominal tons (841 kW): rated to cool 576 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection631–1052 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D1DS-O1 closed-circuit cooler (219 tons, 964 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D1DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection723–1205 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D1ES-R1 closed-circuit cooler (271 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D1ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection894–1490 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D2DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (208 tons, 916 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection687–1145 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D2DS-P1 closed-circuit cooler (240 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D2DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 240 nominal tons (1056 kW): rated to cool 723 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection792–1320 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D2DS-Q1 closed-circuit cooler (252 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D2DS-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 252 nominal tons (1108 kW): rated to cool 759 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection831–1386 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D2ES-P1 closed-circuit cooler (260 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D2ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 260 nominal tons (1144 kW): rated to cool 783 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection858–1429 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D2ES-R1 closed-circuit cooler (281 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D2ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 281 nominal tons (1236 kW): rated to cool 846 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection927–1544 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D3DS-L1 closed-circuit cooler (198 tons, 872 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D3DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection654–1090 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D3DS-Q1 closed-circuit cooler (259 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D3DS-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection854–1424 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D3ES-O1 closed-circuit cooler (248 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D3ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 248 nominal tons (1091 kW): rated to cool 747 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection818–1364 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D4DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (215 tons, 946 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 215 nominal tons (946 kW): rated to cool 648 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection710–1183 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D4DS-N1 closed-circuit cooler (227 tons, 999 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 227 nominal tons (999 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection749–1249 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D4DS-P1 closed-circuit cooler (254 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 254 nominal tons (1117 kW): rated to cool 765 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection838–1397 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D4DS-Q1 closed-circuit cooler (268 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4DS-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 268 nominal tons (1179 kW): rated to cool 807 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection884–1473 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D4ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (232 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 232 nominal tons (1021 kW): rated to cool 699 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection766–1276 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-3D4ES-R1 closed-circuit cooler (296 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection976–1627 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D1ES-O1 closed-circuit cooler (271 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D1ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection894–1490 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D2ES-Q1 closed-circuit cooler (308 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D2ES-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 308 nominal tons (1354 kW): rated to cool 927 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1015–1692 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D2ES-R1 closed-circuit cooler (321 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D2ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 321 nominal tons (1411 kW): rated to cool 966 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1058–1764 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D3DS-P1 closed-circuit cooler (277 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D3DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 277 nominal tons (1218 kW): rated to cool 834 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection914–1523 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D3ES-P1 closed-circuit cooler (296 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D3ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection976–1627 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D3ES-Q1 closed-circuit cooler (312 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D3ES-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 312 nominal tons (1371 kW): rated to cool 939 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1029–1714 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D4DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (237 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 237 nominal tons (1043 kW): rated to cool 714 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection782–1303 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D4DS-O1 closed-circuit cooler (264 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 264 nominal tons (1161 kW): rated to cool 795 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection871–1451 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D4DS-P1 closed-circuit cooler (285 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 285 nominal tons (1253 kW): rated to cool 858 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection940–1566 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D4ES-Q1 closed-circuit cooler (318 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4ES-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1048–1747 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-4D4ES-R1 closed-circuit cooler (333 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 333 nominal tons (1463 kW): rated to cool 1002 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1098–1829 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-5D2ES-Q1 closed-circuit cooler (329 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-5D2ES-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 329 nominal tons (1446 kW): rated to cool 990 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1084–1807 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-6D1ES-R1 closed-circuit cooler (359 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-6D1ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 359 nominal tons (1577 kW): rated to cool 1080 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1183–1972 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1218N-6D3ES-R1 closed-circuit cooler (351 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1218N-6D3ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1157–1928 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-2D4DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (198 tons, 872 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection654–1090 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-2D4ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (238 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection785–1309 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-2D4ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (249 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 249 nominal tons (1095 kW): rated to cool 750 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection822–1369 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-2D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (259 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection854–1424 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D1DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (271 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection894–1490 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D1DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (284 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D1DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection937–1561 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D1DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (313 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D1DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 313 nominal tons (1376 kW): rated to cool 942 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1032–1720 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D2DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (245 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 245 nominal tons (1078 kW): rated to cool 738 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection808–1347 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D2DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (265 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection874–1457 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D2DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (295 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 295 nominal tons (1297 kW): rated to cool 888 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection973–1621 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D2DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (306 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1009–1681 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D2ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (287 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1262 kW): rated to cool 864 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection946–1577 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D2ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (304 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1002–1670 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D3ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (323 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D3ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1065–1774 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D4DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (276 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection910–1517 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D4ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (315 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1038–1731 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (345 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1137–1895 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-3D4ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (368 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 368 nominal tons (1617 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1213–2021 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-4D2DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (323 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1065–1774 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-4D2DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (340 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 340 nominal tons (1494 kW): rated to cool 1023 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1121–1868 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-4D2ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (406 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D2ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 406 nominal tons (1783 kW): rated to cool 1221 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1337–2229 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-4D3DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (388 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D3DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1278–2130 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-4D3ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (351 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D3ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1157–1928 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-4D4ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (375 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1236–2059 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-5D1DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (375 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-5D1DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1236–2059 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-5D2ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (396 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-5D2ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1739 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1305–2174 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-5D4DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (394 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-5D4DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 394 nominal tons (1731 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1298–2163 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-5D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (418 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-5D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 418 nominal tons (1836 kW): rated to cool 1257 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1377–2295 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-5D4ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (446 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-5D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 446 nominal tons (1958 kW): rated to cool 1341 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1469–2448 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-6D1DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (369 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-6D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1216–2026 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-6D1ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (434 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-6D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 434 nominal tons (1906 kW): rated to cool 1305 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1429–2382 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1224N-6D1ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (462 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1224N-6D1ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 462 nominal tons (2033 kW): rated to cool 1392 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1525–2541 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-2D1DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (331 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D1DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 331 nominal tons (1455 kW): rated to cool 996 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1091–1818 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-2D2DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (343 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1130–1884 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-2D2DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (356 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D2DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 356 nominal tons (1564 kW): rated to cool 1071 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1173–1955 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-2D2ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (353 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 353 nominal tons (1551 kW): rated to cool 1062 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1163–1939 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-2D3DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (296 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D3DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection976–1627 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-2D4DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (402 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1766 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1324–2207 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-2D4ES-K2 closed-circuit cooler (319 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D4ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1052–1753 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-2D4ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (369 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1216–2026 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-2D4ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (387 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1275–2125 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-2D4ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (424 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1397–2328 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D1DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (384 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D1DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1265–2109 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D1DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (438 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D1DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 438 nominal tons (1923 kW): rated to cool 1317 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1443–2404 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D1ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (543 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D1ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1791–2985 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D2DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (481 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D2DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 481 nominal tons (2116 kW): rated to cool 1449 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1587–2645 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D2DS-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (504 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D2DS-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 144.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1663–2771 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D2ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (520 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D2ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 520 nominal tons (2287 kW): rated to cool 1566 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1715–2859 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D2ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (562 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D2ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 562 nominal tons (2471 kW): rated to cool 1692 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 147.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1853–3089 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D3DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (396 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D3DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1739 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 94.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1305–2174 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D3ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (496 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D3ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 496 nominal tons (2182 kW): rated to cool 1494 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1636–2727 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D4DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (432 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 432 nominal tons (1897 kW): rated to cool 1299 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1423–2371 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D4DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (454 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 454 nominal tons (1998 kW): rated to cool 1368 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1498–2497 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D4DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (509 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 509 nominal tons (2239 kW): rated to cool 1533 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1679–2799 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D4DS-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (535 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4DS-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 535 nominal tons (2353 kW): rated to cool 1611 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1765–2941 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D4ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (463 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 463 nominal tons (2037 kW): rated to cool 1395 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1528–2547 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-3D4ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (592 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 592 nominal tons (2603 kW): rated to cool 1782 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 138.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1952–3253 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-4D1ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (541 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 541 nominal tons (2379 kW): rated to cool 1629 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 117.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1784–2974 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-4D2ES-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (616 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D2ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 133.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2031–3385 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-4D2ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (641 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D2ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 641 nominal tons (2817 kW): rated to cool 1929 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 140.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2113–3522 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-4D3DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (553 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D3DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 553 nominal tons (2432 kW): rated to cool 1665 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1824–3040 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-4D3ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (592 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D3ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 592 nominal tons (2603 kW): rated to cool 1782 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1952–3253 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-4D3ES-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (623 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D3ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2054–3423 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-4D4DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (475 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 475 nominal tons (2090 kW): rated to cool 1431 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1567–2612 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-4D4DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (569 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 569 nominal tons (2502 kW): rated to cool 1713 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1876–3127 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-4D4ES-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (637 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D4ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 637 nominal tons (2800 kW): rated to cool 1917 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2100–3500 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-4D4ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (666 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D4ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 666 nominal tons (2927 kW): rated to cool 2004 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2195–3658 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-5D2ES-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (658 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-5D2ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1980 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2169–3615 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-6D1ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (719 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-6D1ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 719 nominal tons (3159 kW): rated to cool 2163 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2369–3949 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1236N-6D3ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (703 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1236N-6D3ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3089 kW): rated to cool 2115 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2317–3861 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-2D2DS-J2 closed-circuit cooler (150 tons, 657 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-2D2DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection493–822 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-2D2ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (178 tons, 784 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-2D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection588–980 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-2D4ES-K2 closed-circuit cooler (175 tons, 771 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-2D4ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection578–964 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-2D4ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (210 tons, 924 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 633 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection693–1156 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-3D1DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D1DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-3D2DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (206 tons, 907 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 206 nominal tons (907 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection680–1134 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-3D2DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (237 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 237 nominal tons (1043 kW): rated to cool 714 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection782–1303 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-3D2ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (242 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 242 nominal tons (1065 kW): rated to cool 729 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection799–1331 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-3D2ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (256 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection845–1408 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-3D2ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D2ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection917–1528 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-3D3DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (259 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D3DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection854–1424 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-3D4DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (235 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection776–1293 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-3D4DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (251 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 251 nominal tons (1104 kW): rated to cool 756 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection828–1380 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-3D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (293 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 293 nominal tons (1288 kW): rated to cool 882 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection966–1610 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-4D1DS-J2 closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-4D1DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (266 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection877–1462 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-4D1ES-J2 closed-circuit cooler (235 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D1ES-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection776–1293 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-4D1ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (289 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D1ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 289 nominal tons (1271 kW): rated to cool 870 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection953–1588 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-4D2ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (310 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D2ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 310 nominal tons (1363 kW): rated to cool 933 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1022–1703 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-4D3ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (283 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D3ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 283 nominal tons (1244 kW): rated to cool 852 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection933–1555 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-4D3ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (319 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D3ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1052–1753 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-4D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (335 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 335 nominal tons (1472 kW): rated to cool 1008 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1104–1840 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-5D2DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (298 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-5D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection983–1638 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-5D2DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (314 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-5D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1035–1725 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-6D1ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (337 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-6D1ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 337 nominal tons (1481 kW): rated to cool 1014 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1111–1851 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2012N-6D1ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (370 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2012N-6D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 370 nominal tons (1625 kW): rated to cool 1113 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1219–2032 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-2D4DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (198 tons, 872 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-2D4DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection654–1090 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-2D4ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (238 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection785–1309 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-2D4ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (249 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 249 nominal tons (1095 kW): rated to cool 750 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection822–1369 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-2D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (259 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-2D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection854–1424 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D1DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (271 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection894–1490 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D1DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (284 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D1DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection937–1561 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D1DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (313 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D1DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 313 nominal tons (1376 kW): rated to cool 942 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1032–1720 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D2DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (245 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 245 nominal tons (1078 kW): rated to cool 738 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection808–1347 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D2DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (265 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection874–1457 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D2DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (295 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 295 nominal tons (1297 kW): rated to cool 888 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection973–1621 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D2DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (306 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1009–1681 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D2ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (287 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1262 kW): rated to cool 864 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection946–1577 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D2ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (304 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1002–1670 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D3ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (323 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D3ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1065–1774 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D4DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (276 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection910–1517 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D4ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (315 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1038–1731 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (345 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1137–1895 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-3D4ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (368 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 368 nominal tons (1617 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1213–2021 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-4D2DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (323 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1065–1774 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-4D2DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (340 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 340 nominal tons (1494 kW): rated to cool 1023 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1121–1868 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-4D2ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (406 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D2ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 406 nominal tons (1783 kW): rated to cool 1221 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1337–2229 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-4D3DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (388 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D3DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1278–2130 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-4D3ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (351 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D3ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1157–1928 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-4D4ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (375 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1236–2059 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-5D1DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (375 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-5D1DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1236–2059 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-5D2ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (396 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-5D2ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1739 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1305–2174 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-5D4DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (394 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-5D4DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 394 nominal tons (1731 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1298–2163 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-5D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (418 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-5D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 418 nominal tons (1836 kW): rated to cool 1257 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1377–2295 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-5D4ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (446 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-5D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 446 nominal tons (1958 kW): rated to cool 1341 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1469–2448 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-6D1DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (369 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-6D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1216–2026 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-6D1ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (434 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-6D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 434 nominal tons (1906 kW): rated to cool 1305 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1429–2382 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2412N-6D1ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (462 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2412N-6D1ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 462 nominal tons (2033 kW): rated to cool 1392 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1525–2541 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-2D1DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (331 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D1DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 331 nominal tons (1455 kW): rated to cool 996 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1091–1818 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-2D2DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (343 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1130–1884 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-2D2DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (356 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D2DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 356 nominal tons (1564 kW): rated to cool 1071 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1173–1955 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-2D2ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (353 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 353 nominal tons (1551 kW): rated to cool 1062 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1163–1939 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-2D3DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (296 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D3DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection976–1627 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-2D4DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (402 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1766 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1324–2207 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-2D4ES-K2 closed-circuit cooler (319 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D4ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1052–1753 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-2D4ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (369 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1216–2026 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-2D4ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (387 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1275–2125 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-2D4ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (424 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1397–2328 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D1DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (384 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D1DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1265–2109 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D1DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (438 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D1DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 438 nominal tons (1923 kW): rated to cool 1317 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1443–2404 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D1ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (543 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D1ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1791–2985 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D2DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (416 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 416 nominal tons (1827 kW): rated to cool 1251 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1370–2284 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D2DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (481 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D2DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 481 nominal tons (2116 kW): rated to cool 1449 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1587–2645 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D2DS-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (504 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D2DS-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 144.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1663–2771 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D2ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (520 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D2ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 520 nominal tons (2287 kW): rated to cool 1566 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1715–2859 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D2ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (562 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D2ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 562 nominal tons (2471 kW): rated to cool 1692 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 147.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1853–3089 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D3DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (396 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D3DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1739 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 94.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1305–2174 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D3ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (496 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D3ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 496 nominal tons (2182 kW): rated to cool 1494 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1636–2727 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D4DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (432 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 432 nominal tons (1897 kW): rated to cool 1299 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1423–2371 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D4DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (454 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 454 nominal tons (1998 kW): rated to cool 1368 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1498–2497 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D4DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (509 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 509 nominal tons (2239 kW): rated to cool 1533 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1679–2799 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D4DS-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (535 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4DS-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 535 nominal tons (2353 kW): rated to cool 1611 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1765–2941 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D4ES-M2 closed-circuit cooler (463 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 463 nominal tons (2037 kW): rated to cool 1395 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1528–2547 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-3D4ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (592 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 592 nominal tons (2603 kW): rated to cool 1782 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 138.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1952–3253 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D1ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (541 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 541 nominal tons (2379 kW): rated to cool 1629 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 117.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1784–2974 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D2ES-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (616 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D2ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 133.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2031–3385 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D2ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (641 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D2ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 641 nominal tons (2817 kW): rated to cool 1929 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 140.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2113–3522 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D3DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (553 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D3DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 553 nominal tons (2432 kW): rated to cool 1665 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1824–3040 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D3ES-P2 closed-circuit cooler (592 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D3ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 592 nominal tons (2603 kW): rated to cool 1782 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1952–3253 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D3ES-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (623 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D3ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2054–3423 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D4DS-M2 closed-circuit cooler (475 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 475 nominal tons (2090 kW): rated to cool 1431 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1567–2612 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D4DS-O2 closed-circuit cooler (527 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D4DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 527 nominal tons (2318 kW): rated to cool 1587 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1738–2897 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D4DS-P2 closed-circuit cooler (569 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 569 nominal tons (2502 kW): rated to cool 1713 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1876–3127 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D4ES-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (637 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D4ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 637 nominal tons (2800 kW): rated to cool 1917 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2100–3500 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-4D4ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (666 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D4ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 666 nominal tons (2927 kW): rated to cool 2004 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2195–3658 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-5D2ES-Q2 closed-circuit cooler (658 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-5D2ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1980 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2169–3615 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-6D1ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (719 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-6D1ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 719 nominal tons (3159 kW): rated to cool 2163 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2369–3949 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-2418N-6D3ES-R2 closed-circuit cooler (703 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-2418N-6D3ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3089 kW): rated to cool 2115 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2317–3861 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0412A-1H cooling tower (122 tons, 535 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0412A-1H — a PT2 cooling tower, 122 nominal tons (535 kW): rated to cool 366 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection401–668 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0412A-2J cooling tower (153 tons, 675 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0412A-2J — a PT2 cooling tower, 153 nominal tons (675 kW): rated to cool 462 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection506–843 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0412A-3J cooling tower (157 tons, 692 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0412A-3J — a PT2 cooling tower, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection519–865 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0412A-4J cooling tower (163 tons, 719 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0412A-4J — a PT2 cooling tower, 163 nominal tons (719 kW): rated to cool 492 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection539–898 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0709A-1K cooling tower (158 tons, 697 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0709A-1K — a PT2 cooling tower, 158 nominal tons (697 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection522–871 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0709A-2L cooling tower (198 tons, 872 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0709A-2L — a PT2 cooling tower, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection654–1090 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0709A-3L cooling tower (209 tons, 920 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0709A-3L — a PT2 cooling tower, 209 nominal tons (920 kW): rated to cool 630 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection690–1150 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0709A-4L cooling tower (213 tons, 938 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0709A-4L — a PT2 cooling tower, 213 nominal tons (938 kW): rated to cool 642 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection703–1172 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0709A-5L cooling tower (222 tons, 977 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0709A-5L — a PT2 cooling tower, 222 nominal tons (977 kW): rated to cool 669 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection733–1221 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0809A-1L cooling tower (197 tons, 868 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0809A-1L — a PT2 cooling tower, 197 nominal tons (868 kW): rated to cool 594 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection651–1084 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0809A-2L cooling tower (223 tons, 981 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0809A-2L — a PT2 cooling tower, 223 nominal tons (981 kW): rated to cool 672 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection736–1227 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0809A-3M cooling tower (257 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0809A-3M — a PT2 cooling tower, 257 nominal tons (1130 kW): rated to cool 774 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection848–1413 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0809A-4M cooling tower (263 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0809A-4M — a PT2 cooling tower, 263 nominal tons (1157 kW): rated to cool 792 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection868–1446 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0809A-5M cooling tower (271 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0809A-5M — a PT2 cooling tower, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection894–1490 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0812A-1M cooling tower (273 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0812A-1M — a PT2 cooling tower, 273 nominal tons (1200 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection900–1501 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0812A-2N cooling tower (325 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0812A-2N — a PT2 cooling tower, 325 nominal tons (1428 kW): rated to cool 978 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1071–1785 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0812A-3O cooling tower (361 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0812A-3O — a PT2 cooling tower, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1190–1983 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0812A-4O cooling tower (368 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0812A-4O — a PT2 cooling tower, 368 nominal tons (1617 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1213–2021 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0812A-5O cooling tower (379 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0812A-5O — a PT2 cooling tower, 379 nominal tons (1665 kW): rated to cool 1140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1249–2081 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0814A-1N cooling tower (320 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0814A-1N — a PT2 cooling tower, 320 nominal tons (1406 kW): rated to cool 963 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1055–1758 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0814A-2O cooling tower (379 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0814A-2O — a PT2 cooling tower, 379 nominal tons (1665 kW): rated to cool 1140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1249–2081 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0814A-3O cooling tower (400 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0814A-3O — a PT2 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1318–2196 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0814A-4O cooling tower (410 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0814A-4O — a PT2 cooling tower, 410 nominal tons (1801 kW): rated to cool 1233 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1351–2251 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-0814A-5O cooling tower (422 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-0814A-5O — a PT2 cooling tower, 422 nominal tons (1853 kW): rated to cool 1269 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1390–2317 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1009A-1L cooling tower (224 tons, 986 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1009A-1L — a PT2 cooling tower, 224 nominal tons (986 kW): rated to cool 675 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection739–1232 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1009A-2M cooling tower (270 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1009A-2M — a PT2 cooling tower, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection891–1484 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1009A-3N cooling tower (300 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1009A-3N — a PT2 cooling tower, 300 nominal tons (1319 kW): rated to cool 903 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection989–1648 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1009A-4N cooling tower (306 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1009A-4N — a PT2 cooling tower, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1009–1681 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1009A-5N cooling tower (318 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1009A-5N — a PT2 cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1048–1747 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1012A-1O cooling tower (332 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1012A-1O — a PT2 cooling tower, 332 nominal tons (1459 kW): rated to cool 999 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1094–1824 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1012A-2O cooling tower (367 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1012A-2O — a PT2 cooling tower, 367 nominal tons (1612 kW): rated to cool 1104 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1209–2015 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1012A-3P cooling tower (424 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1012A-3P — a PT2 cooling tower, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1397–2328 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1012A-4P cooling tower (432 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1012A-4P — a PT2 cooling tower, 432 nominal tons (1897 kW): rated to cool 1299 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1423–2371 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1012A-5P cooling tower (449 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1012A-5P — a PT2 cooling tower, 449 nominal tons (1972 kW): rated to cool 1350 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1479–2465 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1212A-1O cooling tower (381 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1212A-1O — a PT2 cooling tower, 381 nominal tons (1674 kW): rated to cool 1146 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1255–2092 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1212A-2O cooling tower (435 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1212A-2O — a PT2 cooling tower, 435 nominal tons (1910 kW): rated to cool 1308 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1433–2388 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1212A-3P cooling tower (500 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1212A-3P — a PT2 cooling tower, 500 nominal tons (2199 kW): rated to cool 1506 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1650–2749 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1212A-4P cooling tower (510 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1212A-4P — a PT2 cooling tower, 510 nominal tons (2243 kW): rated to cool 1536 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1682–2804 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1212A-5P cooling tower (531 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1212A-5P — a PT2 cooling tower, 531 nominal tons (2335 kW): rated to cool 1599 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1751–2919 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1214A-1O cooling tower (421 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1214A-1O — a PT2 cooling tower, 421 nominal tons (1849 kW): rated to cool 1266 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1387–2311 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1214A-2P cooling tower (518 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1214A-2P — a PT2 cooling tower, 518 nominal tons (2278 kW): rated to cool 1560 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1709–2848 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1214A-3P cooling tower (555 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1214A-3P — a PT2 cooling tower, 555 nominal tons (2440 kW): rated to cool 1671 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1830–3051 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1214A-4P cooling tower (567 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1214A-4P — a PT2 cooling tower, 567 nominal tons (2493 kW): rated to cool 1707 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1870–3116 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1214A-5P cooling tower (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1214A-5P — a PT2 cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1922–3204 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1218A-1P cooling tower (548 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1218A-1P — a PT2 cooling tower, 548 nominal tons (2410 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1807–3012 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PT2-1218A-2Q cooling tower (672 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) ✓
BAC's PT2-1218A-2Q — a PT2 cooling tower, 672 nominal tons (2953 kW): rated to cool 2022 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2215–3691 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-07JN cooling tower (281 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-07JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 281 nominal tons (1236 kW): rated to cool 846 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection927–1544 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-07JN-2 cooling tower (562 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-07JN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 562 nominal tons (2471 kW): rated to cool 1692 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1853–3089 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-07KN cooling tower (308 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-07KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 308 nominal tons (1354 kW): rated to cool 927 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1015–1692 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-07KN-2 cooling tower (616 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-07KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2031–3385 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-07LC cooling tower (331 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-07LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 331 nominal tons (1455 kW): rated to cool 996 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1091–1818 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-07LC-2 cooling tower (662 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-07LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 662 nominal tons (2909 kW): rated to cool 1992 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2182–3637 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-09JN cooling tower (327 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-09JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 327 nominal tons (1437 kW): rated to cool 984 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1078–1796 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-09JN-2 cooling tower (654 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-09JN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 654 nominal tons (2874 kW): rated to cool 1968 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2156–3593 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-09KN cooling tower (357 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-09KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1176–1961 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-09KN-2 cooling tower (714 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-09KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 714 nominal tons (3137 kW): rated to cool 2148 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2353–3921 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-09LC cooling tower (382 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-09LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 382 nominal tons (1678 kW): rated to cool 1149 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1259–2098 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-09LC-2 cooling tower (763 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-09LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 763 nominal tons (3356 kW): rated to cool 2298 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2517–4195 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-09LN cooling tower (400 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-09LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1318–2196 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-09LN-2 cooling tower (799 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-09LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 799 nominal tons (3514 kW): rated to cool 2406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2635–4392 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-10KN cooling tower (375 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-10KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1236–2059 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-10KN-2 cooling tower (749 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-10KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 749 nominal tons (3295 kW): rated to cool 2256 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2471–4118 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-10LC cooling tower (401 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-10LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1206 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1321–2202 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-10LC-2 cooling tower (801 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-10LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 801 nominal tons (3523 kW): rated to cool 2412 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2642–4403 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-10LN cooling tower (420 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-10LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 420 nominal tons (1845 kW): rated to cool 1263 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1383–2306 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-10LN-2 cooling tower (839 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-10LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 839 nominal tons (3689 kW): rated to cool 2526 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2767–4611 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-10MN cooling tower (457 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-10MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 457 nominal tons (2011 kW): rated to cool 1377 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1508–2514 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-10MN-2 cooling tower (915 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-10MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 915 nominal tons (4022 kW): rated to cool 2754 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3017–5028 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-11KN cooling tower (386 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-11KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 386 nominal tons (1696 kW): rated to cool 1161 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1272–2119 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-11KN-2 cooling tower (771 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-11KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 771 nominal tons (3391 kW): rated to cool 2322 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2543–4239 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-11LC cooling tower (413 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-11LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 413 nominal tons (1814 kW): rated to cool 1242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1360–2267 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-11LC-2 cooling tower (825 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-11LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 825 nominal tons (3628 kW): rated to cool 2484 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2721–4535 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-11LN cooling tower (433 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-11LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 433 nominal tons (1902 kW): rated to cool 1302 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1426–2377 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-11LN-2 cooling tower (865 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-11LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 865 nominal tons (3803 kW): rated to cool 2604 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2852–4754 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-11MN cooling tower (476 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-11MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 476 nominal tons (2094 kW): rated to cool 1434 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1571–2618 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-11MN-2 cooling tower (953 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-11MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 953 nominal tons (4189 kW): rated to cool 2868 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3141–5236 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-12KN cooling tower (400 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-12KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1318–2196 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-12KN-2 cooling tower (799 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-12KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 799 nominal tons (3514 kW): rated to cool 2406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2635–4392 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-12LC cooling tower (428 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-12LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 428 nominal tons (1880 kW): rated to cool 1287 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1410–2350 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-12LC-2 cooling tower (855 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-12LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 855 nominal tons (3759 kW): rated to cool 2574 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2819–4699 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-12LN cooling tower (448 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-12LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 448 nominal tons (1967 kW): rated to cool 1347 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1475–2459 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-12LN-2 cooling tower (895 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-12LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 895 nominal tons (3934 kW): rated to cool 2694 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2951–4918 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-12MN cooling tower (493 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-12MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 493 nominal tons (2169 kW): rated to cool 1485 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1627–2711 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1212-12MN-2 cooling tower (987 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1212-12MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 987 nominal tons (4338 kW): rated to cool 2970 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3253–5422 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-07JN cooling tower (426 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-07JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 426 nominal tons (1871 kW): rated to cool 1281 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1403–2339 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-07JN-2 cooling tower (851 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-07JN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 851 nominal tons (3742 kW): rated to cool 2562 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 94.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2806–4677 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-07KN cooling tower (464 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-07KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 464 nominal tons (2042 kW): rated to cool 1398 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1531–2552 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-07KN-2 cooling tower (929 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-07KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 929 nominal tons (4083 kW): rated to cool 2796 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3063–5104 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-07LC cooling tower (499 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-07LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 499 nominal tons (2195 kW): rated to cool 1503 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1646–2744 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-07LC-2 cooling tower (999 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-07LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 999 nominal tons (4390 kW): rated to cool 3006 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3293–5488 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-09JN cooling tower (488 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-09JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 488 nominal tons (2147 kW): rated to cool 1470 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1610–2684 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-09JN-2 cooling tower (977 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-09JN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 977 nominal tons (4294 kW): rated to cool 2940 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3220–5367 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-09KN cooling tower (533 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-09KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 533 nominal tons (2344 kW): rated to cool 1605 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1758–2930 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-09KN-2 cooling tower (1066 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-09KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1066 nominal tons (4688 kW): rated to cool 3210 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3516–5860 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-09LC cooling tower (570 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-09LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 570 nominal tons (2506 kW): rated to cool 1716 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1880–3133 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-09LC-2 cooling tower (1140 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-09LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1140 nominal tons (5012 kW): rated to cool 3432 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3759–6265 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-09LN cooling tower (604 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-09LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 604 nominal tons (2655 kW): rated to cool 1818 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1991–3319 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-09LN-2 cooling tower (1208 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-09LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1208 nominal tons (5310 kW): rated to cool 3636 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3983–6638 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-10KN cooling tower (559 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-10KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 559 nominal tons (2458 kW): rated to cool 1683 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1843–3072 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-10KN-2 cooling tower (1118 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-10KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1118 nominal tons (4916 kW): rated to cool 3366 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3687–6145 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-10LC cooling tower (598 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-10LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 598 nominal tons (2629 kW): rated to cool 1800 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1972–3286 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-10LC-2 cooling tower (1196 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-10LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1196 nominal tons (5258 kW): rated to cool 3600 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 128.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3943–6572 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-10LN cooling tower (627 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-10LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 627 nominal tons (2756 kW): rated to cool 1887 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2067–3445 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-10LN-2 cooling tower (1254 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-10LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1254 nominal tons (5512 kW): rated to cool 3774 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4134–6890 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-10MN cooling tower (692 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-10MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 692 nominal tons (3041 kW): rated to cool 2082 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2281–3801 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-10MN-2 cooling tower (1383 tons, 6.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-10MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1383 nominal tons (6081 kW): rated to cool 4164 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 147.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4561–7602 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-11KN cooling tower (582 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-11KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 582 nominal tons (2559 kW): rated to cool 1752 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1919–3198 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-11KN-2 cooling tower (1164 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-11KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1164 nominal tons (5117 kW): rated to cool 3504 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3838–6397 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-11LC cooling tower (623 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-11LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2054–3423 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-11LC-2 cooling tower (1246 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-11LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1246 nominal tons (5477 kW): rated to cool 3750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 133.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4108–6846 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-11LN cooling tower (653 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-11LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 653 nominal tons (2870 kW): rated to cool 1965 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2152–3587 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-11LN-2 cooling tower (1306 tons, 5.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-11LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1306 nominal tons (5740 kW): rated to cool 3930 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 140.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4305–7175 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-11MN cooling tower (720 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-11MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 720 nominal tons (3163 kW): rated to cool 2166 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2373–3954 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-11MN-2 cooling tower (1439 tons, 6.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-11MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1439 nominal tons (6327 kW): rated to cool 4332 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4745–7908 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-12KN cooling tower (603 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-12KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 603 nominal tons (2651 kW): rated to cool 1815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1988–3313 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-12KN-2 cooling tower (1206 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-12KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1206 nominal tons (5301 kW): rated to cool 3630 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 128.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3976–6627 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-12LC cooling tower (645 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-12LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 645 nominal tons (2835 kW): rated to cool 1941 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2126–3543 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-12LC-2 cooling tower (1290 tons, 5.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-12LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1290 nominal tons (5670 kW): rated to cool 3882 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 137.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4252–7087 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-12LN cooling tower (676 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-12LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 676 nominal tons (2971 kW): rated to cool 2034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2228–3713 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-12LN-2 cooling tower (1351 tons, 5.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-12LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1351 nominal tons (5941 kW): rated to cool 4068 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 144.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4456–7426 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-12MN cooling tower (745 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-12MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 745 nominal tons (3273 kW): rated to cool 2241 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2455–4091 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1218-12MN-2 cooling tower (1489 tons, 6.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1218-12MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1489 nominal tons (6546 kW): rated to cool 4482 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 157.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4909–8182 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-06JN cooling tower (157 tons, 692 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-06JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection519–865 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-06JN-2 cooling tower (315 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-06JN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1038–1731 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-06KN cooling tower (172 tons, 758 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-06KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 172 nominal tons (758 kW): rated to cool 519 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection568–947 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-06KN-2 cooling tower (345 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-06KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1137–1895 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-06LN cooling tower (197 tons, 868 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-06LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 197 nominal tons (868 kW): rated to cool 594 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection651–1084 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-06LN-2 cooling tower (395 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-06LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 395 nominal tons (1735 kW): rated to cool 1188 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1301–2169 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-07KN cooling tower (188 tons, 828 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-07KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 188 nominal tons (828 kW): rated to cool 567 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection621–1035 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-07KN-2 cooling tower (377 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-07KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 377 nominal tons (1656 kW): rated to cool 1134 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1242–2070 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-07LN cooling tower (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-07LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-07LN-2 cooling tower (433 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-07LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 433 nominal tons (1902 kW): rated to cool 1302 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1426–2377 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-07MN cooling tower (235 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-07MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection776–1293 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-07MN-2 cooling tower (470 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-07MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 470 nominal tons (2068 kW): rated to cool 1416 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1551–2585 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-09KN cooling tower (222 tons, 977 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-09KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 222 nominal tons (977 kW): rated to cool 669 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection733–1221 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-09KN-2 cooling tower (445 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-09KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 445 nominal tons (1954 kW): rated to cool 1338 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1466–2443 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-09LN-2 cooling tower (504 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-09LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1663–2771 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-09MN cooling tower (275 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-09MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 275 nominal tons (1209 kW): rated to cool 828 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection907–1512 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-09MN-2 cooling tower (550 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-09MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 550 nominal tons (2419 kW): rated to cool 1656 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1814–3023 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-10LN cooling tower (263 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-10LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 263 nominal tons (1157 kW): rated to cool 792 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection868–1446 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-10LN-2 cooling tower (526 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-10LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 526 nominal tons (2313 kW): rated to cool 1584 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1735–2892 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-10MN cooling tower (288 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-10MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 288 nominal tons (1266 kW): rated to cool 867 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection950–1583 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-10MN-2 cooling tower (576 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-10MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 576 nominal tons (2532 kW): rated to cool 1734 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1899–3166 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-10NN cooling tower (309 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-10NN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 309 nominal tons (1358 kW): rated to cool 930 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1019–1698 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-10NN-2 cooling tower (618 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-10NN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 618 nominal tons (2716 kW): rated to cool 1860 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2037–3396 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-06M cooling tower (383 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-06M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 383 nominal tons (1682 kW): rated to cool 1152 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1262–2103 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-06M-2 cooling tower (764 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-06M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 764 nominal tons (3361 kW): rated to cool 2301 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2520–4201 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-06N cooling tower (411 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-06N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 411 nominal tons (1805 kW): rated to cool 1236 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1354–2256 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-06N-2 cooling tower (820 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-06N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 820 nominal tons (3606 kW): rated to cool 2469 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2704–4507 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-06O cooling tower (435 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-06O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 435 nominal tons (1910 kW): rated to cool 1308 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1433–2388 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-06O-2 cooling tower (869 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-06O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 869 nominal tons (3821 kW): rated to cool 2616 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2865–4776 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-07M cooling tower (424 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-07M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1397–2328 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-07M-2 cooling tower (848 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-07M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 848 nominal tons (3729 kW): rated to cool 2553 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2796–4661 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-07N cooling tower (455 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-07N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 455 nominal tons (2002 kW): rated to cool 1371 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1502–2503 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-07N-2 cooling tower (910 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-07N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 910 nominal tons (4000 kW): rated to cool 2739 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3000–5000 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-07O cooling tower (482 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-07O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 482 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1452 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1590–2651 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-07O-2 cooling tower (965 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-07O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 965 nominal tons (4241 kW): rated to cool 2904 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3181–5301 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-07P cooling tower (528 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-07P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 528 nominal tons (2322 kW): rated to cool 1590 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1742–2903 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1020-07P-2 cooling tower (1056 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1020-07P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1056 nominal tons (4644 kW): rated to cool 3180 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3483–5805 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-06M cooling tower (437 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-06M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 437 nominal tons (1919 kW): rated to cool 1314 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1439–2399 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-06M-2 cooling tower (874 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-06M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 874 nominal tons (3842 kW): rated to cool 2631 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2882–4803 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-06N-2 cooling tower (939 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-06N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 939 nominal tons (4127 kW): rated to cool 2826 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3095–5159 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-06O cooling tower (498 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-06O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 498 nominal tons (2191 kW): rated to cool 1500 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1643–2738 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-06O-2 cooling tower (996 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-06O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 996 nominal tons (4377 kW): rated to cool 2997 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 119.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3283–5471 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-07N cooling tower (521 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-07N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 521 nominal tons (2291 kW): rated to cool 1569 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1719–2864 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-07N-2 cooling tower (1043 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-07N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1043 nominal tons (4583 kW): rated to cool 3138 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3437–5729 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-07O cooling tower (552 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-07O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 552 nominal tons (2427 kW): rated to cool 1662 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1820–3034 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-07O-2 cooling tower (1105 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-07O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1105 nominal tons (4859 kW): rated to cool 3327 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3644–6074 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-07P cooling tower (605 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-07P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 605 nominal tons (2659 kW): rated to cool 1821 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1995–3324 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-07P-2 cooling tower (1211 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-07P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1211 nominal tons (5323 kW): rated to cool 3645 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 141.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3993–6654 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-07Q cooling tower (650 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-07Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 650 nominal tons (2857 kW): rated to cool 1956 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2142–3571 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-07Q-2 cooling tower (1299 tons, 5.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-07Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1299 nominal tons (5709 kW): rated to cool 3909 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 151.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4282–7136 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-07R cooling tower (688 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-07R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 688 nominal tons (3023 kW): rated to cool 2070 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2267–3779 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-07R-2 cooling tower (1375 tons, 6.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-07R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1375 nominal tons (6046 kW): rated to cool 4140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 159.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4535–7558 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-10P cooling tower (754 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-10P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 754 nominal tons (3317 kW): rated to cool 2271 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2488–4146 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-10P-2 cooling tower (1509 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-10P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1509 nominal tons (6633 kW): rated to cool 4542 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 170.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4975–8292 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-10Q cooling tower (807 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-10Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 807 nominal tons (3549 kW): rated to cool 2430 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2662–4436 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-10Q-2 cooling tower (1616 tons, 7.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-10Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1616 nominal tons (7102 kW): rated to cool 4863 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 181.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5327–8878 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-10R cooling tower (853 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-10R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 853 nominal tons (3750 kW): rated to cool 2568 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2813–4688 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-10R-2 cooling tower (1706 tons, 7.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-10R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1706 nominal tons (7501 kW): rated to cool 5136 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 191.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5626–9376 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-10S cooling tower (913 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-10S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 913 nominal tons (4013 kW): rated to cool 2748 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3010–5017 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-10S-2 cooling tower (1826 tons, 8.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-10S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1826 nominal tons (8027 kW): rated to cool 5496 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 204.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6020–10033 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-12P cooling tower (809 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-12P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 809 nominal tons (3558 kW): rated to cool 2436 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2668–4447 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-12P-2 cooling tower (1619 tons, 7.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-12P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1619 nominal tons (7115 kW): rated to cool 4872 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 180.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5337–8894 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-12Q cooling tower (866 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-12Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 866 nominal tons (3807 kW): rated to cool 2607 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 96.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2856–4759 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-12Q-2 cooling tower (1731 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-12Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1731 nominal tons (7610 kW): rated to cool 5211 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 192.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5708–9513 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-12R cooling tower (914 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-12R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 914 nominal tons (4018 kW): rated to cool 2751 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3013–5022 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-12R-2 cooling tower (1829 tons, 8.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-12R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1829 nominal tons (8040 kW): rated to cool 5505 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 203.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6030–10050 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-12S cooling tower (978 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-12S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 978 nominal tons (4298 kW): rated to cool 2943 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3224–5373 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-12S-2 cooling tower (1954 tons, 8.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-12S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1954 nominal tons (8592 kW): rated to cool 5883 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 216.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6444–10740 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-13P cooling tower (836 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-13P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2757–4595 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-13P-2 cooling tower (1672 tons, 7.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-13P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1672 nominal tons (7352 kW): rated to cool 5034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 185.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5514–9190 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-13Q cooling tower (894 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-13Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 894 nominal tons (3930 kW): rated to cool 2691 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2948–4913 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-13Q-2 cooling tower (1788 tons, 7.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-13Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1788 nominal tons (7860 kW): rated to cool 5382 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 198.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5895–9825 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-13R cooling tower (944 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-13R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 944 nominal tons (4149 kW): rated to cool 2841 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3112–5186 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-13R-2 cooling tower (1889 tons, 8.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-13R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1889 nominal tons (8303 kW): rated to cool 5685 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 208.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6227–10378 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-13S cooling tower (1010 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-13S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1010 nominal tons (4438 kW): rated to cool 3039 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3329–5548 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-13S-2 cooling tower (2018 tons, 8.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-13S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2018 nominal tons (8872 kW): rated to cool 6075 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 222.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6654–11090 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-14P cooling tower (869 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-14P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 869 nominal tons (3821 kW): rated to cool 2616 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 96.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2865–4776 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-14P-2 cooling tower (1738 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-14P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1738 nominal tons (7641 kW): rated to cool 5232 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 192.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5731–9551 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-14Q cooling tower (930 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-14Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 930 nominal tons (4088 kW): rated to cool 2799 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3066–5110 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-14Q-2 cooling tower (1860 tons, 8.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-14Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1860 nominal tons (8176 kW): rated to cool 5598 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 205.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6132–10220 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-14R cooling tower (982 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-14R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 982 nominal tons (4316 kW): rated to cool 2955 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3237–5395 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-14R-2 cooling tower (1963 tons, 8.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-14R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1963 nominal tons (8631 kW): rated to cool 5910 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 216.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6473–10789 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-14S cooling tower (1052 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-14S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1052 nominal tons (4627 kW): rated to cool 3168 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3470–5783 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-14S-2 cooling tower (2105 tons, 9.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-14S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2105 nominal tons (9253 kW): rated to cool 6336 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 230.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6940–11567 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-14T cooling tower (1143 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-14T — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1143 nominal tons (5025 kW): rated to cool 3441 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3769–6282 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1222-14T-2 cooling tower (2286 tons, 10.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1222-14T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2286 nominal tons (10051 kW): rated to cool 6882 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 250.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7538–12564 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-07O cooling tower (619 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-07O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 619 nominal tons (2721 kW): rated to cool 1863 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2041–3401 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-07O-2 cooling tower (1237 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-07O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1237 nominal tons (5437 kW): rated to cool 3723 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 145.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4078–6797 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-07P cooling tower (678 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-07P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 678 nominal tons (2979 kW): rated to cool 2040 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2235–3724 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-07P-2 cooling tower (1355 tons, 6.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-07P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1355 nominal tons (5959 kW): rated to cool 4080 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 158.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4469–7448 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-07Q cooling tower (727 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-07Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 727 nominal tons (3194 kW): rated to cool 2187 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2396–3993 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-07Q-2 cooling tower (1454 tons, 6.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-07Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1454 nominal tons (6392 kW): rated to cool 4377 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 169.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4794–7991 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-07R cooling tower (769 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-07R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 769 nominal tons (3382 kW): rated to cool 2316 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2537–4228 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-07R-2 cooling tower (1540 tons, 6.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-07R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1540 nominal tons (6769 kW): rated to cool 4635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 179.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5077–8462 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-12Q cooling tower (992 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-12Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 992 nominal tons (4359 kW): rated to cool 2985 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3270–5449 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-12Q-2 cooling tower (1982 tons, 8.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-12Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1982 nominal tons (8715 kW): rated to cool 5967 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 221.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6536–10893 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-12R cooling tower (1047 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-12R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1047 nominal tons (4600 kW): rated to cool 3150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3450–5751 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-12R-2 cooling tower (2092 tons, 9.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-12R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2092 nominal tons (9197 kW): rated to cool 6297 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 232.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6897–11496 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-12S cooling tower (1117 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-12S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1117 nominal tons (4912 kW): rated to cool 3363 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3684–6139 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-12S-2 cooling tower (2235 tons, 9.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-12S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2235 nominal tons (9823 kW): rated to cool 6726 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 248.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7367–12279 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-12T cooling tower (1203 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-12T — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1203 nominal tons (5288 kW): rated to cool 3621 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3966–6610 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-12T-2 cooling tower (2406 tons, 10.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-12T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2406 nominal tons (10577 kW): rated to cool 7242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 263.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7932–13221 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-13Q cooling tower (1028 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-13Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1028 nominal tons (4517 kW): rated to cool 3093 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3388–5647 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-13Q-2 cooling tower (2055 tons, 9.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-13Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2055 nominal tons (9034 kW): rated to cool 6186 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 228.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6776–11293 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-13R cooling tower (1084 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-13R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1084 nominal tons (4767 kW): rated to cool 3264 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3575–5959 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-13R-2 cooling tower (2168 tons, 9.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-13R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2168 nominal tons (9530 kW): rated to cool 6525 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 240.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7147–11912 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-13S cooling tower (1157 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-13S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1157 nominal tons (5087 kW): rated to cool 3483 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3815–6358 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-13S-2 cooling tower (2314 tons, 10.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-13S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2314 nominal tons (10174 kW): rated to cool 6966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 255.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7630–12717 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-13T cooling tower (1246 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-13T — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1246 nominal tons (5477 kW): rated to cool 3750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4108–6846 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-13T-2 cooling tower (2492 tons, 11.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-13T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2492 nominal tons (10953 kW): rated to cool 7500 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 271.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8215–13692 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14Q cooling tower (1071 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1071 nominal tons (4710 kW): rated to cool 3225 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3532–5887 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14Q-2 cooling tower (2143 tons, 9.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2143 nominal tons (9420 kW): rated to cool 6450 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 236.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7065–11775 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14R cooling tower (1130 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1130 nominal tons (4968 kW): rated to cool 3402 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3726–6211 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14R-2 cooling tower (2260 tons, 9.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2260 nominal tons (9937 kW): rated to cool 6804 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 249.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7453–12421 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14S cooling tower (1211 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1211 nominal tons (5323 kW): rated to cool 3645 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 132.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3993–6654 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14S-2 cooling tower (2423 tons, 10.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2423 nominal tons (10651 kW): rated to cool 7293 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 265.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7988–13314 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14T cooling tower (1299 tons, 5.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14T — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1299 nominal tons (5709 kW): rated to cool 3909 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 141.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4282–7136 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14T-2 cooling tower (2596 tons, 11.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2596 nominal tons (11413 kW): rated to cool 7815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 283.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8560–14267 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14U cooling tower (1369 tons, 6.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14U — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1369 nominal tons (6020 kW): rated to cool 4122 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4515–7525 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14U-2 cooling tower (2739 tons, 12.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14U-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2739 nominal tons (12040 kW): rated to cool 8244 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 298.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9030–15050 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14W cooling tower (1389 tons, 6.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14W — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1389 nominal tons (6108 kW): rated to cool 4182 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 151.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4581–7635 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14W-2 cooling tower (2778 tons, 12.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14W-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2778 nominal tons (12211 kW): rated to cool 8361 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 303.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9158–15264 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-05L cooling tower (292 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-05L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 292 nominal tons (1284 kW): rated to cool 879 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection963–1605 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-05L-2 cooling tower (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-05L-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1922–3204 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-05M cooling tower (321 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-05M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 321 nominal tons (1411 kW): rated to cool 966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1058–1764 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-05M-2 cooling tower (641 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-05M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 641 nominal tons (2817 kW): rated to cool 1929 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2113–3522 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-06L cooling tower (328 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-06L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1081–1802 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-06L-2 cooling tower (656 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-06L-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 656 nominal tons (2883 kW): rated to cool 1974 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2162–3604 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-06M cooling tower (360 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-06M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 360 nominal tons (1582 kW): rated to cool 1083 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1186–1977 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-06M-2 cooling tower (721 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-06M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 721 nominal tons (3168 kW): rated to cool 2169 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2376–3960 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-06N cooling tower (387 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-06N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1275–2125 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-06N-2 cooling tower (773 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-06N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 773 nominal tons (3400 kW): rated to cool 2328 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2550–4250 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-06O cooling tower (405 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-06O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 405 nominal tons (1779 kW): rated to cool 1218 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1334–2224 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-06O-2 cooling tower (810 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-06O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 810 nominal tons (3562 kW): rated to cool 2439 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2672–4453 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-07M cooling tower (399 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-07M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 399 nominal tons (1753 kW): rated to cool 1200 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1314–2191 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-07M-2 cooling tower (797 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-07M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 797 nominal tons (3505 kW): rated to cool 2400 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2629–4381 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-07N cooling tower (428 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-07N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 428 nominal tons (1880 kW): rated to cool 1287 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1410–2350 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-07N-2 cooling tower (855 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-07N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 855 nominal tons (3759 kW): rated to cool 2574 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2819–4699 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-07O cooling tower (450 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-07O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 450 nominal tons (1976 kW): rated to cool 1353 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1482–2470 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-07O-2 cooling tower (900 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-07O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 900 nominal tons (3956 kW): rated to cool 2709 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2967–4945 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-07P cooling tower (482 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-07P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 482 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1452 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1590–2651 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-07P-2 cooling tower (965 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-8518-07P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 965 nominal tons (4241 kW): rated to cool 2904 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3181–5301 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-009-12E closed-circuit cooler (4 tons, 18 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-009-12E — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 4 nominal tons (18 kW): rated to cool 12 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection13–22 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-009-12F closed-circuit cooler (5 tons, 22 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-009-12F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 5 nominal tons (22 kW): rated to cool 15 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection16–27 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-009-12G closed-circuit cooler (5 tons, 22 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-009-12G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 5 nominal tons (22 kW): rated to cool 15 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection16–27 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-009-22F closed-circuit cooler (6 tons, 26 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-009-22F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 6 nominal tons (26 kW): rated to cool 18 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection20–33 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-009-22G closed-circuit cooler (7 tons, 31 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-009-22G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 7 nominal tons (31 kW): rated to cool 21 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection23–38 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-009-32G closed-circuit cooler (8 tons, 35 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-009-32G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 8 nominal tons (35 kW): rated to cool 24 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection26–44 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-009-42G closed-circuit cooler (9 tons, 39 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-009-42G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 9 nominal tons (39 kW): rated to cool 27 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection30–49 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-018-12F closed-circuit cooler (9 tons, 39 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-018-12F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 9 nominal tons (39 kW): rated to cool 27 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection30–49 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-018-12G closed-circuit cooler (11 tons, 48 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-018-12G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 11 nominal tons (48 kW): rated to cool 33 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection36–60 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-018-12H closed-circuit cooler (14 tons, 61 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-018-12H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 14 nominal tons (61 kW): rated to cool 42 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection46–77 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-018-22H closed-circuit cooler (17 tons, 74 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-018-22H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 17 nominal tons (74 kW): rated to cool 51 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection56–93 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-018-22J closed-circuit cooler (20 tons, 88 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-018-22J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 20 nominal tons (88 kW): rated to cool 60 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection66–110 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-018-32G closed-circuit cooler (16 tons, 70 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-018-32G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 16 nominal tons (70 kW): rated to cool 48 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection53–88 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-018-32H closed-circuit cooler (19 tons, 83 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-018-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 19 nominal tons (83 kW): rated to cool 57 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection62–104 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-018-32J closed-circuit cooler (22 tons, 96 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-018-32J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 22 nominal tons (96 kW): rated to cool 66 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection72–120 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-018-42H closed-circuit cooler (21 tons, 92 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-018-42H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 21 nominal tons (92 kW): rated to cool 63 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection69–115 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-018-42J closed-circuit cooler (24 tons, 105 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-018-42J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 24 nominal tons (105 kW): rated to cool 72 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection79–131 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-027-22H closed-circuit cooler (24 tons, 105 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-027-22H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 24 nominal tons (105 kW): rated to cool 72 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection79–131 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-027-22J closed-circuit cooler (28 tons, 123 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-027-22J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 28 nominal tons (123 kW): rated to cool 84 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection92–153 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-027-22K closed-circuit cooler (32 tons, 140 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-027-22K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 32 nominal tons (140 kW): rated to cool 96 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection105–175 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-027-32H closed-circuit cooler (26 tons, 114 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-027-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 26 nominal tons (114 kW): rated to cool 78 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection85–142 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-027-32J closed-circuit cooler (31 tons, 136 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-027-32J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 31 nominal tons (136 kW): rated to cool 93 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection102–170 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-027-32K closed-circuit cooler (35 tons, 153 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-027-32K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 35 nominal tons (153 kW): rated to cool 105 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection115–192 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-027-42H closed-circuit cooler (28 tons, 123 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-027-42H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 28 nominal tons (123 kW): rated to cool 84 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection92–153 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-027-42J closed-circuit cooler (33 tons, 145 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-027-42J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 33 nominal tons (145 kW): rated to cool 99 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection108–181 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-027-42K closed-circuit cooler (37 tons, 162 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-027-42K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 37 nominal tons (162 kW): rated to cool 111 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection122–203 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-036-21L closed-circuit cooler (41 tons, 180 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-036-21L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 41 nominal tons (180 kW): rated to cool 123 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection135–225 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-036-22J closed-circuit cooler (35 tons, 153 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-036-22J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 35 nominal tons (153 kW): rated to cool 105 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 9.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection115–192 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-036-22K closed-circuit cooler (39 tons, 171 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-036-22K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection128–214 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-036-22L closed-circuit cooler (47 tons, 206 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-036-22L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 47 nominal tons (206 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection154–257 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-036-31L closed-circuit cooler (44 tons, 193 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-036-31L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 44 nominal tons (193 kW): rated to cool 132 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection145–241 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-036-32J closed-circuit cooler (37 tons, 162 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-036-32J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 37 nominal tons (162 kW): rated to cool 111 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 9.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection122–203 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-036-41L closed-circuit cooler (47 tons, 206 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-036-41L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 47 nominal tons (206 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection154–257 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-036-51L closed-circuit cooler (49 tons, 215 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-036-51L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 49 nominal tons (215 kW): rated to cool 147 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection161–268 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-048-21L closed-circuit cooler (48 tons, 210 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-048-21L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 48 nominal tons (210 kW): rated to cool 144 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection158–263 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-048-21M closed-circuit cooler (55 tons, 241 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-048-21M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 55 nominal tons (241 kW): rated to cool 165 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection181–301 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-048-31M closed-circuit cooler (59 tons, 259 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-048-31M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 59 nominal tons (259 kW): rated to cool 177 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection194–323 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-048-31N closed-circuit cooler (65 tons, 285 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-048-31N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 65 nominal tons (285 kW): rated to cool 195 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection214–356 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-048-41M closed-circuit cooler (63 tons, 276 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-048-41M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 63 nominal tons (276 kW): rated to cool 189 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection207–345 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-048-41N closed-circuit cooler (70 tons, 307 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-048-41N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 70 nominal tons (307 kW): rated to cool 210 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection230–383 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-072-21M closed-circuit cooler (62 tons, 272 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-072-21M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 62 nominal tons (272 kW): rated to cool 186 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection204–340 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-072-21N closed-circuit cooler (69 tons, 302 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-072-21N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 69 nominal tons (302 kW): rated to cool 207 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection227–378 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-072-21O closed-circuit cooler (75 tons, 329 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-072-21O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 75 nominal tons (329 kW): rated to cool 225 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection246–411 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-072-31M closed-circuit cooler (67 tons, 294 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-072-31M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 67 nominal tons (294 kW): rated to cool 201 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection220–367 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-072-31N closed-circuit cooler (74 tons, 324 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-072-31N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection243–405 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-072-31O closed-circuit cooler (81 tons, 355 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-072-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 81 nominal tons (355 kW): rated to cool 243 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection266–444 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-072-41M closed-circuit cooler (72 tons, 315 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-072-41M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 72 nominal tons (315 kW): rated to cool 216 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection237–394 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-072-41N closed-circuit cooler (80 tons, 351 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-072-41N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 80 nominal tons (351 kW): rated to cool 240 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection263–438 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-072-41O closed-circuit cooler (86 tons, 377 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-072-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 86 nominal tons (377 kW): rated to cool 258 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection283–471 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-096-31O closed-circuit cooler (81 tons, 355 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-096-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 81 nominal tons (355 kW): rated to cool 243 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection266–444 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-096-31P closed-circuit cooler (93 tons, 407 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-096-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 93 nominal tons (407 kW): rated to cool 279 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection306–509 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-096-31Q closed-circuit cooler (102 tons, 447 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-096-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 102 nominal tons (447 kW): rated to cool 306 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection335–559 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-096-41O closed-circuit cooler (87 tons, 381 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-096-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 87 nominal tons (381 kW): rated to cool 261 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection286–476 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-096-41P closed-circuit cooler (99 tons, 434 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-096-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 297 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection325–542 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-096-41Q closed-circuit cooler (109 tons, 478 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-096-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection358–597 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-096-51P closed-circuit cooler (104 tons, 456 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-096-51P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 104 nominal tons (456 kW): rated to cool 312 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection342–570 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-096-51Q closed-circuit cooler (114 tons, 499 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-096-51Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 114 nominal tons (499 kW): rated to cool 342 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection375–624 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1012N-4D closed-circuit cooler (127 tons, 556 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1012N-4D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 127 nominal tons (556 kW): rated to cool 381 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection417–696 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1012N-5D closed-circuit cooler (145 tons, 635 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1012N-5D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 145 nominal tons (635 kW): rated to cool 435 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection476–794 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1012N-6D closed-circuit cooler (176 tons, 776 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1012N-6D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 176 nominal tons (776 kW): rated to cool 531 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection582–969 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1012N-7D closed-circuit cooler (191 tons, 841 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1012N-7D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 191 nominal tons (841 kW): rated to cool 576 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection631–1052 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1012N-8D closed-circuit cooler (200 tons, 881 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1012N-8D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 200 nominal tons (881 kW): rated to cool 603 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection660–1101 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1018N-4D closed-circuit cooler (219 tons, 964 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1018N-4D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection723–1205 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1018N-5D closed-circuit cooler (248 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1018N-5D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 248 nominal tons (1091 kW): rated to cool 747 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection818–1364 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1018N-6D closed-circuit cooler (272 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1018N-6D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 272 nominal tons (1196 kW): rated to cool 819 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection897–1495 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1018N-7D closed-circuit cooler (293 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1018N-7D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 293 nominal tons (1288 kW): rated to cool 882 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection966–1610 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1018N-8D closed-circuit cooler (306 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1018N-8D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1009–1681 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1024N-4D closed-circuit cooler (254 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1024N-4D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 254 nominal tons (1117 kW): rated to cool 765 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection838–1397 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1024N-5D closed-circuit cooler (289 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1024N-5D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 289 nominal tons (1271 kW): rated to cool 870 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection953–1588 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1024N-6D closed-circuit cooler (354 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1024N-6D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 354 nominal tons (1555 kW): rated to cool 1065 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1167–1944 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1024N-7D closed-circuit cooler (384 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1024N-7D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1265–2109 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1024N-8D closed-circuit cooler (401 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1024N-8D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1206 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1321–2202 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1036N-4D closed-circuit cooler (440 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1036N-4D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 440 nominal tons (1932 kW): rated to cool 1323 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1449–2415 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1036N-5D closed-circuit cooler (496 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1036N-5D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 496 nominal tons (2182 kW): rated to cool 1494 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1636–2727 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1036N-6D closed-circuit cooler (544 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1036N-6D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 544 nominal tons (2392 kW): rated to cool 1638 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1794–2990 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1036N-7D closed-circuit cooler (587 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1036N-7D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 587 nominal tons (2581 kW): rated to cool 1767 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 121.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1935–3226 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-1036N-8D closed-circuit cooler (612 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VF1-1036N-8D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 612 nominal tons (2690 kW): rated to cool 1842 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2018–3363 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-21P closed-circuit cooler (116 tons, 508 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 116 nominal tons (508 kW): rated to cool 348 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection381–635 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-21Q closed-circuit cooler (129 tons, 565 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144-21Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 129 nominal tons (565 kW): rated to cool 387 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection424–706 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-21R closed-circuit cooler (141 tons, 618 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144-21R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 141 nominal tons (618 kW): rated to cool 423 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection463–772 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-31P closed-circuit cooler (127 tons, 556 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 127 nominal tons (556 kW): rated to cool 381 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection417–696 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-31Q closed-circuit cooler (140 tons, 613 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 140 nominal tons (613 kW): rated to cool 420 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection460–767 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-31R closed-circuit cooler (152 tons, 670 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144-31R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 152 nominal tons (670 kW): rated to cool 459 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection503–838 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-41P closed-circuit cooler (137 tons, 600 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 137 nominal tons (600 kW): rated to cool 411 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection450–750 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-41Q closed-circuit cooler (150 tons, 662 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 150 nominal tons (662 kW): rated to cool 453 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection496–827 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-41R closed-circuit cooler (163 tons, 719 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144-41R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 163 nominal tons (719 kW): rated to cool 492 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection539–898 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-21P closed-circuit cooler (113 tons, 495 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144N-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 113 nominal tons (495 kW): rated to cool 339 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection371–619 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-21Q closed-circuit cooler (127 tons, 556 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144N-21Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 127 nominal tons (556 kW): rated to cool 381 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection417–696 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-21R closed-circuit cooler (139 tons, 609 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144N-21R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 139 nominal tons (609 kW): rated to cool 417 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection457–761 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-31P closed-circuit cooler (122 tons, 535 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144N-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 122 nominal tons (535 kW): rated to cool 366 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection401–668 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-31Q closed-circuit cooler (136 tons, 596 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144N-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 136 nominal tons (596 kW): rated to cool 408 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection447–745 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-31R closed-circuit cooler (148 tons, 648 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144N-31R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 148 nominal tons (648 kW): rated to cool 444 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection486–811 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-41P closed-circuit cooler (130 tons, 570 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144N-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection427–712 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-41Q closed-circuit cooler (144 tons, 631 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144N-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 144 nominal tons (631 kW): rated to cool 432 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection473–789 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-41R closed-circuit cooler (156 tons, 688 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-144N-41R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 156 nominal tons (688 kW): rated to cool 471 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection516–860 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-31O closed-circuit cooler (162 tons, 714 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-192-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 162 nominal tons (714 kW): rated to cool 489 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection536–893 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-31P closed-circuit cooler (184 tons, 811 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-192-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection608–1013 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-31Q closed-circuit cooler (204 tons, 898 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-192-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 204 nominal tons (898 kW): rated to cool 615 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection674–1123 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-41O closed-circuit cooler (173 tons, 762 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-192-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection572–953 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-41P closed-circuit cooler (197 tons, 868 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-192-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 197 nominal tons (868 kW): rated to cool 594 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection651–1084 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-41Q closed-circuit cooler (218 tons, 960 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-192-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection720–1199 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-51P closed-circuit cooler (206 tons, 907 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-192-51P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 206 nominal tons (907 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection680–1134 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-51Q closed-circuit cooler (227 tons, 999 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-192-51Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 227 nominal tons (999 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection749–1249 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-216-21N closed-circuit cooler (171 tons, 754 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-216-21N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 171 nominal tons (754 kW): rated to cool 516 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection565–942 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-216-21O closed-circuit cooler (187 tons, 824 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-216-21O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 187 nominal tons (824 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection618–1030 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-216-21P closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-216-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-216-31N closed-circuit cooler (184 tons, 811 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-216-31N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection608–1013 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-216-31O closed-circuit cooler (201 tons, 885 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-216-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection664–1106 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-216-31P closed-circuit cooler (230 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-216-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 230 nominal tons (1012 kW): rated to cool 693 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection759–1265 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-216-41O closed-circuit cooler (214 tons, 942 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-216-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 214 nominal tons (942 kW): rated to cool 645 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection706–1177 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-216-41P closed-circuit cooler (244 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-216-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 244 nominal tons (1073 kW): rated to cool 735 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection805–1342 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-216-41Q closed-circuit cooler (270 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-216-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection891–1484 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288-21P closed-circuit cooler (231 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 231 nominal tons (1016 kW): rated to cool 696 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection762–1271 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288-21Q closed-circuit cooler (258 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288-21Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 258 nominal tons (1135 kW): rated to cool 777 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection851–1418 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288-21R closed-circuit cooler (281 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288-21R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 281 nominal tons (1236 kW): rated to cool 846 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection927–1544 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288-31P closed-circuit cooler (253 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 253 nominal tons (1113 kW): rated to cool 762 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection835–1391 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288-31Q closed-circuit cooler (280 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 280 nominal tons (1231 kW): rated to cool 843 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection923–1539 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288-31R closed-circuit cooler (304 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288-31R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1002–1670 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288-41Q closed-circuit cooler (298 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection983–1638 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288-41R closed-circuit cooler (324 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288-41R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 324 nominal tons (1424 kW): rated to cool 975 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1068–1780 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-21P closed-circuit cooler (225 tons, 990 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288N-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 225 nominal tons (990 kW): rated to cool 678 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection743–1238 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-21Q closed-circuit cooler (252 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288N-21Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 252 nominal tons (1108 kW): rated to cool 759 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection831–1386 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-21R closed-circuit cooler (276 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288N-21R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection910–1517 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-31P closed-circuit cooler (243 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288N-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 243 nominal tons (1069 kW): rated to cool 732 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection802–1336 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-31Q closed-circuit cooler (270 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288N-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection891–1484 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-31R closed-circuit cooler (294 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288N-31R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 294 nominal tons (1293 kW): rated to cool 885 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection969–1616 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-41P closed-circuit cooler (259 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288N-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection854–1424 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-41Q closed-circuit cooler (287 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288N-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1262 kW): rated to cool 864 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection946–1577 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-41R closed-circuit cooler (312 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288N-41R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 312 nominal tons (1371 kW): rated to cool 939 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1029–1714 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-432-21N closed-circuit cooler (342 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-432-21N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 342 nominal tons (1503 kW): rated to cool 1029 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1127–1879 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-432-21O closed-circuit cooler (375 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-432-21O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1236–2059 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-432-21P closed-circuit cooler (433 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-432-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 433 nominal tons (1902 kW): rated to cool 1302 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1426–2377 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-432-31N closed-circuit cooler (370 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-432-31N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 370 nominal tons (1625 kW): rated to cool 1113 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1219–2032 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-432-31O closed-circuit cooler (403 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-432-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 403 nominal tons (1770 kW): rated to cool 1212 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1328–2213 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-432-31P closed-circuit cooler (460 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-432-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 460 nominal tons (2024 kW): rated to cool 1386 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 128.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1518–2530 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-432-41O closed-circuit cooler (429 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-432-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1413–2355 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-432-41P closed-circuit cooler (488 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-432-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 488 nominal tons (2147 kW): rated to cool 1470 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1610–2684 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-432-41Q closed-circuit cooler (541 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-432-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 541 nominal tons (2379 kW): rated to cool 1629 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 136.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1784–2974 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-012-02F closed-circuit cooler (4 tons, 18 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-012-02F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 4 nominal tons (18 kW): rated to cool 12 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection13–22 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-012-02G closed-circuit cooler (5 tons, 22 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-012-02G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 5 nominal tons (22 kW): rated to cool 15 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection16–27 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-012-12F closed-circuit cooler (7 tons, 31 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-012-12F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 7 nominal tons (31 kW): rated to cool 21 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection23–38 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-012-12H closed-circuit cooler (9 tons, 39 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-012-12H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 9 nominal tons (39 kW): rated to cool 27 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection30–49 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-012-22F closed-circuit cooler (8 tons, 35 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-012-22F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 8 nominal tons (35 kW): rated to cool 24 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection26–44 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-012-22H closed-circuit cooler (11 tons, 48 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-012-22H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 11 nominal tons (48 kW): rated to cool 33 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection36–60 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-012-32G closed-circuit cooler (12 tons, 53 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-012-32G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 12 nominal tons (53 kW): rated to cool 36 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection39–66 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-012-32H closed-circuit cooler (14 tons, 61 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-012-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 14 nominal tons (61 kW): rated to cool 42 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection46–77 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-024-12H closed-circuit cooler (17 tons, 74 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-024-12H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 17 nominal tons (74 kW): rated to cool 51 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection56–93 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-024-22H closed-circuit cooler (21 tons, 92 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-024-22H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 21 nominal tons (92 kW): rated to cool 63 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection69–115 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-024-22J closed-circuit cooler (24 tons, 105 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-024-22J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 24 nominal tons (105 kW): rated to cool 72 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection79–131 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-024-32H closed-circuit cooler (26 tons, 114 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-024-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 26 nominal tons (114 kW): rated to cool 78 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection85–142 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-024-32J closed-circuit cooler (30 tons, 131 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-024-32J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 30 nominal tons (131 kW): rated to cool 90 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection99–164 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-036-22K closed-circuit cooler (35 tons, 153 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-036-22K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 35 nominal tons (153 kW): rated to cool 105 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection115–192 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-036-22L closed-circuit cooler (40 tons, 175 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-036-22L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 40 nominal tons (175 kW): rated to cool 120 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection131–219 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-036-22M closed-circuit cooler (46 tons, 202 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-036-22M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 46 nominal tons (202 kW): rated to cool 138 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection151–252 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-036-31M closed-circuit cooler (49 tons, 215 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-036-31M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 49 nominal tons (215 kW): rated to cool 147 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection161–268 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-036-32K closed-circuit cooler (43 tons, 188 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-036-32K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 43 nominal tons (188 kW): rated to cool 129 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection141–235 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-036-32L closed-circuit cooler (50 tons, 219 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-036-32L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 50 nominal tons (219 kW): rated to cool 150 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection164–274 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-048-22L closed-circuit cooler (43 tons, 188 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-048-22L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 43 nominal tons (188 kW): rated to cool 129 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection141–235 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-048-31L closed-circuit cooler (46 tons, 202 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-048-31L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 46 nominal tons (202 kW): rated to cool 138 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection151–252 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-048-31M closed-circuit cooler (52 tons, 228 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-048-31M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 52 nominal tons (228 kW): rated to cool 156 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection171–285 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-048-41L closed-circuit cooler (49 tons, 215 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-048-41L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 49 nominal tons (215 kW): rated to cool 147 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection161–268 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-072-22N closed-circuit cooler (69 tons, 302 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-072-22N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 69 nominal tons (302 kW): rated to cool 207 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection227–378 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-072-22O closed-circuit cooler (75 tons, 329 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-072-22O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 75 nominal tons (329 kW): rated to cool 225 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection246–411 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-072-31N closed-circuit cooler (75 tons, 329 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-072-31N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 75 nominal tons (329 kW): rated to cool 225 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection246–411 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-072-31O closed-circuit cooler (81 tons, 355 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-072-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 81 nominal tons (355 kW): rated to cool 243 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection266–444 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-072-31P closed-circuit cooler (92 tons, 403 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-072-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 92 nominal tons (403 kW): rated to cool 276 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection302–504 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-072-41N closed-circuit cooler (79 tons, 346 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-072-41N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 79 nominal tons (346 kW): rated to cool 237 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection260–433 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-072-41O closed-circuit cooler (86 tons, 377 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-072-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 86 nominal tons (377 kW): rated to cool 258 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection283–471 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-072-41P closed-circuit cooler (97 tons, 425 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-072-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 97 nominal tons (425 kW): rated to cool 291 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection319–531 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-096-41N closed-circuit cooler (86 tons, 377 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-096-41N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 86 nominal tons (377 kW): rated to cool 258 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection283–471 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-096-41O closed-circuit cooler (94 tons, 412 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-096-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 94 nominal tons (412 kW): rated to cool 282 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection309–515 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VFL-096-41P closed-circuit cooler (108 tons, 473 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VFL-096-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 108 nominal tons (473 kW): rated to cool 324 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection355–591 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-102-L cooling tower (102 tons, 447 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-102-L — a Series V cooling tower, 102 nominal tons (447 kW): rated to cool 306 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection335–559 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-107-L cooling tower (107 tons, 469 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-107-L — a Series V cooling tower, 107 nominal tons (469 kW): rated to cool 321 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection352–586 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-116-M cooling tower (116 tons, 508 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-116-M — a Series V cooling tower, 116 nominal tons (508 kW): rated to cool 348 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection381–635 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-132-L cooling tower (132 tons, 578 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-132-L — a Series V cooling tower, 132 nominal tons (578 kW): rated to cool 396 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection434–723 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-14-F cooling tower (14 tons, 61 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-14-F — a Series V cooling tower, 14 nominal tons (61 kW): rated to cool 42 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection46–77 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-145-M cooling tower (145 tons, 635 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-145-M — a Series V cooling tower, 145 nominal tons (635 kW): rated to cool 435 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection476–794 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-155-N cooling tower (154 tons, 679 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-155-N — a Series V cooling tower, 154 nominal tons (679 kW): rated to cool 465 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection509–849 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-166-N cooling tower (165 tons, 727 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-166-N — a Series V cooling tower, 165 nominal tons (727 kW): rated to cool 498 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection545–909 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-176-O cooling tower (175 tons, 771 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-176-O — a Series V cooling tower, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection578–964 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-19-G cooling tower (19 tons, 83 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-19-G — a Series V cooling tower, 19 nominal tons (83 kW): rated to cool 57 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection62–104 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-24-G cooling tower (24 tons, 105 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-24-G — a Series V cooling tower, 24 nominal tons (105 kW): rated to cool 72 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection79–131 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-28-H cooling tower (28 tons, 123 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-28-H — a Series V cooling tower, 28 nominal tons (123 kW): rated to cool 84 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection92–153 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-32-H cooling tower (32 tons, 140 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-32-H — a Series V cooling tower, 32 nominal tons (140 kW): rated to cool 96 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection105–175 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-41-J cooling tower (41 tons, 180 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-41-J — a Series V cooling tower, 41 nominal tons (180 kW): rated to cool 123 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection135–225 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-52-J cooling tower (52 tons, 228 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-52-J — a Series V cooling tower, 52 nominal tons (228 kW): rated to cool 156 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection171–285 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-57-K cooling tower (57 tons, 250 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-57-K — a Series V cooling tower, 57 nominal tons (250 kW): rated to cool 171 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection187–312 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-65-J cooling tower (65 tons, 285 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-65-J — a Series V cooling tower, 65 nominal tons (285 kW): rated to cool 195 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection214–356 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-75-K cooling tower (75 tons, 329 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-75-K — a Series V cooling tower, 75 nominal tons (329 kW): rated to cool 225 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection246–411 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-78-K cooling tower (78 tons, 342 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-78-K — a Series V cooling tower, 78 nominal tons (342 kW): rated to cool 234 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection256–427 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-88-L cooling tower (88 tons, 386 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-88-L — a Series V cooling tower, 88 nominal tons (386 kW): rated to cool 264 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 9.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection289–482 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-1020-P cooling tower (1017 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-1020-P — a Series V cooling tower, 1017 nominal tons (4469 kW): rated to cool 3060 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3352–5586 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-1125-P cooling tower (1121 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-1125-P — a Series V cooling tower, 1121 nominal tons (4929 kW): rated to cool 3375 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3697–6161 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-1200-Q cooling tower (1196 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-1200-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 1196 nominal tons (5258 kW): rated to cool 3600 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3943–6572 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-1245-R cooling tower (1241 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-1245-R — a Series V cooling tower, 1241 nominal tons (5455 kW): rated to cool 3735 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4091–6819 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-1335-S cooling tower (1331 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-1335-S — a Series V cooling tower, 1331 nominal tons (5849 kW): rated to cool 4005 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 137.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4387–7311 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-275-P cooling tower (274 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-275-P — a Series V cooling tower, 274 nominal tons (1205 kW): rated to cool 825 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection904–1506 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-307-O cooling tower (306 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-307-O — a Series V cooling tower, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1009–1681 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-340-P cooling tower (339 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-340-P — a Series V cooling tower, 339 nominal tons (1490 kW): rated to cool 1020 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1117–1862 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-375-P cooling tower (374 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-375-P — a Series V cooling tower, 374 nominal tons (1643 kW): rated to cool 1125 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1232–2054 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-400-Q cooling tower (399 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-400-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 399 nominal tons (1753 kW): rated to cool 1200 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1314–2191 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-415-R cooling tower (414 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-415-R — a Series V cooling tower, 414 nominal tons (1818 kW): rated to cool 1245 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1364–2273 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-416-O cooling tower (415 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-416-O — a Series V cooling tower, 415 nominal tons (1823 kW): rated to cool 1248 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1367–2278 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-478-N cooling tower (476 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-478-N — a Series V cooling tower, 476 nominal tons (2094 kW): rated to cool 1434 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1571–2618 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-507-O cooling tower (505 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-507-O — a Series V cooling tower, 505 nominal tons (2221 kW): rated to cool 1521 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1666–2777 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-550-P cooling tower (548 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-550-P — a Series V cooling tower, 548 nominal tons (2410 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1807–3012 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-560-O cooling tower (558 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-560-O — a Series V cooling tower, 558 nominal tons (2454 kW): rated to cool 1680 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1840–3067 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-680-P cooling tower (678 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-680-P — a Series V cooling tower, 678 nominal tons (2979 kW): rated to cool 2040 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2235–3724 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-750-P cooling tower (748 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-750-P — a Series V cooling tower, 748 nominal tons (3286 kW): rated to cool 2250 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2465–4108 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-800-Q cooling tower (797 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-800-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 797 nominal tons (3505 kW): rated to cool 2400 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2629–4381 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-825-P cooling tower (822 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-825-P — a Series V cooling tower, 822 nominal tons (3615 kW): rated to cool 2475 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2711–4518 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-830-R cooling tower (827 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-830-R — a Series V cooling tower, 827 nominal tons (3637 kW): rated to cool 2490 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2727–4546 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-921-O cooling tower (918 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-921-O — a Series V cooling tower, 918 nominal tons (4035 kW): rated to cool 2763 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3026–5044 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M1044-P cooling tower (1041 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M1044-P — a Series V cooling tower, 1041 nominal tons (4574 kW): rated to cool 3132 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3431–5718 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M1050-O cooling tower (1047 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M1050-O — a Series V cooling tower, 1047 nominal tons (4600 kW): rated to cool 3150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3450–5751 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M1056-P cooling tower (1052 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M1056-P — a Series V cooling tower, 1052 nominal tons (4627 kW): rated to cool 3168 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3470–5783 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M1113-P cooling tower (1109 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M1113-P — a Series V cooling tower, 1109 nominal tons (4876 kW): rated to cool 3339 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3657–6096 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M1137-Q cooling tower (1133 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M1137-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 1133 nominal tons (4982 kW): rated to cool 3411 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 107.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3736–6227 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M1194-Q cooling tower (1190 tons, 5.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M1194-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 1190 nominal tons (5231 kW): rated to cool 3582 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3924–6539 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M1260-R cooling tower (1256 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M1260-R — a Series V cooling tower, 1256 nominal tons (5521 kW): rated to cool 3780 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4140–6901 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M316-O cooling tower (315 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M316-O — a Series V cooling tower, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1038–1731 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M328-O cooling tower (327 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M328-O — a Series V cooling tower, 327 nominal tons (1437 kW): rated to cool 984 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1078–1796 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M348-P cooling tower (347 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M348-P — a Series V cooling tower, 347 nominal tons (1525 kW): rated to cool 1044 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1144–1906 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M350-O cooling tower (349 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M350-O — a Series V cooling tower, 349 nominal tons (1533 kW): rated to cool 1050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1150–1917 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M352-P cooling tower (351 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M352-P — a Series V cooling tower, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1157–1928 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M371-P cooling tower (370 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M371-P — a Series V cooling tower, 370 nominal tons (1625 kW): rated to cool 1113 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1219–2032 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M379-Q cooling tower (378 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M379-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 378 nominal tons (1661 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1245–2076 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M398-Q cooling tower (397 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M398-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 397 nominal tons (1744 kW): rated to cool 1194 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1308–2180 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M420-R cooling tower (419 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M420-R — a Series V cooling tower, 419 nominal tons (1840 kW): rated to cool 1260 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1380–2300 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M431-N cooling tower (430 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M431-N — a Series V cooling tower, 430 nominal tons (1888 kW): rated to cool 1293 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1416–2360 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M455-O cooling tower (453 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M455-O — a Series V cooling tower, 453 nominal tons (1994 kW): rated to cool 1365 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1495–2492 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M484-N cooling tower (482 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M484-N — a Series V cooling tower, 482 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1452 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1590–2651 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M514-O cooling tower (512 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M514-O — a Series V cooling tower, 512 nominal tons (2252 kW): rated to cool 1542 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1689–2815 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M515-N cooling tower (513 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M515-N — a Series V cooling tower, 513 nominal tons (2256 kW): rated to cool 1545 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1692–2821 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M533-N cooling tower (531 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M533-N — a Series V cooling tower, 531 nominal tons (2335 kW): rated to cool 1599 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1751–2919 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M544-O cooling tower (542 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M544-O — a Series V cooling tower, 542 nominal tons (2383 kW): rated to cool 1632 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1788–2979 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M557-O cooling tower (555 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M557-O — a Series V cooling tower, 555 nominal tons (2440 kW): rated to cool 1671 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1830–3051 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M560-P cooling tower (558 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M560-P — a Series V cooling tower, 558 nominal tons (2454 kW): rated to cool 1680 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1840–3067 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M595-P cooling tower (593 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M595-P — a Series V cooling tower, 593 nominal tons (2607 kW): rated to cool 1785 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1955–3259 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M610-P cooling tower (608 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-M610-P — a Series V cooling tower, 608 nominal tons (2673 kW): rated to cool 1830 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2004–3341 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M632-O cooling tower (630 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M632-O — a Series V cooling tower, 630 nominal tons (2769 kW): rated to cool 1896 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2077–3461 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M656-O cooling tower (654 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M656-O — a Series V cooling tower, 654 nominal tons (2874 kW): rated to cool 1968 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2156–3593 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M696-P cooling tower (694 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M696-P — a Series V cooling tower, 694 nominal tons (3049 kW): rated to cool 2088 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2287–3812 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M700-O cooling tower (698 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M700-O — a Series V cooling tower, 698 nominal tons (3067 kW): rated to cool 2100 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2300–3834 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M704-P cooling tower (702 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M704-P — a Series V cooling tower, 702 nominal tons (3084 kW): rated to cool 2112 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2313–3856 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M742-P cooling tower (740 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M742-P — a Series V cooling tower, 740 nominal tons (3251 kW): rated to cool 2226 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2438–4064 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M758-Q cooling tower (755 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M758-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 755 nominal tons (3321 kW): rated to cool 2274 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2491–4151 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M796-Q cooling tower (793 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M796-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 793 nominal tons (3488 kW): rated to cool 2388 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2616–4359 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M840-R cooling tower (837 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M840-R — a Series V cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2760–4600 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M948-O cooling tower (945 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M948-O — a Series V cooling tower, 945 nominal tons (4154 kW): rated to cool 2844 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3115–5192 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-M984-O cooling tower (981 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-M984-O — a Series V cooling tower, 981 nominal tons (4311 kW): rated to cool 2952 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3233–5389 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N209-P cooling tower (208 tons, 916 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-N209-P — a Series V cooling tower, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection687–1145 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N220-O cooling tower (219 tons, 964 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-N220-O — a Series V cooling tower, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection723–1205 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N240-P cooling tower (239 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-N240-P — a Series V cooling tower, 239 nominal tons (1052 kW): rated to cool 720 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection789–1314 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N255-P cooling tower (254 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-N255-P — a Series V cooling tower, 254 nominal tons (1117 kW): rated to cool 765 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection838–1397 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N301-Q cooling tower (300 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-N301-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 300 nominal tons (1319 kW): rated to cool 903 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection989–1648 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N325-P cooling tower (324 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-N325-P — a Series V cooling tower, 324 nominal tons (1424 kW): rated to cool 975 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1068–1780 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N346-Q cooling tower (345 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-N346-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1137–1895 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N370-Q cooling tower (369 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-N370-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1216–2026 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N395-R cooling tower (394 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT1-N395-R — a Series V cooling tower, 394 nominal tons (1731 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1298–2163 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N418-P cooling tower (417 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-N418-P — a Series V cooling tower, 417 nominal tons (1831 kW): rated to cool 1254 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1374–2289 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N440-O cooling tower (439 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-N440-O — a Series V cooling tower, 439 nominal tons (1928 kW): rated to cool 1320 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1446–2410 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N480-P cooling tower (478 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-N480-P — a Series V cooling tower, 478 nominal tons (2103 kW): rated to cool 1440 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1577–2629 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N510-P cooling tower (508 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's VT1-N510-P — a Series V cooling tower, 508 nominal tons (2235 kW): rated to cool 1530 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1676–2793 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-016-E cooling tower (16 tons, 70 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-016-E — a Series V cooling tower, 16 nominal tons (70 kW): rated to cool 48 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection53–88 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-021-F cooling tower (21 tons, 92 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-021-F — a Series V cooling tower, 21 nominal tons (92 kW): rated to cool 63 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection69–115 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-027-F cooling tower (27 tons, 118 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-027-F — a Series V cooling tower, 27 nominal tons (118 kW): rated to cool 81 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection89–148 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-030-G cooling tower (30 tons, 131 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-030-G — a Series V cooling tower, 30 nominal tons (131 kW): rated to cool 90 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection99–164 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-034-H cooling tower (34 tons, 149 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-034-H — a Series V cooling tower, 34 nominal tons (149 kW): rated to cool 102 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection112–186 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-039-H cooling tower (39 tons, 171 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-039-H — a Series V cooling tower, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection128–214 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-045-H cooling tower (45 tons, 197 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-045-H — a Series V cooling tower, 45 nominal tons (197 kW): rated to cool 135 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection148–246 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-051-G cooling tower (51 tons, 223 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-051-G — a Series V cooling tower, 51 nominal tons (223 kW): rated to cool 153 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection168–279 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-059-H cooling tower (59 tons, 259 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-059-H — a Series V cooling tower, 59 nominal tons (259 kW): rated to cool 177 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection194–323 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-066-J cooling tower (66 tons, 289 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-066-J — a Series V cooling tower, 66 nominal tons (289 kW): rated to cool 198 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection217–361 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-072-K cooling tower (72 tons, 315 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-072-K — a Series V cooling tower, 72 nominal tons (315 kW): rated to cool 216 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection237–394 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-079-K cooling tower (79 tons, 346 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-079-K — a Series V cooling tower, 79 nominal tons (346 kW): rated to cool 237 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection260–433 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-082-K cooling tower (82 tons, 359 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-082-K — a Series V cooling tower, 82 nominal tons (359 kW): rated to cool 246 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection269–449 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-092-L cooling tower (92 tons, 403 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-092-L — a Series V cooling tower, 92 nominal tons (403 kW): rated to cool 276 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection302–504 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-095-K cooling tower (95 tons, 416 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-095-K — a Series V cooling tower, 95 nominal tons (416 kW): rated to cool 285 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection312–520 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-103-K cooling tower (103 tons, 451 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-103-K — a Series V cooling tower, 103 nominal tons (451 kW): rated to cool 309 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection338–564 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-116-L cooling tower (116 tons, 508 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-116-L — a Series V cooling tower, 116 nominal tons (508 kW): rated to cool 348 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection381–635 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-126-M cooling tower (126 tons, 552 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-126-M — a Series V cooling tower, 126 nominal tons (552 kW): rated to cool 378 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection414–690 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-137-M cooling tower (137 tons, 600 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-137-M — a Series V cooling tower, 137 nominal tons (600 kW): rated to cool 411 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection450–750 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-152-M cooling tower (151 tons, 666 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-152-M — a Series V cooling tower, 151 nominal tons (666 kW): rated to cool 456 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection499–832 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-171-L cooling tower (170 tons, 749 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-171-L — a Series V cooling tower, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection562–937 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-185-M cooling tower (184 tons, 811 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-185-M — a Series V cooling tower, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection608–1013 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-198-N cooling tower (197 tons, 868 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-198-N — a Series V cooling tower, 197 nominal tons (868 kW): rated to cool 594 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection651–1084 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-209-O cooling tower (208 tons, 916 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-209-O — a Series V cooling tower, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection687–1145 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-227-O cooling tower (226 tons, 995 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-227-O — a Series V cooling tower, 226 nominal tons (995 kW): rated to cool 681 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection746–1243 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-245-P cooling tower (244 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-245-P — a Series V cooling tower, 244 nominal tons (1073 kW): rated to cool 735 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection805–1342 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-272-P cooling tower (271 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-272-P — a Series V cooling tower, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection894–1490 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-07EN cooling tower (166 tons, 732 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-07EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 166 nominal tons (732 kW): rated to cool 501 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection549–915 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-07FN cooling tower (182 tons, 802 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-07FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 182 nominal tons (802 kW): rated to cool 549 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection601–1002 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-07GC cooling tower (196 tons, 863 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-07GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection647–1079 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-07GN cooling tower (207 tons, 911 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-07GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 207 nominal tons (911 kW): rated to cool 624 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection683–1139 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-07HC cooling tower (225 tons, 990 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-07HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 225 nominal tons (990 kW): rated to cool 678 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection743–1238 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-07HN cooling tower (246 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-07HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection812–1353 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-09EN cooling tower (194 tons, 854 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-09EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 194 nominal tons (854 kW): rated to cool 585 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection641–1068 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-09FN cooling tower (212 tons, 933 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-09FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 212 nominal tons (933 kW): rated to cool 639 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection700–1167 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-09GC cooling tower (228 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-09GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 228 nominal tons (1003 kW): rated to cool 687 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection753–1254 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-09GN cooling tower (242 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-09GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 242 nominal tons (1065 kW): rated to cool 729 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection799–1331 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-09HC cooling tower (262 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-09HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 262 nominal tons (1152 kW): rated to cool 789 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection864–1440 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-09HN cooling tower (286 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-09HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 286 nominal tons (1257 kW): rated to cool 861 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection943–1572 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-10EN cooling tower (203 tons, 894 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-10EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 203 nominal tons (894 kW): rated to cool 612 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection670–1117 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-10FN cooling tower (223 tons, 981 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-10FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 223 nominal tons (981 kW): rated to cool 672 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection736–1227 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-10GC cooling tower (240 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-10GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 240 nominal tons (1056 kW): rated to cool 723 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection792–1320 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-10GN cooling tower (254 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-10GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 254 nominal tons (1117 kW): rated to cool 765 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection838–1397 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-10HC cooling tower (275 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-10HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 275 nominal tons (1209 kW): rated to cool 828 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection907–1512 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-10HN cooling tower (301 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-10HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 301 nominal tons (1323 kW): rated to cool 906 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection992–1654 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-10JN cooling tower (343 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-10JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1130–1884 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-11EN cooling tower (210 tons, 924 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-11EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 633 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection693–1156 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-11FN cooling tower (230 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-11FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 230 nominal tons (1012 kW): rated to cool 693 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection759–1265 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-11GC cooling tower (247 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-11GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 247 nominal tons (1087 kW): rated to cool 744 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection815–1358 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-11GN cooling tower (262 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-11GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 262 nominal tons (1152 kW): rated to cool 789 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection864–1440 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-11HC cooling tower (284 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-11HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection937–1561 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-11HN cooling tower (310 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-11HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 310 nominal tons (1363 kW): rated to cool 933 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1022–1703 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-11JN cooling tower (354 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-11JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 354 nominal tons (1555 kW): rated to cool 1065 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1167–1944 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-12FN cooling tower (238 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-12FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection785–1309 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-12GC cooling tower (256 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-12GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection845–1408 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-12GN cooling tower (271 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-12GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection894–1490 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-12HC cooling tower (294 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-12HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 294 nominal tons (1293 kW): rated to cool 885 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection969–1616 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-12HN cooling tower (322 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-12HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 322 nominal tons (1415 kW): rated to cool 969 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1061–1769 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-12JN cooling tower (367 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-12JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 367 nominal tons (1612 kW): rated to cool 1104 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1209–2015 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-07EN cooling tower (251 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-07EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 251 nominal tons (1104 kW): rated to cool 756 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection828–1380 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-07FN cooling tower (276 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-07FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection910–1517 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-07GN cooling tower (317 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-07GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 317 nominal tons (1393 kW): rated to cool 954 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1045–1742 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-07HN cooling tower (372 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-07HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 372 nominal tons (1634 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1226–2043 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-09EN cooling tower (290 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-09EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 290 nominal tons (1275 kW): rated to cool 873 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection956–1594 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-09FN cooling tower (318 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-09FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1048–1747 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-09GN cooling tower (365 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-09GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 365 nominal tons (1604 kW): rated to cool 1098 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1203–2004 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-09HN cooling tower (429 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-09HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1413–2355 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-10EN cooling tower (304 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-10EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1002–1670 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-10FN cooling tower (334 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-10FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 334 nominal tons (1468 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1101–1835 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-10GN cooling tower (384 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-10GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1265–2109 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-10HN cooling tower (450 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-10HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 450 nominal tons (1976 kW): rated to cool 1353 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1482–2470 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-10JN cooling tower (512 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-10JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 512 nominal tons (2252 kW): rated to cool 1542 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1689–2815 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-11EN cooling tower (317 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-11EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 317 nominal tons (1393 kW): rated to cool 954 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1045–1742 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-11FN cooling tower (347 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-11FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 347 nominal tons (1525 kW): rated to cool 1044 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1144–1906 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-11GN cooling tower (400 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-11GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1318–2196 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-11HN cooling tower (468 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-11HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 468 nominal tons (2059 kW): rated to cool 1410 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1544–2574 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-11JN cooling tower (534 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-11JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 534 nominal tons (2348 kW): rated to cool 1608 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1761–2936 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-12EN cooling tower (328 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-12EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1081–1802 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-12FN cooling tower (360 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-12FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 360 nominal tons (1582 kW): rated to cool 1083 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1186–1977 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-12GN cooling tower (414 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-12GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 414 nominal tons (1818 kW): rated to cool 1245 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1364–2273 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-12HN cooling tower (484 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-12HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 484 nominal tons (2129 kW): rated to cool 1458 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1597–2662 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1218-12JN cooling tower (553 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1218-12JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 553 nominal tons (2432 kW): rated to cool 1665 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1824–3040 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-06EN cooling tower (92 tons, 403 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-06EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 92 nominal tons (403 kW): rated to cool 276 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection302–504 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-06FN cooling tower (101 tons, 443 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-06FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 101 nominal tons (443 kW): rated to cool 303 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection332–553 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-06GN cooling tower (117 tons, 513 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-06GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 117 nominal tons (513 kW): rated to cool 351 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection384–641 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-06HN cooling tower (138 tons, 605 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-06HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 138 nominal tons (605 kW): rated to cool 414 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection453–756 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-07EN cooling tower (101 tons, 443 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-07EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 101 nominal tons (443 kW): rated to cool 303 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection332–553 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-07FN cooling tower (111 tons, 486 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-07FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 111 nominal tons (486 kW): rated to cool 333 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection365–608 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-07GN cooling tower (128 tons, 561 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-07GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 128 nominal tons (561 kW): rated to cool 384 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection421–701 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-07HN cooling tower (150 tons, 657 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-07HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection493–822 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-07JN cooling tower (173 tons, 762 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-07JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection572–953 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-09FN cooling tower (131 tons, 574 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-09FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 131 nominal tons (574 kW): rated to cool 393 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection430–717 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-09GN cooling tower (150 tons, 662 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-09GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 150 nominal tons (662 kW): rated to cool 453 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection496–827 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-09HN cooling tower (177 tons, 780 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-09HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 177 nominal tons (780 kW): rated to cool 534 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection585–975 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-09JN cooling tower (203 tons, 894 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-09JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 203 nominal tons (894 kW): rated to cool 612 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection670–1117 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-10FN cooling tower (137 tons, 600 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-10FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 137 nominal tons (600 kW): rated to cool 411 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection450–750 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-10GN cooling tower (157 tons, 692 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-10GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection519–865 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-10HN cooling tower (185 tons, 815 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-10HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 185 nominal tons (815 kW): rated to cool 558 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection611–1019 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-10JN cooling tower (212 tons, 933 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-10JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 212 nominal tons (933 kW): rated to cool 639 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection700–1167 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1285-10KN cooling tower (232 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1285-10KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 232 nominal tons (1021 kW): rated to cool 699 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection766–1276 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-06G cooling tower (205 tons, 903 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-06G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 205 nominal tons (903 kW): rated to cool 618 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection677–1128 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-06H cooling tower (243 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-06H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 243 nominal tons (1069 kW): rated to cool 732 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection802–1336 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-06J cooling tower (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-06J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection917–1528 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-06K cooling tower (306 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-06K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1009–1681 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-06L cooling tower (349 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-06L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 349 nominal tons (1533 kW): rated to cool 1050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1150–1917 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-07G cooling tower (227 tons, 999 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-07G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 227 nominal tons (999 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection749–1249 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-07H cooling tower (270 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-07H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection891–1484 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-07J cooling tower (309 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-07J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 309 nominal tons (1358 kW): rated to cool 930 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1019–1698 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-07K cooling tower (339 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-07K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 339 nominal tons (1490 kW): rated to cool 1020 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1117–1862 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-07L cooling tower (387 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-07L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1275–2125 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-06H cooling tower (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-06H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection917–1528 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-06J cooling tower (317 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-06J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 317 nominal tons (1393 kW): rated to cool 954 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1045–1742 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-06K cooling tower (349 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-06K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 349 nominal tons (1533 kW): rated to cool 1050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1150–1917 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-06L cooling tower (398 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-06L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 398 nominal tons (1748 kW): rated to cool 1197 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1311–2185 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-07J cooling tower (353 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-07J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 353 nominal tons (1551 kW): rated to cool 1062 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1163–1939 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-07K cooling tower (388 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-07K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1278–2130 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-07L cooling tower (443 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-07L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 443 nominal tons (1945 kW): rated to cool 1332 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1459–2432 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-07M cooling tower (485 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-07M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 485 nominal tons (2134 kW): rated to cool 1461 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1600–2667 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-10K cooling tower (489 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-10K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 489 nominal tons (2151 kW): rated to cool 1473 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1613–2689 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-10L cooling tower (557 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-10L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 557 nominal tons (2449 kW): rated to cool 1677 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1837–3061 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-10M cooling tower (609 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-10M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 609 nominal tons (2677 kW): rated to cool 1833 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2008–3346 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-10N cooling tower (653 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-10N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 653 nominal tons (2870 kW): rated to cool 1965 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2152–3587 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-10O cooling tower (691 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-10O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 691 nominal tons (3036 kW): rated to cool 2079 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2277–3795 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-12K cooling tower (526 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-12K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 526 nominal tons (2313 kW): rated to cool 1584 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1735–2892 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-12L cooling tower (598 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-12L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 598 nominal tons (2629 kW): rated to cool 1800 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1972–3286 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-12M cooling tower (655 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-12M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 655 nominal tons (2879 kW): rated to cool 1971 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2159–3598 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-12N cooling tower (701 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-12N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 701 nominal tons (3080 kW): rated to cool 2109 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2310–3850 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-12O cooling tower (742 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-12O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 742 nominal tons (3260 kW): rated to cool 2232 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2445–4075 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-13K cooling tower (543 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-13K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1791–2985 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-13L cooling tower (618 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-13L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 618 nominal tons (2716 kW): rated to cool 1860 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2037–3396 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-13M cooling tower (676 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-13M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 676 nominal tons (2971 kW): rated to cool 2034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2228–3713 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-13N cooling tower (725 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-13N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 725 nominal tons (3185 kW): rated to cool 2181 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2389–3982 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-13O cooling tower (766 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-13O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 766 nominal tons (3369 kW): rated to cool 2307 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2527–4212 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-14L cooling tower (643 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-14L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 643 nominal tons (2826 kW): rated to cool 1935 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2119–3532 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-14M cooling tower (704 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-14M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 704 nominal tons (3093 kW): rated to cool 2118 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2320–3867 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-14N cooling tower (753 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-14N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 753 nominal tons (3312 kW): rated to cool 2268 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2484–4140 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1222-14O cooling tower (796 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1222-14O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 796 nominal tons (3501 kW): rated to cool 2397 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2626–4376 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-07J cooling tower (395 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-07J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 395 nominal tons (1735 kW): rated to cool 1188 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1301–2169 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-07K cooling tower (434 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-07K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 434 nominal tons (1906 kW): rated to cool 1305 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1429–2382 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-07L cooling tower (495 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-07L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 495 nominal tons (2178 kW): rated to cool 1491 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1633–2722 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-07M cooling tower (543 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-07M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1791–2985 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-07N cooling tower (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-07N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1922–3204 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-12L cooling tower (689 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-12L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 689 nominal tons (3028 kW): rated to cool 2073 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2271–3784 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-12M cooling tower (752 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-12M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 752 nominal tons (3308 kW): rated to cool 2265 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2481–4135 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-12N cooling tower (805 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-12N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 805 nominal tons (3540 kW): rated to cool 2424 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2655–4425 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-12O cooling tower (851 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-12O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 851 nominal tons (3742 kW): rated to cool 2562 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2806–4677 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-12P cooling tower (928 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-12P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 928 nominal tons (4079 kW): rated to cool 2793 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 103.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3059–5099 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-13L cooling tower (715 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-13L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 715 nominal tons (3141 kW): rated to cool 2151 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2356–3927 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-13M cooling tower (780 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-13M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 780 nominal tons (3431 kW): rated to cool 2349 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2573–4288 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-13N cooling tower (835 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-13N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 835 nominal tons (3672 kW): rated to cool 2514 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2754–4589 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-13O cooling tower (882 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-13O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 882 nominal tons (3878 kW): rated to cool 2655 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2908–4847 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-13P cooling tower (962 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-13P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 962 nominal tons (4228 kW): rated to cool 2895 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 107.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3171–5285 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-14M cooling tower (814 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-14M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 814 nominal tons (3580 kW): rated to cool 2451 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2685–4474 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-14N cooling tower (871 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-14N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 871 nominal tons (3829 kW): rated to cool 2622 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2872–4787 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-14O cooling tower (921 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-14O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 921 nominal tons (4048 kW): rated to cool 2772 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3036–5060 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1424-14P cooling tower (1004 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1424-14P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1004 nominal tons (4412 kW): rated to cool 3021 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3309–5515 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-05G cooling tower (170 tons, 749 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-05G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection562–937 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-05H cooling tower (202 tons, 889 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-05H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection667–1112 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-05J cooling tower (232 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-05J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 232 nominal tons (1021 kW): rated to cool 699 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection766–1276 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-05K cooling tower (255 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-05K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 768 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection841–1402 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-06G cooling tower (193 tons, 850 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-06G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 193 nominal tons (850 kW): rated to cool 582 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection637–1062 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-06H cooling tower (229 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-06H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 229 nominal tons (1008 kW): rated to cool 690 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection756–1260 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-06J cooling tower (261 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-06J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 261 nominal tons (1148 kW): rated to cool 786 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection861–1435 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-06K cooling tower (287 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-06K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 287 nominal tons (1262 kW): rated to cool 864 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection946–1577 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-07G cooling tower (215 tons, 946 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-07G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 215 nominal tons (946 kW): rated to cool 648 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection710–1183 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-07H cooling tower (255 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-07H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 768 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection841–1402 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-07J cooling tower (291 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-07J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 291 nominal tons (1279 kW): rated to cool 876 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection960–1599 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-07K cooling tower (319 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-07K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1052–1753 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-8518-07L cooling tower (364 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-8518-07L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 364 nominal tons (1599 kW): rated to cool 1095 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1199–1999 kWEUOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-210 cooling tower (8 tons, 34 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-210 — a T-2 cooling tower, 8 tons (34 kW): rated to cool 23 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 1.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection25–42 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2100 cooling tower (76 tons, 336 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2100 — a T-2 cooling tower, 76 tons (336 kW): rated to cool 230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection252–420 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2125 cooling tower (96 tons, 422 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2125 — a T-2 cooling tower, 96 tons (422 kW): rated to cool 289 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection317–528 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-215 cooling tower (11 tons, 48 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-215 — a T-2 cooling tower, 11 tons (48 kW): rated to cool 33 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection36–60 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2150 cooling tower (117 tons, 516 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2150 — a T-2 cooling tower, 117 tons (516 kW): rated to cool 353 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection387–644 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2175 cooling tower (135 tons, 594 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2175 — a T-2 cooling tower, 135 tons (594 kW): rated to cool 407 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection446–743 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-220 cooling tower (15 tons, 66 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-220 — a T-2 cooling tower, 15 tons (66 kW): rated to cool 45 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection49–82 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2200 cooling tower (156 tons, 685 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2200 — a T-2 cooling tower, 156 tons (685 kW): rated to cool 469 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection514–856 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2225 cooling tower (167 tons, 735 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2225 — a T-2 cooling tower, 167 tons (735 kW): rated to cool 503 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection551–918 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-225 cooling tower (19 tons, 82 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-225 — a T-2 cooling tower, 19 tons (82 kW): rated to cool 56 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection61–102 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2250 cooling tower (191 tons, 838 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2250 — a T-2 cooling tower, 191 tons (838 kW): rated to cool 574 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection629–1048 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-230 cooling tower (23 tons, 99 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-230 — a T-2 cooling tower, 23 tons (99 kW): rated to cool 68 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection74–124 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2300 cooling tower (228 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2300 — a T-2 cooling tower, 228 tons (1000 kW): rated to cool 685 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection750–1251 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2350 cooling tower (272 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2350 — a T-2 cooling tower, 272 tons (1195 kW): rated to cool 818 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection896–1493 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-240 cooling tower (31 tons, 134 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-240 — a T-2 cooling tower, 31 tons (134 kW): rated to cool 92 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection101–168 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2400 cooling tower (309 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2400 — a T-2 cooling tower, 309 tons (1358 kW): rated to cool 930 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1019–1698 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-25 cooling tower (4 tons, 16 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-25 — a T-2 cooling tower, 4 tons (16 kW): rated to cool 11 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 1.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection12–20 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-250 cooling tower (39 tons, 169 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-250 — a T-2 cooling tower, 39 tons (169 kW): rated to cool 116 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection127–212 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2500 cooling tower (407 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2500 — a T-2 cooling tower, 407 tons (1791 kW): rated to cool 1226 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1343–2238 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-260 cooling tower (46 tons, 202 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-260 — a T-2 cooling tower, 46 tons (202 kW): rated to cool 138 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection151–252 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2600 cooling tower (467 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2600 — a T-2 cooling tower, 467 tons (2053 kW): rated to cool 1406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1540–2567 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-270 cooling tower (53 tons, 234 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-270 — a T-2 cooling tower, 53 tons (234 kW): rated to cool 160 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection175–292 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2700 cooling tower (565 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2700 — a T-2 cooling tower, 565 tons (2483 kW): rated to cool 1700 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1862–3103 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-28 cooling tower (6 tons, 26 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-28 — a T-2 cooling tower, 6 tons (26 kW): rated to cool 18 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 1.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection20–33 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-280 cooling tower (61 tons, 270 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-280 — a T-2 cooling tower, 61 tons (270 kW): rated to cool 185 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection203–338 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-2800 cooling tower (623 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-2800 — a T-2 cooling tower, 623 tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2054–3423 kWNAOpen in the builder
Cooling Tower Systems T-3000 cooling tower (825 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
CTS's T-3000 — a T-2 cooling tower, 825 tons (3628 kW): rated to cool 2484 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2721–4535 kWNAOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-2I12 cooling tower (226 tons, 995 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-2I12 — an AT cooling tower, 226 nominal tons (995 kW): rated to cool 681 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection746–1243 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-2I18 cooling tower (289 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-2I18 — an AT cooling tower, 289 nominal tons (1271 kW): rated to cool 870 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection953–1588 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-2J12 cooling tower (275 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-2J12 — an AT cooling tower, 275 nominal tons (1209 kW): rated to cool 828 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection907–1512 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-2J18 cooling tower (350 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-2J18 — an AT cooling tower, 350 nominal tons (1538 kW): rated to cool 1053 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1153–1922 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-2K12 cooling tower (304 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-2K12 — an AT cooling tower, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1002–1670 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-2K18 cooling tower (388 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-2K18 — an AT cooling tower, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1278–2130 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-2L12 cooling tower (325 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-2L12 — an AT cooling tower, 325 nominal tons (1428 kW): rated to cool 978 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1071–1785 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-2L18 cooling tower (419 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-2L18 — an AT cooling tower, 419 nominal tons (1840 kW): rated to cool 1260 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1380–2300 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-2M12 cooling tower (341 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-2M12 — an AT cooling tower, 341 nominal tons (1498 kW): rated to cool 1026 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1124–1873 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-2M18 cooling tower (444 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-2M18 — an AT cooling tower, 444 nominal tons (1950 kW): rated to cool 1335 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1462–2437 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3I12 cooling tower (263 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3I12 — an AT cooling tower, 263 nominal tons (1157 kW): rated to cool 792 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection868–1446 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3I18 cooling tower (332 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3I18 — an AT cooling tower, 332 nominal tons (1459 kW): rated to cool 999 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1094–1824 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3J12 cooling tower (308 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3J12 — an AT cooling tower, 308 nominal tons (1354 kW): rated to cool 927 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1015–1692 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3J18 cooling tower (394 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3J18 — an AT cooling tower, 394 nominal tons (1731 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1298–2163 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3K12 cooling tower (337 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3K12 — an AT cooling tower, 337 nominal tons (1481 kW): rated to cool 1014 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1111–1851 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3K18 cooling tower (436 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3K18 — an AT cooling tower, 436 nominal tons (1915 kW): rated to cool 1311 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1436–2393 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3L12 cooling tower (360 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3L12 — an AT cooling tower, 360 nominal tons (1582 kW): rated to cool 1083 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1186–1977 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3L18 cooling tower (469 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3L18 — an AT cooling tower, 469 nominal tons (2064 kW): rated to cool 1413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1548–2580 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3M12 cooling tower (379 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3M12 — an AT cooling tower, 379 nominal tons (1665 kW): rated to cool 1140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1249–2081 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3M18 cooling tower (497 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3M18 — an AT cooling tower, 497 nominal tons (2186 kW): rated to cool 1497 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1640–2733 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3N18 cooling tower (545 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3N18 — an AT cooling tower, 545 nominal tons (2397 kW): rated to cool 1641 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1797–2996 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4I12 cooling tower (276 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4I12 — an AT cooling tower, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection910–1517 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4I18 cooling tower (363 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4I18 — an AT cooling tower, 363 nominal tons (1595 kW): rated to cool 1092 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1196–1994 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4J12 cooling tower (321 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4J12 — an AT cooling tower, 321 nominal tons (1411 kW): rated to cool 966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1058–1764 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4J18 cooling tower (419 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4J18 — an AT cooling tower, 419 nominal tons (1840 kW): rated to cool 1260 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1380–2300 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4K12 cooling tower (349 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4K12 — an AT cooling tower, 349 nominal tons (1533 kW): rated to cool 1050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1150–1917 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4K18 cooling tower (458 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4K18 — an AT cooling tower, 458 nominal tons (2015 kW): rated to cool 1380 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1512–2519 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4L12 cooling tower (372 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4L12 — an AT cooling tower, 372 nominal tons (1634 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1226–2043 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4L18 cooling tower (491 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4L18 — an AT cooling tower, 491 nominal tons (2160 kW): rated to cool 1479 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1620–2700 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4M12 cooling tower (392 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4M12 — an AT cooling tower, 392 nominal tons (1722 kW): rated to cool 1179 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1291–2152 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4M18 cooling tower (520 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4M18 — an AT cooling tower, 520 nominal tons (2287 kW): rated to cool 1566 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1715–2859 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4N12 cooling tower (409 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4N12 — an AT cooling tower, 409 nominal tons (1796 kW): rated to cool 1230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1347–2245 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4N18 cooling tower (568 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4N18 — an AT cooling tower, 568 nominal tons (2497 kW): rated to cool 1710 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1873–3122 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2I12 cooling tower (279 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-2I12 — an AT cooling tower, 279 nominal tons (1227 kW): rated to cool 840 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection920–1533 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2I14 cooling tower (298 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-2I14 — an AT cooling tower, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection983–1638 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2J12 cooling tower (333 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-2J12 — an AT cooling tower, 333 nominal tons (1463 kW): rated to cool 1002 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1098–1829 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2J14 cooling tower (358 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-2J14 — an AT cooling tower, 358 nominal tons (1573 kW): rated to cool 1077 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1180–1966 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2J18 cooling tower (438 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-2J18 — an AT cooling tower, 438 nominal tons (1923 kW): rated to cool 1317 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1443–2404 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2K12 cooling tower (363 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-2K12 — an AT cooling tower, 363 nominal tons (1595 kW): rated to cool 1092 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1196–1994 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2K14 cooling tower (393 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-2K14 — an AT cooling tower, 393 nominal tons (1726 kW): rated to cool 1182 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1295–2158 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2K18 cooling tower (495 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-2K18 — an AT cooling tower, 495 nominal tons (2178 kW): rated to cool 1491 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1633–2722 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2K20 cooling tower (457 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-2K20 — an AT cooling tower, 457 nominal tons (2011 kW): rated to cool 1377 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1508–2514 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2L12 cooling tower (390 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-2L12 — an AT cooling tower, 390 nominal tons (1713 kW): rated to cool 1173 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1285–2141 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2L14 cooling tower (424 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-2L14 — an AT cooling tower, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1397–2328 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2L18 cooling tower (523 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-2L18 — an AT cooling tower, 523 nominal tons (2300 kW): rated to cool 1575 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1725–2875 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2L20 cooling tower (504 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-2L20 — an AT cooling tower, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1663–2771 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2M12 cooling tower (413 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-2M12 — an AT cooling tower, 413 nominal tons (1814 kW): rated to cool 1242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1360–2267 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2M14 cooling tower (449 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-2M14 — an AT cooling tower, 449 nominal tons (1972 kW): rated to cool 1350 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1479–2465 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2M18 cooling tower (552 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-2M18 — an AT cooling tower, 552 nominal tons (2427 kW): rated to cool 1662 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1820–3034 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2M20 cooling tower (542 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-2M20 — an AT cooling tower, 542 nominal tons (2383 kW): rated to cool 1632 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1788–2979 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2N18 cooling tower (608 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-2N18 — an AT cooling tower, 608 nominal tons (2673 kW): rated to cool 1830 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2004–3341 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2N20 cooling tower (623 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-2N20 — an AT cooling tower, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2054–3423 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-2O20 cooling tower (677 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-2O20 — an AT cooling tower, 677 nominal tons (2975 kW): rated to cool 2037 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2231–3719 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3I12 cooling tower (315 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3I12 — an AT cooling tower, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1038–1731 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3I14 cooling tower (343 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3I14 — an AT cooling tower, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1130–1884 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3J12 cooling tower (369 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3J12 — an AT cooling tower, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1216–2026 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3J14 cooling tower (404 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3J14 — an AT cooling tower, 404 nominal tons (1774 kW): rated to cool 1215 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1331–2218 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3J18 cooling tower (486 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3J18 — an AT cooling tower, 486 nominal tons (2138 kW): rated to cool 1464 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1604–2673 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3K12 cooling tower (403 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3K12 — an AT cooling tower, 403 nominal tons (1770 kW): rated to cool 1212 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1328–2213 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3K14 cooling tower (438 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3K14 — an AT cooling tower, 438 nominal tons (1923 kW): rated to cool 1317 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1443–2404 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3K18 cooling tower (544 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3K18 — an AT cooling tower, 544 nominal tons (2392 kW): rated to cool 1638 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1794–2990 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3K20 cooling tower (534 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3K20 — an AT cooling tower, 534 nominal tons (2348 kW): rated to cool 1608 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1761–2936 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3L12 cooling tower (433 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3L12 — an AT cooling tower, 433 nominal tons (1902 kW): rated to cool 1302 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1426–2377 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3L14 cooling tower (469 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3L14 — an AT cooling tower, 469 nominal tons (2064 kW): rated to cool 1413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1548–2580 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3L18 cooling tower (579 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3L18 — an AT cooling tower, 579 nominal tons (2546 kW): rated to cool 1743 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1909–3182 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3L20 cooling tower (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3L20 — an AT cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1922–3204 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3M12 cooling tower (459 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3M12 — an AT cooling tower, 459 nominal tons (2020 kW): rated to cool 1383 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1515–2525 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3M14 cooling tower (499 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3M14 — an AT cooling tower, 499 nominal tons (2195 kW): rated to cool 1503 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1646–2744 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3M18 cooling tower (612 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3M18 — an AT cooling tower, 612 nominal tons (2690 kW): rated to cool 1842 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2018–3363 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3M20 cooling tower (621 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3M20 — an AT cooling tower, 621 nominal tons (2730 kW): rated to cool 1869 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2047–3412 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3N14 cooling tower (546 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-3N14 — an AT cooling tower, 546 nominal tons (2401 kW): rated to cool 1644 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1801–3001 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3N18 cooling tower (673 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3N18 — an AT cooling tower, 673 nominal tons (2957 kW): rated to cool 2025 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2218–3697 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3N20 cooling tower (696 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3N20 — an AT cooling tower, 696 nominal tons (3058 kW): rated to cool 2094 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2294–3823 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3O18 cooling tower (722 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3O18 — an AT cooling tower, 722 nominal tons (3172 kW): rated to cool 2172 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2379–3965 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-3O20 cooling tower (754 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-3O20 — an AT cooling tower, 754 nominal tons (3317 kW): rated to cool 2271 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2488–4146 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4I12 cooling tower (336 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4I12 — an AT cooling tower, 336 nominal tons (1477 kW): rated to cool 1011 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1107–1846 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4I14 cooling tower (369 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4I14 — an AT cooling tower, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1216–2026 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4J12 cooling tower (386 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4J12 — an AT cooling tower, 386 nominal tons (1696 kW): rated to cool 1161 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1272–2119 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4J14 cooling tower (426 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4J14 — an AT cooling tower, 426 nominal tons (1871 kW): rated to cool 1281 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1403–2339 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4J18 cooling tower (516 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4J18 — an AT cooling tower, 516 nominal tons (2270 kW): rated to cool 1554 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1702–2837 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4K12 cooling tower (421 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4K12 — an AT cooling tower, 421 nominal tons (1849 kW): rated to cool 1266 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1387–2311 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4K14 cooling tower (458 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4K14 — an AT cooling tower, 458 nominal tons (2015 kW): rated to cool 1380 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1512–2519 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4K18 cooling tower (570 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4K18 — an AT cooling tower, 570 nominal tons (2506 kW): rated to cool 1716 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1880–3133 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4K20 cooling tower (570 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4K20 — an AT cooling tower, 570 nominal tons (2506 kW): rated to cool 1716 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1880–3133 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4L12 cooling tower (452 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4L12 — an AT cooling tower, 452 nominal tons (1989 kW): rated to cool 1362 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1492–2486 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4L14 cooling tower (492 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4L14 — an AT cooling tower, 492 nominal tons (2164 kW): rated to cool 1482 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1623–2706 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4L18 cooling tower (604 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4L18 — an AT cooling tower, 604 nominal tons (2655 kW): rated to cool 1818 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1991–3319 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4L20 cooling tower (616 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4L20 — an AT cooling tower, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2031–3385 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4M12 cooling tower (479 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4M12 — an AT cooling tower, 479 nominal tons (2107 kW): rated to cool 1443 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1581–2634 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4M14 cooling tower (522 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4M14 — an AT cooling tower, 522 nominal tons (2296 kW): rated to cool 1572 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1722–2870 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4M18 cooling tower (640 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4M18 — an AT cooling tower, 640 nominal tons (2813 kW): rated to cool 1926 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2110–3516 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4M20 cooling tower (653 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4M20 — an AT cooling tower, 653 nominal tons (2870 kW): rated to cool 1965 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2152–3587 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4N12 cooling tower (513 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4N12 — an AT cooling tower, 513 nominal tons (2256 kW): rated to cool 1545 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1692–2821 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4N14 cooling tower (572 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 112-4N14 — an AT cooling tower, 572 nominal tons (2515 kW): rated to cool 1722 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1886–3144 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4N18 cooling tower (703 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4N18 — an AT cooling tower, 703 nominal tons (3089 kW): rated to cool 2115 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2317–3861 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4N20 cooling tower (726 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4N20 — an AT cooling tower, 726 nominal tons (3190 kW): rated to cool 2184 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2392–3987 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4O18 cooling tower (754 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4O18 — an AT cooling tower, 754 nominal tons (3317 kW): rated to cool 2271 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2488–4146 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4O20 cooling tower (785 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4O20 — an AT cooling tower, 785 nominal tons (3453 kW): rated to cool 2364 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2589–4316 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4P18 cooling tower (782 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4P18 — an AT cooling tower, 782 nominal tons (3439 kW): rated to cool 2355 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2580–4299 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 112-4P20 cooling tower (814 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 112-4P20 — an AT cooling tower, 814 nominal tons (3580 kW): rated to cool 2451 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2685–4474 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-2K24 cooling tower (617 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-2K24 — an AT cooling tower, 617 nominal tons (2712 kW): rated to cool 1857 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2034–3390 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-2L24 cooling tower (682 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-2L24 — an AT cooling tower, 682 nominal tons (2997 kW): rated to cool 2052 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2248–3746 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-2M24 cooling tower (720 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-2M24 — an AT cooling tower, 720 nominal tons (3163 kW): rated to cool 2166 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2373–3954 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-2N24 cooling tower (778 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-2N24 — an AT cooling tower, 778 nominal tons (3422 kW): rated to cool 2343 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 94.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2566–4277 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-2O24 cooling tower (836 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-2O24 — an AT cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2757–4595 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-3K24 cooling tower (706 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 706 nominal tons (3102 kW): rated to cool 2124 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2327–3878 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-3L24 cooling tower (772 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 772 nominal tons (3396 kW): rated to cool 2325 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2547–4244 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-3M24 cooling tower (809 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-3M24 — an AT cooling tower, 809 nominal tons (3558 kW): rated to cool 2436 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2668–4447 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-3N24 cooling tower (889 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-3N24 — an AT cooling tower, 889 nominal tons (3908 kW): rated to cool 2676 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2931–4885 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-3O24 cooling tower (948 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-3O24 — an AT cooling tower, 948 nominal tons (4167 kW): rated to cool 2853 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3125–5208 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-3P24 cooling tower (1005 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-3P24 — an AT cooling tower, 1005 nominal tons (4416 kW): rated to cool 3024 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3312–5521 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-4K24 cooling tower (769 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-4K24 — an AT cooling tower, 769 nominal tons (3382 kW): rated to cool 2316 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2537–4228 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-4L24 cooling tower (831 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-4L24 — an AT cooling tower, 831 nominal tons (3654 kW): rated to cool 2502 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2741–4568 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-4M24 cooling tower (869 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-4M24 — an AT cooling tower, 869 nominal tons (3821 kW): rated to cool 2616 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2865–4776 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-4N24 cooling tower (944 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-4N24 — an AT cooling tower, 944 nominal tons (4149 kW): rated to cool 2841 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3112–5186 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-4O24 cooling tower (995 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-4O24 — an AT cooling tower, 995 nominal tons (4373 kW): rated to cool 2994 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3279–5466 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-4P24 cooling tower (1052 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-4P24 — an AT cooling tower, 1052 nominal tons (4627 kW): rated to cool 3168 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 103.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3470–5783 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-4Q24 cooling tower (1131 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-4Q24 — an AT cooling tower, 1131 nominal tons (4973 kW): rated to cool 3405 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3730–6216 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-5K26 cooling tower (1000 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-5K26 — an AT cooling tower, 1000 nominal tons (4395 kW): rated to cool 3009 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 94.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3296–5493 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-5L26 cooling tower (1074 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-5L26 — an AT cooling tower, 1074 nominal tons (4723 kW): rated to cool 3234 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3542–5904 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-5M26 cooling tower (1138 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-5M26 — an AT cooling tower, 1138 nominal tons (5004 kW): rated to cool 3426 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 107.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3753–6254 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-5N26 cooling tower (1243 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-5N26 — an AT cooling tower, 1243 nominal tons (5464 kW): rated to cool 3741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 117.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4098–6829 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 114-5O26 cooling tower (1328 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 114-5O26 — an AT cooling tower, 1328 nominal tons (5836 kW): rated to cool 3996 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4377–7295 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-2E4 cooling tower (33 tons, 145 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-2E4 — an AT cooling tower, 33 nominal tons (145 kW): rated to cool 99 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection108–181 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-2E9 cooling tower (76 tons, 333 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-2E9 — an AT cooling tower, 76 nominal tons (333 kW): rated to cool 228 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection250–416 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-2F12 cooling tower (115 tons, 504 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-2F12 — an AT cooling tower, 115 nominal tons (504 kW): rated to cool 345 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection378–630 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-2F4 cooling tower (39 tons, 171 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-2F4 — an AT cooling tower, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection128–214 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-2F6 cooling tower (57 tons, 250 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-2F6 — an AT cooling tower, 57 nominal tons (250 kW): rated to cool 171 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection187–312 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-2F9 cooling tower (90 tons, 394 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-2F9 — an AT cooling tower, 90 nominal tons (394 kW): rated to cool 270 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection296–493 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-2G12 cooling tower (137 tons, 600 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-2G12 — an AT cooling tower, 137 nominal tons (600 kW): rated to cool 411 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection450–750 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-2G6 cooling tower (67 tons, 294 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-2G6 — an AT cooling tower, 67 nominal tons (294 kW): rated to cool 201 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection220–367 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-3E4 cooling tower (37 tons, 162 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-3E4 — an AT cooling tower, 37 nominal tons (162 kW): rated to cool 111 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection122–203 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-3E9 cooling tower (86 tons, 377 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-3E9 — an AT cooling tower, 86 nominal tons (377 kW): rated to cool 258 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 9.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection283–471 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-3F12 cooling tower (129 tons, 565 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-3F12 — an AT cooling tower, 129 nominal tons (565 kW): rated to cool 387 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection424–706 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-3F4 cooling tower (43 tons, 188 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-3F4 — an AT cooling tower, 43 nominal tons (188 kW): rated to cool 129 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection141–235 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-3F6 cooling tower (64 tons, 280 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-3F6 — an AT cooling tower, 64 nominal tons (280 kW): rated to cool 192 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection210–351 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-3F9 cooling tower (100 tons, 438 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-3F9 — an AT cooling tower, 100 nominal tons (438 kW): rated to cool 300 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection329–548 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-3G12 cooling tower (150 tons, 657 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-3G12 — an AT cooling tower, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection493–822 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 14-3G6 cooling tower (74 tons, 324 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-3G6 — an AT cooling tower, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection243–405 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2G18 cooling tower (227 tons, 999 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2G18 — an AT cooling tower, 227 nominal tons (999 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection749–1249 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2G9 cooling tower (113 tons, 495 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2G9 — an AT cooling tower, 113 nominal tons (495 kW): rated to cool 339 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection371–619 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2H12 cooling tower (163 tons, 719 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2H12 — an AT cooling tower, 163 nominal tons (719 kW): rated to cool 492 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection539–898 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2H14 cooling tower (173 tons, 762 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2H14 — an AT cooling tower, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection572–953 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2H18 cooling tower (271 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2H18 — an AT cooling tower, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection894–1490 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2H9 cooling tower (135 tons, 591 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2H9 — an AT cooling tower, 135 nominal tons (591 kW): rated to cool 405 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection444–739 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2I12 cooling tower (179 tons, 789 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2I12 — an AT cooling tower, 179 nominal tons (789 kW): rated to cool 540 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection591–986 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2I14 cooling tower (246 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2I14 — an AT cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection812–1353 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2I18 cooling tower (300 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2I18 — an AT cooling tower, 300 nominal tons (1319 kW): rated to cool 903 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection989–1648 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2I9 cooling tower (149 tons, 653 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2I9 — an AT cooling tower, 149 nominal tons (653 kW): rated to cool 447 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection490–816 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2J12 cooling tower (207 tons, 911 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2J12 — an AT cooling tower, 207 nominal tons (911 kW): rated to cool 624 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection683–1139 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2J14 cooling tower (218 tons, 960 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2J14 — an AT cooling tower, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection720–1199 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2J18 cooling tower (345 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2J18 — an AT cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1137–1895 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2J9 cooling tower (170 tons, 749 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2J9 — an AT cooling tower, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection562–937 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2K12 cooling tower (228 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2K12 — an AT cooling tower, 228 nominal tons (1003 kW): rated to cool 687 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection753–1254 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2K14 cooling tower (300 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2K14 — an AT cooling tower, 300 nominal tons (1319 kW): rated to cool 903 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection989–1648 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-2L14 cooling tower (238 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-2L14 — an AT cooling tower, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection785–1309 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3G18 cooling tower (260 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3G18 — an AT cooling tower, 260 nominal tons (1144 kW): rated to cool 783 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection858–1429 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3G9 cooling tower (129 tons, 565 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3G9 — an AT cooling tower, 129 nominal tons (565 kW): rated to cool 387 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection424–706 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3H12 cooling tower (183 tons, 806 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3H12 — an AT cooling tower, 183 nominal tons (806 kW): rated to cool 552 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection605–1008 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3H14 cooling tower (193 tons, 850 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3H14 — an AT cooling tower, 193 nominal tons (850 kW): rated to cool 582 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection637–1062 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3H18 cooling tower (305 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3H18 — an AT cooling tower, 305 nominal tons (1341 kW): rated to cool 918 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1006–1676 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3H9 cooling tower (151 tons, 666 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3H9 — an AT cooling tower, 151 nominal tons (666 kW): rated to cool 456 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection499–832 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3I12 cooling tower (202 tons, 889 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3I12 — an AT cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection667–1112 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3I14 cooling tower (265 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3I14 — an AT cooling tower, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection874–1457 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3I18 cooling tower (338 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3I18 — an AT cooling tower, 338 nominal tons (1485 kW): rated to cool 1017 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1114–1857 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3I9 cooling tower (167 tons, 736 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3I9 — an AT cooling tower, 167 nominal tons (736 kW): rated to cool 504 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection552–920 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3J12 cooling tower (233 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3J12 — an AT cooling tower, 233 nominal tons (1025 kW): rated to cool 702 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection769–1282 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3J14 cooling tower (251 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3J14 — an AT cooling tower, 251 nominal tons (1104 kW): rated to cool 756 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection828–1380 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3J18 cooling tower (388 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3J18 — an AT cooling tower, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1278–2130 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3J9 cooling tower (192 tons, 846 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3J9 — an AT cooling tower, 192 nominal tons (846 kW): rated to cool 579 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection634–1057 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3K12 cooling tower (257 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3K12 — an AT cooling tower, 257 nominal tons (1130 kW): rated to cool 774 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection848–1413 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3K14 cooling tower (320 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3K14 — an AT cooling tower, 320 nominal tons (1406 kW): rated to cool 963 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1055–1758 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3K18 cooling tower (429 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3K18 — an AT cooling tower, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1413–2355 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3K9 cooling tower (212 tons, 933 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3K9 — an AT cooling tower, 212 nominal tons (933 kW): rated to cool 639 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection700–1167 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3L12 cooling tower (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3L12 — an AT cooling tower, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection917–1528 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3L14 cooling tower (269 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3L14 — an AT cooling tower, 269 nominal tons (1183 kW): rated to cool 810 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection887–1479 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-3M14 cooling tower (314 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3M14 — an AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1035–1725 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4G18 cooling tower (288 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4G18 — an AT cooling tower, 288 nominal tons (1266 kW): rated to cool 867 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection950–1583 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4G9 cooling tower (143 tons, 627 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4G9 — an AT cooling tower, 143 nominal tons (627 kW): rated to cool 429 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection470–783 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4H12 cooling tower (200 tons, 881 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4H12 — an AT cooling tower, 200 nominal tons (881 kW): rated to cool 603 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection660–1101 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4H14 cooling tower (222 tons, 977 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4H14 — an AT cooling tower, 222 nominal tons (977 kW): rated to cool 669 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection733–1221 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4H18 cooling tower (331 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4H18 — an AT cooling tower, 331 nominal tons (1455 kW): rated to cool 996 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1091–1818 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4H9 cooling tower (163 tons, 719 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4H9 — an AT cooling tower, 163 nominal tons (719 kW): rated to cool 492 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection539–898 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4I12 cooling tower (219 tons, 964 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4I12 — an AT cooling tower, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection723–1205 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4I14 cooling tower (196 tons, 863 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4I14 — an AT cooling tower, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection647–1079 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4I18 cooling tower (361 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4I18 — an AT cooling tower, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1190–1983 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4I9 cooling tower (178 tons, 784 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4I9 — an AT cooling tower, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection588–980 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4J12 cooling tower (248 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4J12 — an AT cooling tower, 248 nominal tons (1091 kW): rated to cool 747 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection818–1364 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4J14 cooling tower (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4J14 — an AT cooling tower, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection917–1528 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4J18 cooling tower (407 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4J18 — an AT cooling tower, 407 nominal tons (1788 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1341–2235 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4J9 cooling tower (201 tons, 885 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4J9 — an AT cooling tower, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection664–1106 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4K12 cooling tower (270 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4K12 — an AT cooling tower, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection891–1484 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4K14 cooling tower (218 tons, 960 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4K14 — an AT cooling tower, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection720–1199 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4K18 cooling tower (444 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4K18 — an AT cooling tower, 444 nominal tons (1950 kW): rated to cool 1335 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1462–2437 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4K9 cooling tower (219 tons, 964 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4K9 — an AT cooling tower, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection723–1205 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4L12 cooling tower (289 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4L12 — an AT cooling tower, 289 nominal tons (1271 kW): rated to cool 870 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection953–1588 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4L14 cooling tower (294 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4L14 — an AT cooling tower, 294 nominal tons (1293 kW): rated to cool 885 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection969–1616 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 17-4M14 cooling tower (332 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4M14 — an AT cooling tower, 332 nominal tons (1459 kW): rated to cool 999 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1094–1824 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2F6 cooling tower (89 tons, 390 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2F6 — an AT cooling tower, 89 nominal tons (390 kW): rated to cool 267 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection292–487 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2F8 cooling tower (109 tons, 478 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2F8 — an AT cooling tower, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection358–597 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2G11 cooling tower (155 tons, 683 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2G11 — an AT cooling tower, 155 nominal tons (683 kW): rated to cool 468 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection513–854 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2G6 cooling tower (112 tons, 491 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2G6 — an AT cooling tower, 112 nominal tons (491 kW): rated to cool 336 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection368–613 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2G8 cooling tower (137 tons, 600 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2G8 — an AT cooling tower, 137 nominal tons (600 kW): rated to cool 411 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection450–750 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2G9 cooling tower (135 tons, 591 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2G9 — an AT cooling tower, 135 nominal tons (591 kW): rated to cool 405 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection444–739 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2H11 cooling tower (186 tons, 819 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2H11 — an AT cooling tower, 186 nominal tons (819 kW): rated to cool 561 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection614–1024 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2H12 cooling tower (202 tons, 889 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2H12 — an AT cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection667–1112 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2H14 cooling tower (220 tons, 968 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2H14 — an AT cooling tower, 220 nominal tons (968 kW): rated to cool 663 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection726–1210 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2H6 cooling tower (123 tons, 539 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2H6 — an AT cooling tower, 123 nominal tons (539 kW): rated to cool 369 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection404–674 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2H8 cooling tower (148 tons, 648 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2H8 — an AT cooling tower, 148 nominal tons (648 kW): rated to cool 444 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection486–811 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2H9 cooling tower (161 tons, 710 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2H9 — an AT cooling tower, 161 nominal tons (710 kW): rated to cool 486 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection532–887 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2I11 cooling tower (201 tons, 885 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2I11 — an AT cooling tower, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection664–1106 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2I12 cooling tower (229 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2I12 — an AT cooling tower, 229 nominal tons (1008 kW): rated to cool 690 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection756–1260 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2I14 cooling tower (250 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2I14 — an AT cooling tower, 250 nominal tons (1100 kW): rated to cool 753 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection825–1375 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2I8 cooling tower (158 tons, 697 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2I8 — an AT cooling tower, 158 nominal tons (697 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection522–871 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2I9 cooling tower (177 tons, 780 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2I9 — an AT cooling tower, 177 nominal tons (780 kW): rated to cool 534 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection585–975 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2J11 cooling tower (230 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2J11 — an AT cooling tower, 230 nominal tons (1012 kW): rated to cool 693 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection759–1265 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2J12 cooling tower (256 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2J12 — an AT cooling tower, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection845–1408 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2J14 cooling tower (279 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2J14 — an AT cooling tower, 279 nominal tons (1227 kW): rated to cool 840 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection920–1533 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2J9 cooling tower (207 tons, 911 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2J9 — an AT cooling tower, 207 nominal tons (911 kW): rated to cool 624 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection683–1139 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2K12 cooling tower (282 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2K12 — an AT cooling tower, 282 nominal tons (1240 kW): rated to cool 849 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection930–1550 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2K14 cooling tower (308 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2K14 — an AT cooling tower, 308 nominal tons (1354 kW): rated to cool 927 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1015–1692 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-2L14 cooling tower (336 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-2L14 — an AT cooling tower, 336 nominal tons (1477 kW): rated to cool 1011 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1107–1846 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3F6 cooling tower (101 tons, 443 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3F6 — an AT cooling tower, 101 nominal tons (443 kW): rated to cool 303 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection332–553 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3F8 cooling tower (123 tons, 539 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3F8 — an AT cooling tower, 123 nominal tons (539 kW): rated to cool 369 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection404–674 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3G11 cooling tower (171 tons, 754 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3G11 — an AT cooling tower, 171 nominal tons (754 kW): rated to cool 516 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection565–942 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3G6 cooling tower (124 tons, 543 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3G6 — an AT cooling tower, 124 nominal tons (543 kW): rated to cool 372 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection407–679 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3G8 cooling tower (151 tons, 666 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3G8 — an AT cooling tower, 151 nominal tons (666 kW): rated to cool 456 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection499–832 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3G9 cooling tower (153 tons, 675 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3G9 — an AT cooling tower, 153 nominal tons (675 kW): rated to cool 462 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection506–843 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3H11 cooling tower (201 tons, 885 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3H11 — an AT cooling tower, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection664–1106 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3H12 cooling tower (228 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3H12 — an AT cooling tower, 228 nominal tons (1003 kW): rated to cool 687 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection753–1254 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3H14 cooling tower (248 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3H14 — an AT cooling tower, 248 nominal tons (1091 kW): rated to cool 747 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection818–1364 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3H6 cooling tower (138 tons, 605 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3H6 — an AT cooling tower, 138 nominal tons (605 kW): rated to cool 414 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection453–756 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3H8 cooling tower (164 tons, 723 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3H8 — an AT cooling tower, 164 nominal tons (723 kW): rated to cool 495 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection542–904 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3H9 cooling tower (180 tons, 793 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3H9 — an AT cooling tower, 180 nominal tons (793 kW): rated to cool 543 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection595–991 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3I11 cooling tower (220 tons, 968 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3I11 — an AT cooling tower, 220 nominal tons (968 kW): rated to cool 663 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection726–1210 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3I12 cooling tower (255 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3I12 — an AT cooling tower, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 768 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection841–1402 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3I14 cooling tower (279 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3I14 — an AT cooling tower, 279 nominal tons (1227 kW): rated to cool 840 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection920–1533 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3I6 cooling tower (150 tons, 657 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3I6 — an AT cooling tower, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection493–822 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3I8 cooling tower (178 tons, 784 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3I8 — an AT cooling tower, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection588–980 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3I9 cooling tower (198 tons, 872 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3I9 — an AT cooling tower, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection654–1090 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3J11 cooling tower (255 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3J11 — an AT cooling tower, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 768 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection841–1402 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3J12 cooling tower (288 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3J12 — an AT cooling tower, 288 nominal tons (1266 kW): rated to cool 867 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection950–1583 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3J14 cooling tower (314 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3J14 — an AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1035–1725 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3J8 cooling tower (196 tons, 863 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3J8 — an AT cooling tower, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection647–1079 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3J9 cooling tower (231 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3J9 — an AT cooling tower, 231 nominal tons (1016 kW): rated to cool 696 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection762–1271 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3K11 cooling tower (284 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3K11 — an AT cooling tower, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection937–1561 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3K12 cooling tower (318 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3K12 — an AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1048–1747 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3K14 cooling tower (346 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3K14 — an AT cooling tower, 346 nominal tons (1520 kW): rated to cool 1041 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1140–1900 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3L12 cooling tower (339 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3L12 — an AT cooling tower, 339 nominal tons (1490 kW): rated to cool 1020 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1117–1862 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3L14 cooling tower (376 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3L14 — an AT cooling tower, 376 nominal tons (1652 kW): rated to cool 1131 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1239–2065 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-3M14 cooling tower (398 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-3M14 — an AT cooling tower, 398 nominal tons (1748 kW): rated to cool 1197 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1311–2185 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4F6 cooling tower (109 tons, 478 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4F6 — an AT cooling tower, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection358–597 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4F8 cooling tower (133 tons, 583 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4F8 — an AT cooling tower, 133 nominal tons (583 kW): rated to cool 399 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection437–728 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4G11 cooling tower (189 tons, 832 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4G11 — an AT cooling tower, 189 nominal tons (832 kW): rated to cool 570 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection624–1041 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4G6 cooling tower (130 tons, 570 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4G6 — an AT cooling tower, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection427–712 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4G8 cooling tower (158 tons, 697 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4G8 — an AT cooling tower, 158 nominal tons (697 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection522–871 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4G9 cooling tower (164 tons, 723 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4G9 — an AT cooling tower, 164 nominal tons (723 kW): rated to cool 495 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection542–904 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4H11 cooling tower (219 tons, 964 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4H11 — an AT cooling tower, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection723–1205 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4H12 cooling tower (242 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4H12 — an AT cooling tower, 242 nominal tons (1065 kW): rated to cool 729 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection799–1331 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4H14 cooling tower (265 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4H14 — an AT cooling tower, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection874–1457 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4H6 cooling tower (143 tons, 627 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4H6 — an AT cooling tower, 143 nominal tons (627 kW): rated to cool 429 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection470–783 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4H8 cooling tower (172 tons, 758 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4H8 — an AT cooling tower, 172 nominal tons (758 kW): rated to cool 519 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection568–947 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4H9 cooling tower (190 tons, 837 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4H9 — an AT cooling tower, 190 nominal tons (837 kW): rated to cool 573 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection628–1046 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4I11 cooling tower (237 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4I11 — an AT cooling tower, 237 nominal tons (1043 kW): rated to cool 714 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection782–1303 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4I12 cooling tower (267 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4I12 — an AT cooling tower, 267 nominal tons (1174 kW): rated to cool 804 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection881–1468 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4I14 cooling tower (294 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4I14 — an AT cooling tower, 294 nominal tons (1293 kW): rated to cool 885 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection969–1616 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4I6 cooling tower (156 tons, 688 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4I6 — an AT cooling tower, 156 nominal tons (688 kW): rated to cool 471 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection516–860 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4I8 cooling tower (186 tons, 819 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4I8 — an AT cooling tower, 186 nominal tons (819 kW): rated to cool 561 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection614–1024 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4I9 cooling tower (208 tons, 916 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4I9 — an AT cooling tower, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection687–1145 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4J11 cooling tower (269 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4J11 — an AT cooling tower, 269 nominal tons (1183 kW): rated to cool 810 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection887–1479 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4J12 cooling tower (298 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4J12 — an AT cooling tower, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection983–1638 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4J14 cooling tower (328 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4J14 — an AT cooling tower, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1081–1802 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4J6 cooling tower (170 tons, 749 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4J6 — an AT cooling tower, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection562–937 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4J8 cooling tower (206 tons, 907 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4J8 — an AT cooling tower, 206 nominal tons (907 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection680–1134 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4J9 cooling tower (241 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4J9 — an AT cooling tower, 241 nominal tons (1060 kW): rated to cool 726 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection795–1325 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4K11 cooling tower (297 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4K11 — an AT cooling tower, 297 nominal tons (1306 kW): rated to cool 894 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection979–1632 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4K12 cooling tower (329 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4K12 — an AT cooling tower, 329 nominal tons (1446 kW): rated to cool 990 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1084–1807 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4K14 cooling tower (360 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4K14 — an AT cooling tower, 360 nominal tons (1582 kW): rated to cool 1083 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1186–1977 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4K9 cooling tower (264 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4K9 — an AT cooling tower, 264 nominal tons (1161 kW): rated to cool 795 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection871–1451 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4L11 cooling tower (313 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4L11 — an AT cooling tower, 313 nominal tons (1376 kW): rated to cool 942 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1032–1720 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4L12 cooling tower (351 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4L12 — an AT cooling tower, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1157–1928 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4L14 cooling tower (390 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4L14 — an AT cooling tower, 390 nominal tons (1713 kW): rated to cool 1173 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1285–2141 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4M12 cooling tower (362 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4M12 — an AT cooling tower, 362 nominal tons (1590 kW): rated to cool 1089 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1193–1988 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 19-4M14 cooling tower (412 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 19-4M14 — an AT cooling tower, 412 nominal tons (1810 kW): rated to cool 1239 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1357–2262 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-2I24 cooling tower (453 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-2I24 — an AT cooling tower, 453 nominal tons (1994 kW): rated to cool 1365 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1495–2492 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-2I36 cooling tower (578 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-2I36 — an AT cooling tower, 578 nominal tons (2541 kW): rated to cool 1740 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1906–3177 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-2J24 cooling tower (551 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-2J24 — an AT cooling tower, 551 nominal tons (2423 kW): rated to cool 1659 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1817–3029 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-2J36 cooling tower (699 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-2J36 — an AT cooling tower, 699 nominal tons (3071 kW): rated to cool 2103 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2304–3839 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-2K24 cooling tower (609 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-2K24 — an AT cooling tower, 609 nominal tons (2677 kW): rated to cool 1833 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2008–3346 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-2K36 cooling tower (776 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-2K36 — an AT cooling tower, 776 nominal tons (3413 kW): rated to cool 2337 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2560–4266 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-2L24 cooling tower (649 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-2L24 — an AT cooling tower, 649 nominal tons (2852 kW): rated to cool 1953 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2139–3565 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-2L36 cooling tower (837 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-2L36 — an AT cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2760–4600 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-2M24 cooling tower (682 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-2M24 — an AT cooling tower, 682 nominal tons (2997 kW): rated to cool 2052 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2248–3746 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-2M36 cooling tower (887 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-2M36 — an AT cooling tower, 887 nominal tons (3899 kW): rated to cool 2670 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2925–4874 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3I24 cooling tower (527 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3I24 — an AT cooling tower, 527 nominal tons (2318 kW): rated to cool 1587 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1738–2897 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3I36 cooling tower (665 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3I36 — an AT cooling tower, 665 nominal tons (2922 kW): rated to cool 2001 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2192–3653 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3J24 cooling tower (616 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3J24 — an AT cooling tower, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2031–3385 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3J36 cooling tower (787 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3J36 — an AT cooling tower, 787 nominal tons (3461 kW): rated to cool 2370 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2596–4327 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3K24 cooling tower (674 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 674 nominal tons (2962 kW): rated to cool 2028 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2221–3702 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3K36 cooling tower (870 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 870 nominal tons (3825 kW): rated to cool 2619 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2869–4781 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3L24 cooling tower (720 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 720 nominal tons (3163 kW): rated to cool 2166 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2373–3954 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3L36 cooling tower (938 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3L36 — an AT cooling tower, 938 nominal tons (4123 kW): rated to cool 2823 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3092–5154 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3M24 cooling tower (757 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3M24 — an AT cooling tower, 757 nominal tons (3330 kW): rated to cool 2280 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2497–4162 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3M36 cooling tower (994 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3M36 — an AT cooling tower, 994 nominal tons (4368 kW): rated to cool 2991 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3276–5460 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-3N36 cooling tower (1089 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-3N36 — an AT cooling tower, 1089 nominal tons (4789 kW): rated to cool 3279 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3592–5986 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4I24 cooling tower (553 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4I24 — an AT cooling tower, 553 nominal tons (2432 kW): rated to cool 1665 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1824–3040 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4I36 cooling tower (725 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4I36 — an AT cooling tower, 725 nominal tons (3185 kW): rated to cool 2181 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2389–3982 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4J24 cooling tower (642 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4J24 — an AT cooling tower, 642 nominal tons (2822 kW): rated to cool 1932 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2116–3527 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4J36 cooling tower (836 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4J36 — an AT cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2757–4595 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4K24 cooling tower (699 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4K24 — an AT cooling tower, 699 nominal tons (3071 kW): rated to cool 2103 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2304–3839 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4K36 cooling tower (918 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4K36 — an AT cooling tower, 918 nominal tons (4035 kW): rated to cool 2763 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3026–5044 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4L24 cooling tower (744 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4L24 — an AT cooling tower, 744 nominal tons (3269 kW): rated to cool 2238 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2451–4086 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4L36 cooling tower (984 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4L36 — an AT cooling tower, 984 nominal tons (4324 kW): rated to cool 2961 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3243–5406 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4M24 cooling tower (782 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4M24 — an AT cooling tower, 782 nominal tons (3439 kW): rated to cool 2355 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2580–4299 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4M36 cooling tower (1041 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1041 nominal tons (4574 kW): rated to cool 3132 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3431–5718 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4N24 cooling tower (817 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4N24 — an AT cooling tower, 817 nominal tons (3593 kW): rated to cool 2460 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2695–4491 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 210-4N36 cooling tower (1136 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 210-4N36 — an AT cooling tower, 1136 nominal tons (4995 kW): rated to cool 3420 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 121.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3746–6243 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2F9 cooling tower (178 tons, 784 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2F9 — an AT cooling tower, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection588–980 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2G9 cooling tower (224 tons, 986 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2G9 — an AT cooling tower, 224 nominal tons (986 kW): rated to cool 675 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection739–1232 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2H9 cooling tower (246 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2H9 — an AT cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection812–1353 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2I24 cooling tower (558 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2I24 — an AT cooling tower, 558 nominal tons (2454 kW): rated to cool 1680 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1840–3067 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2I28 cooling tower (596 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2I28 — an AT cooling tower, 596 nominal tons (2620 kW): rated to cool 1794 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1965–3275 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2J24 cooling tower (665 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2J24 — an AT cooling tower, 665 nominal tons (2922 kW): rated to cool 2001 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2192–3653 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2J28 cooling tower (715 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2J28 — an AT cooling tower, 715 nominal tons (3141 kW): rated to cool 2151 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2356–3927 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2J36 cooling tower (874 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-2J36 — an AT cooling tower, 874 nominal tons (3842 kW): rated to cool 2631 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 103.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2882–4803 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2K24 cooling tower (727 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2K24 — an AT cooling tower, 727 nominal tons (3194 kW): rated to cool 2187 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2396–3993 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2K28 cooling tower (784 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2K28 — an AT cooling tower, 784 nominal tons (3448 kW): rated to cool 2361 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2586–4310 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2K36 cooling tower (991 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-2K36 — an AT cooling tower, 991 nominal tons (4355 kW): rated to cool 2982 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3266–5444 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2K40 cooling tower (915 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-2K40 — an AT cooling tower, 915 nominal tons (4022 kW): rated to cool 2754 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3017–5028 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2L24 cooling tower (779 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2L24 — an AT cooling tower, 779 nominal tons (3426 kW): rated to cool 2346 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2570–4283 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2L28 cooling tower (847 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2L28 — an AT cooling tower, 847 nominal tons (3724 kW): rated to cool 2550 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2793–4655 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2L36 cooling tower (1048 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-2L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1048 nominal tons (4605 kW): rated to cool 3153 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3454–5756 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2L40 cooling tower (1010 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-2L40 — an AT cooling tower, 1010 nominal tons (4438 kW): rated to cool 3039 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3329–5548 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2M24 cooling tower (825 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2M24 — an AT cooling tower, 825 nominal tons (3628 kW): rated to cool 2484 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2721–4535 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2M28 cooling tower (897 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-2M28 — an AT cooling tower, 897 nominal tons (3943 kW): rated to cool 2700 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2957–4929 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2M36 cooling tower (1103 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-2M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1103 nominal tons (4850 kW): rated to cool 3321 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3638–6063 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2M40 cooling tower (1084 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-2M40 — an AT cooling tower, 1084 nominal tons (4767 kW): rated to cool 3264 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 132.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3575–5959 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2N36 cooling tower (1215 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-2N36 — an AT cooling tower, 1215 nominal tons (5341 kW): rated to cool 3657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 142.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4006–6676 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2N40 cooling tower (1246 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-2N40 — an AT cooling tower, 1246 nominal tons (5477 kW): rated to cool 3750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 144.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4108–6846 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-2O40 cooling tower (1352 tons, 5.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-2O40 — an AT cooling tower, 1352 nominal tons (5946 kW): rated to cool 4071 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4459–7432 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3F9 cooling tower (202 tons, 889 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3F9 — an AT cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection667–1112 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3G9 cooling tower (249 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3G9 — an AT cooling tower, 249 nominal tons (1095 kW): rated to cool 750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection822–1369 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3H9 cooling tower (276 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3H9 — an AT cooling tower, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection910–1517 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3I28 cooling tower (685 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3I28 — an AT cooling tower, 685 nominal tons (3010 kW): rated to cool 2061 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2258–3763 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3I9 cooling tower (301 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3I9 — an AT cooling tower, 301 nominal tons (1323 kW): rated to cool 906 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection992–1654 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3J24 cooling tower (738 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3J24 — an AT cooling tower, 738 nominal tons (3242 kW): rated to cool 2220 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2432–4053 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3J28 cooling tower (807 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3J28 — an AT cooling tower, 807 nominal tons (3549 kW): rated to cool 2430 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2662–4436 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3J36 cooling tower (974 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3J36 — an AT cooling tower, 974 nominal tons (4281 kW): rated to cool 2931 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3210–5351 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3K24 cooling tower (804 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 804 nominal tons (3536 kW): rated to cool 2421 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2652–4420 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3K28 cooling tower (874 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3K28 — an AT cooling tower, 874 nominal tons (3842 kW): rated to cool 2631 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2882–4803 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3K36 cooling tower (1088 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 1088 nominal tons (4784 kW): rated to cool 3276 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3588–5981 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3K40 cooling tower (1069 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3K40 — an AT cooling tower, 1069 nominal tons (4701 kW): rated to cool 3219 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3526–5877 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3L24 cooling tower (865 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 865 nominal tons (3803 kW): rated to cool 2604 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2852–4754 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3L28 cooling tower (939 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3L28 — an AT cooling tower, 939 nominal tons (4127 kW): rated to cool 2826 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 96.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3095–5159 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3L36 cooling tower (1157 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1157 nominal tons (5087 kW): rated to cool 3483 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3815–6358 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3L40 cooling tower (1166 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3L40 — an AT cooling tower, 1166 nominal tons (5126 kW): rated to cool 3510 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3845–6408 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3M24 cooling tower (919 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3M24 — an AT cooling tower, 919 nominal tons (4040 kW): rated to cool 2766 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3030–5050 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3M28 cooling tower (999 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3M28 — an AT cooling tower, 999 nominal tons (4390 kW): rated to cool 3006 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3293–5488 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3M36 cooling tower (1223 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1223 nominal tons (5376 kW): rated to cool 3681 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4032–6720 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3M40 cooling tower (1242 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3M40 — an AT cooling tower, 1242 nominal tons (5459 kW): rated to cool 3738 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4094–6824 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3N28 cooling tower (1093 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-3N28 — an AT cooling tower, 1093 nominal tons (4806 kW): rated to cool 3291 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3605–6008 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3N36 cooling tower (1346 tons, 5.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3N36 — an AT cooling tower, 1346 nominal tons (5915 kW): rated to cool 4050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 139.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4436–7394 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3N40 cooling tower (1391 tons, 6.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3N40 — an AT cooling tower, 1391 nominal tons (6116 kW): rated to cool 4188 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 142.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4587–7646 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3O36 cooling tower (1443 tons, 6.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3O36 — an AT cooling tower, 1443 nominal tons (6344 kW): rated to cool 4344 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4758–7930 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-3O40 cooling tower (1510 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-3O40 — an AT cooling tower, 1510 nominal tons (6638 kW): rated to cool 4545 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4978–8297 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4F9 cooling tower (218 tons, 960 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4F9 — an AT cooling tower, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection720–1199 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4G9 cooling tower (261 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4G9 — an AT cooling tower, 261 nominal tons (1148 kW): rated to cool 786 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection861–1435 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4H9 cooling tower (286 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4H9 — an AT cooling tower, 286 nominal tons (1257 kW): rated to cool 861 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection943–1572 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4I24 cooling tower (672 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4I24 — an AT cooling tower, 672 nominal tons (2953 kW): rated to cool 2022 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2215–3691 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4I28 cooling tower (739 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4I28 — an AT cooling tower, 739 nominal tons (3247 kW): rated to cool 2223 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2435–4058 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4I9 cooling tower (314 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4I9 — an AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1035–1725 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4J24 cooling tower (772 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4J24 — an AT cooling tower, 772 nominal tons (3396 kW): rated to cool 2325 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2547–4244 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4J28 cooling tower (850 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4J28 — an AT cooling tower, 850 nominal tons (3737 kW): rated to cool 2559 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2803–4672 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4J36 cooling tower (1032 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4J36 — an AT cooling tower, 1032 nominal tons (4535 kW): rated to cool 3105 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3401–5668 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4J9 cooling tower (343 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4J9 — an AT cooling tower, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1130–1884 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4K24 cooling tower (840 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4K24 — an AT cooling tower, 840 nominal tons (3694 kW): rated to cool 2529 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2770–4617 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4K28 cooling tower (918 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4K28 — an AT cooling tower, 918 nominal tons (4035 kW): rated to cool 2763 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3026–5044 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4K36 cooling tower (1141 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4K36 — an AT cooling tower, 1141 nominal tons (5017 kW): rated to cool 3435 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3763–6271 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4K40 cooling tower (1139 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4K40 — an AT cooling tower, 1139 nominal tons (5008 kW): rated to cool 3429 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3756–6260 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4L24 cooling tower (905 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4L24 — an AT cooling tower, 905 nominal tons (3978 kW): rated to cool 2724 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2984–4973 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4L28 cooling tower (984 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4L28 — an AT cooling tower, 984 nominal tons (4324 kW): rated to cool 2961 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3243–5406 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4L36 cooling tower (1209 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1209 nominal tons (5315 kW): rated to cool 3639 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3986–6643 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4L40 cooling tower (1231 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4L40 — an AT cooling tower, 1231 nominal tons (5411 kW): rated to cool 3705 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4058–6764 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4M24 cooling tower (960 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4M24 — an AT cooling tower, 960 nominal tons (4219 kW): rated to cool 2889 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3164–5274 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4M28 cooling tower (1046 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4M28 — an AT cooling tower, 1046 nominal tons (4596 kW): rated to cool 3147 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3447–5745 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4M36 cooling tower (1279 tons, 5.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1279 nominal tons (5621 kW): rated to cool 3849 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4216–7027 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4M40 cooling tower (1306 tons, 5.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4M40 — an AT cooling tower, 1306 nominal tons (5740 kW): rated to cool 3930 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4305–7175 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4N24 cooling tower (1027 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4N24 — an AT cooling tower, 1027 nominal tons (4513 kW): rated to cool 3090 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3385–5641 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4N28 cooling tower (1143 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 212-4N28 — an AT cooling tower, 1143 nominal tons (5025 kW): rated to cool 3441 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3769–6282 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4N36 cooling tower (1404 tons, 6.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4N36 — an AT cooling tower, 1404 nominal tons (6173 kW): rated to cool 4227 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 137.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4630–7717 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4N40 cooling tower (1452 tons, 6.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4N40 — an AT cooling tower, 1452 nominal tons (6384 kW): rated to cool 4371 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 139.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4788–7980 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4O36 cooling tower (1508 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4O36 — an AT cooling tower, 1508 nominal tons (6629 kW): rated to cool 4539 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 146.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4972–8286 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4O40 cooling tower (1571 tons, 6.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4O40 — an AT cooling tower, 1571 nominal tons (6905 kW): rated to cool 4728 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5179–8631 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4P36 cooling tower (1565 tons, 6.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4P36 — an AT cooling tower, 1565 nominal tons (6879 kW): rated to cool 4710 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5159–8598 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 212-4P40 cooling tower (1630 tons, 7.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 212-4P40 — an AT cooling tower, 1630 nominal tons (7164 kW): rated to cool 4905 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 158.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5373–8954 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2G18 cooling tower (440 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2G18 — an AT cooling tower, 440 nominal tons (1932 kW): rated to cool 1323 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1449–2415 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2G9 cooling tower (224 tons, 986 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2G9 — an AT cooling tower, 224 nominal tons (986 kW): rated to cool 675 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection739–1232 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2H12 cooling tower (316 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2H12 — an AT cooling tower, 316 nominal tons (1389 kW): rated to cool 951 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1042–1736 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2H14 cooling tower (341 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2H14 — an AT cooling tower, 341 nominal tons (1498 kW): rated to cool 1026 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1124–1873 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2H18 cooling tower (526 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2H18 — an AT cooling tower, 526 nominal tons (2313 kW): rated to cool 1584 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1735–2892 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2H9 cooling tower (268 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2H9 — an AT cooling tower, 268 nominal tons (1179 kW): rated to cool 807 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection884–1473 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2I12 cooling tower (349 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2I12 — an AT cooling tower, 349 nominal tons (1533 kW): rated to cool 1050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1150–1917 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2I14 cooling tower (483 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2I14 — an AT cooling tower, 483 nominal tons (2125 kW): rated to cool 1455 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1594–2656 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2I18 cooling tower (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2I18 — an AT cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1922–3204 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2I9 cooling tower (297 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2I9 — an AT cooling tower, 297 nominal tons (1306 kW): rated to cool 894 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection979–1632 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2J12 cooling tower (403 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2J12 — an AT cooling tower, 403 nominal tons (1770 kW): rated to cool 1212 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1328–2213 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2J14 cooling tower (429 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2J14 — an AT cooling tower, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1413–2355 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2J18 cooling tower (671 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2J18 — an AT cooling tower, 671 nominal tons (2949 kW): rated to cool 2019 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2212–3686 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2J9 cooling tower (341 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2J9 — an AT cooling tower, 341 nominal tons (1498 kW): rated to cool 1026 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1124–1873 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2K12 cooling tower (445 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2K12 — an AT cooling tower, 445 nominal tons (1954 kW): rated to cool 1338 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1466–2443 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2K14 cooling tower (591 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2K14 — an AT cooling tower, 591 nominal tons (2598 kW): rated to cool 1779 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1949–3248 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2K48 cooling tower (1201 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2K48 — an AT cooling tower, 1201 nominal tons (5280 kW): rated to cool 3615 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 148.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3960–6599 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2L14 cooling tower (469 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2L14 — an AT cooling tower, 469 nominal tons (2064 kW): rated to cool 1413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1548–2580 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2L48 cooling tower (1332 tons, 5.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2L48 — an AT cooling tower, 1332 nominal tons (5854 kW): rated to cool 4008 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 158.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4390–7317 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2M48 cooling tower (1405 tons, 6.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2M48 — an AT cooling tower, 1405 nominal tons (6178 kW): rated to cool 4230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 168.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4633–7722 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2N48 cooling tower (1522 tons, 6.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2N48 — an AT cooling tower, 1522 nominal tons (6690 kW): rated to cool 4581 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 184.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5018–8363 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-2O48 cooling tower (1636 tons, 7.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-2O48 — an AT cooling tower, 1636 nominal tons (7190 kW): rated to cool 4923 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 198.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5392–8987 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3G18 cooling tower (506 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3G18 — an AT cooling tower, 506 nominal tons (2226 kW): rated to cool 1524 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1669–2782 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3G9 cooling tower (258 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3G9 — an AT cooling tower, 258 nominal tons (1135 kW): rated to cool 777 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection851–1418 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3H12 cooling tower (357 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3H12 — an AT cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1176–1961 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3H14 cooling tower (379 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3H14 — an AT cooling tower, 379 nominal tons (1665 kW): rated to cool 1140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1249–2081 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3H18 cooling tower (595 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3H18 — an AT cooling tower, 595 nominal tons (2616 kW): rated to cool 1791 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1962–3270 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3H9 cooling tower (302 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3H9 — an AT cooling tower, 302 nominal tons (1328 kW): rated to cool 909 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection996–1659 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3I12 cooling tower (395 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3I12 — an AT cooling tower, 395 nominal tons (1735 kW): rated to cool 1188 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1301–2169 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3I14 cooling tower (522 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3I14 — an AT cooling tower, 522 nominal tons (2296 kW): rated to cool 1572 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1722–2870 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3I18 cooling tower (659 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3I18 — an AT cooling tower, 659 nominal tons (2896 kW): rated to cool 1983 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2172–3620 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3I9 cooling tower (335 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3I9 — an AT cooling tower, 335 nominal tons (1472 kW): rated to cool 1008 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1104–1840 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3J12 cooling tower (454 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3J12 — an AT cooling tower, 454 nominal tons (1998 kW): rated to cool 1368 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1498–2497 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3J14 cooling tower (495 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3J14 — an AT cooling tower, 495 nominal tons (2178 kW): rated to cool 1491 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1633–2722 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3J18 cooling tower (757 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3J18 — an AT cooling tower, 757 nominal tons (3330 kW): rated to cool 2280 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2497–4162 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3J9 cooling tower (384 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3J9 — an AT cooling tower, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1265–2109 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3K12 cooling tower (502 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3K12 — an AT cooling tower, 502 nominal tons (2208 kW): rated to cool 1512 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1656–2760 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3K14 cooling tower (631 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3K14 — an AT cooling tower, 631 nominal tons (2773 kW): rated to cool 1899 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2080–3467 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3K18 cooling tower (837 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3K18 — an AT cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2760–4600 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3K48 cooling tower (1378 tons, 6.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3K48 — an AT cooling tower, 1378 nominal tons (6059 kW): rated to cool 4149 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 145.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4545–7574 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3K9 cooling tower (425 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3K9 — an AT cooling tower, 425 nominal tons (1866 kW): rated to cool 1278 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1400–2333 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3L12 cooling tower (543 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3L12 — an AT cooling tower, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1791–2985 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3L14 cooling tower (532 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3L14 — an AT cooling tower, 532 nominal tons (2340 kW): rated to cool 1602 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1755–2925 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3L48 cooling tower (1512 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3L48 — an AT cooling tower, 1512 nominal tons (6647 kW): rated to cool 4551 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 156.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4985–8308 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3M14 cooling tower (621 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3M14 — an AT cooling tower, 621 nominal tons (2730 kW): rated to cool 1869 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2047–3412 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3M48 cooling tower (1584 tons, 7.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3M48 — an AT cooling tower, 1584 nominal tons (6962 kW): rated to cool 4767 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 165.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5222–8703 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3N48 cooling tower (1742 tons, 7.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3N48 — an AT cooling tower, 1742 nominal tons (7659 kW): rated to cool 5244 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 181.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5744–9573 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3O48 cooling tower (1857 tons, 8.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3O48 — an AT cooling tower, 1857 nominal tons (8163 kW): rated to cool 5589 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 194.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6122–10203 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-3P48 cooling tower (1971 tons, 8.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-3P48 — an AT cooling tower, 1971 nominal tons (8666 kW): rated to cool 5934 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 206.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6500–10833 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4G18 cooling tower (563 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4G18 — an AT cooling tower, 563 nominal tons (2475 kW): rated to cool 1695 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1857–3094 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4G9 cooling tower (286 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4G9 — an AT cooling tower, 286 nominal tons (1257 kW): rated to cool 861 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection943–1572 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4H12 cooling tower (392 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4H12 — an AT cooling tower, 392 nominal tons (1722 kW): rated to cool 1179 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1291–2152 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4H14 cooling tower (437 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4H14 — an AT cooling tower, 437 nominal tons (1919 kW): rated to cool 1314 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1439–2399 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4H18 cooling tower (646 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4H18 — an AT cooling tower, 646 nominal tons (2839 kW): rated to cool 1944 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2129–3549 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4H9 cooling tower (327 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4H9 — an AT cooling tower, 327 nominal tons (1437 kW): rated to cool 984 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1078–1796 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4I12 cooling tower (429 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4I12 — an AT cooling tower, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1413–2355 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4I14 cooling tower (387 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4I14 — an AT cooling tower, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1275–2125 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4I18 cooling tower (705 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4I18 — an AT cooling tower, 705 nominal tons (3098 kW): rated to cool 2121 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2323–3872 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4I9 cooling tower (357 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4I9 — an AT cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1176–1961 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4J12 cooling tower (484 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4J12 — an AT cooling tower, 484 nominal tons (2129 kW): rated to cool 1458 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1597–2662 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4J14 cooling tower (547 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4J14 — an AT cooling tower, 547 nominal tons (2405 kW): rated to cool 1647 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1804–3007 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4J18 cooling tower (796 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4J18 — an AT cooling tower, 796 nominal tons (3501 kW): rated to cool 2397 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2626–4376 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4J9 cooling tower (403 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4J9 — an AT cooling tower, 403 nominal tons (1770 kW): rated to cool 1212 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1328–2213 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4K12 cooling tower (528 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4K12 — an AT cooling tower, 528 nominal tons (2322 kW): rated to cool 1590 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1742–2903 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4K14 cooling tower (430 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4K14 — an AT cooling tower, 430 nominal tons (1888 kW): rated to cool 1293 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1416–2360 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4K18 cooling tower (868 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4K18 — an AT cooling tower, 868 nominal tons (3816 kW): rated to cool 2613 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2862–4770 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4K48 cooling tower (1509 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4K48 — an AT cooling tower, 1509 nominal tons (6633 kW): rated to cool 4542 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 143.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4975–8292 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4K9 cooling tower (440 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4K9 — an AT cooling tower, 440 nominal tons (1932 kW): rated to cool 1323 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1449–2415 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4L12 cooling tower (565 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4L12 — an AT cooling tower, 565 nominal tons (2484 kW): rated to cool 1701 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1863–3105 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4L14 cooling tower (580 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4L14 — an AT cooling tower, 580 nominal tons (2550 kW): rated to cool 1746 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1912–3187 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4L48 cooling tower (1632 tons, 7.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4L48 — an AT cooling tower, 1632 nominal tons (7172 kW): rated to cool 4911 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 153.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5379–8965 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4M14 cooling tower (656 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4M14 — an AT cooling tower, 656 nominal tons (2883 kW): rated to cool 1974 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2162–3604 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4M48 cooling tower (1707 tons, 7.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4M48 — an AT cooling tower, 1707 nominal tons (7505 kW): rated to cool 5139 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 162.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5629–9382 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4N48 cooling tower (1854 tons, 8.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4N48 — an AT cooling tower, 1854 nominal tons (8149 kW): rated to cool 5580 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 178.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6112–10187 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4O48 cooling tower (1953 tons, 8.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4O48 — an AT cooling tower, 1953 nominal tons (8588 kW): rated to cool 5880 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 191.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6441–10734 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4P48 cooling tower (2068 tons, 9.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4P48 — an AT cooling tower, 2068 nominal tons (9091 kW): rated to cool 6225 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 202.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6819–11364 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-4Q48 cooling tower (2223 tons, 9.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-4Q48 — an AT cooling tower, 2223 nominal tons (9770 kW): rated to cool 6690 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 217.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7328–12213 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-5K52 cooling tower (1964 tons, 8.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-5K52 — an AT cooling tower, 1964 nominal tons (8636 kW): rated to cool 5913 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 185.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6477–10795 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-5L52 cooling tower (2112 tons, 9.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-5L52 — an AT cooling tower, 2112 nominal tons (9284 kW): rated to cool 6357 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 199.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6963–11605 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-5M52 cooling tower (2238 tons, 9.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-5M52 — an AT cooling tower, 2238 nominal tons (9836 kW): rated to cool 6735 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 210.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7377–12295 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-5N52 cooling tower (2444 tons, 10.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-5N52 — an AT cooling tower, 2444 nominal tons (10743 kW): rated to cool 7356 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 230.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8057–13429 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 214-5O52 cooling tower (2613 tons, 11.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 214-5O52 — an AT cooling tower, 2613 nominal tons (11488 kW): rated to cool 7866 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 247.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8616–14360 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-2F9 cooling tower (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-2F9 — an AT cooling tower, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-2G9 cooling tower (273 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-2G9 — an AT cooling tower, 273 nominal tons (1200 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection900–1501 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-2H9 cooling tower (296 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-2H9 — an AT cooling tower, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection976–1627 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-2I9 cooling tower (318 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-2I9 — an AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1048–1747 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-3F9 cooling tower (246 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-3F9 — an AT cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection812–1353 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-3G9 cooling tower (303 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-3G9 — an AT cooling tower, 303 nominal tons (1332 kW): rated to cool 912 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection999–1665 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-3H9 cooling tower (330 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-3H9 — an AT cooling tower, 330 nominal tons (1450 kW): rated to cool 993 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1088–1813 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-3I9 cooling tower (357 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-3I9 — an AT cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1176–1961 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-3J9 cooling tower (392 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-3J9 — an AT cooling tower, 392 nominal tons (1722 kW): rated to cool 1179 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1291–2152 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-4F9 cooling tower (266 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-4F9 — an AT cooling tower, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection877–1462 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-4G9 cooling tower (318 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-4G9 — an AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1048–1747 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-4H9 cooling tower (345 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-4H9 — an AT cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1137–1895 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-4I9 cooling tower (372 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-4I9 — an AT cooling tower, 372 nominal tons (1634 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1226–2043 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 215-4J9 cooling tower (413 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 215-4J9 — an AT cooling tower, 413 nominal tons (1814 kW): rated to cool 1242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1360–2267 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2G11 cooling tower (315 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2G11 — an AT cooling tower, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1038–1731 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2G9 cooling tower (269 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2G9 — an AT cooling tower, 269 nominal tons (1183 kW): rated to cool 810 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection887–1479 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2H11 cooling tower (378 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2H11 — an AT cooling tower, 378 nominal tons (1661 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1245–2076 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2H12 cooling tower (393 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2H12 — an AT cooling tower, 393 nominal tons (1726 kW): rated to cool 1182 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1295–2158 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2H14 cooling tower (434 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2H14 — an AT cooling tower, 434 nominal tons (1906 kW): rated to cool 1305 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1429–2382 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2H9 cooling tower (323 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2H9 — an AT cooling tower, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1065–1774 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2I11 cooling tower (407 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2I11 — an AT cooling tower, 407 nominal tons (1788 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1341–2235 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2I12 cooling tower (446 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2I12 — an AT cooling tower, 446 nominal tons (1958 kW): rated to cool 1341 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1469–2448 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2I14 cooling tower (492 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2I14 — an AT cooling tower, 492 nominal tons (2164 kW): rated to cool 1482 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1623–2706 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2I9 cooling tower (355 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2I9 — an AT cooling tower, 355 nominal tons (1560 kW): rated to cool 1068 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1170–1950 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2J11 cooling tower (465 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2J11 — an AT cooling tower, 465 nominal tons (2046 kW): rated to cool 1401 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1535–2558 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2J12 cooling tower (497 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2J12 — an AT cooling tower, 497 nominal tons (2186 kW): rated to cool 1497 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1640–2733 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2J14 cooling tower (549 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2J14 — an AT cooling tower, 549 nominal tons (2414 kW): rated to cool 1653 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1811–3018 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2J9 cooling tower (415 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2J9 — an AT cooling tower, 415 nominal tons (1823 kW): rated to cool 1248 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1367–2278 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2K12 cooling tower (548 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2K12 — an AT cooling tower, 548 nominal tons (2410 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1807–3012 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2K14 cooling tower (606 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2K14 — an AT cooling tower, 606 nominal tons (2664 kW): rated to cool 1824 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1998–3330 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-2L14 cooling tower (662 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-2L14 — an AT cooling tower, 662 nominal tons (2909 kW): rated to cool 1992 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2182–3637 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3G11 cooling tower (346 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3G11 — an AT cooling tower, 346 nominal tons (1520 kW): rated to cool 1041 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1140–1900 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3G9 cooling tower (307 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3G9 — an AT cooling tower, 307 nominal tons (1349 kW): rated to cool 924 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1012–1687 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3H11 cooling tower (408 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3H11 — an AT cooling tower, 408 nominal tons (1792 kW): rated to cool 1227 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1344–2240 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3H12 cooling tower (445 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3H12 — an AT cooling tower, 445 nominal tons (1954 kW): rated to cool 1338 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1466–2443 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3H14 cooling tower (488 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3H14 — an AT cooling tower, 488 nominal tons (2147 kW): rated to cool 1470 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1610–2684 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3H9 cooling tower (361 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3H9 — an AT cooling tower, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1190–1983 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3I11 cooling tower (446 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3I11 — an AT cooling tower, 446 nominal tons (1958 kW): rated to cool 1341 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1469–2448 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3I12 cooling tower (497 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3I12 — an AT cooling tower, 497 nominal tons (2186 kW): rated to cool 1497 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1640–2733 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3I14 cooling tower (549 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3I14 — an AT cooling tower, 549 nominal tons (2414 kW): rated to cool 1653 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1811–3018 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3I9 cooling tower (398 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3I9 — an AT cooling tower, 398 nominal tons (1748 kW): rated to cool 1197 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1311–2185 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3J11 cooling tower (514 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3J11 — an AT cooling tower, 514 nominal tons (2261 kW): rated to cool 1548 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1696–2826 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3J12 cooling tower (562 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3J12 — an AT cooling tower, 562 nominal tons (2471 kW): rated to cool 1692 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1853–3089 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3J14 cooling tower (619 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3J14 — an AT cooling tower, 619 nominal tons (2721 kW): rated to cool 1863 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2041–3401 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3J9 cooling tower (462 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3J9 — an AT cooling tower, 462 nominal tons (2033 kW): rated to cool 1392 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1525–2541 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3K11 cooling tower (574 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3K11 — an AT cooling tower, 574 nominal tons (2524 kW): rated to cool 1728 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1893–3155 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3K12 cooling tower (620 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3K12 — an AT cooling tower, 620 nominal tons (2725 kW): rated to cool 1866 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2044–3407 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3K14 cooling tower (683 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3K14 — an AT cooling tower, 683 nominal tons (3001 kW): rated to cool 2055 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2251–3752 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3L12 cooling tower (663 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3L12 — an AT cooling tower, 663 nominal tons (2914 kW): rated to cool 1995 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2185–3642 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3L14 cooling tower (742 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3L14 — an AT cooling tower, 742 nominal tons (3260 kW): rated to cool 2232 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2445–4075 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-3M14 cooling tower (784 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-3M14 — an AT cooling tower, 784 nominal tons (3448 kW): rated to cool 2361 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2586–4310 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4G11 cooling tower (384 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4G11 — an AT cooling tower, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1265–2109 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4G9 cooling tower (329 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4G9 — an AT cooling tower, 329 nominal tons (1446 kW): rated to cool 990 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1084–1807 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4H11 cooling tower (443 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4H11 — an AT cooling tower, 443 nominal tons (1945 kW): rated to cool 1332 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1459–2432 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4H12 cooling tower (472 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4H12 — an AT cooling tower, 472 nominal tons (2077 kW): rated to cool 1422 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1558–2596 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4H14 cooling tower (523 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4H14 — an AT cooling tower, 523 nominal tons (2300 kW): rated to cool 1575 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1725–2875 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4H9 cooling tower (380 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4H9 — an AT cooling tower, 380 nominal tons (1669 kW): rated to cool 1143 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1252–2087 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4I11 cooling tower (478 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4I11 — an AT cooling tower, 478 nominal tons (2103 kW): rated to cool 1440 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1577–2629 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4I12 cooling tower (522 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4I12 — an AT cooling tower, 522 nominal tons (2296 kW): rated to cool 1572 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1722–2870 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4I14 cooling tower (579 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4I14 — an AT cooling tower, 579 nominal tons (2546 kW): rated to cool 1743 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1909–3182 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4I9 cooling tower (417 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4I9 — an AT cooling tower, 417 nominal tons (1831 kW): rated to cool 1254 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1374–2289 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4J11 cooling tower (543 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4J11 — an AT cooling tower, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1791–2985 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4J12 cooling tower (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4J12 — an AT cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1922–3204 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4J14 cooling tower (647 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4J14 — an AT cooling tower, 647 nominal tons (2844 kW): rated to cool 1947 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2133–3554 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4J9 cooling tower (482 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4J9 — an AT cooling tower, 482 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1452 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1590–2651 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4K11 cooling tower (600 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4K11 — an AT cooling tower, 600 nominal tons (2638 kW): rated to cool 1806 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1978–3297 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4K12 cooling tower (643 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4K12 — an AT cooling tower, 643 nominal tons (2826 kW): rated to cool 1935 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2119–3532 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4K14 cooling tower (712 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4K14 — an AT cooling tower, 712 nominal tons (3128 kW): rated to cool 2142 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2346–3910 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4K9 cooling tower (528 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4K9 — an AT cooling tower, 528 nominal tons (2322 kW): rated to cool 1590 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1742–2903 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4L11 cooling tower (632 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4L11 — an AT cooling tower, 632 nominal tons (2778 kW): rated to cool 1902 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2083–3472 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4L12 cooling tower (686 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4L12 — an AT cooling tower, 686 nominal tons (3014 kW): rated to cool 2064 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2261–3768 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4L14 cooling tower (770 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4L14 — an AT cooling tower, 770 nominal tons (3387 kW): rated to cool 2319 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2540–4234 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4M12 cooling tower (707 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4M12 — an AT cooling tower, 707 nominal tons (3106 kW): rated to cool 2127 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2330–3883 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 217-4M14 cooling tower (812 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 217-4M14 — an AT cooling tower, 812 nominal tons (3571 kW): rated to cool 2445 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2678–4464 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-2I12 cooling tower (453 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-2I12 — an AT cooling tower, 453 nominal tons (1994 kW): rated to cool 1365 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1495–2492 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-2I18 cooling tower (578 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-2I18 — an AT cooling tower, 578 nominal tons (2541 kW): rated to cool 1740 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1906–3177 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-2J12 cooling tower (551 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-2J12 — an AT cooling tower, 551 nominal tons (2423 kW): rated to cool 1659 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1817–3029 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-2J18 cooling tower (699 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-2J18 — an AT cooling tower, 699 nominal tons (3071 kW): rated to cool 2103 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2304–3839 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-2K12 cooling tower (609 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-2K12 — an AT cooling tower, 609 nominal tons (2677 kW): rated to cool 1833 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2008–3346 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-2K18 cooling tower (776 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-2K18 — an AT cooling tower, 776 nominal tons (3413 kW): rated to cool 2337 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2560–4266 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-2L12 cooling tower (649 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-2L12 — an AT cooling tower, 649 nominal tons (2852 kW): rated to cool 1953 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2139–3565 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-2L18 cooling tower (837 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-2L18 — an AT cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2760–4600 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-2M12 cooling tower (682 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-2M12 — an AT cooling tower, 682 nominal tons (2997 kW): rated to cool 2052 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2248–3746 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-2M18 cooling tower (887 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-2M18 — an AT cooling tower, 887 nominal tons (3899 kW): rated to cool 2670 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2925–4874 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3I12 cooling tower (527 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3I12 — an AT cooling tower, 527 nominal tons (2318 kW): rated to cool 1587 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1738–2897 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3I18 cooling tower (665 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3I18 — an AT cooling tower, 665 nominal tons (2922 kW): rated to cool 2001 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2192–3653 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3J12 cooling tower (616 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3J12 — an AT cooling tower, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2031–3385 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3J18 cooling tower (787 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3J18 — an AT cooling tower, 787 nominal tons (3461 kW): rated to cool 2370 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2596–4327 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3K12 cooling tower (674 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3K12 — an AT cooling tower, 674 nominal tons (2962 kW): rated to cool 2028 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2221–3702 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3K18 cooling tower (870 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3K18 — an AT cooling tower, 870 nominal tons (3825 kW): rated to cool 2619 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2869–4781 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3L12 cooling tower (720 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3L12 — an AT cooling tower, 720 nominal tons (3163 kW): rated to cool 2166 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2373–3954 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3L18 cooling tower (938 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3L18 — an AT cooling tower, 938 nominal tons (4123 kW): rated to cool 2823 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3092–5154 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3M12 cooling tower (757 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3M12 — an AT cooling tower, 757 nominal tons (3330 kW): rated to cool 2280 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2497–4162 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3M18 cooling tower (994 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3M18 — an AT cooling tower, 994 nominal tons (4368 kW): rated to cool 2991 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3276–5460 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-3N18 cooling tower (1089 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-3N18 — an AT cooling tower, 1089 nominal tons (4789 kW): rated to cool 3279 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3592–5986 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4I12 cooling tower (553 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4I12 — an AT cooling tower, 553 nominal tons (2432 kW): rated to cool 1665 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1824–3040 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4I18 cooling tower (725 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4I18 — an AT cooling tower, 725 nominal tons (3185 kW): rated to cool 2181 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2389–3982 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4J12 cooling tower (642 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4J12 — an AT cooling tower, 642 nominal tons (2822 kW): rated to cool 1932 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2116–3527 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4J18 cooling tower (836 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4J18 — an AT cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2757–4595 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4K12 cooling tower (699 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4K12 — an AT cooling tower, 699 nominal tons (3071 kW): rated to cool 2103 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2304–3839 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4K18 cooling tower (918 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4K18 — an AT cooling tower, 918 nominal tons (4035 kW): rated to cool 2763 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3026–5044 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4L12 cooling tower (744 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4L12 — an AT cooling tower, 744 nominal tons (3269 kW): rated to cool 2238 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2451–4086 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4L18 cooling tower (984 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4L18 — an AT cooling tower, 984 nominal tons (4324 kW): rated to cool 2961 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3243–5406 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4M12 cooling tower (782 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4M12 — an AT cooling tower, 782 nominal tons (3439 kW): rated to cool 2355 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2580–4299 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4M18 cooling tower (1041 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4M18 — an AT cooling tower, 1041 nominal tons (4574 kW): rated to cool 3132 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3431–5718 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4N12 cooling tower (817 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4N12 — an AT cooling tower, 817 nominal tons (3593 kW): rated to cool 2460 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2695–4491 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 220-4N18 cooling tower (1136 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 220-4N18 — an AT cooling tower, 1136 nominal tons (4995 kW): rated to cool 3420 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 121.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3746–6243 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-2J18 cooling tower (874 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-2J18 — an AT cooling tower, 874 nominal tons (3842 kW): rated to cool 2631 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 103.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2882–4803 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-2K18 cooling tower (991 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-2K18 — an AT cooling tower, 991 nominal tons (4355 kW): rated to cool 2982 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3266–5444 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-2K20 cooling tower (890 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-2K20 — an AT cooling tower, 890 nominal tons (3913 kW): rated to cool 2679 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2934–4891 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-2L18 cooling tower (1048 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-2L18 — an AT cooling tower, 1048 nominal tons (4605 kW): rated to cool 3153 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 121.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3454–5756 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-2L20 cooling tower (983 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-2L20 — an AT cooling tower, 983 nominal tons (4320 kW): rated to cool 2958 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3240–5400 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-2M18 cooling tower (1103 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-2M18 — an AT cooling tower, 1103 nominal tons (4850 kW): rated to cool 3321 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3638–6063 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-2M20 cooling tower (1057 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-2M20 — an AT cooling tower, 1057 nominal tons (4649 kW): rated to cool 3183 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3486–5811 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-2N18 cooling tower (1215 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-2N18 — an AT cooling tower, 1215 nominal tons (5341 kW): rated to cool 3657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 141.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4006–6676 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-2N20 cooling tower (1216 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-2N20 — an AT cooling tower, 1216 nominal tons (5345 kW): rated to cool 3660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 143.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4009–6682 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-2O20 cooling tower (1320 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-2O20 — an AT cooling tower, 1320 nominal tons (5801 kW): rated to cool 3972 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 153.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4351–7251 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3J18 cooling tower (974 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3J18 — an AT cooling tower, 974 nominal tons (4281 kW): rated to cool 2931 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3210–5351 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3K18 cooling tower (1088 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3K18 — an AT cooling tower, 1088 nominal tons (4784 kW): rated to cool 3276 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3588–5981 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3K20 cooling tower (1043 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3K20 — an AT cooling tower, 1043 nominal tons (4583 kW): rated to cool 3138 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3437–5729 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3L18 cooling tower (1157 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3L18 — an AT cooling tower, 1157 nominal tons (5087 kW): rated to cool 3483 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 119.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3815–6358 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3L20 cooling tower (1138 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3L20 — an AT cooling tower, 1138 nominal tons (5004 kW): rated to cool 3426 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 121.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3753–6254 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3M18 cooling tower (1223 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3M18 — an AT cooling tower, 1223 nominal tons (5376 kW): rated to cool 3681 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4032–6720 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3M20 cooling tower (1215 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3M20 — an AT cooling tower, 1215 nominal tons (5341 kW): rated to cool 3657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 128.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4006–6676 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3N18 cooling tower (1346 tons, 5.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3N18 — an AT cooling tower, 1346 nominal tons (5915 kW): rated to cool 4050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 138.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4436–7394 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3N20 cooling tower (1361 tons, 6.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3N20 — an AT cooling tower, 1361 nominal tons (5985 kW): rated to cool 4098 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 140.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4489–7481 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3O18 cooling tower (1443 tons, 6.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3O18 — an AT cooling tower, 1443 nominal tons (6344 kW): rated to cool 4344 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4758–7930 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-3O20 cooling tower (1477 tons, 6.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-3O20 — an AT cooling tower, 1477 nominal tons (6493 kW): rated to cool 4446 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 150.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4870–8117 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4J18 cooling tower (1032 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4J18 — an AT cooling tower, 1032 nominal tons (4535 kW): rated to cool 3105 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3401–5668 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4K18 cooling tower (1141 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4K18 — an AT cooling tower, 1141 nominal tons (5017 kW): rated to cool 3435 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3763–6271 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4K20 cooling tower (1115 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4K20 — an AT cooling tower, 1115 nominal tons (4903 kW): rated to cool 3357 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3677–6128 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4L18 cooling tower (1209 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4L18 — an AT cooling tower, 1209 nominal tons (5315 kW): rated to cool 3639 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 117.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3986–6643 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4L20 cooling tower (1206 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4L20 — an AT cooling tower, 1206 nominal tons (5301 kW): rated to cool 3630 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 119.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3976–6627 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4M18 cooling tower (1279 tons, 5.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4M18 — an AT cooling tower, 1279 nominal tons (5621 kW): rated to cool 3849 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4216–7027 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4M20 cooling tower (1280 tons, 5.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4M20 — an AT cooling tower, 1280 nominal tons (5626 kW): rated to cool 3852 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4219–7032 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4N18 cooling tower (1404 tons, 6.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4N18 — an AT cooling tower, 1404 nominal tons (6173 kW): rated to cool 4227 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 136.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4630–7717 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4N20 cooling tower (1423 tons, 6.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4N20 — an AT cooling tower, 1423 nominal tons (6257 kW): rated to cool 4284 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 138.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4692–7821 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4O18 cooling tower (1508 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4O18 — an AT cooling tower, 1508 nominal tons (6629 kW): rated to cool 4539 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 146.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4972–8286 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4O20 cooling tower (1540 tons, 6.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4O20 — an AT cooling tower, 1540 nominal tons (6769 kW): rated to cool 4635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 148.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5077–8462 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4P18 cooling tower (1565 tons, 6.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4P18 — an AT cooling tower, 1565 nominal tons (6879 kW): rated to cool 4710 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5159–8598 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 224-4P20 cooling tower (1598 tons, 7.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 224-4P20 — an AT cooling tower, 1598 nominal tons (7023 kW): rated to cool 4809 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 157.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5268–8779 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-2K24 cooling tower (1194 tons, 5.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-2K24 — an AT cooling tower, 1194 nominal tons (5249 kW): rated to cool 3594 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 147.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3937–6561 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-2L24 cooling tower (1325 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-2L24 — an AT cooling tower, 1325 nominal tons (5823 kW): rated to cool 3987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 158.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4367–7279 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-2M24 cooling tower (1397 tons, 6.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-2M24 — an AT cooling tower, 1397 nominal tons (6143 kW): rated to cool 4206 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 167.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4607–7678 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-2N24 cooling tower (1515 tons, 6.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-2N24 — an AT cooling tower, 1515 nominal tons (6660 kW): rated to cool 4560 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 184.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4995–8325 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-2O24 cooling tower (1628 tons, 7.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-2O24 — an AT cooling tower, 1628 nominal tons (7155 kW): rated to cool 4899 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 197.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5366–8943 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-3K24 cooling tower (1371 tons, 6.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 1371 nominal tons (6029 kW): rated to cool 4128 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 145.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4522–7536 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-3L24 cooling tower (1505 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 1505 nominal tons (6616 kW): rated to cool 4530 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4962–8270 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-3M24 cooling tower (1577 tons, 6.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-3M24 — an AT cooling tower, 1577 nominal tons (6931 kW): rated to cool 4746 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 165.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5199–8664 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-3N24 cooling tower (1734 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-3N24 — an AT cooling tower, 1734 nominal tons (7624 kW): rated to cool 5220 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 180.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5718–9530 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-3O24 cooling tower (1849 tons, 8.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-3O24 — an AT cooling tower, 1849 nominal tons (8127 kW): rated to cool 5565 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 194.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6096–10159 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-3P24 cooling tower (1962 tons, 8.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-3P24 — an AT cooling tower, 1962 nominal tons (8627 kW): rated to cool 5907 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 205.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6470–10784 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-4K24 cooling tower (1503 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-4K24 — an AT cooling tower, 1503 nominal tons (6607 kW): rated to cool 4524 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 142.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4955–8259 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-4L24 cooling tower (1625 tons, 7.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-4L24 — an AT cooling tower, 1625 nominal tons (7142 kW): rated to cool 4890 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 153.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5356–8927 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-4M24 cooling tower (1700 tons, 7.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-4M24 — an AT cooling tower, 1700 nominal tons (7475 kW): rated to cool 5118 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 162.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5606–9343 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-4N24 cooling tower (1847 tons, 8.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-4N24 — an AT cooling tower, 1847 nominal tons (8119 kW): rated to cool 5559 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 177.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6089–10148 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-4O24 cooling tower (1946 tons, 8.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-4O24 — an AT cooling tower, 1946 nominal tons (8552 kW): rated to cool 5856 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 190.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6414–10691 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-4P24 cooling tower (2060 tons, 9.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-4P24 — an AT cooling tower, 2060 nominal tons (9056 kW): rated to cool 6201 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 202.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6792–11320 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-4Q24 cooling tower (2214 tons, 9.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-4Q24 — an AT cooling tower, 2214 nominal tons (9731 kW): rated to cool 6663 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 216.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7298–12164 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-5K26 cooling tower (1956 tons, 8.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-5K26 — an AT cooling tower, 1956 nominal tons (8601 kW): rated to cool 5889 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 185.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6450–10751 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-5L26 cooling tower (2104 tons, 9.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-5L26 — an AT cooling tower, 2104 nominal tons (9249 kW): rated to cool 6333 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 198.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6937–11561 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-5M26 cooling tower (2229 tons, 9.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-5M26 — an AT cooling tower, 2229 nominal tons (9797 kW): rated to cool 6708 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 210.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7348–12246 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-5N26 cooling tower (2435 tons, 10.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-5N26 — an AT cooling tower, 2435 nominal tons (10704 kW): rated to cool 7329 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 229.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8028–13380 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 228-5O26 cooling tower (2604 tons, 11.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 228-5O26 — an AT cooling tower, 2604 nominal tons (11449 kW): rated to cool 7839 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 246.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8586–14311 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-2F17 cooling tower (178 tons, 784 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-2F17 — an AT cooling tower, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection588–980 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-2G17 cooling tower (224 tons, 986 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-2G17 — an AT cooling tower, 224 nominal tons (986 kW): rated to cool 675 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection739–1232 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-2H17 cooling tower (246 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-2H17 — an AT cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection812–1353 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-3F17 cooling tower (202 tons, 889 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-3F17 — an AT cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection667–1112 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-3G17 cooling tower (249 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-3G17 — an AT cooling tower, 249 nominal tons (1095 kW): rated to cool 750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection822–1369 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-3H17 cooling tower (276 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-3H17 — an AT cooling tower, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection910–1517 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-3I17 cooling tower (301 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-3I17 — an AT cooling tower, 301 nominal tons (1323 kW): rated to cool 906 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection992–1654 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-4F17 cooling tower (218 tons, 960 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-4F17 — an AT cooling tower, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection720–1199 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-4G17 cooling tower (261 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-4G17 — an AT cooling tower, 261 nominal tons (1148 kW): rated to cool 786 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection861–1435 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-4H17 cooling tower (286 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-4H17 — an AT cooling tower, 286 nominal tons (1257 kW): rated to cool 861 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection943–1572 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-4I17 cooling tower (314 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-4I17 — an AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1035–1725 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 26-4J17 cooling tower (343 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 26-4J17 — an AT cooling tower, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1130–1884 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2G36 cooling tower (443 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2G36 — an AT cooling tower, 443 nominal tons (1945 kW): rated to cool 1332 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1459–2432 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2H24 cooling tower (322 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2H24 — an AT cooling tower, 322 nominal tons (1415 kW): rated to cool 969 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1061–1769 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2H28 cooling tower (342 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2H28 — an AT cooling tower, 342 nominal tons (1503 kW): rated to cool 1029 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1127–1879 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2H36 cooling tower (529 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2H36 — an AT cooling tower, 529 nominal tons (2327 kW): rated to cool 1593 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1745–2908 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2I24 cooling tower (355 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2I24 — an AT cooling tower, 355 nominal tons (1560 kW): rated to cool 1068 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1170–1950 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2I28 cooling tower (485 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2I28 — an AT cooling tower, 485 nominal tons (2134 kW): rated to cool 1461 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1600–2667 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2I36 cooling tower (586 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2I36 — an AT cooling tower, 586 nominal tons (2576 kW): rated to cool 1764 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1932–3220 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2J24 cooling tower (409 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2J24 — an AT cooling tower, 409 nominal tons (1796 kW): rated to cool 1230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1347–2245 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2J28 cooling tower (431 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2J28 — an AT cooling tower, 431 nominal tons (1893 kW): rated to cool 1296 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1420–2366 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2J36 cooling tower (674 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2J36 — an AT cooling tower, 674 nominal tons (2962 kW): rated to cool 2028 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2221–3702 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2K24 cooling tower (451 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2K24 — an AT cooling tower, 451 nominal tons (1985 kW): rated to cool 1359 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1489–2481 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2K28 cooling tower (593 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2K28 — an AT cooling tower, 593 nominal tons (2607 kW): rated to cool 1785 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1955–3259 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-2L28 cooling tower (470 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-2L28 — an AT cooling tower, 470 nominal tons (2068 kW): rated to cool 1416 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1551–2585 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3G36 cooling tower (509 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3G36 — an AT cooling tower, 509 nominal tons (2239 kW): rated to cool 1533 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1679–2799 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3H24 cooling tower (362 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3H24 — an AT cooling tower, 362 nominal tons (1590 kW): rated to cool 1089 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1193–1988 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3H28 cooling tower (381 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3H28 — an AT cooling tower, 381 nominal tons (1674 kW): rated to cool 1146 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1255–2092 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3H36 cooling tower (598 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3H36 — an AT cooling tower, 598 nominal tons (2629 kW): rated to cool 1800 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1972–3286 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3I24 cooling tower (401 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3I24 — an AT cooling tower, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1206 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1321–2202 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3I28 cooling tower (524 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3I28 — an AT cooling tower, 524 nominal tons (2305 kW): rated to cool 1578 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1728–2881 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3I36 cooling tower (662 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3I36 — an AT cooling tower, 662 nominal tons (2909 kW): rated to cool 1992 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2182–3637 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3J24 cooling tower (461 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3J24 — an AT cooling tower, 461 nominal tons (2029 kW): rated to cool 1389 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1521–2536 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3J28 cooling tower (496 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3J28 — an AT cooling tower, 496 nominal tons (2182 kW): rated to cool 1494 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1636–2727 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3J36 cooling tower (760 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3J36 — an AT cooling tower, 760 nominal tons (3343 kW): rated to cool 2289 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2507–4179 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3K24 cooling tower (509 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 509 nominal tons (2239 kW): rated to cool 1533 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1679–2799 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3K28 cooling tower (633 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3K28 — an AT cooling tower, 633 nominal tons (2782 kW): rated to cool 1905 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2087–3478 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3K36 cooling tower (841 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 841 nominal tons (3698 kW): rated to cool 2532 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2773–4622 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3L24 cooling tower (551 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 551 nominal tons (2423 kW): rated to cool 1659 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1817–3029 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3L28 cooling tower (533 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3L28 — an AT cooling tower, 533 nominal tons (2344 kW): rated to cool 1605 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1758–2930 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3M28 cooling tower (623 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3M28 — an AT cooling tower, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2054–3423 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4G36 cooling tower (566 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4G36 — an AT cooling tower, 566 nominal tons (2489 kW): rated to cool 1704 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1866–3111 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4H24 cooling tower (397 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4H24 — an AT cooling tower, 397 nominal tons (1744 kW): rated to cool 1194 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1308–2180 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4H28 cooling tower (439 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4H28 — an AT cooling tower, 439 nominal tons (1928 kW): rated to cool 1320 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1446–2410 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4H36 cooling tower (649 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4H36 — an AT cooling tower, 649 nominal tons (2852 kW): rated to cool 1953 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2139–3565 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4I24 cooling tower (435 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4I24 — an AT cooling tower, 435 nominal tons (1910 kW): rated to cool 1308 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1433–2388 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4I28 cooling tower (389 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4I28 — an AT cooling tower, 389 nominal tons (1709 kW): rated to cool 1170 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1282–2136 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4I36 cooling tower (708 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4I36 — an AT cooling tower, 708 nominal tons (3111 kW): rated to cool 2130 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2333–3888 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4J24 cooling tower (490 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4J24 — an AT cooling tower, 490 nominal tons (2156 kW): rated to cool 1476 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1617–2695 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4J28 cooling tower (549 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4J28 — an AT cooling tower, 549 nominal tons (2414 kW): rated to cool 1653 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1811–3018 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4J36 cooling tower (799 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4J36 — an AT cooling tower, 799 nominal tons (3514 kW): rated to cool 2406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2635–4392 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4K24 cooling tower (535 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4K24 — an AT cooling tower, 535 nominal tons (2353 kW): rated to cool 1611 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1765–2941 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4K28 cooling tower (432 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4K28 — an AT cooling tower, 432 nominal tons (1897 kW): rated to cool 1299 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1423–2371 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4K36 cooling tower (872 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4K36 — an AT cooling tower, 872 nominal tons (3834 kW): rated to cool 2625 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2875–4792 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4L24 cooling tower (572 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4L24 — an AT cooling tower, 572 nominal tons (2515 kW): rated to cool 1722 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1886–3144 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4L28 cooling tower (582 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4L28 — an AT cooling tower, 582 nominal tons (2559 kW): rated to cool 1752 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1919–3198 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4M28 cooling tower (658 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4M28 — an AT cooling tower, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1980 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2169–3615 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-2F17 cooling tower (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-2F17 — an AT cooling tower, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-2G17 cooling tower (273 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-2G17 — an AT cooling tower, 273 nominal tons (1200 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection900–1501 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-2H17 cooling tower (296 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-2H17 — an AT cooling tower, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection976–1627 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-2I17 cooling tower (318 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-2I17 — an AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1048–1747 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-3F17 cooling tower (246 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-3F17 — an AT cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection812–1353 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-3G17 cooling tower (303 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-3G17 — an AT cooling tower, 303 nominal tons (1332 kW): rated to cool 912 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection999–1665 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-3H17 cooling tower (330 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-3H17 — an AT cooling tower, 330 nominal tons (1450 kW): rated to cool 993 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1088–1813 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-3I17 cooling tower (357 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-3I17 — an AT cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1176–1961 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-3J17 cooling tower (392 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-3J17 — an AT cooling tower, 392 nominal tons (1722 kW): rated to cool 1179 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1291–2152 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-4F17 cooling tower (266 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-4F17 — an AT cooling tower, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection877–1462 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-4G17 cooling tower (318 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-4G17 — an AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1048–1747 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-4H17 cooling tower (345 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-4H17 — an AT cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1137–1895 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-4I17 cooling tower (372 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-4I17 — an AT cooling tower, 372 nominal tons (1634 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1226–2043 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-4J17 cooling tower (413 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-4J17 — an AT cooling tower, 413 nominal tons (1814 kW): rated to cool 1242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1360–2267 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2G18 cooling tower (273 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2G18 — an AT cooling tower, 273 nominal tons (1200 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection900–1501 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2G21 cooling tower (314 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2G21 — an AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1035–1725 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2H18 cooling tower (328 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2H18 — an AT cooling tower, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1081–1802 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2H21 cooling tower (378 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2H21 — an AT cooling tower, 378 nominal tons (1661 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1245–2076 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2H24 cooling tower (399 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2H24 — an AT cooling tower, 399 nominal tons (1753 kW): rated to cool 1200 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1314–2191 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2H28 cooling tower (445 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2H28 — an AT cooling tower, 445 nominal tons (1954 kW): rated to cool 1338 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1466–2443 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2I18 cooling tower (361 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2I18 — an AT cooling tower, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1190–1983 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2I21 cooling tower (407 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2I21 — an AT cooling tower, 407 nominal tons (1788 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1341–2235 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2I24 cooling tower (452 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2I24 — an AT cooling tower, 452 nominal tons (1989 kW): rated to cool 1362 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1492–2486 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2I28 cooling tower (504 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2I28 — an AT cooling tower, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1663–2771 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2J18 cooling tower (421 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2J18 — an AT cooling tower, 421 nominal tons (1849 kW): rated to cool 1266 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1387–2311 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2J21 cooling tower (465 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2J21 — an AT cooling tower, 465 nominal tons (2046 kW): rated to cool 1401 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1535–2558 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2J24 cooling tower (505 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2J24 — an AT cooling tower, 505 nominal tons (2221 kW): rated to cool 1521 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1666–2777 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2J28 cooling tower (561 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2J28 — an AT cooling tower, 561 nominal tons (2467 kW): rated to cool 1689 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1850–3083 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2K24 cooling tower (557 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2K24 — an AT cooling tower, 557 nominal tons (2449 kW): rated to cool 1677 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1837–3061 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2K28 cooling tower (620 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2K28 — an AT cooling tower, 620 nominal tons (2725 kW): rated to cool 1866 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2044–3407 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-2L28 cooling tower (676 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-2L28 — an AT cooling tower, 676 nominal tons (2971 kW): rated to cool 2034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2228–3713 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3G18 cooling tower (311 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3G18 — an AT cooling tower, 311 nominal tons (1367 kW): rated to cool 936 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1025–1709 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3G21 cooling tower (346 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3G21 — an AT cooling tower, 346 nominal tons (1520 kW): rated to cool 1041 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1140–1900 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3H18 cooling tower (367 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3H18 — an AT cooling tower, 367 nominal tons (1612 kW): rated to cool 1104 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1209–2015 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3H21 cooling tower (409 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3H21 — an AT cooling tower, 409 nominal tons (1796 kW): rated to cool 1230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1347–2245 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3H24 cooling tower (450 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3H24 — an AT cooling tower, 450 nominal tons (1980 kW): rated to cool 1356 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1485–2475 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3H28 cooling tower (500 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3H28 — an AT cooling tower, 500 nominal tons (2199 kW): rated to cool 1506 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1650–2749 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3I18 cooling tower (403 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3I18 — an AT cooling tower, 403 nominal tons (1770 kW): rated to cool 1212 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1328–2213 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3I21 cooling tower (447 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3I21 — an AT cooling tower, 447 nominal tons (1963 kW): rated to cool 1344 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1472–2454 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3I24 cooling tower (504 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3I24 — an AT cooling tower, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1663–2771 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3I28 cooling tower (561 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3I28 — an AT cooling tower, 561 nominal tons (2467 kW): rated to cool 1689 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1850–3083 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3J18 cooling tower (469 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3J18 — an AT cooling tower, 469 nominal tons (2064 kW): rated to cool 1413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1548–2580 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3J21 cooling tower (516 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3J21 — an AT cooling tower, 516 nominal tons (2270 kW): rated to cool 1554 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1702–2837 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3J24 cooling tower (569 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3J24 — an AT cooling tower, 569 nominal tons (2502 kW): rated to cool 1713 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1876–3127 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3J28 cooling tower (631 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3J28 — an AT cooling tower, 631 nominal tons (2773 kW): rated to cool 1899 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2080–3467 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3K21 cooling tower (576 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3K21 — an AT cooling tower, 576 nominal tons (2532 kW): rated to cool 1734 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1899–3166 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3K24 cooling tower (628 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 628 nominal tons (2760 kW): rated to cool 1890 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2070–3450 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3K28 cooling tower (696 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3K28 — an AT cooling tower, 696 nominal tons (3058 kW): rated to cool 2094 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2294–3823 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3L24 cooling tower (672 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 672 nominal tons (2953 kW): rated to cool 2022 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2215–3691 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3L28 cooling tower (754 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3L28 — an AT cooling tower, 754 nominal tons (3317 kW): rated to cool 2271 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2488–4146 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-3M28 cooling tower (799 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-3M28 — an AT cooling tower, 799 nominal tons (3514 kW): rated to cool 2406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2635–4392 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4G18 cooling tower (334 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4G18 — an AT cooling tower, 334 nominal tons (1468 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1101–1835 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4G21 cooling tower (382 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4G21 — an AT cooling tower, 382 nominal tons (1678 kW): rated to cool 1149 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1259–2098 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4H18 cooling tower (386 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4H18 — an AT cooling tower, 386 nominal tons (1696 kW): rated to cool 1161 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1272–2119 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4H21 cooling tower (444 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4H21 — an AT cooling tower, 444 nominal tons (1950 kW): rated to cool 1335 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1462–2437 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4H24 cooling tower (479 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4H24 — an AT cooling tower, 479 nominal tons (2107 kW): rated to cool 1443 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1581–2634 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4H28 cooling tower (533 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4H28 — an AT cooling tower, 533 nominal tons (2344 kW): rated to cool 1605 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1758–2930 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4I18 cooling tower (424 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4I18 — an AT cooling tower, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1397–2328 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4I21 cooling tower (480 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4I21 — an AT cooling tower, 480 nominal tons (2112 kW): rated to cool 1446 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1584–2640 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4I24 cooling tower (529 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4I24 — an AT cooling tower, 529 nominal tons (2327 kW): rated to cool 1593 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1745–2908 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4I28 cooling tower (590 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4I28 — an AT cooling tower, 590 nominal tons (2594 kW): rated to cool 1776 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1945–3242 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4J18 cooling tower (489 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4J18 — an AT cooling tower, 489 nominal tons (2151 kW): rated to cool 1473 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1613–2689 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4J21 cooling tower (545 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4J21 — an AT cooling tower, 545 nominal tons (2397 kW): rated to cool 1641 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1797–2996 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4J24 cooling tower (591 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4J24 — an AT cooling tower, 591 nominal tons (2598 kW): rated to cool 1779 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1949–3248 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4J28 cooling tower (659 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4J28 — an AT cooling tower, 659 nominal tons (2896 kW): rated to cool 1983 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2172–3620 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4K18 cooling tower (536 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4K18 — an AT cooling tower, 536 nominal tons (2357 kW): rated to cool 1614 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1768–2946 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4K21 cooling tower (602 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4K21 — an AT cooling tower, 602 nominal tons (2646 kW): rated to cool 1812 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1985–3308 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4K24 cooling tower (651 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4K24 — an AT cooling tower, 651 nominal tons (2861 kW): rated to cool 1959 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2146–3576 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4K28 cooling tower (724 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4K28 — an AT cooling tower, 724 nominal tons (3181 kW): rated to cool 2178 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2386–3976 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4L21 cooling tower (634 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4L21 — an AT cooling tower, 634 nominal tons (2787 kW): rated to cool 1908 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2090–3483 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4L24 cooling tower (694 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4L24 — an AT cooling tower, 694 nominal tons (3049 kW): rated to cool 2088 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2287–3812 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4L28 cooling tower (784 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4L28 — an AT cooling tower, 784 nominal tons (3448 kW): rated to cool 2361 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2586–4310 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4M24 cooling tower (716 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4M24 — an AT cooling tower, 716 nominal tons (3146 kW): rated to cool 2154 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2359–3932 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 29-4M28 cooling tower (827 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 29-4M28 — an AT cooling tower, 827 nominal tons (3637 kW): rated to cool 2490 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2727–4546 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-2I36 cooling tower (670 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-2I36 — an AT cooling tower, 670 nominal tons (2944 kW): rated to cool 2016 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2208–3680 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-2J36 cooling tower (814 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-2J36 — an AT cooling tower, 814 nominal tons (3580 kW): rated to cool 2451 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2685–4474 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-2K36 cooling tower (900 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-2K36 — an AT cooling tower, 900 nominal tons (3956 kW): rated to cool 2709 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2967–4945 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-2L36 cooling tower (960 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-2L36 — an AT cooling tower, 960 nominal tons (4219 kW): rated to cool 2889 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3164–5274 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-2M36 cooling tower (1009 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-2M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1009 nominal tons (4434 kW): rated to cool 3036 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3325–5542 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-3I36 cooling tower (779 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-3I36 — an AT cooling tower, 779 nominal tons (3426 kW): rated to cool 2346 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2570–4283 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-3J36 cooling tower (911 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-3J36 — an AT cooling tower, 911 nominal tons (4005 kW): rated to cool 2742 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3003–5006 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-3K36 cooling tower (997 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 997 nominal tons (4381 kW): rated to cool 3000 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3286–5477 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-3L36 cooling tower (1064 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-3L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1064 nominal tons (4679 kW): rated to cool 3204 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3509–5849 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-3M36 cooling tower (1122 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-3M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1122 nominal tons (4933 kW): rated to cool 3378 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3700–6167 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-4I36 cooling tower (818 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-4I36 — an AT cooling tower, 818 nominal tons (3597 kW): rated to cool 2463 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2698–4496 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-4J36 cooling tower (950 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-4J36 — an AT cooling tower, 950 nominal tons (4175 kW): rated to cool 2859 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3132–5219 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-4K36 cooling tower (1035 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-4K36 — an AT cooling tower, 1035 nominal tons (4548 kW): rated to cool 3114 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3411–5685 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-4L36 cooling tower (1102 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-4L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1102 nominal tons (4846 kW): rated to cool 3318 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3634–6057 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-4M36 cooling tower (1160 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-4M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1160 nominal tons (5100 kW): rated to cool 3492 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3825–6375 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 310-4N36 cooling tower (1212 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 310-4N36 — an AT cooling tower, 1212 nominal tons (5328 kW): rated to cool 3648 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3996–6660 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2I36 cooling tower (848 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-2I36 — an AT cooling tower, 848 nominal tons (3729 kW): rated to cool 2553 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2796–4661 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2I42 cooling tower (907 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-2I42 — an AT cooling tower, 907 nominal tons (3987 kW): rated to cool 2730 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2990–4984 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2J36 cooling tower (1011 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-2J36 — an AT cooling tower, 1011 nominal tons (4443 kW): rated to cool 3042 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3332–5553 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2J42 cooling tower (1087 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-2J42 — an AT cooling tower, 1087 nominal tons (4780 kW): rated to cool 3273 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3585–5975 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2J54 cooling tower (1320 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-2J54 — an AT cooling tower, 1320 nominal tons (5801 kW): rated to cool 3972 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 156.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4351–7251 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2K36 cooling tower (1102 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-2K36 — an AT cooling tower, 1102 nominal tons (4846 kW): rated to cool 3318 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3634–6057 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2K42 cooling tower (1191 tons, 5.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-2K42 — an AT cooling tower, 1191 nominal tons (5236 kW): rated to cool 3585 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 138.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3927–6545 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2K54 cooling tower (1494 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-2K54 — an AT cooling tower, 1494 nominal tons (6568 kW): rated to cool 4497 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 170.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4926–8210 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2K60 cooling tower (1363 tons, 6.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-2K60 — an AT cooling tower, 1363 nominal tons (5994 kW): rated to cool 4104 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 174.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4495–7492 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2L36 cooling tower (1183 tons, 5.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-2L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1183 nominal tons (5201 kW): rated to cool 3561 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 136.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3901–6501 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2L42 cooling tower (1285 tons, 5.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-2L42 — an AT cooling tower, 1285 nominal tons (5648 kW): rated to cool 3867 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 148.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4236–7060 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2L54 cooling tower (1581 tons, 6.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-2L54 — an AT cooling tower, 1581 nominal tons (6949 kW): rated to cool 4758 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 183.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5212–8686 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2L60 cooling tower (1503 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-2L60 — an AT cooling tower, 1503 nominal tons (6607 kW): rated to cool 4524 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 187.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4955–8259 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2M36 cooling tower (1253 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-2M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1253 nominal tons (5507 kW): rated to cool 3771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 145.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4131–6884 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2M42 cooling tower (1361 tons, 6.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-2M42 — an AT cooling tower, 1361 nominal tons (5985 kW): rated to cool 4098 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 157.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4489–7481 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2M54 cooling tower (1664 tons, 7.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-2M54 — an AT cooling tower, 1664 nominal tons (7317 kW): rated to cool 5010 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 194.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5488–9146 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2M60 cooling tower (1617 tons, 7.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-2M60 — an AT cooling tower, 1617 nominal tons (7107 kW): rated to cool 4866 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 198.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5330–8883 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2N54 cooling tower (1834 tons, 8.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-2N54 — an AT cooling tower, 1834 nominal tons (8062 kW): rated to cool 5520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 213.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6046–10077 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2N60 cooling tower (1859 tons, 8.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-2N60 — an AT cooling tower, 1859 nominal tons (8171 kW): rated to cool 5595 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 217.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6128–10214 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-2O60 cooling tower (2016 tons, 8.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-2O60 — an AT cooling tower, 2016 nominal tons (8864 kW): rated to cool 6069 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 233.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6648–11079 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3I36 cooling tower (957 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3I36 — an AT cooling tower, 957 nominal tons (4206 kW): rated to cool 2880 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3155–5258 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3I42 cooling tower (1042 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3I42 — an AT cooling tower, 1042 nominal tons (4579 kW): rated to cool 3135 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3434–5723 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3J36 cooling tower (1118 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3J36 — an AT cooling tower, 1118 nominal tons (4916 kW): rated to cool 3366 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3687–6145 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3J42 cooling tower (1225 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3J42 — an AT cooling tower, 1225 nominal tons (5385 kW): rated to cool 3687 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4039–6731 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3J54 cooling tower (1468 tons, 6.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3J54 — an AT cooling tower, 1468 nominal tons (6454 kW): rated to cool 4419 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 153.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4840–8067 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3K36 cooling tower (1220 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 1220 nominal tons (5363 kW): rated to cool 3672 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4022–6704 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3K42 cooling tower (1326 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3K42 — an AT cooling tower, 1326 nominal tons (5827 kW): rated to cool 3990 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 136.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4370–7284 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3K54 cooling tower (1643 tons, 7.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3K54 — an AT cooling tower, 1643 nominal tons (7221 kW): rated to cool 4944 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 168.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5415–9026 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3K60 cooling tower (1595 tons, 7.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3K60 — an AT cooling tower, 1595 nominal tons (7010 kW): rated to cool 4800 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 171.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5258–8763 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3L36 cooling tower (1312 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1312 nominal tons (5766 kW): rated to cool 3948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4324–7207 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3L42 cooling tower (1423 tons, 6.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3L42 — an AT cooling tower, 1423 nominal tons (6257 kW): rated to cool 4284 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 146.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4692–7821 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3L54 cooling tower (1746 tons, 7.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3L54 — an AT cooling tower, 1746 nominal tons (7676 kW): rated to cool 5256 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 180.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5757–9595 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3L60 cooling tower (1739 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3L60 — an AT cooling tower, 1739 nominal tons (7646 kW): rated to cool 5235 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 184.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5734–9557 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3M36 cooling tower (1393 tons, 6.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1393 nominal tons (6125 kW): rated to cool 4194 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 142.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4594–7656 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3M42 cooling tower (1514 tons, 6.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3M42 — an AT cooling tower, 1514 nominal tons (6655 kW): rated to cool 4557 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 154.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4991–8319 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3M54 cooling tower (1845 tons, 8.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3M54 — an AT cooling tower, 1845 nominal tons (8110 kW): rated to cool 5553 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 191.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6082–10137 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3M60 cooling tower (1853 tons, 8.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3M60 — an AT cooling tower, 1853 nominal tons (8145 kW): rated to cool 5577 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 194.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6109–10181 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3N42 cooling tower (1656 tons, 7.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-3N42 — an AT cooling tower, 1656 nominal tons (7282 kW): rated to cool 4986 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 169.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5461–9102 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3N54 cooling tower (2029 tons, 8.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3N54 — an AT cooling tower, 2029 nominal tons (8920 kW): rated to cool 6108 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 209.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6690–11151 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3N60 cooling tower (2076 tons, 9.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3N60 — an AT cooling tower, 2076 nominal tons (9126 kW): rated to cool 6249 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 213.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6845–11408 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3O54 cooling tower (2175 tons, 9.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3O54 — an AT cooling tower, 2175 nominal tons (9560 kW): rated to cool 6546 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 224.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7170–11950 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-3O60 cooling tower (2252 tons, 9.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-3O60 — an AT cooling tower, 2252 nominal tons (9902 kW): rated to cool 6780 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 228.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7426–12377 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4I36 cooling tower (1018 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4I36 — an AT cooling tower, 1018 nominal tons (4473 kW): rated to cool 3063 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3355–5592 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4I42 cooling tower (1119 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4I42 — an AT cooling tower, 1119 nominal tons (4920 kW): rated to cool 3369 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 107.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3690–6150 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4J36 cooling tower (1170 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4J36 — an AT cooling tower, 1170 nominal tons (5144 kW): rated to cool 3522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3858–6430 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4J42 cooling tower (1289 tons, 5.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4J42 — an AT cooling tower, 1289 nominal tons (5665 kW): rated to cool 3879 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4249–7081 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4J54 cooling tower (1555 tons, 6.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4J54 — an AT cooling tower, 1555 nominal tons (6835 kW): rated to cool 4680 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 151.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5126–8544 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4K36 cooling tower (1273 tons, 5.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4K36 — an AT cooling tower, 1273 nominal tons (5595 kW): rated to cool 3831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4196–6994 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4K42 cooling tower (1390 tons, 6.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4K42 — an AT cooling tower, 1390 nominal tons (6112 kW): rated to cool 4185 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4584–7640 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4K54 cooling tower (1719 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4K54 — an AT cooling tower, 1719 nominal tons (7558 kW): rated to cool 5175 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 165.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5668–9447 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4K60 cooling tower (1701 tons, 7.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4K60 — an AT cooling tower, 1701 nominal tons (7479 kW): rated to cool 5121 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 168.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5609–9349 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4L36 cooling tower (1370 tons, 6.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1370 nominal tons (6024 kW): rated to cool 4125 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 132.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4518–7530 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4L42 cooling tower (1490 tons, 6.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4L42 — an AT cooling tower, 1490 nominal tons (6550 kW): rated to cool 4485 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 143.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4913–8188 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4L54 cooling tower (1822 tons, 8.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4L54 — an AT cooling tower, 1822 nominal tons (8009 kW): rated to cool 5484 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 177.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6007–10011 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4L60 cooling tower (1838 tons, 8.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4L60 — an AT cooling tower, 1838 nominal tons (8079 kW): rated to cool 5532 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 181.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6059–10099 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4M36 cooling tower (1453 tons, 6.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1453 nominal tons (6388 kW): rated to cool 4374 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 139.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4791–7985 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4M42 cooling tower (1584 tons, 7.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4M42 — an AT cooling tower, 1584 nominal tons (6962 kW): rated to cool 4767 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5222–8703 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4M54 cooling tower (1929 tons, 8.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4M54 — an AT cooling tower, 1929 nominal tons (8478 kW): rated to cool 5805 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 188.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6358–10597 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4M60 cooling tower (1948 tons, 8.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4M60 — an AT cooling tower, 1948 nominal tons (8566 kW): rated to cool 5865 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 191.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6424–10707 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4N36 cooling tower (1555 tons, 6.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4N36 — an AT cooling tower, 1555 nominal tons (6835 kW): rated to cool 4680 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 153.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5126–8544 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4N42 cooling tower (1732 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 312-4N42 — an AT cooling tower, 1732 nominal tons (7615 kW): rated to cool 5214 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 166.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5711–9519 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4N54 cooling tower (2117 tons, 9.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4N54 — an AT cooling tower, 2117 nominal tons (9306 kW): rated to cool 6372 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 205.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6980–11633 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4N60 cooling tower (2167 tons, 9.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4N60 — an AT cooling tower, 2167 nominal tons (9525 kW): rated to cool 6522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 209.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7144–11906 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4O54 cooling tower (2273 tons, 10.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4O54 — an AT cooling tower, 2273 nominal tons (9994 kW): rated to cool 6843 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 220.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7495–12492 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4O60 cooling tower (2344 tons, 10.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4O60 — an AT cooling tower, 2344 nominal tons (10305 kW): rated to cool 7056 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 224.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7729–12881 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4P54 cooling tower (2359 tons, 10.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4P54 — an AT cooling tower, 2359 nominal tons (10371 kW): rated to cool 7101 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 233.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7778–12963 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 312-4P60 cooling tower (2432 tons, 10.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 312-4P60 — an AT cooling tower, 2432 nominal tons (10691 kW): rated to cool 7320 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 238.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8018–13363 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-2K72 cooling tower (1783 tons, 7.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-2K72 — an AT cooling tower, 1783 nominal tons (7838 kW): rated to cool 5367 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 220.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5879–9798 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-2L72 cooling tower (1979 tons, 8.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-2L72 — an AT cooling tower, 1979 nominal tons (8701 kW): rated to cool 5958 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 236.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6526–10877 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-2M72 cooling tower (2088 tons, 9.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-2M72 — an AT cooling tower, 2088 nominal tons (9179 kW): rated to cool 6285 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 250.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6884–11474 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-2N72 cooling tower (2263 tons, 10.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-2N72 — an AT cooling tower, 2263 nominal tons (9950 kW): rated to cool 6813 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 275.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7463–12438 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-2O72 cooling tower (2431 tons, 10.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-2O72 — an AT cooling tower, 2431 nominal tons (10686 kW): rated to cool 7317 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 295.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8015–13358 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-3K72 cooling tower (2049 tons, 9.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-3K72 — an AT cooling tower, 2049 nominal tons (9008 kW): rated to cool 6168 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 217.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6756–11260 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-3L72 cooling tower (2249 tons, 9.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-3L72 — an AT cooling tower, 2249 nominal tons (9889 kW): rated to cool 6771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 232.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7417–12361 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-3M72 cooling tower (2356 tons, 10.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-3M72 — an AT cooling tower, 2356 nominal tons (10358 kW): rated to cool 7092 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 246.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7768–12947 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-3N72 cooling tower (2592 tons, 11.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-3N72 — an AT cooling tower, 2592 nominal tons (11396 kW): rated to cool 7803 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 270.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8547–14245 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-3O72 cooling tower (2764 tons, 12.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-3O72 — an AT cooling tower, 2764 nominal tons (12150 kW): rated to cool 8319 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 290.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9112–15187 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-3P72 cooling tower (2934 tons, 12.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-3P72 — an AT cooling tower, 2934 nominal tons (12899 kW): rated to cool 8832 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 307.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9674–16123 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-4K72 cooling tower (2248 tons, 9.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-4K72 — an AT cooling tower, 2248 nominal tons (9880 kW): rated to cool 6765 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 213.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7410–12350 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-4L72 cooling tower (2429 tons, 10.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-4L72 — an AT cooling tower, 2429 nominal tons (10677 kW): rated to cool 7311 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 228.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8008–13347 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-4M72 cooling tower (2543 tons, 11.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-4M72 — an AT cooling tower, 2543 nominal tons (11177 kW): rated to cool 7653 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 242.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8383–13971 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-4N72 cooling tower (2761 tons, 12.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-4N72 — an AT cooling tower, 2761 nominal tons (12136 kW): rated to cool 8310 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 265.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9102–15171 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-4O72 cooling tower (2909 tons, 12.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-4O72 — an AT cooling tower, 2909 nominal tons (12789 kW): rated to cool 8757 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 285.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9592–15987 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-4P72 cooling tower (3081 tons, 13.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-4P72 — an AT cooling tower, 3081 nominal tons (13543 kW): rated to cool 9273 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 302.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10157–16929 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-4Q72 cooling tower (3311 tons, 14.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-4Q72 — an AT cooling tower, 3311 nominal tons (14555 kW): rated to cool 9966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 323.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10916–18194 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-5K78 cooling tower (2926 tons, 12.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-5K78 — an AT cooling tower, 2926 nominal tons (12864 kW): rated to cool 8808 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 276.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9648–16080 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-5L78 cooling tower (3147 tons, 13.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-5L78 — an AT cooling tower, 3147 nominal tons (13832 kW): rated to cool 9471 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 296.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10374–17290 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-5M78 cooling tower (3333 tons, 14.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-5M78 — an AT cooling tower, 3333 nominal tons (14651 kW): rated to cool 10032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 314.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10989–18314 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-5N78 cooling tower (3643 tons, 16.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-5N78 — an AT cooling tower, 3643 nominal tons (16014 kW): rated to cool 10965 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 343.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection12010–20017 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 314-5O78 cooling tower (3895 tons, 17.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 314-5O78 — an AT cooling tower, 3895 nominal tons (17122 kW): rated to cool 11724 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 368.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection12842–21403 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 342-5K26 cooling tower (2872 tons, 12.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 342-5K26 — an AT cooling tower, 2872 nominal tons (12627 kW): rated to cool 8646 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 277.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9470–15784 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 342-5L26 cooling tower (3090 tons, 13.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 342-5L26 — an AT cooling tower, 3090 nominal tons (13582 kW): rated to cool 9300 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 298.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10187–16978 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 342-5M26 cooling tower (3275 tons, 14.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 342-5M26 — an AT cooling tower, 3275 nominal tons (14397 kW): rated to cool 9858 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 315.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10798–17997 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 342-5N26 cooling tower (3581 tons, 15.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 342-5N26 — an AT cooling tower, 3581 nominal tons (15742 kW): rated to cool 10779 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 345.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection11807–19678 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 342-5O26 cooling tower (3831 tons, 16.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 342-5O26 — an AT cooling tower, 3831 nominal tons (16842 kW): rated to cool 11532 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 369.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection12632–21053 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-2H36 cooling tower (603 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-2H36 — an AT cooling tower, 603 nominal tons (2651 kW): rated to cool 1815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1988–3313 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-2H42 cooling tower (662 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-2H42 — an AT cooling tower, 662 nominal tons (2909 kW): rated to cool 1992 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2182–3637 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-2I36 cooling tower (684 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-2I36 — an AT cooling tower, 684 nominal tons (3006 kW): rated to cool 2058 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2254–3757 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-2I42 cooling tower (751 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-2I42 — an AT cooling tower, 751 nominal tons (3304 kW): rated to cool 2262 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2478–4129 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-2J36 cooling tower (762 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-2J36 — an AT cooling tower, 762 nominal tons (3352 kW): rated to cool 2295 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2514–4190 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-2J42 cooling tower (837 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-2J42 — an AT cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2760–4600 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-2K36 cooling tower (840 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-2K36 — an AT cooling tower, 840 nominal tons (3694 kW): rated to cool 2529 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2770–4617 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-2K42 cooling tower (924 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-2K42 — an AT cooling tower, 924 nominal tons (4062 kW): rated to cool 2781 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3046–5077 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-2L42 cooling tower (1008 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-2L42 — an AT cooling tower, 1008 nominal tons (4430 kW): rated to cool 3033 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3322–5537 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3H36 cooling tower (680 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3H36 — an AT cooling tower, 680 nominal tons (2988 kW): rated to cool 2046 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2241–3735 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3H42 cooling tower (746 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3H42 — an AT cooling tower, 746 nominal tons (3277 kW): rated to cool 2244 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2458–4097 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3I36 cooling tower (760 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3I36 — an AT cooling tower, 760 nominal tons (3343 kW): rated to cool 2289 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2507–4179 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3I42 cooling tower (836 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3I42 — an AT cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2757–4595 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3J36 cooling tower (859 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3J36 — an AT cooling tower, 859 nominal tons (3777 kW): rated to cool 2586 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2833–4721 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3J42 cooling tower (942 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3J42 — an AT cooling tower, 942 nominal tons (4140 kW): rated to cool 2835 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3105–5176 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3K36 cooling tower (948 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 948 nominal tons (4167 kW): rated to cool 2853 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3125–5208 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3K42 cooling tower (1039 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3K42 — an AT cooling tower, 1039 nominal tons (4565 kW): rated to cool 3126 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3424–5707 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3L36 cooling tower (1013 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1013 nominal tons (4451 kW): rated to cool 3048 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3339–5564 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3L42 cooling tower (1126 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3L42 — an AT cooling tower, 1126 nominal tons (4951 kW): rated to cool 3390 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3713–6189 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-3M42 cooling tower (1193 tons, 5.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-3M42 — an AT cooling tower, 1193 nominal tons (5245 kW): rated to cool 3591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3933–6556 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4H36 cooling tower (723 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4H36 — an AT cooling tower, 723 nominal tons (3177 kW): rated to cool 2175 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2382–3971 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4H42 cooling tower (796 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4H42 — an AT cooling tower, 796 nominal tons (3501 kW): rated to cool 2397 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2626–4376 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4I36 cooling tower (797 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4I36 — an AT cooling tower, 797 nominal tons (3505 kW): rated to cool 2400 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2629–4381 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4I42 cooling tower (881 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4I42 — an AT cooling tower, 881 nominal tons (3873 kW): rated to cool 2652 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2905–4841 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4J36 cooling tower (890 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4J36 — an AT cooling tower, 890 nominal tons (3913 kW): rated to cool 2679 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2934–4891 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4J42 cooling tower (983 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4J42 — an AT cooling tower, 983 nominal tons (4320 kW): rated to cool 2958 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3240–5400 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4K36 cooling tower (981 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4K36 — an AT cooling tower, 981 nominal tons (4311 kW): rated to cool 2952 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3233–5389 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4K42 cooling tower (1080 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4K42 — an AT cooling tower, 1080 nominal tons (4749 kW): rated to cool 3252 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3562–5937 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4L36 cooling tower (1047 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1047 nominal tons (4600 kW): rated to cool 3150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3450–5751 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4L42 cooling tower (1170 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4L42 — an AT cooling tower, 1170 nominal tons (5144 kW): rated to cool 3522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3858–6430 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4M36 cooling tower (1078 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1078 nominal tons (4741 kW): rated to cool 3246 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3555–5926 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 39-4M42 cooling tower (1235 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 39-4M42 — an AT cooling tower, 1235 nominal tons (5429 kW): rated to cool 3717 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4071–6786 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2I24 cooling tower (1110 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-2I24 — an AT cooling tower, 1110 nominal tons (4881 kW): rated to cool 3342 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 133.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3661–6101 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2I28 cooling tower (1155 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-2I28 — an AT cooling tower, 1155 nominal tons (5078 kW): rated to cool 3477 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 141.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3809–6348 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2J24 cooling tower (1323 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-2J24 — an AT cooling tower, 1323 nominal tons (5814 kW): rated to cool 3981 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4361–7268 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2J28 cooling tower (1400 tons, 6.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-2J28 — an AT cooling tower, 1400 nominal tons (6156 kW): rated to cool 4215 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 160.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4617–7695 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2J36 cooling tower (1681 tons, 7.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-2J36 — an AT cooling tower, 1681 nominal tons (7391 kW): rated to cool 5061 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 199.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5544–9239 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2K24 cooling tower (1444 tons, 6.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-2K24 — an AT cooling tower, 1444 nominal tons (6349 kW): rated to cool 4347 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 166.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4761–7936 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2K28 cooling tower (1559 tons, 6.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-2K28 — an AT cooling tower, 1559 nominal tons (6852 kW): rated to cool 4692 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 176.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5139–8566 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2K36 cooling tower (1908 tons, 8.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-2K36 — an AT cooling tower, 1908 nominal tons (8386 kW): rated to cool 5742 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 218.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6289–10482 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2K40 cooling tower (1727 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-2K40 — an AT cooling tower, 1727 nominal tons (7593 kW): rated to cool 5199 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 222.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5695–9491 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2L24 cooling tower (1550 tons, 6.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-2L24 — an AT cooling tower, 1550 nominal tons (6813 kW): rated to cool 4665 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 179.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5110–8516 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2L28 cooling tower (1683 tons, 7.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-2L28 — an AT cooling tower, 1683 nominal tons (7400 kW): rated to cool 5067 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 188.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5550–9250 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2L36 cooling tower (2016 tons, 8.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-2L36 — an AT cooling tower, 2016 nominal tons (8864 kW): rated to cool 6069 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 235.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6648–11079 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2L40 cooling tower (1913 tons, 8.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-2L40 — an AT cooling tower, 1913 nominal tons (8408 kW): rated to cool 5757 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 239.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6306–10510 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2M24 cooling tower (1642 tons, 7.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-2M24 — an AT cooling tower, 1642 nominal tons (7216 kW): rated to cool 4941 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 189.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5412–9020 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2M28 cooling tower (1832 tons, 8.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-2M28 — an AT cooling tower, 1832 nominal tons (8053 kW): rated to cool 5514 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 200.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6040–10066 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2M36 cooling tower (2126 tons, 9.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-2M36 — an AT cooling tower, 2126 nominal tons (9345 kW): rated to cool 6399 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 249.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7009–11682 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2M40 cooling tower (2057 tons, 9.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-2M40 — an AT cooling tower, 2057 nominal tons (9043 kW): rated to cool 6192 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 253.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6782–11304 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2N36 cooling tower (2342 tons, 10.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-2N36 — an AT cooling tower, 2342 nominal tons (10296 kW): rated to cool 7050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 273.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7722–12870 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2N40 cooling tower (2371 tons, 10.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-2N40 — an AT cooling tower, 2371 nominal tons (10423 kW): rated to cool 7137 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 277.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7817–13029 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-2O40 cooling tower (2575 tons, 11.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-2O40 — an AT cooling tower, 2575 nominal tons (11321 kW): rated to cool 7752 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 297.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8491–14152 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3I24 cooling tower (1253 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3I24 — an AT cooling tower, 1253 nominal tons (5507 kW): rated to cool 3771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4131–6884 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3I28 cooling tower (1318 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3I28 — an AT cooling tower, 1318 nominal tons (5792 kW): rated to cool 3966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 139.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4344–7240 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3J24 cooling tower (1466 tons, 6.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3J24 — an AT cooling tower, 1466 nominal tons (6445 kW): rated to cool 4413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4834–8056 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3J28 cooling tower (1558 tons, 6.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3J28 — an AT cooling tower, 1558 nominal tons (6848 kW): rated to cool 4689 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 158.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5136–8560 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3J36 cooling tower (1877 tons, 8.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3J36 — an AT cooling tower, 1877 nominal tons (8250 kW): rated to cool 5649 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 196.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6188–10313 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3K24 cooling tower (1600 tons, 7.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 1600 nominal tons (7032 kW): rated to cool 4815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 163.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5274–8790 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3K28 cooling tower (1739 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3K28 — an AT cooling tower, 1739 nominal tons (7646 kW): rated to cool 5235 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 173.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5734–9557 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3K36 cooling tower (2101 tons, 9.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 2101 nominal tons (9236 kW): rated to cool 6324 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 215.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6927–11545 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3K40 cooling tower (2031 tons, 8.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3K40 — an AT cooling tower, 2031 nominal tons (8929 kW): rated to cool 6114 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 219.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6697–11162 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3L24 cooling tower (1721 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 1721 nominal tons (7567 kW): rated to cool 5181 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 175.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5675–9458 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3L28 cooling tower (1867 tons, 8.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3L28 — an AT cooling tower, 1867 nominal tons (8206 kW): rated to cool 5619 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 185.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6155–10258 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3L36 cooling tower (2239 tons, 9.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3L36 — an AT cooling tower, 2239 nominal tons (9841 kW): rated to cool 6738 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 231.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7380–12301 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3L40 cooling tower (2223 tons, 9.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3L40 — an AT cooling tower, 2223 nominal tons (9770 kW): rated to cool 6690 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 235.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7328–12213 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3M24 cooling tower (1829 tons, 8.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3M24 — an AT cooling tower, 1829 nominal tons (8040 kW): rated to cool 5505 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 186.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6030–10050 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3M28 cooling tower (1986 tons, 8.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3M28 — an AT cooling tower, 1986 nominal tons (8732 kW): rated to cool 5979 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 196.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6549–10915 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3M36 cooling tower (2365 tons, 10.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3M36 — an AT cooling tower, 2365 nominal tons (10397 kW): rated to cool 7119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 244.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7798–12996 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3M40 cooling tower (2372 tons, 10.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3M40 — an AT cooling tower, 2372 nominal tons (10428 kW): rated to cool 7140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 249.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7821–13035 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3N28 cooling tower (2192 tons, 9.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3N28 — an AT cooling tower, 2192 nominal tons (9635 kW): rated to cool 6597 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 215.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7226–12043 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3N36 cooling tower (2605 tons, 11.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3N36 — an AT cooling tower, 2605 nominal tons (11453 kW): rated to cool 7842 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 267.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8590–14316 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3N40 cooling tower (2661 tons, 11.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3N40 — an AT cooling tower, 2661 nominal tons (11698 kW): rated to cool 8010 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 272.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8774–14623 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3O36 cooling tower (2797 tons, 12.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3O36 — an AT cooling tower, 2797 nominal tons (12294 kW): rated to cool 8418 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 287.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9221–15368 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3O40 cooling tower (2890 tons, 12.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3O40 — an AT cooling tower, 2890 nominal tons (12706 kW): rated to cool 8700 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 291.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9530–15883 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4I24 cooling tower (1336 tons, 5.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4I24 — an AT cooling tower, 1336 nominal tons (5871 kW): rated to cool 4020 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4403–7339 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4I28 cooling tower (1429 tons, 6.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4I28 — an AT cooling tower, 1429 nominal tons (6283 kW): rated to cool 4302 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 136.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4712–7854 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4J24 cooling tower (1537 tons, 6.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4J24 — an AT cooling tower, 1537 nominal tons (6756 kW): rated to cool 4626 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 147.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5067–8445 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4J28 cooling tower (1648 tons, 7.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4J28 — an AT cooling tower, 1648 nominal tons (7247 kW): rated to cool 4962 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5435–9059 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4J36 cooling tower (1998 tons, 8.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4J36 — an AT cooling tower, 1998 nominal tons (8785 kW): rated to cool 6015 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 193.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6589–10981 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4K24 cooling tower (1672 tons, 7.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4K24 — an AT cooling tower, 1672 nominal tons (7352 kW): rated to cool 5034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 161.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5514–9190 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4K28 cooling tower (1827 tons, 8.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4K28 — an AT cooling tower, 1827 nominal tons (8031 kW): rated to cool 5499 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 170.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6023–10039 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4K36 cooling tower (2214 tons, 9.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4K36 — an AT cooling tower, 2214 nominal tons (9731 kW): rated to cool 6663 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 211.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7298–12164 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4K40 cooling tower (2183 tons, 9.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4K40 — an AT cooling tower, 2183 nominal tons (9595 kW): rated to cool 6570 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 215.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7196–11994 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4L24 cooling tower (1801 tons, 7.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4L24 — an AT cooling tower, 1801 nominal tons (7917 kW): rated to cool 5421 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 172.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5938–9896 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4L28 cooling tower (1958 tons, 8.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4L28 — an AT cooling tower, 1958 nominal tons (8609 kW): rated to cool 5895 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 182.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6457–10762 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4L36 cooling tower (2345 tons, 10.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4L36 — an AT cooling tower, 2345 nominal tons (10309 kW): rated to cool 7059 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 227.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7732–12887 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4L40 cooling tower (2361 tons, 10.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4L40 — an AT cooling tower, 2361 nominal tons (10379 kW): rated to cool 7107 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 231.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7785–12974 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4M24 cooling tower (1910 tons, 8.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4M24 — an AT cooling tower, 1910 nominal tons (8395 kW): rated to cool 5748 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 182.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6296–10493 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4M28 cooling tower (2081 tons, 9.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4M28 — an AT cooling tower, 2081 nominal tons (9148 kW): rated to cool 6264 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 193.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6861–11435 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4M36 cooling tower (2483 tons, 10.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4M36 — an AT cooling tower, 2483 nominal tons (10914 kW): rated to cool 7473 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 240.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8186–13643 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4M40 cooling tower (2507 tons, 11.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4M40 — an AT cooling tower, 2507 nominal tons (11019 kW): rated to cool 7545 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 244.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8264–13774 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4N24 cooling tower (2043 tons, 9.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4N24 — an AT cooling tower, 2043 nominal tons (8982 kW): rated to cool 6150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 200.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection6736–11227 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4N28 cooling tower (2275 tons, 10.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-4N28 — an AT cooling tower, 2275 nominal tons (10003 kW): rated to cool 6849 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 211.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection7502–12503 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4N36 cooling tower (2727 tons, 12.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4N36 — an AT cooling tower, 2727 nominal tons (11987 kW): rated to cool 8208 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 263.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection8991–14984 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4N40 cooling tower (2789 tons, 12.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4N40 — an AT cooling tower, 2789 nominal tons (12259 kW): rated to cool 8394 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 267.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9194–15324 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4O36 cooling tower (2928 tons, 12.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4O36 — an AT cooling tower, 2928 nominal tons (12872 kW): rated to cool 8814 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 282.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9654–16091 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4O40 cooling tower (3018 tons, 13.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4O40 — an AT cooling tower, 3018 nominal tons (13267 kW): rated to cool 9084 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 287.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection9950–16584 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4P36 cooling tower (3039 tons, 13.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4P36 — an AT cooling tower, 3039 nominal tons (13359 kW): rated to cool 9147 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 299.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10019–16699 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-4P40 cooling tower (3131 tons, 13.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-4P40 — an AT cooling tower, 3131 nominal tons (13762 kW): rated to cool 9423 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 304.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection10321–17202 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 428-5K52 cooling tower (3844 tons, 16.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 428-5K52 — an AT cooling tower, 3844 nominal tons (16899 kW): rated to cool 11571 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 352.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection12674–21124 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 428-5L52 cooling tower (4134 tons, 18.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 428-5L52 — an AT cooling tower, 4134 nominal tons (18174 kW): rated to cool 12444 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 377.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection13630–22717 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 428-5M52 cooling tower (4380 tons, 19.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 428-5M52 — an AT cooling tower, 4380 nominal tons (19256 kW): rated to cool 13185 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 400.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection14442–24070 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 428-5N52 cooling tower (4790 tons, 21.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 428-5N52 — an AT cooling tower, 4790 nominal tons (21057 kW): rated to cool 14418 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 437.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection15793–26321 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 428-5O52 cooling tower (5124 tons, 22.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 428-5O52 — an AT cooling tower, 5124 nominal tons (22525 kW): rated to cool 15423 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 468.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection16894–28156 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 456-5K26 cooling tower (3789 tons, 16.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 456-5K26 — an AT cooling tower, 3789 nominal tons (16658 kW): rated to cool 11406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 352.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection12494–20823 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 456-5L26 cooling tower (4076 tons, 17.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 456-5L26 — an AT cooling tower, 4076 nominal tons (17920 kW): rated to cool 12270 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 378.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection13440–22400 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 456-5M26 cooling tower (4321 tons, 19.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 456-5M26 — an AT cooling tower, 4321 nominal tons (18993 kW): rated to cool 13005 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 400.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection14245–23742 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 456-5N26 cooling tower (4727 tons, 20.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 456-5N26 — an AT cooling tower, 4727 nominal tons (20781 kW): rated to cool 14229 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 437.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection15586–25976 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 456-5O26 cooling tower (5058 tons, 22.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 456-5O26 — an AT cooling tower, 5058 nominal tons (22236 kW): rated to cool 15225 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 469.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection16677–27794 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-3I12 closed-circuit cooler (155 tons, 681 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-3I12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 155 nominal tons (681 kW): rated to cool 389 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 26.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection511–851 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-3I36 closed-circuit cooler (461 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-3I36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 461 nominal tons (2025 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1519–2531 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-3J36 closed-circuit cooler (529 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-3J36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 529 nominal tons (2326 kW): rated to cool 1327 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1744–2907 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-3K12 closed-circuit cooler (198 tons, 871 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-3K12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (871 kW): rated to cool 497 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection653–1088 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-3K36 closed-circuit cooler (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-3K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 583 nominal tons (2561 kW): rated to cool 1462 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1921–3202 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-3L36 closed-circuit cooler (627 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-3L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 627 nominal tons (2758 kW): rated to cool 1574 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 93.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2069–3448 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-3M36 closed-circuit cooler (666 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-3M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 666 nominal tons (2929 kW): rated to cool 1671 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 98.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2197–3661 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-3N36 closed-circuit cooler (732 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-3N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 732 nominal tons (3216 kW): rated to cool 1835 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2412–4021 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-4I12 closed-circuit cooler (169 tons, 744 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-4I12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 169 nominal tons (744 kW): rated to cool 425 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 25.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection558–930 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-4I36 closed-circuit cooler (488 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-4I36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 488 nominal tons (2146 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1609–2682 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-4J12 closed-circuit cooler (195 tons, 857 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-4J12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 195 nominal tons (857 kW): rated to cool 489 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 29.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection643–1072 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-4J36 closed-circuit cooler (560 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-4J36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 560 nominal tons (2460 kW): rated to cool 1404 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 76.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1845–3075 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-4K36 closed-circuit cooler (616 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-4K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2706 kW): rated to cool 1544 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2030–3383 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-4L36 closed-circuit cooler (662 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-4L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 662 nominal tons (2912 kW): rated to cool 1661 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2184–3640 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-4M24 closed-circuit cooler (493 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-4M24 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 493 nominal tons (2169 kW): rated to cool 1238 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 71.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1627–2711 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-4M36 closed-circuit cooler (703 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-4M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3090 kW): rated to cool 1763 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 95.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2317–3862 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-4N36 closed-circuit cooler (771 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-4N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 771 nominal tons (3390 kW): rated to cool 1934 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2543–4238 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5I24 closed-circuit cooler (375 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5I24 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1650 kW): rated to cool 942 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 49.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1238–2063 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5I36 closed-circuit cooler (523 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5I36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 523 nominal tons (2301 kW): rated to cool 1313 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1726–2876 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5J36 closed-circuit cooler (599 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5J36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 599 nominal tons (2633 kW): rated to cool 1502 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 74.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1975–3291 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5K36 closed-circuit cooler (658 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2169–3616 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5L36 closed-circuit cooler (707 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 707 nominal tons (3109 kW): rated to cool 1774 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2332–3887 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5M36 closed-circuit cooler (750 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 750 nominal tons (3297 kW): rated to cool 1881 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 92.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2473–4121 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5N36 closed-circuit cooler (822 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 822 nominal tons (3614 kW): rated to cool 2062 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 100.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2710–4517 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-6I12 closed-circuit cooler (210 tons, 924 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-6I12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 527 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection693–1155 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-6I36 closed-circuit cooler (567 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-6I36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 567 nominal tons (2491 kW): rated to cool 1422 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1868–3114 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-6J12 closed-circuit cooler (241 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-6J12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 241 nominal tons (1058 kW): rated to cool 604 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 27.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection793–1322 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-6J36 closed-circuit cooler (647 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-6J36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 647 nominal tons (2844 kW): rated to cool 1623 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 72.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2133–3555 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-6K36 closed-circuit cooler (710 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-6K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 710 nominal tons (3121 kW): rated to cool 1781 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2341–3901 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-6L36 closed-circuit cooler (762 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-6L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 762 nominal tons (3352 kW): rated to cool 1912 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 85.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2514–4189 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-6M36 closed-circuit cooler (808 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-6M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 808 nominal tons (3551 kW): rated to cool 2026 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2664–4439 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-6N36 closed-circuit cooler (885 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-6N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 885 nominal tons (3888 kW): rated to cool 2219 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 97.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2916–4860 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-7I36 closed-circuit cooler (618 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-7I36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 618 nominal tons (2717 kW): rated to cool 1550 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 61.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2037–3396 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-7J36 closed-circuit cooler (704 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-7J36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 704 nominal tons (3095 kW): rated to cool 1766 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2321–3869 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-7K36 closed-circuit cooler (772 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-7K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 772 nominal tons (3392 kW): rated to cool 1935 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 76.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2544–4240 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-7L36 closed-circuit cooler (828 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-7L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 828 nominal tons (3639 kW): rated to cool 2076 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 82.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2729–4549 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-7M36 closed-circuit cooler (876 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-7M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 876 nominal tons (3853 kW): rated to cool 2199 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2890–4816 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-7N36 closed-circuit cooler (959 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-7N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 959 nominal tons (4214 kW): rated to cool 2405 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 94.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3161–5268 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3K14 closed-circuit cooler (259 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1137 kW): rated to cool 649 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 41.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection852–1421 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3K28 closed-circuit cooler (517 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3K28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 517 nominal tons (2273 kW): rated to cool 1297 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1705–2841 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3L14 closed-circuit cooler (279 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 279 nominal tons (1228 kW): rated to cool 701 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 44.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection921–1535 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3L20 closed-circuit cooler (387 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3L20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 387 nominal tons (1699 kW): rated to cool 970 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 58.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1274–2124 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3L28 closed-circuit cooler (559 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3L28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 559 nominal tons (2456 kW): rated to cool 1402 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1842–3070 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3L40 closed-circuit cooler (768 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3L40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 768 nominal tons (3374 kW): rated to cool 1925 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 117.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2531–4218 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3M14 closed-circuit cooler (297 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 297 nominal tons (1307 kW): rated to cool 746 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 47.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection981–1634 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3M20 closed-circuit cooler (411 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3M20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 411 nominal tons (1806 kW): rated to cool 1031 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 62.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1355–2258 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3M28 closed-circuit cooler (595 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3M28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 595 nominal tons (2615 kW): rated to cool 1492 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 94.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1961–3269 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3M36 closed-circuit cooler (748 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 748 nominal tons (3290 kW): rated to cool 1877 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 116.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2467–4112 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3M40 closed-circuit cooler (816 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3M40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 816 nominal tons (3586 kW): rated to cool 2046 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 125.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2690–4483 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3N14 closed-circuit cooler (328 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3N14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1081–1802 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3N20 closed-circuit cooler (452 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3N20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 452 nominal tons (1986 kW): rated to cool 1133 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 68.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1490–2483 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3N28 closed-circuit cooler (656 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3N28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 656 nominal tons (2883 kW): rated to cool 1645 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 102.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2162–3603 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3N36 closed-circuit cooler (823 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 823 nominal tons (3620 kW): rated to cool 2066 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 126.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2715–4525 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3N40 closed-circuit cooler (897 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3N40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 897 nominal tons (3944 kW): rated to cool 2251 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 136.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2958–4930 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3O20 closed-circuit cooler (486 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3O20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 486 nominal tons (2137 kW): rated to cool 1219 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 72.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1603–2671 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-3O40 closed-circuit cooler (965 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-3O40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 965 nominal tons (4243 kW): rated to cool 2421 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 145.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3182–5304 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4K14 closed-circuit cooler (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1224 kW): rated to cool 699 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 40.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection918–1530 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4K28 closed-circuit cooler (557 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4K28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 557 nominal tons (2448 kW): rated to cool 1397 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1836–3061 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4K36 closed-circuit cooler (691 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 691 nominal tons (3039 kW): rated to cool 1734 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 99.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2279–3799 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4L14 closed-circuit cooler (300 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 300 nominal tons (1321 kW): rated to cool 754 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection991–1651 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4L20 closed-circuit cooler (407 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4L20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 407 nominal tons (1789 kW): rated to cool 1021 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 57.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1342–2236 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4L28 closed-circuit cooler (601 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4L28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 601 nominal tons (2642 kW): rated to cool 1508 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1981–3302 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4L36 closed-circuit cooler (745 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 745 nominal tons (3275 kW): rated to cool 1869 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2456–4094 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4L40 closed-circuit cooler (808 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4L40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 808 nominal tons (3553 kW): rated to cool 2027 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 114.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2664–4441 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4M14 closed-circuit cooler (320 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 320 nominal tons (1405 kW): rated to cool 802 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 45.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1054–1756 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4M20 closed-circuit cooler (432 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4M20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 432 nominal tons (1900 kW): rated to cool 1084 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1425–2375 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4M28 closed-circuit cooler (639 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4M28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 639 nominal tons (2810 kW): rated to cool 1603 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2107–3512 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4M36 closed-circuit cooler (792 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 792 nominal tons (3480 kW): rated to cool 1986 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 113.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2610–4350 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4M40 closed-circuit cooler (858 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4M40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 858 nominal tons (3773 kW): rated to cool 2153 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 121.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2830–4717 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4N14 closed-circuit cooler (352 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4N14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 352 nominal tons (1546 kW): rated to cool 882 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 49.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1160–1933 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4N20 closed-circuit cooler (475 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4N20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 475 nominal tons (2088 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 66.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1566–2610 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4N28 closed-circuit cooler (703 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4N28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3093 kW): rated to cool 1765 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 99.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2319–3866 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4N36 closed-circuit cooler (870 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 870 nominal tons (3825 kW): rated to cool 2182 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 123.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2869–4781 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4N40 closed-circuit cooler (943 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4N40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 943 nominal tons (4146 kW): rated to cool 2366 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 132.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3110–5183 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4O20 closed-circuit cooler (511 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4O20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 511 nominal tons (2244 kW): rated to cool 1281 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 70.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1683–2805 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4O36 closed-circuit cooler (936 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4O36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 936 nominal tons (4113 kW): rated to cool 2347 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 130.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3085–5141 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-4O40 closed-circuit cooler (1014 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-4O40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1014 nominal tons (4457 kW): rated to cool 2543 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 141.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3343–5572 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5L14 closed-circuit cooler (328 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 328 nominal tons (1440 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 42.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1080–1801 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5L28 closed-circuit cooler (655 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5L28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 655 nominal tons (2881 kW): rated to cool 1644 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2161–3601 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5L36 closed-circuit cooler (798 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 798 nominal tons (3508 kW): rated to cool 2002 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2631–4386 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5M14 closed-circuit cooler (348 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 348 nominal tons (1530 kW): rated to cool 873 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 44.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1148–1913 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5M20 closed-circuit cooler (460 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5M20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 460 nominal tons (2021 kW): rated to cool 1153 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1516–2527 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5M28 closed-circuit cooler (696 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5M28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 696 nominal tons (3060 kW): rated to cool 1746 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2295–3825 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5M36 closed-circuit cooler (847 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 847 nominal tons (3724 kW): rated to cool 2125 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 109.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2793–4655 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5M40 closed-circuit cooler (913 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5M40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 913 nominal tons (4014 kW): rated to cool 2291 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 117.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3011–5018 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5N14 closed-circuit cooler (382 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5N14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 382 nominal tons (1681 kW): rated to cool 959 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 48.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1261–2102 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5N20 closed-circuit cooler (505 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5N20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 505 nominal tons (2218 kW): rated to cool 1266 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 64.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1664–2773 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5N28 closed-circuit cooler (765 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5N28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 765 nominal tons (3363 kW): rated to cool 1919 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 96.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2522–4203 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5N36 closed-circuit cooler (930 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 930 nominal tons (4089 kW): rated to cool 2333 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 119.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3066–5111 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5N40 closed-circuit cooler (1002 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5N40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1002 nominal tons (4406 kW): rated to cool 2514 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 128.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3304–5507 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5O20 closed-circuit cooler (542 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5O20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 542 nominal tons (2383 kW): rated to cool 1360 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 68.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1787–2978 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5O36 closed-circuit cooler (999 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5O36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 999 nominal tons (4393 kW): rated to cool 2506 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 127.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3294–5491 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5O40 closed-circuit cooler (1077 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5O40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1077 nominal tons (4733 kW): rated to cool 2700 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 137.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3549–5916 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5P20 closed-circuit cooler (574 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5P20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 574 nominal tons (2525 kW): rated to cool 1441 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 72.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1894–3156 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-5P40 closed-circuit cooler (1141 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-5P40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1141 nominal tons (5015 kW): rated to cool 2862 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 144.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3762–6269 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6L14 closed-circuit cooler (361 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 361 nominal tons (1587 kW): rated to cool 905 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 40.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1190–1983 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6L28 closed-circuit cooler (722 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6L28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 722 nominal tons (3174 kW): rated to cool 1811 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2380–3967 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6M14 closed-circuit cooler (383 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 383 nominal tons (1684 kW): rated to cool 961 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1263–2105 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6M28 closed-circuit cooler (766 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6M28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 766 nominal tons (3367 kW): rated to cool 1921 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 86.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2526–4209 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6M36 closed-circuit cooler (915 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 915 nominal tons (4024 kW): rated to cool 2296 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3018–5030 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6N14 closed-circuit cooler (420 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6N14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 420 nominal tons (1847 kW): rated to cool 1054 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1385–2309 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6N20 closed-circuit cooler (541 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6N20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 541 nominal tons (2378 kW): rated to cool 1357 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 62.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1784–2973 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6N28 closed-circuit cooler (840 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6N28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 840 nominal tons (3694 kW): rated to cool 2108 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2771–4618 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6N36 closed-circuit cooler (1004 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1004 nominal tons (4412 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 115.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3309–5515 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6N40 closed-circuit cooler (1075 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6N40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1075 nominal tons (4724 kW): rated to cool 2695 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 124.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3543–5905 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6O20 closed-circuit cooler (581 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6O20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 581 nominal tons (2552 kW): rated to cool 1456 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 66.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1914–3190 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6O36 closed-circuit cooler (1077 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6O36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1077 nominal tons (4735 kW): rated to cool 2702 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 123.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3552–5919 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6O40 closed-circuit cooler (1153 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6O40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1153 nominal tons (5070 kW): rated to cool 2893 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 132.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3802–6337 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6P20 closed-circuit cooler (615 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6P20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 615 nominal tons (2703 kW): rated to cool 1542 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2027–3379 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6P36 closed-circuit cooler (1141 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6P36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1141 nominal tons (5016 kW): rated to cool 2862 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 129.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3762–6270 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-6P40 closed-circuit cooler (1221 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-6P40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1221 nominal tons (5369 kW): rated to cool 3064 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 139.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4027–6712 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7L14 closed-circuit cooler (401 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 39.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1320–2201 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7L28 closed-circuit cooler (801 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7L28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 801 nominal tons (3521 kW): rated to cool 2009 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2641–4401 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7M14 closed-circuit cooler (425 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 425 nominal tons (1866 kW): rated to cool 1065 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 41.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1400–2333 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7M28 closed-circuit cooler (849 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7M28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 849 nominal tons (3732 kW): rated to cool 2130 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2799–4665 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7M36 closed-circuit cooler (996 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 996 nominal tons (4379 kW): rated to cool 2499 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3284–5474 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7N14 closed-circuit cooler (465 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7N14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 465 nominal tons (2044 kW): rated to cool 1166 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1533–2555 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7N20 closed-circuit cooler (584 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7N20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 584 nominal tons (2568 kW): rated to cool 1465 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1926–3210 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7N28 closed-circuit cooler (930 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7N28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 930 nominal tons (4088 kW): rated to cool 2333 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3066–5110 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7N36 closed-circuit cooler (1091 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1091 nominal tons (4795 kW): rated to cool 2736 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 111.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3596–5994 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7N40 closed-circuit cooler (1160 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7N40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1160 nominal tons (5101 kW): rated to cool 2911 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 120.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3826–6376 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7O20 closed-circuit cooler (626 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7O20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 626 nominal tons (2753 kW): rated to cool 1571 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 64.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2065–3442 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7O36 closed-circuit cooler (1170 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7O36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1170 nominal tons (5142 kW): rated to cool 2934 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 119.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3857–6428 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7O40 closed-circuit cooler (1244 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7O40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1244 nominal tons (5470 kW): rated to cool 3121 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 128.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4102–6837 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7P20 closed-circuit cooler (663 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7P20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 663 nominal tons (2914 kW): rated to cool 1663 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2185–3642 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 12-7P40 closed-circuit cooler (1317 tons, 5.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 12-7P40 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1317 nominal tons (5789 kW): rated to cool 3303 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 135.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4342–7236 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 14-3H9 closed-circuit cooler (176 tons, 775 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-3H9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 176 nominal tons (775 kW): rated to cool 442 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection581–969 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 14-3I9 closed-circuit cooler (196 tons, 862 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-3I9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 196 nominal tons (862 kW): rated to cool 492 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection647–1078 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 14-4I9 closed-circuit cooler (220 tons, 967 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-4I9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 220 nominal tons (967 kW): rated to cool 552 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection725–1208 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 14-4J9 closed-circuit cooler (254 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-4J9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 254 nominal tons (1115 kW): rated to cool 636 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 38.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection836–1393 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 14-5I9 closed-circuit cooler (250 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-5I9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 250 nominal tons (1101 kW): rated to cool 628 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 37.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection826–1376 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 14-5J9 closed-circuit cooler (287 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-5J9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1264 kW): rated to cool 721 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 37.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection948–1580 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 14-6J9 closed-circuit cooler (329 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-6J9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 329 nominal tons (1447 kW): rated to cool 826 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 36.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1085–1809 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 14-7J18 closed-circuit cooler (733 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-7J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 733 nominal tons (3222 kW): rated to cool 1839 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 70.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2417–4028 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 14-7J9 closed-circuit cooler (379 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 14-7J9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 379 nominal tons (1666 kW): rated to cool 950 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1249–2082 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-3I14 closed-circuit cooler (323 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3I14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 810 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 52.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1065–1774 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-3J14 closed-circuit cooler (372 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3J14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 372 nominal tons (1633 kW): rated to cool 932 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1225–2041 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-3K14 closed-circuit cooler (410 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 410 nominal tons (1801 kW): rated to cool 1028 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1351–2251 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-3L14 closed-circuit cooler (441 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-3L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 441 nominal tons (1941 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 70.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1456–2426 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-4J14 closed-circuit cooler (399 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4J14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 399 nominal tons (1753 kW): rated to cool 1000 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 58.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1315–2191 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-4K12 closed-circuit cooler (376 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4K12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 376 nominal tons (1655 kW): rated to cool 944 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 57.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1241–2069 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-4K14 closed-circuit cooler (439 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 439 nominal tons (1930 kW): rated to cool 1101 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 63.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1447–2412 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-4L12 closed-circuit cooler (406 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4L12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 406 nominal tons (1784 kW): rated to cool 1018 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1338–2230 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-4L14 closed-circuit cooler (473 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 473 nominal tons (2077 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1558–2597 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-4M14 closed-circuit cooler (502 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-4M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 502 nominal tons (2205 kW): rated to cool 1258 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 71.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1654–2757 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-5J12 closed-circuit cooler (377 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-5J12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 377 nominal tons (1655 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 51.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1242–2069 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-5J14 closed-circuit cooler (434 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-5J14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 434 nominal tons (1907 kW): rated to cool 1088 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 56.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1430–2383 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-5K12 closed-circuit cooler (414 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-5K12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 414 nominal tons (1822 kW): rated to cool 1040 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 55.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1366–2277 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-5K14 closed-circuit cooler (477 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-5K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 477 nominal tons (2096 kW): rated to cool 1196 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1572–2620 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-5L12 closed-circuit cooler (446 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-5L12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 446 nominal tons (1961 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1470–2451 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-5L14 closed-circuit cooler (513 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-5L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 513 nominal tons (2254 kW): rated to cool 1286 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1690–2817 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-5M12 closed-circuit cooler (473 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-5M12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 473 nominal tons (2081 kW): rated to cool 1187 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 62.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1561–2601 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-5M14 closed-circuit cooler (544 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-5M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 544 nominal tons (2390 kW): rated to cool 1364 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1793–2988 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-6K14 closed-circuit cooler (523 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-6K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 523 nominal tons (2299 kW): rated to cool 1312 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1725–2874 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-6L14 closed-circuit cooler (562 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-6L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 562 nominal tons (2470 kW): rated to cool 1409 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 63.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1852–3087 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-6M14 closed-circuit cooler (595 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-6M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 595 nominal tons (2617 kW): rated to cool 1493 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1963–3271 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-7K14 closed-circuit cooler (578 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-7K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 578 nominal tons (2542 kW): rated to cool 1450 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 58.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1906–3177 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-7L14 closed-circuit cooler (620 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-7L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 620 nominal tons (2727 kW): rated to cool 1556 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 61.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2045–3408 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 17-7M14 closed-circuit cooler (657 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 17-7M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 657 nominal tons (2887 kW): rated to cool 1647 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2165–3609 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-3I18 closed-circuit cooler (461 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-3I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 461 nominal tons (2025 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1519–2531 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-3I36 closed-circuit cooler (876 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-3I36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 876 nominal tons (3853 kW): rated to cool 2198 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 138.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2890–4816 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-3J18 closed-circuit cooler (529 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-3J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 529 nominal tons (2326 kW): rated to cool 1327 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1744–2907 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-3J36 closed-circuit cooler (1008 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-3J36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1008 nominal tons (4430 kW): rated to cool 2528 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 158.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3322–5537 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-3K18 closed-circuit cooler (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-3K18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 583 nominal tons (2561 kW): rated to cool 1462 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1921–3202 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-3K36 closed-circuit cooler (1111 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-3K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1111 nominal tons (4882 kW): rated to cool 2786 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 173.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3662–6103 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-3L18 closed-circuit cooler (627 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-3L18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 627 nominal tons (2758 kW): rated to cool 1574 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 93.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2069–3448 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-3L36 closed-circuit cooler (1197 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-3L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1197 nominal tons (5260 kW): rated to cool 3001 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 187.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3945–6575 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-3M18 closed-circuit cooler (666 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-3M18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 666 nominal tons (2929 kW): rated to cool 1671 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 98.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2197–3661 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-3N18 closed-circuit cooler (732 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-3N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 732 nominal tons (3216 kW): rated to cool 1835 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2412–4021 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-4I18 closed-circuit cooler (488 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-4I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 488 nominal tons (2146 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1609–2682 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-4I36 closed-circuit cooler (929 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-4I36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 929 nominal tons (4086 kW): rated to cool 2331 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 134.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3064–5107 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-4J18 closed-circuit cooler (560 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-4J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 560 nominal tons (2460 kW): rated to cool 1404 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 76.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1845–3075 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-4J36 closed-circuit cooler (1067 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-4J36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1067 nominal tons (4689 kW): rated to cool 2675 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 153.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3516–5861 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-4K18 closed-circuit cooler (616 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-4K18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2706 kW): rated to cool 1544 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2030–3383 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-4K36 closed-circuit cooler (1174 tons, 5.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-4K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1174 nominal tons (5161 kW): rated to cool 2945 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 168.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3871–6452 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-4L18 closed-circuit cooler (662 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-4L18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 662 nominal tons (2912 kW): rated to cool 1661 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2184–3640 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-4L36 closed-circuit cooler (1264 tons, 5.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-4L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1264 nominal tons (5556 kW): rated to cool 3170 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 181.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4167–6944 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-4M18 closed-circuit cooler (703 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-4M18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3090 kW): rated to cool 1763 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 95.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2317–3862 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-4N18 closed-circuit cooler (771 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-4N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 771 nominal tons (3390 kW): rated to cool 1934 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2543–4238 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5I18 closed-circuit cooler (523 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 523 nominal tons (2301 kW): rated to cool 1313 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1726–2876 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5I36 closed-circuit cooler (998 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5I36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 998 nominal tons (4385 kW): rated to cool 2502 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 130.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3289–5482 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5J18 closed-circuit cooler (599 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 599 nominal tons (2633 kW): rated to cool 1502 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 74.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1975–3291 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5J36 closed-circuit cooler (1142 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5J36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1142 nominal tons (5021 kW): rated to cool 2865 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 148.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3766–6277 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5K18 closed-circuit cooler (658 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5K18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2169–3616 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5K36 closed-circuit cooler (1256 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1256 nominal tons (5520 kW): rated to cool 3150 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 163.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4140–6900 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5L12 closed-circuit cooler (511 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5L12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 511 nominal tons (2247 kW): rated to cool 1282 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1685–2808 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5L18 closed-circuit cooler (707 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5L18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 707 nominal tons (3109 kW): rated to cool 1774 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2332–3887 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5L36 closed-circuit cooler (1350 tons, 5.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1350 nominal tons (5936 kW): rated to cool 3387 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 176.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4452–7420 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5M12 closed-circuit cooler (543 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5M12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 543 nominal tons (2385 kW): rated to cool 1361 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1789–2982 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5M18 closed-circuit cooler (750 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5M18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 750 nominal tons (3297 kW): rated to cool 1881 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 92.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2473–4121 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5M24 closed-circuit cooler (1078 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5M24 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1078 nominal tons (4737 kW): rated to cool 2703 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 138.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3553–5921 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5M36 closed-circuit cooler (1432 tons, 6.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1432 nominal tons (6297 kW): rated to cool 3593 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 185.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4722–7871 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-5N18 closed-circuit cooler (822 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-5N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 822 nominal tons (3614 kW): rated to cool 2062 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 100.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2710–4517 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6I18 closed-circuit cooler (567 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 567 nominal tons (2491 kW): rated to cool 1422 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1868–3114 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6I24 closed-circuit cooler (835 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6I24 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 835 nominal tons (3670 kW): rated to cool 2094 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 95.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2752–4587 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6I36 closed-circuit cooler (1081 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6I36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1081 nominal tons (4751 kW): rated to cool 2711 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 126.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3563–5939 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6J18 closed-circuit cooler (647 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 647 nominal tons (2844 kW): rated to cool 1623 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 72.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2133–3555 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6J36 closed-circuit cooler (1235 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6J36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1235 nominal tons (5429 kW): rated to cool 3098 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 144.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4072–6786 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6K18 closed-circuit cooler (710 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6K18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 710 nominal tons (3121 kW): rated to cool 1781 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2341–3901 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6K36 closed-circuit cooler (1356 tons, 6.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1356 nominal tons (5960 kW): rated to cool 3401 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 158.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4470–7450 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6L18 closed-circuit cooler (762 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6L18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 762 nominal tons (3352 kW): rated to cool 1912 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 85.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2514–4189 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6L36 closed-circuit cooler (1456 tons, 6.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1456 nominal tons (6403 kW): rated to cool 3653 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 171.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4802–8003 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6M18 closed-circuit cooler (808 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6M18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 808 nominal tons (3551 kW): rated to cool 2026 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2664–4439 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6M36 closed-circuit cooler (1544 tons, 6.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1544 nominal tons (6786 kW): rated to cool 3872 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 180.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5090–8483 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-6N18 closed-circuit cooler (885 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-6N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 885 nominal tons (3888 kW): rated to cool 2219 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 97.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2916–4860 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-7I18 closed-circuit cooler (618 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-7I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 618 nominal tons (2717 kW): rated to cool 1550 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 61.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2037–3396 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-7J18 closed-circuit cooler (704 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-7J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 704 nominal tons (3095 kW): rated to cool 1766 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2321–3869 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-7K18 closed-circuit cooler (772 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-7K18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 772 nominal tons (3392 kW): rated to cool 1935 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 76.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2544–4240 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-7L18 closed-circuit cooler (828 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-7L18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 828 nominal tons (3639 kW): rated to cool 2076 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 82.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2729–4549 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-7M18 closed-circuit cooler (876 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-7M18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 876 nominal tons (3853 kW): rated to cool 2199 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2890–4816 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 20-7N18 closed-circuit cooler (959 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 20-7N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 959 nominal tons (4214 kW): rated to cool 2405 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 94.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3161–5268 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3J12 closed-circuit cooler (402 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3J12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1768 kW): rated to cool 1009 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 68.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1326–2210 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3K12 closed-circuit cooler (446 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3K12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 446 nominal tons (1961 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 75.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1471–2451 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3K14 closed-circuit cooler (517 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 517 nominal tons (2273 kW): rated to cool 1297 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1705–2841 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3K28 closed-circuit cooler (987 tons, 4.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3K28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 987 nominal tons (4340 kW): rated to cool 2476 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 167.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3255–5425 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3L12 closed-circuit cooler (483 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3L12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 483 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1211 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 80.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1591–2652 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3L14 closed-circuit cooler (559 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 559 nominal tons (2456 kW): rated to cool 1402 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1842–3070 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3L20 closed-circuit cooler (762 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3L20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 762 nominal tons (3349 kW): rated to cool 1911 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 117.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2512–4186 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3L28 closed-circuit cooler (1067 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3L28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1067 nominal tons (4692 kW): rated to cool 2677 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 179.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3519–5865 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3M12 closed-circuit cooler (514 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3M12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 514 nominal tons (2261 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1696–2826 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3M14 closed-circuit cooler (595 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 595 nominal tons (2615 kW): rated to cool 1492 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 94.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1961–3269 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3M18 closed-circuit cooler (748 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3M18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 748 nominal tons (3290 kW): rated to cool 1877 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 116.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2467–4112 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3M20 closed-circuit cooler (810 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3M20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 810 nominal tons (3560 kW): rated to cool 2031 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 125.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2670–4450 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3N14 closed-circuit cooler (656 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3N14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 656 nominal tons (2883 kW): rated to cool 1645 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 102.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2162–3603 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3N18 closed-circuit cooler (823 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 823 nominal tons (3620 kW): rated to cool 2066 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 126.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2715–4525 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3N20 closed-circuit cooler (891 tons, 3.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3N20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 891 nominal tons (3916 kW): rated to cool 2234 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 136.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2937–4895 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-3O20 closed-circuit cooler (958 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-3O20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 958 nominal tons (4213 kW): rated to cool 2404 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 145.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3160–5266 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4K12 closed-circuit cooler (487 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4K12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 487 nominal tons (2139 kW): rated to cool 1221 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1604–2674 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4K14 closed-circuit cooler (557 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 557 nominal tons (2448 kW): rated to cool 1397 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1836–3061 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4K18 closed-circuit cooler (691 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4K18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 691 nominal tons (3039 kW): rated to cool 1734 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 99.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2279–3799 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4K28 closed-circuit cooler (1064 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4K28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1064 nominal tons (4679 kW): rated to cool 2670 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 162.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3509–5848 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4L12 closed-circuit cooler (526 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4L12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 526 nominal tons (2310 kW): rated to cool 1318 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 77.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1733–2888 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4L14 closed-circuit cooler (601 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 601 nominal tons (2642 kW): rated to cool 1508 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1981–3302 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4L18 closed-circuit cooler (745 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4L18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 745 nominal tons (3275 kW): rated to cool 1869 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2456–4094 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4L20 closed-circuit cooler (802 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4L20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 802 nominal tons (3527 kW): rated to cool 2012 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 114.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2645–4408 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4L28 closed-circuit cooler (1149 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4L28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1149 nominal tons (5051 kW): rated to cool 2882 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 174.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3788–6314 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4M12 closed-circuit cooler (559 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4M12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 559 nominal tons (2458 kW): rated to cool 1403 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 82.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1844–3073 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4M14 closed-circuit cooler (639 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 639 nominal tons (2810 kW): rated to cool 1603 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2107–3512 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4M18 closed-circuit cooler (792 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4M18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 792 nominal tons (3480 kW): rated to cool 1986 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 113.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2610–4350 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4M20 closed-circuit cooler (852 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4M20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 852 nominal tons (3746 kW): rated to cool 2138 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 121.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2810–4683 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4M28 closed-circuit cooler (1222 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4M28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1222 nominal tons (5374 kW): rated to cool 3066 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 183.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4030–6717 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4N12 closed-circuit cooler (616 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4N12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2709 kW): rated to cool 1546 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2032–3386 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4N14 closed-circuit cooler (703 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4N14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3093 kW): rated to cool 1765 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 99.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2319–3866 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4N18 closed-circuit cooler (870 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 870 nominal tons (3825 kW): rated to cool 2182 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 123.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2869–4781 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4N20 closed-circuit cooler (936 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4N20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 936 nominal tons (4116 kW): rated to cool 2349 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 132.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3087–5145 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4O18 closed-circuit cooler (936 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4O18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 936 nominal tons (4113 kW): rated to cool 2347 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 130.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3085–5141 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-4O20 closed-circuit cooler (1007 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-4O20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1007 nominal tons (4426 kW): rated to cool 2525 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 141.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3319–5532 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5K12 closed-circuit cooler (539 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5K12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 539 nominal tons (2368 kW): rated to cool 1351 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 70.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1776–2960 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5L12 closed-circuit cooler (581 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5L12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 581 nominal tons (2553 kW): rated to cool 1457 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 75.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1915–3191 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5L14 closed-circuit cooler (655 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 655 nominal tons (2881 kW): rated to cool 1644 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2161–3601 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5L18 closed-circuit cooler (798 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5L18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 798 nominal tons (3508 kW): rated to cool 2002 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2631–4386 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5L28 closed-circuit cooler (1254 tons, 5.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5L28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1254 nominal tons (5513 kW): rated to cool 3146 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 169.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4135–6891 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5M12 closed-circuit cooler (617 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5M12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 617 nominal tons (2713 kW): rated to cool 1548 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2035–3391 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5M14 closed-circuit cooler (696 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 696 nominal tons (3060 kW): rated to cool 1746 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2295–3825 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5M18 closed-circuit cooler (847 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5M18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 847 nominal tons (3724 kW): rated to cool 2125 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 109.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2793–4655 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5M20 closed-circuit cooler (907 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5M20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 907 nominal tons (3985 kW): rated to cool 2274 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 117.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2989–4982 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5M28 closed-circuit cooler (1333 tons, 5.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5M28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1333 nominal tons (5858 kW): rated to cool 3343 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 177.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4393–7322 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5N12 closed-circuit cooler (679 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5N12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 679 nominal tons (2984 kW): rated to cool 1703 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 86.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2238–3730 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5N14 closed-circuit cooler (765 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5N14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 765 nominal tons (3363 kW): rated to cool 1919 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 96.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2522–4203 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5N18 closed-circuit cooler (930 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 930 nominal tons (4089 kW): rated to cool 2333 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 119.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3066–5111 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5N20 closed-circuit cooler (995 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5N20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 995 nominal tons (4375 kW): rated to cool 2496 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 128.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3281–5468 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5O18 closed-circuit cooler (999 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5O18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 999 nominal tons (4393 kW): rated to cool 2506 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 127.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3294–5491 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5O20 closed-circuit cooler (1069 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5O20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1069 nominal tons (4699 kW): rated to cool 2681 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 137.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3524–5874 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-5P20 closed-circuit cooler (1133 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-5P20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1133 nominal tons (4980 kW): rated to cool 2842 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 144.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3735–6225 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6L12 closed-circuit cooler (648 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6L12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 648 nominal tons (2850 kW): rated to cool 1626 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 73.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2138–3563 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6L14 closed-circuit cooler (722 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 722 nominal tons (3174 kW): rated to cool 1811 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2380–3967 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6L28 closed-circuit cooler (1383 tons, 6.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6L28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1383 nominal tons (6078 kW): rated to cool 3468 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 163.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4559–7598 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6M12 closed-circuit cooler (688 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6M12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 688 nominal tons (3025 kW): rated to cool 1726 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 77.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2269–3782 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6M14 closed-circuit cooler (766 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 766 nominal tons (3367 kW): rated to cool 1921 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 86.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2526–4209 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6M18 closed-circuit cooler (915 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6M18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 915 nominal tons (4024 kW): rated to cool 2296 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3018–5030 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6M28 closed-circuit cooler (1468 tons, 6.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6M28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1468 nominal tons (6451 kW): rated to cool 3681 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 172.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4838–8064 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6N12 closed-circuit cooler (755 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6N12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 755 nominal tons (3321 kW): rated to cool 1895 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2490–4151 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6N14 closed-circuit cooler (840 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6N14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 840 nominal tons (3694 kW): rated to cool 2108 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2771–4618 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6N18 closed-circuit cooler (1004 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1004 nominal tons (4412 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 115.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3309–5515 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6N20 closed-circuit cooler (1067 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6N20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1067 nominal tons (4691 kW): rated to cool 2677 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 124.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3518–5864 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6N28 closed-circuit cooler (1611 tons, 7.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6N28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1611 nominal tons (7081 kW): rated to cool 4040 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 186.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection5311–8851 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6O18 closed-circuit cooler (1077 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6O18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1077 nominal tons (4735 kW): rated to cool 2702 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 123.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3552–5919 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6O20 closed-circuit cooler (1145 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6O20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1145 nominal tons (5035 kW): rated to cool 2873 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 132.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3776–6293 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6P18 closed-circuit cooler (1141 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6P18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1141 nominal tons (5016 kW): rated to cool 2862 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 129.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3762–6270 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-6P20 closed-circuit cooler (1213 tons, 5.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-6P20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1213 nominal tons (5332 kW): rated to cool 3043 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 139.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3999–6665 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-7L12 closed-circuit cooler (729 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-7L12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 729 nominal tons (3203 kW): rated to cool 1828 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 70.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2403–4004 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-7L14 closed-circuit cooler (801 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-7L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 801 nominal tons (3521 kW): rated to cool 2009 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2641–4401 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-7M14 closed-circuit cooler (849 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-7M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 849 nominal tons (3732 kW): rated to cool 2130 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection2799–4665 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-7M18 closed-circuit cooler (996 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-7M18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 996 nominal tons (4379 kW): rated to cool 2499 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3284–5474 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-7N14 closed-circuit cooler (930 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-7N14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 930 nominal tons (4088 kW): rated to cool 2333 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3066–5110 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-7N18 closed-circuit cooler (1091 tons, 4.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-7N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1091 nominal tons (4795 kW): rated to cool 2736 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 111.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3596–5994 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-7N20 closed-circuit cooler (1152 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-7N20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1152 nominal tons (5066 kW): rated to cool 2890 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 120.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3799–6332 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-7O18 closed-circuit cooler (1170 tons, 5.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-7O18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1170 nominal tons (5142 kW): rated to cool 2934 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 119.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection3857–6428 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-7O20 closed-circuit cooler (1236 tons, 5.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-7O20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1236 nominal tons (5432 kW): rated to cool 3100 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 128.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4074–6790 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 24-7P20 closed-circuit cooler (1308 tons, 5.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 24-7P20 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1308 nominal tons (5750 kW): rated to cool 3281 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 135.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection4312–7187 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-3E12 closed-circuit cooler (66 tons, 288 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-3E12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 66 nominal tons (288 kW): rated to cool 165 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 10.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection216–361 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-3E9 closed-circuit cooler (50 tons, 219 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-3E9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 50 nominal tons (219 kW): rated to cool 125 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 8.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection164–274 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-3F12 closed-circuit cooler (74 tons, 326 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-3F12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (326 kW): rated to cool 186 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 11.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection245–408 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-3F9 closed-circuit cooler (56 tons, 247 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-3F9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 56 nominal tons (247 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 9.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection186–309 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-3G12 closed-circuit cooler (86 tons, 380 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-3G12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 86 nominal tons (380 kW): rated to cool 217 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection285–475 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-4E12 closed-circuit cooler (75 tons, 331 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-4E12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 75 nominal tons (331 kW): rated to cool 189 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 10.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection249–414 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-4E9 closed-circuit cooler (57 tons, 251 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-4E9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 57 nominal tons (251 kW): rated to cool 143 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 8.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection188–314 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-4F12 closed-circuit cooler (85 tons, 374 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-4F12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 85 nominal tons (374 kW): rated to cool 213 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 11.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection280–467 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-4F9 closed-circuit cooler (64 tons, 283 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-4F9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 64 nominal tons (283 kW): rated to cool 162 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 9.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection213–354 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-4G12 closed-circuit cooler (99 tons, 434 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-4G12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 248 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection326–543 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-5E12 closed-circuit cooler (81 tons, 357 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-5E12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 81 nominal tons (357 kW): rated to cool 204 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 9.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection268–446 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-5E9 closed-circuit cooler (62 tons, 271 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-5E9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 62 nominal tons (271 kW): rated to cool 154 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 8.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection203–338 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-5F12 closed-circuit cooler (92 tons, 402 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-5F12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 92 nominal tons (402 kW): rated to cool 230 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 11.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection302–503 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-5F6 closed-circuit cooler (38 tons, 167 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-5F6 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 38 nominal tons (167 kW): rated to cool 96 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 5.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection126–209 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-5F9 closed-circuit cooler (69 tons, 305 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-5F9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 69 nominal tons (305 kW): rated to cool 174 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 9.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection229–381 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 4-5G12 closed-circuit cooler (106 tons, 467 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 4-5G12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 106 nominal tons (467 kW): rated to cool 267 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection350–584 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-3H18 closed-circuit cooler (225 tons, 990 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-3H18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 225 nominal tons (990 kW): rated to cool 565 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection743–1238 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-3I18 closed-circuit cooler (247 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-3I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 247 nominal tons (1088 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection816–1360 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-3J12 closed-circuit cooler (152 tons, 667 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-3J12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 152 nominal tons (667 kW): rated to cool 381 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection501–834 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-3J24 closed-circuit cooler (304 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-3J24 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1335 kW): rated to cool 762 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 48.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1001–1668 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-4H18 closed-circuit cooler (238 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-4H18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 238 nominal tons (1044 kW): rated to cool 596 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 31.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection783–1305 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-4I18 closed-circuit cooler (261 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-4I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 261 nominal tons (1146 kW): rated to cool 654 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection859–1432 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-4J12 closed-circuit cooler (165 tons, 723 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-4J12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 165 nominal tons (723 kW): rated to cool 413 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection543–904 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-4J18 closed-circuit cooler (297 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-4J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 297 nominal tons (1304 kW): rated to cool 744 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 38.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection978–1631 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-5H18 closed-circuit cooler (253 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-5H18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 253 nominal tons (1113 kW): rated to cool 635 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 30.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection835–1392 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-5I18 closed-circuit cooler (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-5I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1221 kW): rated to cool 697 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 33.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection915–1526 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-5J12 closed-circuit cooler (181 tons, 796 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-5J12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 181 nominal tons (796 kW): rated to cool 454 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection597–995 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-5J18 closed-circuit cooler (316 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-5J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 316 nominal tons (1388 kW): rated to cool 792 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1041–1735 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-5J9 closed-circuit cooler (144 tons, 632 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-5J9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 144 nominal tons (632 kW): rated to cool 361 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 18.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection474–790 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-5K12 closed-circuit cooler (199 tons, 874 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-5K12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 199 nominal tons (874 kW): rated to cool 499 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection656–1093 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-6H18 closed-circuit cooler (273 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-6H18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 273 nominal tons (1198 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection899–1498 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-6I18 closed-circuit cooler (299 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-6I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 299 nominal tons (1312 kW): rated to cool 749 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection984–1640 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-6J18 closed-circuit cooler (339 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-6J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 339 nominal tons (1490 kW): rated to cool 850 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1117–1862 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-6J9 closed-circuit cooler (165 tons, 724 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-6J9 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 165 nominal tons (724 kW): rated to cool 413 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 18.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection543–905 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-6K12 closed-circuit cooler (221 tons, 970 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-6K12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 221 nominal tons (970 kW): rated to cool 554 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection728–1213 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-7I18 closed-circuit cooler (323 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-7I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1421 kW): rated to cool 811 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1066–1777 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-7J18 closed-circuit cooler (366 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-7J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 366 nominal tons (1611 kW): rated to cool 919 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1208–2014 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 7-7K12 closed-circuit cooler (247 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 7-7K12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 247 nominal tons (1084 kW): rated to cool 619 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection813–1355 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3G8 closed-circuit cooler (74 tons, 324 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3G8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 185 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection243–405 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3H11 closed-circuit cooler (111 tons, 488 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3H11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 111 nominal tons (488 kW): rated to cool 279 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 19.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection366–611 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3H18 closed-circuit cooler (242 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3H18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 242 nominal tons (1063 kW): rated to cool 607 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection797–1329 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3H21 closed-circuit cooler (279 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3H21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 279 nominal tons (1228 kW): rated to cool 701 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 39.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection921–1535 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3H8 closed-circuit cooler (86 tons, 380 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3H8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 86 nominal tons (380 kW): rated to cool 217 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 15.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection285–475 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3I11 closed-circuit cooler (124 tons, 543 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3I11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 124 nominal tons (543 kW): rated to cool 310 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 21.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection407–679 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3I14 closed-circuit cooler (165 tons, 726 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3I14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 165 nominal tons (726 kW): rated to cool 414 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 26.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection545–908 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3I18 closed-circuit cooler (266 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1169 kW): rated to cool 667 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 39.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection877–1461 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3I21 closed-circuit cooler (307 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3I21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 307 nominal tons (1349 kW): rated to cool 770 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1012–1687 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3I8 closed-circuit cooler (96 tons, 424 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3I8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 96 nominal tons (424 kW): rated to cool 242 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 17.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection318–529 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3J11 closed-circuit cooler (143 tons, 628 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3J11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 143 nominal tons (628 kW): rated to cool 358 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection471–785 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3J14 closed-circuit cooler (190 tons, 835 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3J14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 190 nominal tons (835 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 30.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection626–1044 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3J18 closed-circuit cooler (304 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1334 kW): rated to cool 761 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 44.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1001–1668 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3J21 closed-circuit cooler (350 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3J21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 350 nominal tons (1538 kW): rated to cool 877 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 49.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1153–1922 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3J8 closed-circuit cooler (112 tons, 492 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3J8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 112 nominal tons (492 kW): rated to cool 281 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 19.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection369–614 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3K11 closed-circuit cooler (158 tons, 695 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3K11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 158 nominal tons (695 kW): rated to cool 396 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 26.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection521–868 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3K14 closed-circuit cooler (209 tons, 921 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 209 nominal tons (921 kW): rated to cool 525 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection690–1151 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3K18 closed-circuit cooler (333 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3K18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 333 nominal tons (1464 kW): rated to cool 835 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 47.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1098–1830 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3K21 closed-circuit cooler (383 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3K21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 383 nominal tons (1685 kW): rated to cool 962 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 53.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1264–2107 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-3L14 closed-circuit cooler (226 tons, 992 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-3L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 226 nominal tons (992 kW): rated to cool 566 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection744–1240 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4G8 closed-circuit cooler (84 tons, 370 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4G8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 84 nominal tons (370 kW): rated to cool 211 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection278–463 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4H11 closed-circuit cooler (123 tons, 541 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4H11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 123 nominal tons (541 kW): rated to cool 309 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 19.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection406–676 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4H18 closed-circuit cooler (255 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4H18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 640 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection842–1403 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4H21 closed-circuit cooler (293 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4H21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 293 nominal tons (1287 kW): rated to cool 734 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 38.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection965–1608 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4H8 closed-circuit cooler (98 tons, 431 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4H8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 98 nominal tons (431 kW): rated to cool 246 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 15.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection323–539 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4I11 closed-circuit cooler (136 tons, 599 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4I11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 136 nominal tons (599 kW): rated to cool 342 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 21.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection450–749 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4I18 closed-circuit cooler (281 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 281 nominal tons (1233 kW): rated to cool 704 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection925–1541 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4I21 closed-circuit cooler (321 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4I21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 321 nominal tons (1412 kW): rated to cool 806 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 42.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1059–1765 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4I8 closed-circuit cooler (109 tons, 479 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4I8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 109 nominal tons (479 kW): rated to cool 273 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 16.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection359–598 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4J11 closed-circuit cooler (157 tons, 691 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4J11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 157 nominal tons (691 kW): rated to cool 394 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection518–863 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4J14 closed-circuit cooler (204 tons, 896 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4J14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 204 nominal tons (896 kW): rated to cool 511 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 29.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection672–1120 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4J18 closed-circuit cooler (320 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 320 nominal tons (1405 kW): rated to cool 802 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 42.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1054–1757 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4J21 closed-circuit cooler (366 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4J21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 366 nominal tons (1608 kW): rated to cool 917 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 47.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1206–2010 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4J8 closed-circuit cooler (126 tons, 553 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4J8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 126 nominal tons (553 kW): rated to cool 316 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 18.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection415–691 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4K11 closed-circuit cooler (173 tons, 762 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4K11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 435 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 25.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection572–953 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4K14 closed-circuit cooler (224 tons, 986 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 224 nominal tons (986 kW): rated to cool 563 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 31.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection740–1233 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4K18 closed-circuit cooler (350 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4K18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 350 nominal tons (1540 kW): rated to cool 879 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 46.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1155–1925 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4K21 closed-circuit cooler (401 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4K21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 51.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1321–2201 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4L14 closed-circuit cooler (241 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 241 nominal tons (1061 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection796–1327 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-4M14 closed-circuit cooler (256 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-4M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 256 nominal tons (1127 kW): rated to cool 643 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection845–1408 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5H18 closed-circuit cooler (273 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5H18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 273 nominal tons (1199 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection899–1498 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5H8 closed-circuit cooler (113 tons, 497 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5H8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 113 nominal tons (497 kW): rated to cool 284 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 14.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection373–621 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5I11 closed-circuit cooler (153 tons, 672 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5I11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 153 nominal tons (672 kW): rated to cool 383 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 20.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection504–840 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5I18 closed-circuit cooler (299 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 299 nominal tons (1315 kW): rated to cool 751 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection986–1644 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5I21 closed-circuit cooler (340 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5I21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 340 nominal tons (1493 kW): rated to cool 852 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 41.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1120–1866 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5I8 closed-circuit cooler (125 tons, 550 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5I8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 125 nominal tons (550 kW): rated to cool 314 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 16.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection412–687 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5J11 closed-circuit cooler (175 tons, 771 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5J11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 440 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection578–964 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5J14 closed-circuit cooler (222 tons, 974 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5J14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 222 nominal tons (974 kW): rated to cool 556 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 28.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection731–1218 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5J18 closed-circuit cooler (341 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 341 nominal tons (1497 kW): rated to cool 854 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1123–1871 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5J21 closed-circuit cooler (386 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5J21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 386 nominal tons (1698 kW): rated to cool 969 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 46.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1273–2122 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5J8 closed-circuit cooler (144 tons, 632 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5J8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 144 nominal tons (632 kW): rated to cool 360 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 18.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection474–790 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5K11 closed-circuit cooler (193 tons, 849 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5K11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 193 nominal tons (849 kW): rated to cool 485 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection637–1062 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5K14 closed-circuit cooler (244 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 244 nominal tons (1071 kW): rated to cool 611 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 31.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection803–1338 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5K18 closed-circuit cooler (373 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5K18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 373 nominal tons (1639 kW): rated to cool 935 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 45.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1229–2049 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5K21 closed-circuit cooler (423 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5K21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 423 nominal tons (1858 kW): rated to cool 1060 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 50.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1394–2323 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5L11 closed-circuit cooler (208 tons, 914 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5L11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 208 nominal tons (914 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 26.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection686–1143 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5L14 closed-circuit cooler (262 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 262 nominal tons (1151 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection863–1439 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5L21 closed-circuit cooler (453 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5L21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 453 nominal tons (1992 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 53.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1494–2490 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-5M14 closed-circuit cooler (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-5M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1221 kW): rated to cool 697 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection915–1526 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6H8 closed-circuit cooler (131 tons, 578 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6H8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 131 nominal tons (578 kW): rated to cool 330 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 14.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection433–722 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6I18 closed-circuit cooler (322 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 322 nominal tons (1416 kW): rated to cool 808 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1062–1770 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6I8 closed-circuit cooler (145 tons, 637 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6I8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 145 nominal tons (637 kW): rated to cool 363 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 15.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection477–796 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6J11 closed-circuit cooler (198 tons, 870 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6J11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (870 kW): rated to cool 497 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 22.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection653–1088 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6J18 closed-circuit cooler (366 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 366 nominal tons (1609 kW): rated to cool 918 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 40.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1207–2012 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6J21 closed-circuit cooler (411 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6J21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 411 nominal tons (1808 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 45.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1356–2261 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6J8 closed-circuit cooler (166 tons, 729 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6J8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 166 nominal tons (729 kW): rated to cool 416 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 17.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection546–911 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6K11 closed-circuit cooler (218 tons, 956 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6K11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 218 nominal tons (956 kW): rated to cool 546 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection717–1195 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6K14 closed-circuit cooler (267 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 267 nominal tons (1174 kW): rated to cool 670 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection881–1468 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6K18 closed-circuit cooler (401 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6K18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1320–2201 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6K21 closed-circuit cooler (450 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6K21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 450 nominal tons (1978 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 48.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1483–2472 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6L11 closed-circuit cooler (234 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6L11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 234 nominal tons (1028 kW): rated to cool 587 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 25.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection771–1285 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6L14 closed-circuit cooler (287 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1261 kW): rated to cool 720 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 31.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection946–1576 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6L21 closed-circuit cooler (482 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6L21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 482 nominal tons (2118 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 52.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1589–2648 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-6M14 closed-circuit cooler (304 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-6M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 762 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1002–1670 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7H8 closed-circuit cooler (153 tons, 673 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7H8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 153 nominal tons (673 kW): rated to cool 384 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection505–842 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7I18 closed-circuit cooler (349 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 349 nominal tons (1536 kW): rated to cool 877 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1152–1920 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7I8 closed-circuit cooler (168 tons, 740 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7I8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 168 nominal tons (740 kW): rated to cool 422 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 15.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection555–925 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7J11 closed-circuit cooler (225 tons, 988 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7J11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 225 nominal tons (988 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 21.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection741–1235 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7J18 closed-circuit cooler (396 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1743 kW): rated to cool 995 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 39.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1307–2179 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7J21 closed-circuit cooler (441 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7J21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 441 nominal tons (1940 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1455–2425 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7J8 closed-circuit cooler (192 tons, 844 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7J8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 192 nominal tons (844 kW): rated to cool 482 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 17.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection633–1055 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7K11 closed-circuit cooler (246 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7K11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 246 nominal tons (1084 kW): rated to cool 618 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection813–1354 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7K14 closed-circuit cooler (295 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 295 nominal tons (1297 kW): rated to cool 740 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 29.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection973–1622 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7K21 closed-circuit cooler (482 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7K21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 482 nominal tons (2119 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 47.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1589–2649 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7L11 closed-circuit cooler (265 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7L11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 265 nominal tons (1163 kW): rated to cool 664 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection872–1454 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7L14 closed-circuit cooler (317 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 317 nominal tons (1392 kW): rated to cool 794 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 30.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1044–1740 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7L21 closed-circuit cooler (516 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7L21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 516 nominal tons (2269 kW): rated to cool 1295 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 50.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1702–2836 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 9-7M14 closed-circuit cooler (335 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 9-7M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 335 nominal tons (1473 kW): rated to cool 841 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Cooling tower / heat rejection1105–1842 kWEUOpen in the builder
Packaged DX VAV rooftop, 7 m³/s Example
A packaged rooftop for a VAV floor: outside-air damper with an economiser and demand-controlled ventilation, DX coil on an inverter scroll, an electric heater for morning warm-up, and a supply fan that holds a duct static as the boxes throttle; the boxes themselves live on the building. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Rooftop / packaged85–125 kWEUOpen in the builder
VRF indoor unit, 14 kW Example
One indoor unit for the VRF outdoor unit beside it: a fan and a DX coil with both refrigerant ports open, fed across a refrigerant coupling. Four of these on one outdoor unit is a connection ratio of 100 %, which is where the makers rate them. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
VRF / multi-split10–16 kWEUOpen in the builder
VRF outdoor unit, 56 kW (20 HP) Example
A variable-refrigerant-flow outdoor unit: two Copeland JPV066AC inverter scrolls on R410A behind an air-cooled condenser, with an open suction and liquid line so any number of indoor units can be coupled to it. Sized and held to a maker's published 20 HP capacity grid — it makes that maker's rated 56.0 kW from 25 to 35 °C outdoor within +0.5 to +3.6 % on power input, with the compressor at 0.62 to 0.70 of full output the way an inverter does. The design point below is the machine flat out, which is the larger figure — and it moves a few kilowatts with the property backend, which is why the advertised band is wide. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
VRF / multi-split55–80 kWEUOpen in the builder
VRF outdoor unit, 33 kW (12 HP): inverter + fixed scroll bank Example
A 12 HP-class VRF outdoor unit drawn as the frames of that size are built: a catalog inverter scroll and a catalog fixed-speed scroll on one circuit — a bank, the fixed machine running flat out as base load and the inverter trimming — behind a condenser declared from a 12 HP cabinet (980 × 1630 × 800 mm, 11 500 m³/h). Modulated to 33.5 kW the way the control runs it, it draws a maker's published power input within −9 to +3 % from 25 to 39 °C outdoor, the miss at the cool end, where a real unit runs its fixed scroll harder than the staging rule does. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
VRF / multi-split30–60 kWEUOpen in the builder
Water-cooled chiller with a cooling tower Example
A compact water-cooled chiller: supply fan, face-and-bypass dampers around an indoor air coil, inverter scroll compressor, pipe-in-pipe condenser on a closed condenser-water loop, and an evaporative cooling tower with its own fan and pump. The bypass trades a little total capacity for a markedly drier supply. Published as an example — the figures below are solved from this model, not copied from a datasheet.
Chiller8–30 kWEUOpen in the builder
Water-cooled plant, 600 kW class Example
A campus chilled-water plant: four Copeland ZHT300 scrolls on R513A (a centrifugal stand-in, declared as such) on a pipe-in-pipe evaporator and condenser, a condenser-water pump and a cooling tower with a rated point. Exports 6.5 °C water block to block. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Plant / central450–750 kWEUOpen in the builder
Water-source heat pump plant, 30 kW class Example
A heat pump whose source is a data centre's cooling loop: a coaxial evaporator on the 18 °C return water a CRAH sends back, a Danfoss VZH052 inverter scroll from the catalog with the maker's eighteen published speed steps setting its part-load power, and a coaxial condenser lifting a heating loop to 54 °C — the arrangement Seattle's Westin Building Exchange and the offices next to it run. The source is warm all year, so the machine works over a 40 K lift instead of an air-source unit's 50–60 K in winter, and the chiller behind it has that much less to reject. It serves no room; it holds its leaving water for whatever draws on it. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Plant / central26–34 kWEUOpen in the builder

Components

Showing 1–3 of 3

NameTypeRatingMarketsOpen in the builder
Example R410A scroll, 12 kW class ExampleCompressorsR410A compressor — 11.9 kW cooling, 3.86 kW input, COP 3.09 at the AHRI 7.2/54.4 °C rating point.EU, NAOpen in the builder
Example DX coil, 3-row 600 × 600 ExampleCoilsFin-and-tube coil, 600 × 600 mm face, 3 rows at 12.0 fpi, 0.90 m³/s design air flow.EUOpen in the builder
Example electric duct heater, 30 kW ExampleHeatersAir heater, 30.0 kW at 2.00 m³/s.EUOpen in the builder

Request a quote

Open any system, component or accessory above and send the request from its page — it arrives with the item, and with your design when you send it from the builder.