Everything HVAC Builder publishes on HVAC Builder — complete systems and component listings, each with its own spec page and a quote request that needs no account.
A closed-loop heat-pump dryer: a DX coil that takes the water out of the drying chamber's own 55 °C air, the condenser in the same stream reheating it, a circulation fan — on a Copeland ZWD81KBC digital scroll (R134a, rated to 85 °C condensing) with its 10–100 % modulation declared. Nothing leaves but condensate. Run humidity-led in a building: steered on the chamber's humidity ceiling alone. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A dedicated outside-air unit for a densely occupied room: an exhaust-air plate core, a wrap-around heat pipe around the chilled-water coil, winter heating and a supply fan. Published as an example — the figures below are solved from this model, not copied from a datasheet.
A heat pump whose source is a data centre's cooling loop: a coaxial evaporator on the 18 °C return water a CRAH sends back, a Danfoss VZH052 inverter scroll from the catalog with the maker's eighteen published speed steps setting its part-load power, and a coaxial condenser lifting a heating loop to 54 °C — the arrangement Seattle's Westin Building Exchange and the offices next to it run. The source is warm all year, so the machine works over a 40 K lift instead of an air-source unit's 50–60 K in winter, and the chiller behind it has that much less to reject. It serves no room; it holds its leaving water for whatever draws on it. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A 12 HP-class VRF outdoor unit drawn as the frames of that size are built: a catalog inverter scroll and a catalog fixed-speed scroll on one circuit — a bank, the fixed machine running flat out as base load and the inverter trimming — behind a condenser declared from a 12 HP cabinet (980 × 1630 × 800 mm, 11 500 m³/h). Modulated to 33.5 kW the way the control runs it, it draws a maker's published power input within −9 to +3 % from 25 to 39 °C outdoor, the miss at the cool end, where a real unit runs its fixed scroll harder than the staging rule does. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A chilled-water air handler for a campus building: outside-air damper with an economiser and a DCV floor, a chilled-water coil fed from the plant, a hot-water coil drawn as a gas boiler stand-in (fuel reported as gas at 85 %), a supply fan holding duct static. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Midea's 8 HP V4+ outdoor unit as this model runs it — the first small frame: not the 20 HP machine scaled but a condenser declared from the frame's own cabinet (980 × 1630 × 800 mm, a coil wrapping three sides) and its published 11 500 m³/h, with the catalog inverter scroll at the frame's share of the 20 HP pair. Modulated to the rated 25.2 kW the way the control runs it, it draws Midea's own selection software's power input within ±1 % from 25 to 39 °C outdoor at the 100 % combination ratio, capacity falling past 35 °C as the grid does. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
The smallest tower BAC publishes: a counterflow, centrifugal-fan, forced-draft unit rated to cool 36 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb. Drawn at the maker's own printed airflow (2.35 m³/s) and that rated water flow, this model reproduces the certified leaving-water temperature at the rated point exactly — the tower's NTU is derived from it. A centrifugal fan is what lets a Series V sit indoors or behind ductwork. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A 600-ton counterflow Series V — centrifugal fans, forced draft, 1 800 USGPM cooled from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air. Its liquid-to-gas ratio of about 1.6 is the highest of the five published here, which is why its derived NTU is the highest too: a counterflow tower works its fill harder per unit of air than a crossflow one. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's largest crossflow induced-draft range, here at 471 nominal tons: 1 413 USGPM cooled from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.7 m³/s of air behind a 25 hp fan. At this size the tower is the plant's largest single air mover, and the fan motor is the figure that decides the condenser loop's part-load cost. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
The smallest evaporative condenser BAC publishes, drawn as a condensing unit: an R-22 Copeland ZR125KF scroll — 33 kW of cooling, sized under the condenser the way a unit with margin is — rejecting into a tube bundle under a recirculating spray, no fins, the air leaving saturated. Rated by its own sheet at 68.9 kW of base heat rejection on 3.32 m³/s of air — a condition the Series V EC sheet states, 105 °F condensing at a 78 °F wet bulb — and run as the evaporative wet coil with an isothermal tube side, the coil's share of the approach set where the maker's whole range derives. An open suction: couple any evaporator to it. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A variable-refrigerant-flow outdoor unit: two Copeland JPV066AC inverter scrolls on R410A behind an air-cooled condenser, with an open suction and liquid line so any number of indoor units can be coupled to it. Sized and held to a maker's published 20 HP capacity grid — it makes that maker's rated 56.0 kW from 25 to 35 °C outdoor within +1 to +4 % on power input, with the compressor at 0.62 to 0.70 of full output the way an inverter does. The design point below is the machine flat out, which is the larger figure — and it moves a few kilowatts with the property backend, which is why the advertised band is wide. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
One indoor unit for the VRF outdoor unit beside it: a fan and a DX coil with both refrigerant ports open, fed across a refrigerant coupling. Four of these on one outdoor unit is a connection ratio of 100 %, which is where the makers rate them. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A dedicated outside-air unit for a store: a sorption wheel between the exhaust and the outside air (humidity efficiency 65 %), a wrap-around heat pipe around a chilled-water coil, a gas reheat and a supply fan — the outside air dried where it enters, most of its moisture handed back to the exhaust before the coil sees it, so the rooftops can recirculate. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A heat-pump dehumidifier for a pool hall: an eight-row DX coil that takes the water out of the hall's air, a reclaim condenser on the pool water that puts the heat the pool lost back into it first, the condenser in the air stream reheating with the rest — the hot-gas reheat every pool unit dries with — and a supply fan, on eight inverter scroll modules. Run humidity-led in a building: steered on the hall's humidity ceiling alone, the hall's temperature and outside air another machine's. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A frozen-store unit cooler: a fan and a 6 fpi DX coil with both refrigerant ports open, fed by a remote low-temperature condensing unit (boundary.refFeeds on its own page; the pair pinned hourly in a building). Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A packaged rooftop for a VAV floor: outside-air damper with an economiser and demand-controlled ventilation, DX coil on an inverter scroll, an electric heater for morning warm-up, and a supply fan that holds a duct static as the boxes throttle; the boxes themselves live on the building. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A closed-circuit cooler from BAC's Series V range: the loop fluid runs inside a coil under a recirculating spray and never touches the air, which is what a process loop or a heat-pump condenser loop wants. Rated on the same basis as the open towers — 168 USGPM cooled from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb — on 13.8 m³/s of air from a centrifugal fan, with a 1 hp spray pump and 111 gal of coil. Run as an evaporative wet coil: air against the falling spray, the fluid against the air, the two conductances derived from the rating at the split and fluid-side flow exponent BAC's own Series V closed-circuit performance table picks — 4 and −0.6, the spray film outside the tube being much of the fluid side's resistance. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A remote condensing unit on a Copeland ZF49K5E low-temperature scroll (R404A) with an air-cooled condenser and its fan: an open suction and liquid line, the load declared under boundary.refLoads (a unit cooler's, pinned hourly in a building). Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A crossflow, induced-draft tower — the fan pulls through the fill and its motor heat is added after, which is how this model wires it. Rated to cool 759 USGPM from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.9 m³/s of air; a 15 hp fan motor. Series 1500 is BAC's induced-draft crossflow range from 92 to 747 nominal tons a cell. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
An operating-suite air handler: 40 % outside air, a chilled-water coil, an electric heater, a steam humidifier on boiler steam steered to the rooms' humidity floor, and a supply fan against HEPA static. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A packaged rooftop unit: outside-air damper with an economiser, DX coil on four scroll compressors, a gas duct furnace at 80 % and a supply fan, on a two-fan air-cooled condenser. Its heat is gas — reported as fuel, never as electricity — which is what separates a rooftop's winter from a heat pump's. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A liquid-cooled IT load and nothing but water between it and the outside: an immersion tank whose dielectric fluid is cooled by a coil-and-plate exchanger fed straight from a small evaporative cooling tower — no chiller, no air handler, no refrigerant, the arrangement the tank makers sell for data centres. The tank is a **liquid-cooled load**: 45 kW of servers declared as the load, the exchanger between the fluid and the water rated at a point the way a coaxial condenser is, and the solution reports the dielectric temperature the servers sit in — here 39 °C on a 35 °C / 25.6 °C wet-bulb design day, under the 45 °C limit declared. The tower is BAC's VT0-12-E at its published rating. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
An air conditioner that makes hot water from the heat it would otherwise throw away, the way a hot-water booster does it: a second, R134a heat pump whose evaporator is a plate exchanger on the A/C's hot gas. The A/C is a 20 kW-class split drawn from a supplier's own selection — coil faces, rows, fins, circuits and airflows, 7.5 K superheat and 5 K subcooling — on a Mitsubishi Electric LNB53 inverter rotary at its 60 rps rating speed. Between its compressor and its air condenser sits a **cascade exchanger**: the booster takes what the saturation difference across the plate drives, the air condenser rejects the rest, and the A/C condenses cooler for it. The booster's compressor is a catalog R134a heat-pump water-heater scroll standing in for the Mitsubishi SBB172, whose map is not published; its condenser heats water from 55 to 62 °C. The plate and the water side are an example's, not a maker's.
A crossflow, axial-fan, forced-draft tower from the middle of BAC's FXT range, rated to cool 390 USGPM from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.1 m³/s of air. The fan sits ahead of the fill, so its motor heat is in the air the fill sees — which is how BAC builds an FXT and how this model wires it. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A campus chilled-water plant: four Copeland ZHT300 scrolls on R513A (a centrifugal stand-in, declared as such) on a pipe-in-pipe evaporator and condenser, a condenser-water pump and a cooling tower with a rated point. Exports 6.5 °C water block to block. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A recirculating cleanroom handler at twenty air changes: 5 % outside air, a chilled-water coil in face-and-bypass — the damper holds the humidity ceiling by mixing room air back, not an electric reheat — a winter heater, and three ebm-papst RadiPac K3G450 modules on the vendor's own pressure and power curves against 800 Pa of HEPA and duct static. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
The plant a European house runs on: an outdoor coil taking heat from 7 °C air, a scroll compressor, a coaxial condenser heating a water loop, a circulator, and radiators giving it to the room. The radiators are a **hydronic emitter** — rated the way EN 442 rates one, an output at 75/65/20 °C and a characteristic exponent, with no geometry, because that is what a radiator maker publishes. They are deliberately oversized, which is what a heat-pump installer does: 34 kW at the EN 442 rating for a house that wants 12, so the machine settles at 47 °C water and a COP of 3.34 instead of the 53 °C and 3.02 that boiler-sized radiators would have forced. Ten per cent of the running cost, bought with nothing but bigger radiators. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A two-pipe fan coil on chilled water with an 8 kW electric heater: cooling from the loop, heat of its own — the smallest room unit that does both. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Indirect-direct evaporative cooling: outside air over a water coil cooled by a small tower pack, then through a wetted pad, out through a supply fan; one pump round the loop. The dry-climate machine — two fans and a pump for a supply near the wet bulb. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
One office floor's radiators, fed from a plant across a water coupling — the flats' emitter at an office's size, rated the way EN 442 rates one. Thirty kilowatts at the rating carries 15 kW on 54 °C water, the flow temperature a heat pump on a warm source reaches comfortably. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
The indoor half of a split: an outside-air damper with an economiser, a return damper, supply fan and a DX coil with open refrigerant ports. In a building it pairs with a condensing-unit block, which feeds its liquid line; on its own it solves at a declared feed. Published as an example; the figures below come from the solver.
A direct-expansion split — indoor fan and coil, scroll compressor, and an outdoor coil behind a two-fan bank that stages down to hold head pressure in cool weather. Published as an example of what a supplier's system page looks like; its performance below is solved live from this model.
A compact water-cooled chiller: supply fan, face-and-bypass dampers around an indoor air coil, inverter scroll compressor, pipe-in-pipe condenser on a closed condenser-water loop, and an evaporative cooling tower with its own fan and pump. The bypass trades a little total capacity for a markedly drier supply. Published as an example — the figures below are solved from this model, not copied from a datasheet.
The same machine as the one with radiators, with the radiators taken off: an outdoor coil taking heat from the air, a scroll compressor and a coaxial condenser, holding its leaving water for whatever draws on it. This is the shape a plant takes in a building — it serves no room, it holds a temperature, and the flats or the fan coils that drink from it are their own blocks. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Midea's 20 HP V6 outdoor unit as this model runs it: two catalog R410A inverter scrolls behind an air-cooled condenser, modulated to the rated 56.0 kW the way the control runs it, within +1 to +4 % of Midea's published power input from 25 to 35 °C outdoor at the 100 % combination ratio. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
One dwelling's radiators, fed from a plant across a water coupling. It is a single component and that is the point: a radiator is rated, not modelled — the EN 442 output at 75/65/20 °C and a characteristic exponent, with no geometry. Twelve kilowatts at that rating carries a 2.6 kW flat on 40 °C water, which is the low flow temperature a heat pump wants. That four-to-one multiple is the whole cost of a low-temperature retrofit: the same flat on a 70 °C boiler needs a third of the radiator. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
The outdoor half of a split on its own: scroll compressor, air-cooled coil and a two-fan bank, with an open suction and liquid line. In a building it pairs with an indoor DX unit block — the refrigerant coupling pins what its suction carries every hour. Published as an example; solved live at a declared suction load.
Samsung's 20 HP DVM S outdoor unit as this model runs it: two catalog R410A inverter scrolls behind an air-cooled condenser, modulated to the rated 56.0 kW the way the control runs it, holding Samsung's published power input within 6 % from 25 to 39 °C outdoor at the 100 % combination ratio, capacity falling past 35 °C as Samsung publishes it. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A wing of guest-room fan coils run as one machine: a fan and a two-pipe chilled-water coil, breathing the rooms' own air. In the example hotel three such wings and the outside-air unit share one chiller through a water manifold. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Gree's 14-ton GMV5 outdoor unit as this model runs it: the validated 20 HP machine scaled to the frame in every dimension — catalog R410A inverter scrolls behind an air-cooled condenser — modulated to the rated 168 kBtu/h (49.2 kW) the way the control runs it, holding Gree's published power input within −4 to +1 % from 25 to 39 °C outdoor at the 100 % combination ratio, capacity falling past 35 °C as Gree publishes it. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
A computer-room air handler: a deep chilled-water coil and a draw-through plug fan, no outside air, no heater — a data hall is cooled all year. In the example data centre it breathes two halls' return air and takes 14 °C water from the chiller block; the design point here is at 14 °C too. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model, not copied from a datasheet.
A modular air-cooled chiller making chilled water: nine 14 kW-class inverter scroll modules on a pipe-in-pipe evaporator, rejecting through an air-cooled coil behind a two-fan bank. In the example building it serves no room — it holds 7 °C leaving water for the chilled-water air handler, coupled block to block. Published as an example; the figures below come from the solver, not from a datasheet.
Hitachi's 20 HP Set Free outdoor unit as this model runs it: two catalog R410A inverter scrolls behind an air-cooled condenser, modulated to the rated 56.0 kW the way the control runs it. Hitachi publishes the capacity grid — 56.0 kW from 25 to 35 °C outdoor, 52.7 at 40 — and the power input at the rating point only, 15.64 kW (EER 3.58), which this machine draws within 1 %; the capacity is reached at every published temperature. Modelled from the maker's published data — not verified by the manufacturer. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
The gas rooftop without its outside-air damper: a DX coil on a scroll, a gas furnace downstream of it for heat and reheat, a supply fan, a two-fan condenser — for a floor whose outside air comes from a dedicated unit. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0506A-E — a FXT cooling tower, 46 nominal tons (202 kW): rated to cool 138 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0506A-F — a FXT cooling tower, 50 nominal tons (219 kW): rated to cool 150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0506A-G — a FXT cooling tower, 58 nominal tons (254 kW): rated to cool 174 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0506A-H — a FXT cooling tower, 68 nominal tons (298 kW): rated to cool 204 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0706B-F — a FXT cooling tower, 64 nominal tons (280 kW): rated to cool 192 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0706B-G — a FXT cooling tower, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0706B-H — a FXT cooling tower, 87 nominal tons (381 kW): rated to cool 261 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0706B-J — a FXT cooling tower, 95 nominal tons (416 kW): rated to cool 285 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0709B-G — a FXT cooling tower, 97 nominal tons (425 kW): rated to cool 291 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0709B-H — a FXT cooling tower, 115 nominal tons (504 kW): rated to cool 345 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0709B-K — a FXT cooling tower, 136 nominal tons (596 kW): rated to cool 408 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0712B-H — a FXT cooling tower, 140 nominal tons (613 kW): rated to cool 420 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0712B-J — a FXT cooling tower, 159 nominal tons (701 kW): rated to cool 480 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0712B-K — a FXT cooling tower, 174 nominal tons (767 kW): rated to cool 525 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0712B-L — a FXT cooling tower, 191 nominal tons (841 kW): rated to cool 576 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0712C-J — a FXT cooling tower, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0712C-K — a FXT cooling tower, 215 nominal tons (946 kW): rated to cool 648 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0712C-L — a FXT cooling tower, 239 nominal tons (1052 kW): rated to cool 720 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXT-0712C-M — a FXT cooling tower, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H1 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 20 nominal tons (88 kW): rated to cool 60 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H2 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 40 nominal tons (175 kW): rated to cool 120 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H3 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 60 nominal tons (263 kW): rated to cool 180 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H4 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 80 nominal tons (351 kW): rated to cool 240 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H5 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 100 nominal tons (438 kW): rated to cool 300 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0403N-CS2TT-H6 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 120 nominal tons (526 kW): rated to cool 360 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J1 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 30 nominal tons (131 kW): rated to cool 90 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J2 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 60 nominal tons (263 kW): rated to cool 180 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J3 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 90 nominal tons (394 kW): rated to cool 270 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J4 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 120 nominal tons (526 kW): rated to cool 360 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J5 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's NXF-0603N-CS2TT-J6 — a Nexus closed-circuit cooler, 179 nominal tons (789 kW): rated to cool 540 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-07JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 281 nominal tons (1236 kW): rated to cool 846 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-07JN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 562 nominal tons (2471 kW): rated to cool 1692 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-07KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 308 nominal tons (1354 kW): rated to cool 927 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-07KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-07LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 331 nominal tons (1455 kW): rated to cool 996 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-07LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 662 nominal tons (2909 kW): rated to cool 1992 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-09JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 327 nominal tons (1437 kW): rated to cool 984 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-09JN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 654 nominal tons (2874 kW): rated to cool 1968 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-09KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-09KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 714 nominal tons (3137 kW): rated to cool 2148 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-09LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 382 nominal tons (1678 kW): rated to cool 1149 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-09LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 763 nominal tons (3356 kW): rated to cool 2298 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-09LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-09LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 799 nominal tons (3514 kW): rated to cool 2406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-10KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-10KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 749 nominal tons (3295 kW): rated to cool 2256 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-10LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1206 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-10LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 801 nominal tons (3523 kW): rated to cool 2412 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-10LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 420 nominal tons (1845 kW): rated to cool 1263 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-10LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 839 nominal tons (3689 kW): rated to cool 2526 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-10MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 457 nominal tons (2011 kW): rated to cool 1377 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-10MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 915 nominal tons (4022 kW): rated to cool 2754 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-11KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 386 nominal tons (1696 kW): rated to cool 1161 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-11KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 771 nominal tons (3391 kW): rated to cool 2322 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-11LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 413 nominal tons (1814 kW): rated to cool 1242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-11LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 825 nominal tons (3628 kW): rated to cool 2484 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-11LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 433 nominal tons (1902 kW): rated to cool 1302 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-11LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 865 nominal tons (3803 kW): rated to cool 2604 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-11MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 476 nominal tons (2094 kW): rated to cool 1434 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-11MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 953 nominal tons (4189 kW): rated to cool 2868 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-12KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-12KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 799 nominal tons (3514 kW): rated to cool 2406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-12LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 428 nominal tons (1880 kW): rated to cool 1287 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-12LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 855 nominal tons (3759 kW): rated to cool 2574 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-12LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 448 nominal tons (1967 kW): rated to cool 1347 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-12LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 895 nominal tons (3934 kW): rated to cool 2694 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-12MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 493 nominal tons (2169 kW): rated to cool 1485 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1212-12MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 987 nominal tons (4338 kW): rated to cool 2970 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-07JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 426 nominal tons (1871 kW): rated to cool 1281 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-07JN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 851 nominal tons (3742 kW): rated to cool 2562 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 94.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-07KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 464 nominal tons (2042 kW): rated to cool 1398 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-07KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 929 nominal tons (4083 kW): rated to cool 2796 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-07LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 499 nominal tons (2195 kW): rated to cool 1503 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-07LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 999 nominal tons (4390 kW): rated to cool 3006 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-09JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 488 nominal tons (2147 kW): rated to cool 1470 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-09JN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 977 nominal tons (4294 kW): rated to cool 2940 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-09KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 533 nominal tons (2344 kW): rated to cool 1605 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-09KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1066 nominal tons (4688 kW): rated to cool 3210 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-09LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 570 nominal tons (2506 kW): rated to cool 1716 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-09LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1140 nominal tons (5012 kW): rated to cool 3432 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-09LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 604 nominal tons (2655 kW): rated to cool 1818 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-09LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1208 nominal tons (5310 kW): rated to cool 3636 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-10KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 559 nominal tons (2458 kW): rated to cool 1683 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-10KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1118 nominal tons (4916 kW): rated to cool 3366 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-10LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 598 nominal tons (2629 kW): rated to cool 1800 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-10LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1196 nominal tons (5258 kW): rated to cool 3600 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 128.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-10LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 627 nominal tons (2756 kW): rated to cool 1887 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-10LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1254 nominal tons (5512 kW): rated to cool 3774 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-10MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 692 nominal tons (3041 kW): rated to cool 2082 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-10MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1383 nominal tons (6081 kW): rated to cool 4164 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 147.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-11KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 582 nominal tons (2559 kW): rated to cool 1752 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-11KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1164 nominal tons (5117 kW): rated to cool 3504 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-11LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-11LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1246 nominal tons (5477 kW): rated to cool 3750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 133.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-11LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 653 nominal tons (2870 kW): rated to cool 1965 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-11LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1306 nominal tons (5740 kW): rated to cool 3930 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 140.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-11MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 720 nominal tons (3163 kW): rated to cool 2166 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-11MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1439 nominal tons (6327 kW): rated to cool 4332 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-12KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 603 nominal tons (2651 kW): rated to cool 1815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-12KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1206 nominal tons (5301 kW): rated to cool 3630 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 128.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-12LC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 645 nominal tons (2835 kW): rated to cool 1941 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-12LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1290 nominal tons (5670 kW): rated to cool 3882 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 137.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-12LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 676 nominal tons (2971 kW): rated to cool 2034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-12LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1351 nominal tons (5941 kW): rated to cool 4068 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 144.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-12MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 745 nominal tons (3273 kW): rated to cool 2241 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1218-12MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1489 nominal tons (6546 kW): rated to cool 4482 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 157.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-06JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-06JN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-06KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 172 nominal tons (758 kW): rated to cool 519 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-06KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-06LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 197 nominal tons (868 kW): rated to cool 594 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-06LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 395 nominal tons (1735 kW): rated to cool 1188 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-07KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 188 nominal tons (828 kW): rated to cool 567 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-07KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 377 nominal tons (1656 kW): rated to cool 1134 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-07LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-07LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 433 nominal tons (1902 kW): rated to cool 1302 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-07MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-07MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 470 nominal tons (2068 kW): rated to cool 1416 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-09KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 222 nominal tons (977 kW): rated to cool 669 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-09KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 445 nominal tons (1954 kW): rated to cool 1338 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-09LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-09MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 275 nominal tons (1209 kW): rated to cool 828 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-09MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 550 nominal tons (2419 kW): rated to cool 1656 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-10LN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 263 nominal tons (1157 kW): rated to cool 792 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-10LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 526 nominal tons (2313 kW): rated to cool 1584 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-10MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 288 nominal tons (1266 kW): rated to cool 867 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-10MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 576 nominal tons (2532 kW): rated to cool 1734 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-10NN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 309 nominal tons (1358 kW): rated to cool 930 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S15E-1285-10NN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 618 nominal tons (2716 kW): rated to cool 1860 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-07EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 166 nominal tons (732 kW): rated to cool 501 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-07FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 182 nominal tons (802 kW): rated to cool 549 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-07GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-07GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 207 nominal tons (911 kW): rated to cool 624 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-07HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 225 nominal tons (990 kW): rated to cool 678 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-07HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-09EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 194 nominal tons (854 kW): rated to cool 585 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-09FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 212 nominal tons (933 kW): rated to cool 639 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-09GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 228 nominal tons (1003 kW): rated to cool 687 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-09GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 242 nominal tons (1065 kW): rated to cool 729 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-09HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 262 nominal tons (1152 kW): rated to cool 789 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-09HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 286 nominal tons (1257 kW): rated to cool 861 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-10EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 203 nominal tons (894 kW): rated to cool 612 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-10FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 223 nominal tons (981 kW): rated to cool 672 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-10GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 240 nominal tons (1056 kW): rated to cool 723 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-10GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 254 nominal tons (1117 kW): rated to cool 765 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-10HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 275 nominal tons (1209 kW): rated to cool 828 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-10HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 301 nominal tons (1323 kW): rated to cool 906 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-10JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-11EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 633 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-11FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 230 nominal tons (1012 kW): rated to cool 693 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-11GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 247 nominal tons (1087 kW): rated to cool 744 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-11GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 262 nominal tons (1152 kW): rated to cool 789 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-11HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-11HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 310 nominal tons (1363 kW): rated to cool 933 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-11JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 354 nominal tons (1555 kW): rated to cool 1065 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-12FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-12GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-12GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-12HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 294 nominal tons (1293 kW): rated to cool 885 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-12HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 322 nominal tons (1415 kW): rated to cool 969 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1212-12JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 367 nominal tons (1612 kW): rated to cool 1104 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-07EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 251 nominal tons (1104 kW): rated to cool 756 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-07FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-07GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 317 nominal tons (1393 kW): rated to cool 954 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-07HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 372 nominal tons (1634 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-09EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 290 nominal tons (1275 kW): rated to cool 873 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-09FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-09GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 365 nominal tons (1604 kW): rated to cool 1098 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-09HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-10EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-10FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 334 nominal tons (1468 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-10GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-10HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 450 nominal tons (1976 kW): rated to cool 1353 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-10JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 512 nominal tons (2252 kW): rated to cool 1542 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-11EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 317 nominal tons (1393 kW): rated to cool 954 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-11FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 347 nominal tons (1525 kW): rated to cool 1044 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-11GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-11HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 468 nominal tons (2059 kW): rated to cool 1410 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-11JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 534 nominal tons (2348 kW): rated to cool 1608 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-12EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-12FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 360 nominal tons (1582 kW): rated to cool 1083 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-12GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 414 nominal tons (1818 kW): rated to cool 1245 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-12HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 484 nominal tons (2129 kW): rated to cool 1458 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1218-12JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 553 nominal tons (2432 kW): rated to cool 1665 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-06EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 92 nominal tons (403 kW): rated to cool 276 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-06FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 101 nominal tons (443 kW): rated to cool 303 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-06GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 117 nominal tons (513 kW): rated to cool 351 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-06HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 138 nominal tons (605 kW): rated to cool 414 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-07EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 101 nominal tons (443 kW): rated to cool 303 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-07FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 111 nominal tons (486 kW): rated to cool 333 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-07GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 128 nominal tons (561 kW): rated to cool 384 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-07HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-07JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-09FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 131 nominal tons (574 kW): rated to cool 393 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-09GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 150 nominal tons (662 kW): rated to cool 453 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-09HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 177 nominal tons (780 kW): rated to cool 534 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-09JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 203 nominal tons (894 kW): rated to cool 612 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-10FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 137 nominal tons (600 kW): rated to cool 411 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-10GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-10HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 185 nominal tons (815 kW): rated to cool 558 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-10JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 212 nominal tons (933 kW): rated to cool 639 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES15E-1285-10KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 232 nominal tons (1021 kW): rated to cool 699 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-06M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 383 nominal tons (1682 kW): rated to cool 1152 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-06M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 764 nominal tons (3361 kW): rated to cool 2301 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-06N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 411 nominal tons (1805 kW): rated to cool 1236 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-06N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 820 nominal tons (3606 kW): rated to cool 2469 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-06O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 435 nominal tons (1910 kW): rated to cool 1308 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-06O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 869 nominal tons (3821 kW): rated to cool 2616 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-07M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-07M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 848 nominal tons (3729 kW): rated to cool 2553 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-07N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 455 nominal tons (2002 kW): rated to cool 1371 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-07N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 910 nominal tons (4000 kW): rated to cool 2739 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-07O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 482 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1452 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-07O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 965 nominal tons (4241 kW): rated to cool 2904 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-07P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 528 nominal tons (2322 kW): rated to cool 1590 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1020-07P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1056 nominal tons (4644 kW): rated to cool 3180 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-06M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 437 nominal tons (1919 kW): rated to cool 1314 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-06M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 874 nominal tons (3842 kW): rated to cool 2631 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-06N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 939 nominal tons (4127 kW): rated to cool 2826 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-06O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 498 nominal tons (2191 kW): rated to cool 1500 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-06O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 996 nominal tons (4377 kW): rated to cool 2997 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 119.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-07N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 521 nominal tons (2291 kW): rated to cool 1569 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-07N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1043 nominal tons (4583 kW): rated to cool 3138 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-07O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 552 nominal tons (2427 kW): rated to cool 1662 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-07O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1105 nominal tons (4859 kW): rated to cool 3327 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-07P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 605 nominal tons (2659 kW): rated to cool 1821 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-07P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1211 nominal tons (5323 kW): rated to cool 3645 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 141.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-07Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 650 nominal tons (2857 kW): rated to cool 1956 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-07Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1299 nominal tons (5709 kW): rated to cool 3909 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 151.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-07R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 688 nominal tons (3023 kW): rated to cool 2070 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-07R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1375 nominal tons (6046 kW): rated to cool 4140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 159.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-10P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 754 nominal tons (3317 kW): rated to cool 2271 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-10P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1509 nominal tons (6633 kW): rated to cool 4542 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 170.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-10Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 807 nominal tons (3549 kW): rated to cool 2430 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-10Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1616 nominal tons (7102 kW): rated to cool 4863 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 181.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-10R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 853 nominal tons (3750 kW): rated to cool 2568 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-10R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1706 nominal tons (7501 kW): rated to cool 5136 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 191.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-10S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 913 nominal tons (4013 kW): rated to cool 2748 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-10S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1826 nominal tons (8027 kW): rated to cool 5496 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 204.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-12P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 809 nominal tons (3558 kW): rated to cool 2436 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-12P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1619 nominal tons (7115 kW): rated to cool 4872 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 180.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-12Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 866 nominal tons (3807 kW): rated to cool 2607 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 96.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-12Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1731 nominal tons (7610 kW): rated to cool 5211 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 192.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-12R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 914 nominal tons (4018 kW): rated to cool 2751 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-12R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1829 nominal tons (8040 kW): rated to cool 5505 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 203.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-12S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 978 nominal tons (4298 kW): rated to cool 2943 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-12S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1954 nominal tons (8592 kW): rated to cool 5883 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 216.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-13P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-13P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1672 nominal tons (7352 kW): rated to cool 5034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 185.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-13Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 894 nominal tons (3930 kW): rated to cool 2691 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-13Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1788 nominal tons (7860 kW): rated to cool 5382 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 198.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-13R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 944 nominal tons (4149 kW): rated to cool 2841 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-13R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1889 nominal tons (8303 kW): rated to cool 5685 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 208.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-13S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1010 nominal tons (4438 kW): rated to cool 3039 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-13S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2018 nominal tons (8872 kW): rated to cool 6075 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 222.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-14P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 869 nominal tons (3821 kW): rated to cool 2616 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 96.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-14P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1738 nominal tons (7641 kW): rated to cool 5232 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 192.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-14Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 930 nominal tons (4088 kW): rated to cool 2799 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-14Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1860 nominal tons (8176 kW): rated to cool 5598 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 205.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-14R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 982 nominal tons (4316 kW): rated to cool 2955 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-14R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1963 nominal tons (8631 kW): rated to cool 5910 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 216.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-14S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1052 nominal tons (4627 kW): rated to cool 3168 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-14S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2105 nominal tons (9253 kW): rated to cool 6336 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 230.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-14T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2286 nominal tons (10051 kW): rated to cool 6882 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 250.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1222-14T — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1143 nominal tons (5025 kW): rated to cool 3441 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-07O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 619 nominal tons (2721 kW): rated to cool 1863 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-07O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1237 nominal tons (5437 kW): rated to cool 3723 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 145.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-07P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 678 nominal tons (2979 kW): rated to cool 2040 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-07P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1355 nominal tons (5959 kW): rated to cool 4080 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 158.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-07Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 727 nominal tons (3194 kW): rated to cool 2187 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-07Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1454 nominal tons (6392 kW): rated to cool 4377 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 169.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-07R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 769 nominal tons (3382 kW): rated to cool 2316 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-07R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1540 nominal tons (6769 kW): rated to cool 4635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 179.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-12Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 992 nominal tons (4359 kW): rated to cool 2985 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-12Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1982 nominal tons (8715 kW): rated to cool 5967 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 221.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-12R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1047 nominal tons (4600 kW): rated to cool 3150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-12R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2092 nominal tons (9197 kW): rated to cool 6297 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 232.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-12S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1117 nominal tons (4912 kW): rated to cool 3363 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-12S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2235 nominal tons (9823 kW): rated to cool 6726 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 248.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-12T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2406 nominal tons (10577 kW): rated to cool 7242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 263.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-12T — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1203 nominal tons (5288 kW): rated to cool 3621 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-13Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1028 nominal tons (4517 kW): rated to cool 3093 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-13Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2055 nominal tons (9034 kW): rated to cool 6186 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 228.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-13R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1084 nominal tons (4767 kW): rated to cool 3264 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-13R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2168 nominal tons (9530 kW): rated to cool 6525 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 240.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-13S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1157 nominal tons (5087 kW): rated to cool 3483 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-13S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2314 nominal tons (10174 kW): rated to cool 6966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 255.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-13T — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1246 nominal tons (5477 kW): rated to cool 3750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-13T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2492 nominal tons (10953 kW): rated to cool 7500 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 271.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14Q — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1071 nominal tons (4710 kW): rated to cool 3225 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2143 nominal tons (9420 kW): rated to cool 6450 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 236.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14R — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1130 nominal tons (4968 kW): rated to cool 3402 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14R-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2260 nominal tons (9937 kW): rated to cool 6804 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 249.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1211 nominal tons (5323 kW): rated to cool 3645 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 132.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2423 nominal tons (10651 kW): rated to cool 7293 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 265.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14T — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1299 nominal tons (5709 kW): rated to cool 3909 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 141.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2596 nominal tons (11413 kW): rated to cool 7815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 283.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14U — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1369 nominal tons (6020 kW): rated to cool 4122 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14U-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2739 nominal tons (12040 kW): rated to cool 8244 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 298.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14W — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1389 nominal tons (6108 kW): rated to cool 4182 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 151.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-1424-14W-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2778 nominal tons (12211 kW): rated to cool 8361 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 303.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-05L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 292 nominal tons (1284 kW): rated to cool 879 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-05L-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-05M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 321 nominal tons (1411 kW): rated to cool 966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-05M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 641 nominal tons (2817 kW): rated to cool 1929 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-06L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-06L-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 656 nominal tons (2883 kW): rated to cool 1974 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-06M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 360 nominal tons (1582 kW): rated to cool 1083 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-06M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 721 nominal tons (3168 kW): rated to cool 2169 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-06N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-06N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 773 nominal tons (3400 kW): rated to cool 2328 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-06O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 405 nominal tons (1779 kW): rated to cool 1218 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-06O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 810 nominal tons (3562 kW): rated to cool 2439 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-07M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 399 nominal tons (1753 kW): rated to cool 1200 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-07M-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 797 nominal tons (3505 kW): rated to cool 2400 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-07N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 428 nominal tons (1880 kW): rated to cool 1287 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-07N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 855 nominal tons (3759 kW): rated to cool 2574 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-07O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 450 nominal tons (1976 kW): rated to cool 1353 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-07O-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 900 nominal tons (3956 kW): rated to cool 2709 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-07P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 482 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1452 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's S3E-8518-07P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 965 nominal tons (4241 kW): rated to cool 2904 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1020-06G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 205 nominal tons (903 kW): rated to cool 618 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1020-06H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 243 nominal tons (1069 kW): rated to cool 732 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1020-06J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1020-06K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1020-06L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 349 nominal tons (1533 kW): rated to cool 1050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1020-07G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 227 nominal tons (999 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1020-07H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1020-07J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 309 nominal tons (1358 kW): rated to cool 930 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1020-07K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 339 nominal tons (1490 kW): rated to cool 1020 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1020-07L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-06H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-06J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 317 nominal tons (1393 kW): rated to cool 954 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-06K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 349 nominal tons (1533 kW): rated to cool 1050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-06L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 398 nominal tons (1748 kW): rated to cool 1197 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-07J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 353 nominal tons (1551 kW): rated to cool 1062 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-07K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-07L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 443 nominal tons (1945 kW): rated to cool 1332 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-07M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 485 nominal tons (2134 kW): rated to cool 1461 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-10K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 489 nominal tons (2151 kW): rated to cool 1473 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-10L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 557 nominal tons (2449 kW): rated to cool 1677 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-10M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 609 nominal tons (2677 kW): rated to cool 1833 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-10N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 653 nominal tons (2870 kW): rated to cool 1965 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-10O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 691 nominal tons (3036 kW): rated to cool 2079 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-12K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 526 nominal tons (2313 kW): rated to cool 1584 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-12L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 598 nominal tons (2629 kW): rated to cool 1800 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-12M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 655 nominal tons (2879 kW): rated to cool 1971 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-12N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 701 nominal tons (3080 kW): rated to cool 2109 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-12O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 742 nominal tons (3260 kW): rated to cool 2232 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-13K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-13L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 618 nominal tons (2716 kW): rated to cool 1860 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-13M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 676 nominal tons (2971 kW): rated to cool 2034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-13N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 725 nominal tons (3185 kW): rated to cool 2181 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-13O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 766 nominal tons (3369 kW): rated to cool 2307 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-14L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 643 nominal tons (2826 kW): rated to cool 1935 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-14M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 704 nominal tons (3093 kW): rated to cool 2118 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-14N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 753 nominal tons (3312 kW): rated to cool 2268 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1222-14O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 796 nominal tons (3501 kW): rated to cool 2397 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-07J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 395 nominal tons (1735 kW): rated to cool 1188 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-07K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 434 nominal tons (1906 kW): rated to cool 1305 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-07L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 495 nominal tons (2178 kW): rated to cool 1491 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-07M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-07N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-12L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 689 nominal tons (3028 kW): rated to cool 2073 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-12M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 752 nominal tons (3308 kW): rated to cool 2265 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-12N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 805 nominal tons (3540 kW): rated to cool 2424 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-12O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 851 nominal tons (3742 kW): rated to cool 2562 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-12P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 928 nominal tons (4079 kW): rated to cool 2793 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 103.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-13L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 715 nominal tons (3141 kW): rated to cool 2151 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-13M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 780 nominal tons (3431 kW): rated to cool 2349 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-13N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 835 nominal tons (3672 kW): rated to cool 2514 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-13O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 882 nominal tons (3878 kW): rated to cool 2655 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-13P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 962 nominal tons (4228 kW): rated to cool 2895 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 107.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-14M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 814 nominal tons (3580 kW): rated to cool 2451 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-14N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 871 nominal tons (3829 kW): rated to cool 2622 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-14O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 921 nominal tons (4048 kW): rated to cool 2772 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-1424-14P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1004 nominal tons (4412 kW): rated to cool 3021 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-05G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-05H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-05J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 232 nominal tons (1021 kW): rated to cool 699 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-05K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 768 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-06G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 193 nominal tons (850 kW): rated to cool 582 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-06H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 229 nominal tons (1008 kW): rated to cool 690 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-06J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 261 nominal tons (1148 kW): rated to cool 786 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-06K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 287 nominal tons (1262 kW): rated to cool 864 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-07G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 215 nominal tons (946 kW): rated to cool 648 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-07H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 768 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-07J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 291 nominal tons (1279 kW): rated to cool 876 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-07K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's XES3E-8518-07L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 364 nominal tons (1599 kW): rated to cool 1095 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-102-L — a Series V cooling tower, 102 nominal tons (447 kW): rated to cool 306 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-107-L — a Series V cooling tower, 107 nominal tons (469 kW): rated to cool 321 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-116-M — a Series V cooling tower, 116 nominal tons (508 kW): rated to cool 348 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-132-L — a Series V cooling tower, 132 nominal tons (578 kW): rated to cool 396 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-14-F — a Series V cooling tower, 14 nominal tons (61 kW): rated to cool 42 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-145-M — a Series V cooling tower, 145 nominal tons (635 kW): rated to cool 435 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-155-N — a Series V cooling tower, 154 nominal tons (679 kW): rated to cool 465 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-166-N — a Series V cooling tower, 165 nominal tons (727 kW): rated to cool 498 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-176-O — a Series V cooling tower, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-19-G — a Series V cooling tower, 19 nominal tons (83 kW): rated to cool 57 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-24-G — a Series V cooling tower, 24 nominal tons (105 kW): rated to cool 72 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-28-H — a Series V cooling tower, 28 nominal tons (123 kW): rated to cool 84 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-32-H — a Series V cooling tower, 32 nominal tons (140 kW): rated to cool 96 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-41-J — a Series V cooling tower, 41 nominal tons (180 kW): rated to cool 123 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-52-J — a Series V cooling tower, 52 nominal tons (228 kW): rated to cool 156 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-57-K — a Series V cooling tower, 57 nominal tons (250 kW): rated to cool 171 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-65-J — a Series V cooling tower, 65 nominal tons (285 kW): rated to cool 195 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-75-K — a Series V cooling tower, 75 nominal tons (329 kW): rated to cool 225 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-78-K — a Series V cooling tower, 78 nominal tons (342 kW): rated to cool 234 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT0-88-L — a Series V cooling tower, 88 nominal tons (386 kW): rated to cool 264 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 9.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-1020-P — a Series V cooling tower, 1017 nominal tons (4469 kW): rated to cool 3060 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-1125-P — a Series V cooling tower, 1121 nominal tons (4929 kW): rated to cool 3375 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-1200-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 1196 nominal tons (5258 kW): rated to cool 3600 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-1245-R — a Series V cooling tower, 1241 nominal tons (5455 kW): rated to cool 3735 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-1335-S — a Series V cooling tower, 1331 nominal tons (5849 kW): rated to cool 4005 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 137.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-275-P — a Series V cooling tower, 274 nominal tons (1205 kW): rated to cool 825 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-307-O — a Series V cooling tower, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-340-P — a Series V cooling tower, 339 nominal tons (1490 kW): rated to cool 1020 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-375-P — a Series V cooling tower, 374 nominal tons (1643 kW): rated to cool 1125 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-400-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 399 nominal tons (1753 kW): rated to cool 1200 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-415-R — a Series V cooling tower, 414 nominal tons (1818 kW): rated to cool 1245 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-416-O — a Series V cooling tower, 415 nominal tons (1823 kW): rated to cool 1248 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-478-N — a Series V cooling tower, 476 nominal tons (2094 kW): rated to cool 1434 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-507-O — a Series V cooling tower, 505 nominal tons (2221 kW): rated to cool 1521 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-550-P — a Series V cooling tower, 548 nominal tons (2410 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-560-O — a Series V cooling tower, 558 nominal tons (2454 kW): rated to cool 1680 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-680-P — a Series V cooling tower, 678 nominal tons (2979 kW): rated to cool 2040 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-750-P — a Series V cooling tower, 748 nominal tons (3286 kW): rated to cool 2250 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-800-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 797 nominal tons (3505 kW): rated to cool 2400 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-825-P — a Series V cooling tower, 822 nominal tons (3615 kW): rated to cool 2475 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-830-R — a Series V cooling tower, 827 nominal tons (3637 kW): rated to cool 2490 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-921-O — a Series V cooling tower, 918 nominal tons (4035 kW): rated to cool 2763 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M1044-P — a Series V cooling tower, 1041 nominal tons (4574 kW): rated to cool 3132 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M1050-O — a Series V cooling tower, 1047 nominal tons (4600 kW): rated to cool 3150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M1056-P — a Series V cooling tower, 1052 nominal tons (4627 kW): rated to cool 3168 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M1113-P — a Series V cooling tower, 1109 nominal tons (4876 kW): rated to cool 3339 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M1137-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 1133 nominal tons (4982 kW): rated to cool 3411 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 107.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M1194-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 1190 nominal tons (5231 kW): rated to cool 3582 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M1260-R — a Series V cooling tower, 1256 nominal tons (5521 kW): rated to cool 3780 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M316-O — a Series V cooling tower, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M328-O — a Series V cooling tower, 327 nominal tons (1437 kW): rated to cool 984 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M348-P — a Series V cooling tower, 347 nominal tons (1525 kW): rated to cool 1044 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M350-O — a Series V cooling tower, 349 nominal tons (1533 kW): rated to cool 1050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M352-P — a Series V cooling tower, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M371-P — a Series V cooling tower, 370 nominal tons (1625 kW): rated to cool 1113 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M379-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 378 nominal tons (1661 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M398-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 397 nominal tons (1744 kW): rated to cool 1194 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M420-R — a Series V cooling tower, 419 nominal tons (1840 kW): rated to cool 1260 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M431-N — a Series V cooling tower, 430 nominal tons (1888 kW): rated to cool 1293 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M455-O — a Series V cooling tower, 453 nominal tons (1994 kW): rated to cool 1365 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M484-N — a Series V cooling tower, 482 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1452 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M514-O — a Series V cooling tower, 512 nominal tons (2252 kW): rated to cool 1542 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M515-N — a Series V cooling tower, 513 nominal tons (2256 kW): rated to cool 1545 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M533-N — a Series V cooling tower, 531 nominal tons (2335 kW): rated to cool 1599 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M544-O — a Series V cooling tower, 542 nominal tons (2383 kW): rated to cool 1632 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M557-O — a Series V cooling tower, 555 nominal tons (2440 kW): rated to cool 1671 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M560-P — a Series V cooling tower, 558 nominal tons (2454 kW): rated to cool 1680 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M595-P — a Series V cooling tower, 593 nominal tons (2607 kW): rated to cool 1785 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M610-P — a Series V cooling tower, 608 nominal tons (2673 kW): rated to cool 1830 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M632-O — a Series V cooling tower, 630 nominal tons (2769 kW): rated to cool 1896 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M656-O — a Series V cooling tower, 654 nominal tons (2874 kW): rated to cool 1968 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M696-P — a Series V cooling tower, 694 nominal tons (3049 kW): rated to cool 2088 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M700-O — a Series V cooling tower, 698 nominal tons (3067 kW): rated to cool 2100 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M704-P — a Series V cooling tower, 702 nominal tons (3084 kW): rated to cool 2112 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M742-P — a Series V cooling tower, 740 nominal tons (3251 kW): rated to cool 2226 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M758-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 755 nominal tons (3321 kW): rated to cool 2274 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M796-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 793 nominal tons (3488 kW): rated to cool 2388 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M840-R — a Series V cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M948-O — a Series V cooling tower, 945 nominal tons (4154 kW): rated to cool 2844 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-M984-O — a Series V cooling tower, 981 nominal tons (4311 kW): rated to cool 2952 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N209-P — a Series V cooling tower, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N220-O — a Series V cooling tower, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N240-P — a Series V cooling tower, 239 nominal tons (1052 kW): rated to cool 720 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N255-P — a Series V cooling tower, 254 nominal tons (1117 kW): rated to cool 765 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N301-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 300 nominal tons (1319 kW): rated to cool 903 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N325-P — a Series V cooling tower, 324 nominal tons (1424 kW): rated to cool 975 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N346-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N370-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N395-R — a Series V cooling tower, 394 nominal tons (1731 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N418-P — a Series V cooling tower, 417 nominal tons (1831 kW): rated to cool 1254 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N440-O — a Series V cooling tower, 439 nominal tons (1928 kW): rated to cool 1320 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N480-P — a Series V cooling tower, 478 nominal tons (2103 kW): rated to cool 1440 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VT1-N510-P — a Series V cooling tower, 508 nominal tons (2235 kW): rated to cool 1530 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-016-E — a Series V cooling tower, 16 nominal tons (70 kW): rated to cool 48 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-021-F — a Series V cooling tower, 21 nominal tons (92 kW): rated to cool 63 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-027-F — a Series V cooling tower, 27 nominal tons (118 kW): rated to cool 81 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-030-G — a Series V cooling tower, 30 nominal tons (131 kW): rated to cool 90 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-034-H — a Series V cooling tower, 34 nominal tons (149 kW): rated to cool 102 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-039-H — a Series V cooling tower, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-045-H — a Series V cooling tower, 45 nominal tons (197 kW): rated to cool 135 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-051-G — a Series V cooling tower, 51 nominal tons (223 kW): rated to cool 153 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-059-H — a Series V cooling tower, 59 nominal tons (259 kW): rated to cool 177 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-066-J — a Series V cooling tower, 66 nominal tons (289 kW): rated to cool 198 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-072-K — a Series V cooling tower, 72 nominal tons (315 kW): rated to cool 216 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-079-K — a Series V cooling tower, 79 nominal tons (346 kW): rated to cool 237 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-082-K — a Series V cooling tower, 82 nominal tons (359 kW): rated to cool 246 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-092-L — a Series V cooling tower, 92 nominal tons (403 kW): rated to cool 276 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-095-K — a Series V cooling tower, 95 nominal tons (416 kW): rated to cool 285 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-103-K — a Series V cooling tower, 103 nominal tons (451 kW): rated to cool 309 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-116-L — a Series V cooling tower, 116 nominal tons (508 kW): rated to cool 348 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-126-M — a Series V cooling tower, 126 nominal tons (552 kW): rated to cool 378 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-137-M — a Series V cooling tower, 137 nominal tons (600 kW): rated to cool 411 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-152-M — a Series V cooling tower, 151 nominal tons (666 kW): rated to cool 456 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-171-L — a Series V cooling tower, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-185-M — a Series V cooling tower, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-198-N — a Series V cooling tower, 197 nominal tons (868 kW): rated to cool 594 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-209-O — a Series V cooling tower, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-227-O — a Series V cooling tower, 226 nominal tons (995 kW): rated to cool 681 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-245-P — a Series V cooling tower, 244 nominal tons (1073 kW): rated to cool 735 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VTL-272-P — a Series V cooling tower, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-009-12E — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 4 nominal tons (18 kW): rated to cool 12 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-009-12F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 5 nominal tons (22 kW): rated to cool 15 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-009-12G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 5 nominal tons (22 kW): rated to cool 15 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-009-22F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 6 nominal tons (26 kW): rated to cool 18 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-009-22G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 7 nominal tons (31 kW): rated to cool 21 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-009-32G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 8 nominal tons (35 kW): rated to cool 24 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-009-42G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 9 nominal tons (39 kW): rated to cool 27 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-018-12F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 9 nominal tons (39 kW): rated to cool 27 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-018-12G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 11 nominal tons (48 kW): rated to cool 33 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-018-12H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 14 nominal tons (61 kW): rated to cool 42 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-018-22H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 17 nominal tons (74 kW): rated to cool 51 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-018-22J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 20 nominal tons (88 kW): rated to cool 60 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-018-32G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 16 nominal tons (70 kW): rated to cool 48 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-018-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 19 nominal tons (83 kW): rated to cool 57 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-018-32J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 22 nominal tons (96 kW): rated to cool 66 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-018-42H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 21 nominal tons (92 kW): rated to cool 63 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-018-42J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 24 nominal tons (105 kW): rated to cool 72 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-027-22H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 24 nominal tons (105 kW): rated to cool 72 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-027-22J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 28 nominal tons (123 kW): rated to cool 84 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-027-22K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 32 nominal tons (140 kW): rated to cool 96 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-027-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 26 nominal tons (114 kW): rated to cool 78 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-027-32J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 31 nominal tons (136 kW): rated to cool 93 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-027-32K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 35 nominal tons (153 kW): rated to cool 105 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-027-42H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 28 nominal tons (123 kW): rated to cool 84 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-027-42J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 33 nominal tons (145 kW): rated to cool 99 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-027-42K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 37 nominal tons (162 kW): rated to cool 111 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-036-21L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 41 nominal tons (180 kW): rated to cool 123 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-036-22J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 35 nominal tons (153 kW): rated to cool 105 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 9.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-036-22K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-036-22L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 47 nominal tons (206 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-036-31L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 44 nominal tons (193 kW): rated to cool 132 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-036-32J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 37 nominal tons (162 kW): rated to cool 111 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 9.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-036-41L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 47 nominal tons (206 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-036-51L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 49 nominal tons (215 kW): rated to cool 147 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-048-21L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 48 nominal tons (210 kW): rated to cool 144 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-048-21M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 55 nominal tons (241 kW): rated to cool 165 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-048-31M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 59 nominal tons (259 kW): rated to cool 177 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-048-31N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 65 nominal tons (285 kW): rated to cool 195 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-048-41M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 63 nominal tons (276 kW): rated to cool 189 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-048-41N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 70 nominal tons (307 kW): rated to cool 210 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-072-21M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 62 nominal tons (272 kW): rated to cool 186 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-072-21N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 69 nominal tons (302 kW): rated to cool 207 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-072-21O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 75 nominal tons (329 kW): rated to cool 225 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-072-31M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 67 nominal tons (294 kW): rated to cool 201 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-072-31N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-072-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 81 nominal tons (355 kW): rated to cool 243 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-072-41M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 72 nominal tons (315 kW): rated to cool 216 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-072-41N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 80 nominal tons (351 kW): rated to cool 240 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-072-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 86 nominal tons (377 kW): rated to cool 258 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-096-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 81 nominal tons (355 kW): rated to cool 243 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-096-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 93 nominal tons (407 kW): rated to cool 279 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-096-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 102 nominal tons (447 kW): rated to cool 306 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-096-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 87 nominal tons (381 kW): rated to cool 261 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-096-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 297 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-096-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-096-51P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 104 nominal tons (456 kW): rated to cool 312 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-096-51Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 114 nominal tons (499 kW): rated to cool 342 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1012N-4D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 127 nominal tons (556 kW): rated to cool 381 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1012N-5D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 145 nominal tons (635 kW): rated to cool 435 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1012N-6D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 176 nominal tons (776 kW): rated to cool 531 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1012N-7D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 191 nominal tons (841 kW): rated to cool 576 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1012N-8D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 200 nominal tons (881 kW): rated to cool 603 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1018N-4D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1018N-5D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 248 nominal tons (1091 kW): rated to cool 747 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1018N-6D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 272 nominal tons (1196 kW): rated to cool 819 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1018N-7D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 293 nominal tons (1288 kW): rated to cool 882 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1018N-8D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1024N-4D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 254 nominal tons (1117 kW): rated to cool 765 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1024N-5D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 289 nominal tons (1271 kW): rated to cool 870 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1024N-6D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 354 nominal tons (1555 kW): rated to cool 1065 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1024N-7D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1024N-8D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1206 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1036N-4D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 440 nominal tons (1932 kW): rated to cool 1323 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1036N-5D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 496 nominal tons (2182 kW): rated to cool 1494 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1036N-6D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 544 nominal tons (2392 kW): rated to cool 1638 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1036N-7D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 587 nominal tons (2581 kW): rated to cool 1767 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 121.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-1036N-8D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 612 nominal tons (2690 kW): rated to cool 1842 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 116 nominal tons (508 kW): rated to cool 348 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144-21Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 129 nominal tons (565 kW): rated to cool 387 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144-21R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 141 nominal tons (618 kW): rated to cool 423 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 127 nominal tons (556 kW): rated to cool 381 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 140 nominal tons (613 kW): rated to cool 420 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144-31R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 152 nominal tons (670 kW): rated to cool 459 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 137 nominal tons (600 kW): rated to cool 411 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 150 nominal tons (662 kW): rated to cool 453 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144-41R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 163 nominal tons (719 kW): rated to cool 492 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144N-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 113 nominal tons (495 kW): rated to cool 339 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144N-21Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 127 nominal tons (556 kW): rated to cool 381 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144N-21R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 139 nominal tons (609 kW): rated to cool 417 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144N-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 122 nominal tons (535 kW): rated to cool 366 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144N-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 136 nominal tons (596 kW): rated to cool 408 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144N-31R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 148 nominal tons (648 kW): rated to cool 444 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144N-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144N-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 144 nominal tons (631 kW): rated to cool 432 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-144N-41R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 156 nominal tons (688 kW): rated to cool 471 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-192-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 162 nominal tons (714 kW): rated to cool 489 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-192-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-192-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 204 nominal tons (898 kW): rated to cool 615 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-192-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-192-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 197 nominal tons (868 kW): rated to cool 594 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-192-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-192-51P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 206 nominal tons (907 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-192-51Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 227 nominal tons (999 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-216-21N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 171 nominal tons (754 kW): rated to cool 516 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-216-21O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 187 nominal tons (824 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-216-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-216-31N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-216-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-216-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 230 nominal tons (1012 kW): rated to cool 693 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-216-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 214 nominal tons (942 kW): rated to cool 645 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-216-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 244 nominal tons (1073 kW): rated to cool 735 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-216-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 231 nominal tons (1016 kW): rated to cool 696 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288-21Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 258 nominal tons (1135 kW): rated to cool 777 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288-21R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 281 nominal tons (1236 kW): rated to cool 846 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 253 nominal tons (1113 kW): rated to cool 762 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 280 nominal tons (1231 kW): rated to cool 843 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288-31R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288-41R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 324 nominal tons (1424 kW): rated to cool 975 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288N-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 225 nominal tons (990 kW): rated to cool 678 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288N-21Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 252 nominal tons (1108 kW): rated to cool 759 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288N-21R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288N-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 243 nominal tons (1069 kW): rated to cool 732 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288N-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288N-31R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 294 nominal tons (1293 kW): rated to cool 885 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288N-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288N-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1262 kW): rated to cool 864 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-288N-41R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 312 nominal tons (1371 kW): rated to cool 939 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-432-21N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 342 nominal tons (1503 kW): rated to cool 1029 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-432-21O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-432-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 433 nominal tons (1902 kW): rated to cool 1302 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-432-31N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 370 nominal tons (1625 kW): rated to cool 1113 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-432-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 403 nominal tons (1770 kW): rated to cool 1212 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-432-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 460 nominal tons (2024 kW): rated to cool 1386 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 128.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-432-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-432-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 488 nominal tons (2147 kW): rated to cool 1470 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VF1-432-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 541 nominal tons (2379 kW): rated to cool 1629 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 136.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-012-02F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 4 nominal tons (18 kW): rated to cool 12 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-012-02G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 5 nominal tons (22 kW): rated to cool 15 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-012-12F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 7 nominal tons (31 kW): rated to cool 21 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-012-12H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 9 nominal tons (39 kW): rated to cool 27 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-012-22F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 8 nominal tons (35 kW): rated to cool 24 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-012-22H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 11 nominal tons (48 kW): rated to cool 33 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-012-32G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 12 nominal tons (53 kW): rated to cool 36 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-012-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 14 nominal tons (61 kW): rated to cool 42 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-024-12H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 17 nominal tons (74 kW): rated to cool 51 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-024-22H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 21 nominal tons (92 kW): rated to cool 63 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-024-22J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 24 nominal tons (105 kW): rated to cool 72 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-024-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 26 nominal tons (114 kW): rated to cool 78 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-024-32J — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 30 nominal tons (131 kW): rated to cool 90 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-036-22K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 35 nominal tons (153 kW): rated to cool 105 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-036-22L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 40 nominal tons (175 kW): rated to cool 120 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-036-22M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 46 nominal tons (202 kW): rated to cool 138 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-036-31M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 49 nominal tons (215 kW): rated to cool 147 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-036-32K — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 43 nominal tons (188 kW): rated to cool 129 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-036-32L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 50 nominal tons (219 kW): rated to cool 150 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-048-22L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 43 nominal tons (188 kW): rated to cool 129 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-048-31L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 46 nominal tons (202 kW): rated to cool 138 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-048-31M — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 52 nominal tons (228 kW): rated to cool 156 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-048-41L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 49 nominal tons (215 kW): rated to cool 147 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-072-22N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 69 nominal tons (302 kW): rated to cool 207 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-072-22O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 75 nominal tons (329 kW): rated to cool 225 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-072-31N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 75 nominal tons (329 kW): rated to cool 225 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-072-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 81 nominal tons (355 kW): rated to cool 243 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-072-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 92 nominal tons (403 kW): rated to cool 276 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-072-41N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 79 nominal tons (346 kW): rated to cool 237 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-072-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 86 nominal tons (377 kW): rated to cool 258 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-072-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 97 nominal tons (425 kW): rated to cool 291 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-096-41N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 86 nominal tons (377 kW): rated to cool 258 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-096-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 94 nominal tons (412 kW): rated to cool 282 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's VFL-096-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 108 nominal tons (473 kW): rated to cool 324 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806A-12D-K — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806B-32D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 87 nominal tons (381 kW): rated to cool 261 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809B-24D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 119 nominal tons (521 kW): rated to cool 357 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806A-16D-K — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 47 nominal tons (206 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806B-36D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 90 nominal tons (394 kW): rated to cool 270 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806A-20D-K — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 53 nominal tons (232 kW): rated to cool 159 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809B-28D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 135 nominal tons (591 kW): rated to cool 405 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809A-12D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 72 nominal tons (315 kW): rated to cool 216 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806A-24D-K — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 63 nominal tons (276 kW): rated to cool 189 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809B-32D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 140 nominal tons (613 kW): rated to cool 420 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809A-16D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 83 nominal tons (364 kW): rated to cool 249 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806B-12D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 47 nominal tons (206 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809B-36D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 145 nominal tons (635 kW): rated to cool 435 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809A-20D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 91 nominal tons (399 kW): rated to cool 273 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806B-16D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 57 nominal tons (250 kW): rated to cool 171 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809B-24T-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 119 nominal tons (521 kW): rated to cool 357 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809A-24T-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 97 nominal tons (425 kW): rated to cool 291 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806B-20D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 65 nominal tons (285 kW): rated to cool 195 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809B-30T-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806B-24D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 78 nominal tons (342 kW): rated to cool 234 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809B-16D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 297 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0806B-28D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 83 nominal tons (364 kW): rated to cool 249 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809B-36T-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 138 nominal tons (605 kW): rated to cool 414 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0809B-20D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-24D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 160 nominal tons (705 kW): rated to cool 483 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818A-12D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 172 nominal tons (758 kW): rated to cool 519 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812A-12D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 108 nominal tons (473 kW): rated to cool 324 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818A-16D-K — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 160 nominal tons (705 kW): rated to cool 483 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-28D-K — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 148 nominal tons (648 kW): rated to cool 444 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818A-23T-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812A-16D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 122 nominal tons (535 kW): rated to cool 366 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818A-24T-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 225 nominal tons (990 kW): rated to cool 678 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-24T-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 177 nominal tons (780 kW): rated to cool 534 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812A-20D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 131 nominal tons (574 kW): rated to cool 393 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818A-16Q-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818A-23Q-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812A-23T-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 132 nominal tons (578 kW): rated to cool 396 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-30T-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 190 nominal tons (837 kW): rated to cool 573 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818A-24Q-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 217 nominal tons (955 kW): rated to cool 654 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812A-16Q-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 103 nominal tons (451 kW): rated to cool 309 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818A-32Q-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 236 nominal tons (1038 kW): rated to cool 711 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-36T-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 200 nominal tons (881 kW): rated to cool 603 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812A-23Q-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 125 nominal tons (548 kW): rated to cool 375 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818A-36H-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 232 nominal tons (1021 kW): rated to cool 699 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-16Q-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 125 nominal tons (548 kW): rated to cool 375 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818B-12D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 205 nominal tons (903 kW): rated to cool 618 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-12D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 132 nominal tons (578 kW): rated to cool 396 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818B-24T-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 274 nominal tons (1205 kW): rated to cool 825 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-23Q-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 152 nominal tons (670 kW): rated to cool 459 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818B-30T-K — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 226 nominal tons (995 kW): rated to cool 681 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-16D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 149 nominal tons (653 kW): rated to cool 447 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818B-16Q-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 203 nominal tons (894 kW): rated to cool 612 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-32Q-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 186 nominal tons (819 kW): rated to cool 561 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0812B-20D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 162 nominal tons (714 kW): rated to cool 489 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212B-23Q-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 190 nominal tons (837 kW): rated to cool 573 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818B-24Q-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 264 nominal tons (1161 kW): rated to cool 795 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-23Q-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818B-32Q-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 288 nominal tons (1266 kW): rated to cool 867 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-12D-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 183 nominal tons (806 kW): rated to cool 552 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-24T-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 251 nominal tons (1104 kW): rated to cool 756 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-0818B-36H-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 283 nominal tons (1244 kW): rated to cool 852 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-16D-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 207 nominal tons (911 kW): rated to cool 624 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-30T-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212B-12D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 162 nominal tons (714 kW): rated to cool 489 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-20D-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 225 nominal tons (990 kW): rated to cool 678 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212B-16D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-36T-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-24D-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212B-20D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 199 nominal tons (876 kW): rated to cool 600 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-16Q-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212B-24D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 229 nominal tons (1008 kW): rated to cool 690 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-28D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 254 nominal tons (1117 kW): rated to cool 765 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-32D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 234 nominal tons (1030 kW): rated to cool 705 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212B-28D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 240 nominal tons (1056 kW): rated to cool 723 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-24Q-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-36D-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 220 nominal tons (968 kW): rated to cool 663 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212B-23T-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 200 nominal tons (881 kW): rated to cool 603 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-32Q-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-23T-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 228 nominal tons (1003 kW): rated to cool 687 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212B-24T-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1212C-36H-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218C-20D-K — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 244 nominal tons (1073 kW): rated to cool 735 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218B-12D-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218C-24T-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1766 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218B-16D-N — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 281 nominal tons (1236 kW): rated to cool 846 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218B-20D-K — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 230 nominal tons (1012 kW): rated to cool 693 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218C-30T-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 390 nominal tons (1713 kW): rated to cool 1173 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218C-36T-L — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 332 nominal tons (1459 kW): rated to cool 999 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218B-23T-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 333 nominal tons (1463 kW): rated to cool 1002 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218B-24T-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 346 nominal tons (1520 kW): rated to cool 1041 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218C-23Q-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218B-16Q-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 261 nominal tons (1148 kW): rated to cool 786 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218C-16Q-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 295 nominal tons (1297 kW): rated to cool 888 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218B-23Q-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 317 nominal tons (1393 kW): rated to cool 954 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218B-24Q-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 334 nominal tons (1468 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218C-24Q-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218B-36H-O — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 359 nominal tons (1577 kW): rated to cool 1080 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218C-32Q-P — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 423 nominal tons (1858 kW): rated to cool 1272 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218C-36H-K — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 272 nominal tons (1196 kW): rated to cool 819 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's FXV-1218C-16D-M — a FXV closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0406N-3D1DZ-G1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 18 nominal tons (79 kW): rated to cool 54 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 167 nominal tons (736 kW): rated to cool 504 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D3ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0406N-5D4DZ-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 33 nominal tons (145 kW): rated to cool 99 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-6D1ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 185 nominal tons (815 kW): rated to cool 558 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 293 nominal tons (1288 kW): rated to cool 882 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-2D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0406N-6D2DZ-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 35 nominal tons (153 kW): rated to cool 105 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D1DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 136 nominal tons (596 kW): rated to cool 408 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 335 nominal tons (1472 kW): rated to cool 1008 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0406N-3D3EZ-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 23 nominal tons (101 kW): rated to cool 69 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D1DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 143 nominal tons (627 kW): rated to cool 429 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-6D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 370 nominal tons (1625 kW): rated to cool 1113 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 368 nominal tons (1617 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0406N-4D1EZ-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 27 nominal tons (118 kW): rated to cool 81 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 148 nominal tons (648 kW): rated to cool 444 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D2ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 406 nominal tons (1783 kW): rated to cool 1221 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-2D4DZ-G2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 36 nominal tons (158 kW): rated to cool 108 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 153 nominal tons (675 kW): rated to cool 462 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D1DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-5D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 446 nominal tons (1958 kW): rated to cool 1341 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-3D2DZ-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 49 nominal tons (215 kW): rated to cool 147 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-5D1DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 187 nominal tons (824 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 295 nominal tons (1297 kW): rated to cool 888 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-6D1ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 462 nominal tons (2033 kW): rated to cool 1392 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-4D1DZ-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 55 nominal tons (241 kW): rated to cool 165 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D1DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 156 nominal tons (688 kW): rated to cool 471 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D2DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 356 nominal tons (1564 kW): rated to cool 1071 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-4D3EZ-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 62 nominal tons (272 kW): rated to cool 186 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D3DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 193 nominal tons (850 kW): rated to cool 582 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-5D1DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1766 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-4D2EZ-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 67 nominal tons (294 kW): rated to cool 201 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-2D4ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 120 nominal tons (526 kW): rated to cool 360 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D1DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 313 nominal tons (1376 kW): rated to cool 942 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D2DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 481 nominal tons (2116 kW): rated to cool 1449 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-5D1EZ-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 70 nominal tons (307 kW): rated to cool 210 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-2D4ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 125 nominal tons (548 kW): rated to cool 375 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D3DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D2DS-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 144.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-6D1EZ-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 76 nominal tons (333 kW): rated to cool 228 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D3ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 161 nominal tons (710 kW): rated to cool 486 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D4DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 61 nominal tons (267 kW): rated to cool 183 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-2D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 249 nominal tons (1095 kW): rated to cool 750 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4DS-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 535 nominal tons (2353 kW): rated to cool 1611 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-4D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 81 nominal tons (355 kW): rated to cool 243 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 172 nominal tons (758 kW): rated to cool 519 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D3ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-5D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 88 nominal tons (386 kW): rated to cool 264 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D4ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 183 nominal tons (806 kW): rated to cool 552 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D1ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 69 nominal tons (302 kW): rated to cool 207 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D2ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D2ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 562 nominal tons (2471 kW): rated to cool 1692 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 147.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-5D3ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 88 nominal tons (386 kW): rated to cool 264 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-5D4ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 222 nominal tons (977 kW): rated to cool 669 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 368 nominal tons (1617 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 592 nominal tons (2603 kW): rated to cool 1782 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 138.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D3ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-6D1ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 231 nominal tons (1016 kW): rated to cool 696 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D2ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 406 nominal tons (1783 kW): rated to cool 1221 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D2ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 133.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-5D1ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 91 nominal tons (399 kW): rated to cool 273 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D2DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 177 nominal tons (780 kW): rated to cool 534 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-5D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 446 nominal tons (1958 kW): rated to cool 1341 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D2ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 641 nominal tons (2817 kW): rated to cool 1929 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 140.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-6D1ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 297 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D4DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-6D1ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 462 nominal tons (2033 kW): rated to cool 1392 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D4ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 666 nominal tons (2927 kW): rated to cool 2004 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 97 nominal tons (425 kW): rated to cool 291 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D2DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 240 nominal tons (1056 kW): rated to cool 723 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 251 nominal tons (1104 kW): rated to cool 756 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-6D3ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3089 kW): rated to cool 2115 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D3DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 110 nominal tons (482 kW): rated to cool 330 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D2DS-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 252 nominal tons (1108 kW): rated to cool 759 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 237 nominal tons (1043 kW): rated to cool 714 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-6D1ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 719 nominal tons (3159 kW): rated to cool 2163 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D3DS-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D3DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D2DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 356 nominal tons (1564 kW): rated to cool 1071 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 164 nominal tons (723 kW): rated to cool 495 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4DS-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 268 nominal tons (1179 kW): rated to cool 807 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-2D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1766 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D3ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 125 nominal tons (548 kW): rated to cool 375 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D4ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 212 nominal tons (933 kW): rated to cool 639 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 633 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D2DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 481 nominal tons (2116 kW): rated to cool 1449 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D1ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 153 nominal tons (675 kW): rated to cool 462 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D1ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D2ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 310 nominal tons (1363 kW): rated to cool 933 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D2DS-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 144.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 179 nominal tons (789 kW): rated to cool 540 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D2ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 281 nominal tons (1236 kW): rated to cool 846 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D2ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 136 nominal tons (596 kW): rated to cool 408 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 293 nominal tons (1288 kW): rated to cool 882 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4DS-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 535 nominal tons (2353 kW): rated to cool 1611 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 190 nominal tons (837 kW): rated to cool 573 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D2ES-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 308 nominal tons (1354 kW): rated to cool 927 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 335 nominal tons (1472 kW): rated to cool 1008 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-5D1ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D2ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 321 nominal tons (1411 kW): rated to cool 966 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-6D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 370 nominal tons (1625 kW): rated to cool 1113 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D1ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-6D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 213 nominal tons (938 kW): rated to cool 642 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 333 nominal tons (1463 kW): rated to cool 1002 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D2ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 562 nominal tons (2471 kW): rated to cool 1692 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 147.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 119 nominal tons (521 kW): rated to cool 357 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-6D3ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D1DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 592 nominal tons (2603 kW): rated to cool 1782 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 138.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D4DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 126 nominal tons (552 kW): rated to cool 378 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-6D1ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 359 nominal tons (1577 kW): rated to cool 1080 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 295 nominal tons (1297 kW): rated to cool 888 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D2ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 133.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D3DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 237 nominal tons (1043 kW): rated to cool 714 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D2ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 641 nominal tons (2817 kW): rated to cool 1929 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 140.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-2D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 90 nominal tons (394 kW): rated to cool 270 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 251 nominal tons (1104 kW): rated to cool 756 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-5D1DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D4ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 666 nominal tons (2927 kW): rated to cool 2004 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-2D4ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 106 nominal tons (464 kW): rated to cool 318 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D3DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D1DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 313 nominal tons (1376 kW): rated to cool 942 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-6D3ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3089 kW): rated to cool 2115 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D2ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 155 nominal tons (683 kW): rated to cool 468 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-2D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D3DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-6D1ES-R2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 719 nominal tons (3159 kW): rated to cool 2163 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 135.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D2ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 140 nominal tons (613 kW): rated to cool 420 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 633 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 147 nominal tons (644 kW): rated to cool 441 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D2ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 310 nominal tons (1363 kW): rated to cool 933 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 249 nominal tons (1095 kW): rated to cool 750 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0406N-3D1EZ-G1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 20 nominal tons (88 kW): rated to cool 60 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-2D2DS-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 75 nominal tons (329 kW): rated to cool 225 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 144 nominal tons (631 kW): rated to cool 432 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 264 nominal tons (1161 kW): rated to cool 795 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0406N-4D2DZ-G1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 23 nominal tons (101 kW): rated to cool 69 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-2D4ES-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 88 nominal tons (386 kW): rated to cool 264 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 152 nominal tons (670 kW): rated to cool 459 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 285 nominal tons (1253 kW): rated to cool 858 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0406N-5D1EZ-G1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 27 nominal tons (118 kW): rated to cool 81 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D1DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D4DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 138 nominal tons (605 kW): rated to cool 414 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4ES-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0406N-6D2DZ-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 32 nominal tons (140 kW): rated to cool 96 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D2DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 103 nominal tons (451 kW): rated to cool 309 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D4ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-5D2ES-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 329 nominal tons (1446 kW): rated to cool 990 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-3D1DZ-G2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 43 nominal tons (188 kW): rated to cool 129 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 121 nominal tons (530 kW): rated to cool 363 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 161 nominal tons (710 kW): rated to cool 486 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-3D2EZ-G2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 48 nominal tons (210 kW): rated to cool 144 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D2ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 129 nominal tons (565 kW): rated to cool 387 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D2DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 245 nominal tons (1078 kW): rated to cool 738 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-4D1EZ-G2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 54 nominal tons (237 kW): rated to cool 162 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-3D4DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 118 nominal tons (517 kW): rated to cool 354 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D3ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-5D3EZ-G2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 59 nominal tons (259 kW): rated to cool 177 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D1DS-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-4D4ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 187 nominal tons (824 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1262 kW): rated to cool 864 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0412N-6D1DZ-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 65 nominal tons (285 kW): rated to cool 195 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D1DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 134 nominal tons (587 kW): rated to cool 402 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-5D2ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-2D3DS-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D1ES-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 118 nominal tons (517 kW): rated to cool 354 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-5D4DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D1DS-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 50 nominal tons (219 kW): rated to cool 150 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D1ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 145 nominal tons (635 kW): rated to cool 435 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-5D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D1DS-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 54 nominal tons (237 kW): rated to cool 162 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D3ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 142 nominal tons (622 kW): rated to cool 426 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-6D1DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D1ES-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 58 nominal tons (254 kW): rated to cool 174 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-4D3ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 159 nominal tons (701 kW): rated to cool 480 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-6D1ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 217 nominal tons (955 kW): rated to cool 654 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 340 nominal tons (1494 kW): rated to cool 1023 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-3D4ES-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 61 nominal tons (267 kW): rated to cool 183 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-5D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D1DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 165 nominal tons (727 kW): rated to cool 498 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D3ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-4D2ES-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-5D2DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D2DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 171 nominal tons (754 kW): rated to cool 516 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-4D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-4D3ES-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 70 nominal tons (307 kW): rated to cool 210 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1012N-6D1ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 168 nominal tons (740 kW): rated to cool 507 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D2ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 176 nominal tons (776 kW): rated to cool 531 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-5D2ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1739 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-4D4DS-J1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 66 nominal tons (289 kW): rated to cool 198 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-2D2DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D3DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 148 nominal tons (648 kW): rated to cool 444 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-5D4DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 394 nominal tons (1731 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-5D4DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 76 nominal tons (333 kW): rated to cool 228 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-2D4ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D4ES-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 159 nominal tons (701 kW): rated to cool 480 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-5D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 418 nominal tons (1836 kW): rated to cool 1257 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-6D1ES-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 85 nominal tons (372 kW): rated to cool 255 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D1DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D4ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-6D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0709N-6D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 93 nominal tons (407 kW): rated to cool 279 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 206 nominal tons (907 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-2D4ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 193 nominal tons (850 kW): rated to cool 582 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1224N-6D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 434 nominal tons (1906 kW): rated to cool 1305 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D1DS-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 91 nominal tons (399 kW): rated to cool 273 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 242 nominal tons (1065 kW): rated to cool 729 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D1DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 191 nominal tons (841 kW): rated to cool 576 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D1DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 331 nominal tons (1455 kW): rated to cool 996 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-2D4ES-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 113 nominal tons (495 kW): rated to cool 339 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D1DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D1DS-H2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 115 nominal tons (504 kW): rated to cool 345 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D2DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 353 nominal tons (1551 kW): rated to cool 1062 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 124 nominal tons (543 kW): rated to cool 372 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D2ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 260 nominal tons (1144 kW): rated to cool 783 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D3DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D2DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 128 nominal tons (561 kW): rated to cool 384 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D3DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D4ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 136 nominal tons (596 kW): rated to cool 408 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D1ES-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D3ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 248 nominal tons (1091 kW): rated to cool 747 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D2DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 143 nominal tons (627 kW): rated to cool 429 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D1ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 289 nominal tons (1271 kW): rated to cool 870 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 215 nominal tons (946 kW): rated to cool 648 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D3DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 153 nominal tons (675 kW): rated to cool 462 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D3ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 283 nominal tons (1244 kW): rated to cool 852 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 227 nominal tons (999 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D1DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-4D4ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 166 nominal tons (732 kW): rated to cool 501 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-4D3ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 254 nominal tons (1117 kW): rated to cool 765 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D1DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 438 nominal tons (1923 kW): rated to cool 1317 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-5D1ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 172 nominal tons (758 kW): rated to cool 519 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-5D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-3D4ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 232 nominal tons (1021 kW): rated to cool 699 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-5D1ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 187 nominal tons (824 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-5D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D1ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D2ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 520 nominal tons (2287 kW): rated to cool 1566 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-5D2ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1024N-6D1ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 337 nominal tons (1481 kW): rated to cool 1014 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D3DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 277 nominal tons (1218 kW): rated to cool 834 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D3DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1739 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 94.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-6D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 158 nominal tons (697 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-2D4DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 297 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D3ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D3ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 496 nominal tons (2182 kW): rated to cool 1494 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-6D1ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 182 nominal tons (802 kW): rated to cool 549 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 123 nominal tons (539 kW): rated to cool 369 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D3ES-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 312 nominal tons (1371 kW): rated to cool 939 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 432 nominal tons (1897 kW): rated to cool 1299 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-0718N-6D1ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 199 nominal tons (876 kW): rated to cool 600 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 133 nominal tons (583 kW): rated to cool 399 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 237 nominal tons (1043 kW): rated to cool 714 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 454 nominal tons (1998 kW): rated to cool 1368 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 509 nominal tons (2239 kW): rated to cool 1533 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D3ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D3DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-3D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 463 nominal tons (2037 kW): rated to cool 1395 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-5D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D4ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 541 nominal tons (2379 kW): rated to cool 1629 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 117.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-5D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D3DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 553 nominal tons (2432 kW): rated to cool 1665 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-6D1ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 337 nominal tons (1481 kW): rated to cool 1014 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D3ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 592 nominal tons (2603 kW): rated to cool 1782 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-2D4DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D1DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D3ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 245 nominal tons (1078 kW): rated to cool 738 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D1DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 438 nominal tons (1923 kW): rated to cool 1317 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 475 nominal tons (2090 kW): rated to cool 1431 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 416 nominal tons (1827 kW): rated to cool 1251 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1262 kW): rated to cool 864 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D2ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 520 nominal tons (2287 kW): rated to cool 1566 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 569 nominal tons (2502 kW): rated to cool 1713 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D3DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1739 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 94.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-4D4ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 637 nominal tons (2800 kW): rated to cool 1917 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D3ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 496 nominal tons (2182 kW): rated to cool 1494 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-1236N-5D2ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1980 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-3D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 432 nominal tons (1897 kW): rated to cool 1299 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-2D2DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 454 nominal tons (1998 kW): rated to cool 1368 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-2D4ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 340 nominal tons (1494 kW): rated to cool 1023 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 509 nominal tons (2239 kW): rated to cool 1533 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D1DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D3ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-3D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 463 nominal tons (2037 kW): rated to cool 1395 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 206 nominal tons (907 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-4D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 541 nominal tons (2379 kW): rated to cool 1629 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 117.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 242 nominal tons (1065 kW): rated to cool 729 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-5D2ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1739 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D3DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 553 nominal tons (2432 kW): rated to cool 1665 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-5D4DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 394 nominal tons (1731 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D3ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 592 nominal tons (2603 kW): rated to cool 1782 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-3D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-5D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 418 nominal tons (1836 kW): rated to cool 1257 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D3ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-6D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D4DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 475 nominal tons (2090 kW): rated to cool 1431 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2412N-6D1ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 434 nominal tons (1906 kW): rated to cool 1305 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D4DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 527 nominal tons (2318 kW): rated to cool 1587 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D1ES-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D1DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 331 nominal tons (1455 kW): rated to cool 996 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D4DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 569 nominal tons (2502 kW): rated to cool 1713 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D1ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 289 nominal tons (1271 kW): rated to cool 870 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-4D4ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 637 nominal tons (2800 kW): rated to cool 1917 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2012N-4D3ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 283 nominal tons (1244 kW): rated to cool 852 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-2D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 353 nominal tons (1551 kW): rated to cool 1062 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PFI-2418N-5D2ES-Q2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1980 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0412A-1H — a PT2 cooling tower, 122 nominal tons (535 kW): rated to cool 366 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0412A-2J — a PT2 cooling tower, 153 nominal tons (675 kW): rated to cool 462 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0412A-3J — a PT2 cooling tower, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0412A-4J — a PT2 cooling tower, 163 nominal tons (719 kW): rated to cool 492 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0709A-1K — a PT2 cooling tower, 158 nominal tons (697 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0709A-2L — a PT2 cooling tower, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0709A-3L — a PT2 cooling tower, 209 nominal tons (920 kW): rated to cool 630 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0709A-4L — a PT2 cooling tower, 213 nominal tons (938 kW): rated to cool 642 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0709A-5L — a PT2 cooling tower, 222 nominal tons (977 kW): rated to cool 669 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0809A-1L — a PT2 cooling tower, 197 nominal tons (868 kW): rated to cool 594 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0809A-2L — a PT2 cooling tower, 223 nominal tons (981 kW): rated to cool 672 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0809A-3M — a PT2 cooling tower, 257 nominal tons (1130 kW): rated to cool 774 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0809A-4M — a PT2 cooling tower, 263 nominal tons (1157 kW): rated to cool 792 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0809A-5M — a PT2 cooling tower, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0812A-1M — a PT2 cooling tower, 273 nominal tons (1200 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0812A-2N — a PT2 cooling tower, 325 nominal tons (1428 kW): rated to cool 978 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0812A-3O — a PT2 cooling tower, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0812A-4O — a PT2 cooling tower, 368 nominal tons (1617 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0812A-5O — a PT2 cooling tower, 379 nominal tons (1665 kW): rated to cool 1140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0814A-1N — a PT2 cooling tower, 320 nominal tons (1406 kW): rated to cool 963 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0814A-2O — a PT2 cooling tower, 379 nominal tons (1665 kW): rated to cool 1140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0814A-3O — a PT2 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0814A-4O — a PT2 cooling tower, 410 nominal tons (1801 kW): rated to cool 1233 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-0814A-5O — a PT2 cooling tower, 422 nominal tons (1853 kW): rated to cool 1269 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1009A-1L — a PT2 cooling tower, 224 nominal tons (986 kW): rated to cool 675 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1009A-2M — a PT2 cooling tower, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1009A-3N — a PT2 cooling tower, 300 nominal tons (1319 kW): rated to cool 903 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1009A-4N — a PT2 cooling tower, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1009A-5N — a PT2 cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1012A-1O — a PT2 cooling tower, 332 nominal tons (1459 kW): rated to cool 999 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1012A-2O — a PT2 cooling tower, 367 nominal tons (1612 kW): rated to cool 1104 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1012A-3P — a PT2 cooling tower, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1012A-4P — a PT2 cooling tower, 432 nominal tons (1897 kW): rated to cool 1299 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1012A-5P — a PT2 cooling tower, 449 nominal tons (1972 kW): rated to cool 1350 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1212A-1O — a PT2 cooling tower, 381 nominal tons (1674 kW): rated to cool 1146 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1212A-2O — a PT2 cooling tower, 435 nominal tons (1910 kW): rated to cool 1308 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1212A-3P — a PT2 cooling tower, 500 nominal tons (2199 kW): rated to cool 1506 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1212A-4P — a PT2 cooling tower, 510 nominal tons (2243 kW): rated to cool 1536 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1212A-5P — a PT2 cooling tower, 531 nominal tons (2335 kW): rated to cool 1599 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1214A-1O — a PT2 cooling tower, 421 nominal tons (1849 kW): rated to cool 1266 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1214A-2P — a PT2 cooling tower, 518 nominal tons (2278 kW): rated to cool 1560 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1214A-3P — a PT2 cooling tower, 555 nominal tons (2440 kW): rated to cool 1671 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1214A-4P — a PT2 cooling tower, 567 nominal tons (2493 kW): rated to cool 1707 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1214A-5P — a PT2 cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1218A-1P — a PT2 cooling tower, 548 nominal tons (2410 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
BAC's PT2-1218A-2Q — a PT2 cooling tower, 672 nominal tons (2953 kW): rated to cool 2022 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-2I12 — a AT cooling tower, 226 nominal tons (995 kW): rated to cool 681 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-2I18 — a AT cooling tower, 289 nominal tons (1271 kW): rated to cool 870 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-2J12 — a AT cooling tower, 275 nominal tons (1209 kW): rated to cool 828 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-2J18 — a AT cooling tower, 350 nominal tons (1538 kW): rated to cool 1053 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-2K12 — a AT cooling tower, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-2K18 — a AT cooling tower, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-2L12 — a AT cooling tower, 325 nominal tons (1428 kW): rated to cool 978 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-2L18 — a AT cooling tower, 419 nominal tons (1840 kW): rated to cool 1260 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-2M12 — a AT cooling tower, 341 nominal tons (1498 kW): rated to cool 1026 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-2M18 — a AT cooling tower, 444 nominal tons (1950 kW): rated to cool 1335 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3I12 — a AT cooling tower, 263 nominal tons (1157 kW): rated to cool 792 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3I18 — a AT cooling tower, 332 nominal tons (1459 kW): rated to cool 999 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3J12 — a AT cooling tower, 308 nominal tons (1354 kW): rated to cool 927 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3J18 — a AT cooling tower, 394 nominal tons (1731 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3K12 — a AT cooling tower, 337 nominal tons (1481 kW): rated to cool 1014 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3K18 — a AT cooling tower, 436 nominal tons (1915 kW): rated to cool 1311 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3L12 — a AT cooling tower, 360 nominal tons (1582 kW): rated to cool 1083 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3L18 — a AT cooling tower, 469 nominal tons (2064 kW): rated to cool 1413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3M12 — a AT cooling tower, 379 nominal tons (1665 kW): rated to cool 1140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3M18 — a AT cooling tower, 497 nominal tons (2186 kW): rated to cool 1497 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-3N18 — a AT cooling tower, 545 nominal tons (2397 kW): rated to cool 1641 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4I12 — a AT cooling tower, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4I18 — a AT cooling tower, 363 nominal tons (1595 kW): rated to cool 1092 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4J12 — a AT cooling tower, 321 nominal tons (1411 kW): rated to cool 966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4J18 — a AT cooling tower, 419 nominal tons (1840 kW): rated to cool 1260 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4K12 — a AT cooling tower, 349 nominal tons (1533 kW): rated to cool 1050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4K18 — a AT cooling tower, 458 nominal tons (2015 kW): rated to cool 1380 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4L12 — a AT cooling tower, 372 nominal tons (1634 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4L18 — a AT cooling tower, 491 nominal tons (2160 kW): rated to cool 1479 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4M12 — a AT cooling tower, 392 nominal tons (1722 kW): rated to cool 1179 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4M18 — a AT cooling tower, 520 nominal tons (2287 kW): rated to cool 1566 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4N12 — a AT cooling tower, 409 nominal tons (1796 kW): rated to cool 1230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 110-4N18 — a AT cooling tower, 568 nominal tons (2497 kW): rated to cool 1710 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2I12 — a AT cooling tower, 279 nominal tons (1227 kW): rated to cool 840 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2I14 — a AT cooling tower, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2J12 — a AT cooling tower, 333 nominal tons (1463 kW): rated to cool 1002 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2J14 — a AT cooling tower, 358 nominal tons (1573 kW): rated to cool 1077 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2J18 — a AT cooling tower, 438 nominal tons (1923 kW): rated to cool 1317 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2K12 — a AT cooling tower, 363 nominal tons (1595 kW): rated to cool 1092 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2K14 — a AT cooling tower, 393 nominal tons (1726 kW): rated to cool 1182 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2K18 — a AT cooling tower, 495 nominal tons (2178 kW): rated to cool 1491 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2K20 — a AT cooling tower, 457 nominal tons (2011 kW): rated to cool 1377 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2L12 — a AT cooling tower, 390 nominal tons (1713 kW): rated to cool 1173 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2L14 — a AT cooling tower, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2L18 — a AT cooling tower, 523 nominal tons (2300 kW): rated to cool 1575 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2L20 — a AT cooling tower, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2M12 — a AT cooling tower, 413 nominal tons (1814 kW): rated to cool 1242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2M14 — a AT cooling tower, 449 nominal tons (1972 kW): rated to cool 1350 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2M18 — a AT cooling tower, 552 nominal tons (2427 kW): rated to cool 1662 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2M20 — a AT cooling tower, 542 nominal tons (2383 kW): rated to cool 1632 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2N18 — a AT cooling tower, 608 nominal tons (2673 kW): rated to cool 1830 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2N20 — a AT cooling tower, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-2O20 — a AT cooling tower, 677 nominal tons (2975 kW): rated to cool 2037 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3I12 — a AT cooling tower, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3I14 — a AT cooling tower, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3J12 — a AT cooling tower, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3J14 — a AT cooling tower, 404 nominal tons (1774 kW): rated to cool 1215 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3J18 — a AT cooling tower, 486 nominal tons (2138 kW): rated to cool 1464 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3K12 — a AT cooling tower, 403 nominal tons (1770 kW): rated to cool 1212 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3K14 — a AT cooling tower, 438 nominal tons (1923 kW): rated to cool 1317 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3K18 — a AT cooling tower, 544 nominal tons (2392 kW): rated to cool 1638 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3K20 — a AT cooling tower, 534 nominal tons (2348 kW): rated to cool 1608 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3L12 — a AT cooling tower, 433 nominal tons (1902 kW): rated to cool 1302 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3L14 — a AT cooling tower, 469 nominal tons (2064 kW): rated to cool 1413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3L18 — a AT cooling tower, 579 nominal tons (2546 kW): rated to cool 1743 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3L20 — a AT cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3M12 — a AT cooling tower, 459 nominal tons (2020 kW): rated to cool 1383 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3M14 — a AT cooling tower, 499 nominal tons (2195 kW): rated to cool 1503 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3M18 — a AT cooling tower, 612 nominal tons (2690 kW): rated to cool 1842 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3M20 — a AT cooling tower, 621 nominal tons (2730 kW): rated to cool 1869 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3N14 — a AT cooling tower, 546 nominal tons (2401 kW): rated to cool 1644 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3N18 — a AT cooling tower, 673 nominal tons (2957 kW): rated to cool 2025 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3N20 — a AT cooling tower, 696 nominal tons (3058 kW): rated to cool 2094 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3O18 — a AT cooling tower, 722 nominal tons (3172 kW): rated to cool 2172 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-3O20 — a AT cooling tower, 754 nominal tons (3317 kW): rated to cool 2271 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4I12 — a AT cooling tower, 336 nominal tons (1477 kW): rated to cool 1011 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4I14 — a AT cooling tower, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4J12 — a AT cooling tower, 386 nominal tons (1696 kW): rated to cool 1161 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4J14 — a AT cooling tower, 426 nominal tons (1871 kW): rated to cool 1281 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4J18 — a AT cooling tower, 516 nominal tons (2270 kW): rated to cool 1554 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4K12 — a AT cooling tower, 421 nominal tons (1849 kW): rated to cool 1266 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4K14 — a AT cooling tower, 458 nominal tons (2015 kW): rated to cool 1380 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4K18 — a AT cooling tower, 570 nominal tons (2506 kW): rated to cool 1716 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4K20 — a AT cooling tower, 570 nominal tons (2506 kW): rated to cool 1716 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4L12 — a AT cooling tower, 452 nominal tons (1989 kW): rated to cool 1362 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4L14 — a AT cooling tower, 492 nominal tons (2164 kW): rated to cool 1482 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4L18 — a AT cooling tower, 604 nominal tons (2655 kW): rated to cool 1818 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4L20 — a AT cooling tower, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4M12 — a AT cooling tower, 479 nominal tons (2107 kW): rated to cool 1443 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4M14 — a AT cooling tower, 522 nominal tons (2296 kW): rated to cool 1572 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4M18 — a AT cooling tower, 640 nominal tons (2813 kW): rated to cool 1926 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4M20 — a AT cooling tower, 653 nominal tons (2870 kW): rated to cool 1965 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4N12 — a AT cooling tower, 513 nominal tons (2256 kW): rated to cool 1545 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4N14 — a AT cooling tower, 572 nominal tons (2515 kW): rated to cool 1722 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4N18 — a AT cooling tower, 703 nominal tons (3089 kW): rated to cool 2115 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4N20 — a AT cooling tower, 726 nominal tons (3190 kW): rated to cool 2184 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4O18 — a AT cooling tower, 754 nominal tons (3317 kW): rated to cool 2271 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4O20 — a AT cooling tower, 785 nominal tons (3453 kW): rated to cool 2364 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4P18 — a AT cooling tower, 782 nominal tons (3439 kW): rated to cool 2355 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 112-4P20 — a AT cooling tower, 814 nominal tons (3580 kW): rated to cool 2451 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-2K24 — a AT cooling tower, 617 nominal tons (2712 kW): rated to cool 1857 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-2L24 — a AT cooling tower, 682 nominal tons (2997 kW): rated to cool 2052 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-2M24 — a AT cooling tower, 720 nominal tons (3163 kW): rated to cool 2166 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-2N24 — a AT cooling tower, 778 nominal tons (3422 kW): rated to cool 2343 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 94.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-2O24 — a AT cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-3K24 — a AT cooling tower, 706 nominal tons (3102 kW): rated to cool 2124 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-3L24 — a AT cooling tower, 772 nominal tons (3396 kW): rated to cool 2325 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-3M24 — a AT cooling tower, 809 nominal tons (3558 kW): rated to cool 2436 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-3N24 — a AT cooling tower, 889 nominal tons (3908 kW): rated to cool 2676 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-3O24 — a AT cooling tower, 948 nominal tons (4167 kW): rated to cool 2853 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-3P24 — a AT cooling tower, 1005 nominal tons (4416 kW): rated to cool 3024 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-4K24 — a AT cooling tower, 769 nominal tons (3382 kW): rated to cool 2316 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-4L24 — a AT cooling tower, 831 nominal tons (3654 kW): rated to cool 2502 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-4M24 — a AT cooling tower, 869 nominal tons (3821 kW): rated to cool 2616 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-4N24 — a AT cooling tower, 944 nominal tons (4149 kW): rated to cool 2841 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-4O24 — a AT cooling tower, 995 nominal tons (4373 kW): rated to cool 2994 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-4P24 — a AT cooling tower, 1052 nominal tons (4627 kW): rated to cool 3168 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 103.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-4Q24 — a AT cooling tower, 1131 nominal tons (4973 kW): rated to cool 3405 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-5K26 — a AT cooling tower, 1000 nominal tons (4395 kW): rated to cool 3009 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 94.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-5L26 — a AT cooling tower, 1074 nominal tons (4723 kW): rated to cool 3234 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-5M26 — a AT cooling tower, 1138 nominal tons (5004 kW): rated to cool 3426 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 107.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-5N26 — a AT cooling tower, 1243 nominal tons (5464 kW): rated to cool 3741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 117.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 114-5O26 — a AT cooling tower, 1328 nominal tons (5836 kW): rated to cool 3996 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-2E4 — a AT cooling tower, 33 nominal tons (145 kW): rated to cool 99 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-2E9 — a AT cooling tower, 76 nominal tons (333 kW): rated to cool 228 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-2F12 — a AT cooling tower, 115 nominal tons (504 kW): rated to cool 345 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-2F4 — a AT cooling tower, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-2F6 — a AT cooling tower, 57 nominal tons (250 kW): rated to cool 171 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-2F9 — a AT cooling tower, 90 nominal tons (394 kW): rated to cool 270 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-2G12 — a AT cooling tower, 137 nominal tons (600 kW): rated to cool 411 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-2G6 — a AT cooling tower, 67 nominal tons (294 kW): rated to cool 201 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-3E4 — a AT cooling tower, 37 nominal tons (162 kW): rated to cool 111 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-3E9 — a AT cooling tower, 86 nominal tons (377 kW): rated to cool 258 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 9.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-3F12 — a AT cooling tower, 129 nominal tons (565 kW): rated to cool 387 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-3F4 — a AT cooling tower, 43 nominal tons (188 kW): rated to cool 129 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 5.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-3F6 — a AT cooling tower, 64 nominal tons (280 kW): rated to cool 192 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-3F9 — a AT cooling tower, 100 nominal tons (438 kW): rated to cool 300 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-3G12 — a AT cooling tower, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-3G6 — a AT cooling tower, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2G18 — a AT cooling tower, 227 nominal tons (999 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2G9 — a AT cooling tower, 113 nominal tons (495 kW): rated to cool 339 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2H12 — a AT cooling tower, 163 nominal tons (719 kW): rated to cool 492 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2H14 — a AT cooling tower, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2H18 — a AT cooling tower, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2H9 — a AT cooling tower, 135 nominal tons (591 kW): rated to cool 405 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2I12 — a AT cooling tower, 179 nominal tons (789 kW): rated to cool 540 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2I14 — a AT cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2I18 — a AT cooling tower, 300 nominal tons (1319 kW): rated to cool 903 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2I9 — a AT cooling tower, 149 nominal tons (653 kW): rated to cool 447 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2J12 — a AT cooling tower, 207 nominal tons (911 kW): rated to cool 624 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2J14 — a AT cooling tower, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2J18 — a AT cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2J9 — a AT cooling tower, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2K12 — a AT cooling tower, 228 nominal tons (1003 kW): rated to cool 687 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2K14 — a AT cooling tower, 300 nominal tons (1319 kW): rated to cool 903 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-2L14 — a AT cooling tower, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3G18 — a AT cooling tower, 260 nominal tons (1144 kW): rated to cool 783 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3G9 — a AT cooling tower, 129 nominal tons (565 kW): rated to cool 387 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3H12 — a AT cooling tower, 183 nominal tons (806 kW): rated to cool 552 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3H14 — a AT cooling tower, 193 nominal tons (850 kW): rated to cool 582 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3H18 — a AT cooling tower, 305 nominal tons (1341 kW): rated to cool 918 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3H9 — a AT cooling tower, 151 nominal tons (666 kW): rated to cool 456 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3I12 — a AT cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3I14 — a AT cooling tower, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3I18 — a AT cooling tower, 338 nominal tons (1485 kW): rated to cool 1017 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3I9 — a AT cooling tower, 167 nominal tons (736 kW): rated to cool 504 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3J12 — a AT cooling tower, 233 nominal tons (1025 kW): rated to cool 702 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3J14 — a AT cooling tower, 251 nominal tons (1104 kW): rated to cool 756 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3J18 — a AT cooling tower, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3J9 — a AT cooling tower, 192 nominal tons (846 kW): rated to cool 579 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3K12 — a AT cooling tower, 257 nominal tons (1130 kW): rated to cool 774 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3K14 — a AT cooling tower, 320 nominal tons (1406 kW): rated to cool 963 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3K18 — a AT cooling tower, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3K9 — a AT cooling tower, 212 nominal tons (933 kW): rated to cool 639 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3L12 — a AT cooling tower, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3L14 — a AT cooling tower, 269 nominal tons (1183 kW): rated to cool 810 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3M14 — a AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4G18 — a AT cooling tower, 288 nominal tons (1266 kW): rated to cool 867 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4G9 — a AT cooling tower, 143 nominal tons (627 kW): rated to cool 429 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4H12 — a AT cooling tower, 200 nominal tons (881 kW): rated to cool 603 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4H14 — a AT cooling tower, 222 nominal tons (977 kW): rated to cool 669 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4H18 — a AT cooling tower, 331 nominal tons (1455 kW): rated to cool 996 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4H9 — a AT cooling tower, 163 nominal tons (719 kW): rated to cool 492 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4I12 — a AT cooling tower, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4I14 — a AT cooling tower, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4I18 — a AT cooling tower, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4I9 — a AT cooling tower, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4J12 — a AT cooling tower, 248 nominal tons (1091 kW): rated to cool 747 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4J14 — a AT cooling tower, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4J18 — a AT cooling tower, 407 nominal tons (1788 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4J9 — a AT cooling tower, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4K12 — a AT cooling tower, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4K14 — a AT cooling tower, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4K18 — a AT cooling tower, 444 nominal tons (1950 kW): rated to cool 1335 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4K9 — a AT cooling tower, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4L12 — a AT cooling tower, 289 nominal tons (1271 kW): rated to cool 870 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4L14 — a AT cooling tower, 294 nominal tons (1293 kW): rated to cool 885 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4M14 — a AT cooling tower, 332 nominal tons (1459 kW): rated to cool 999 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2F6 — a AT cooling tower, 89 nominal tons (390 kW): rated to cool 267 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2F8 — a AT cooling tower, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2G11 — a AT cooling tower, 155 nominal tons (683 kW): rated to cool 468 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2G6 — a AT cooling tower, 112 nominal tons (491 kW): rated to cool 336 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2G8 — a AT cooling tower, 137 nominal tons (600 kW): rated to cool 411 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2G9 — a AT cooling tower, 135 nominal tons (591 kW): rated to cool 405 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2H11 — a AT cooling tower, 186 nominal tons (819 kW): rated to cool 561 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2H12 — a AT cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2H14 — a AT cooling tower, 220 nominal tons (968 kW): rated to cool 663 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2H6 — a AT cooling tower, 123 nominal tons (539 kW): rated to cool 369 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2H8 — a AT cooling tower, 148 nominal tons (648 kW): rated to cool 444 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2H9 — a AT cooling tower, 161 nominal tons (710 kW): rated to cool 486 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2I11 — a AT cooling tower, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2I12 — a AT cooling tower, 229 nominal tons (1008 kW): rated to cool 690 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2I14 — a AT cooling tower, 250 nominal tons (1100 kW): rated to cool 753 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2I8 — a AT cooling tower, 158 nominal tons (697 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2I9 — a AT cooling tower, 177 nominal tons (780 kW): rated to cool 534 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2J11 — a AT cooling tower, 230 nominal tons (1012 kW): rated to cool 693 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2J12 — a AT cooling tower, 256 nominal tons (1126 kW): rated to cool 771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2J14 — a AT cooling tower, 279 nominal tons (1227 kW): rated to cool 840 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2J9 — a AT cooling tower, 207 nominal tons (911 kW): rated to cool 624 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2K12 — a AT cooling tower, 282 nominal tons (1240 kW): rated to cool 849 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2K14 — a AT cooling tower, 308 nominal tons (1354 kW): rated to cool 927 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-2L14 — a AT cooling tower, 336 nominal tons (1477 kW): rated to cool 1011 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3F6 — a AT cooling tower, 101 nominal tons (443 kW): rated to cool 303 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3F8 — a AT cooling tower, 123 nominal tons (539 kW): rated to cool 369 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3G11 — a AT cooling tower, 171 nominal tons (754 kW): rated to cool 516 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3G6 — a AT cooling tower, 124 nominal tons (543 kW): rated to cool 372 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3G8 — a AT cooling tower, 151 nominal tons (666 kW): rated to cool 456 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3G9 — a AT cooling tower, 153 nominal tons (675 kW): rated to cool 462 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3H11 — a AT cooling tower, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3H12 — a AT cooling tower, 228 nominal tons (1003 kW): rated to cool 687 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3H14 — a AT cooling tower, 248 nominal tons (1091 kW): rated to cool 747 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3H6 — a AT cooling tower, 138 nominal tons (605 kW): rated to cool 414 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3H8 — a AT cooling tower, 164 nominal tons (723 kW): rated to cool 495 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3H9 — a AT cooling tower, 180 nominal tons (793 kW): rated to cool 543 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3I11 — a AT cooling tower, 220 nominal tons (968 kW): rated to cool 663 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3I12 — a AT cooling tower, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 768 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3I14 — a AT cooling tower, 279 nominal tons (1227 kW): rated to cool 840 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3I6 — a AT cooling tower, 150 nominal tons (657 kW): rated to cool 450 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3I8 — a AT cooling tower, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3I9 — a AT cooling tower, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3J11 — a AT cooling tower, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 768 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3J12 — a AT cooling tower, 288 nominal tons (1266 kW): rated to cool 867 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3J14 — a AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3J8 — a AT cooling tower, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3J9 — a AT cooling tower, 231 nominal tons (1016 kW): rated to cool 696 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3K11 — a AT cooling tower, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3K12 — a AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3K14 — a AT cooling tower, 346 nominal tons (1520 kW): rated to cool 1041 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3L12 — a AT cooling tower, 339 nominal tons (1490 kW): rated to cool 1020 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3L14 — a AT cooling tower, 376 nominal tons (1652 kW): rated to cool 1131 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-3M14 — a AT cooling tower, 398 nominal tons (1748 kW): rated to cool 1197 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4F6 — a AT cooling tower, 109 nominal tons (478 kW): rated to cool 327 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4F8 — a AT cooling tower, 133 nominal tons (583 kW): rated to cool 399 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4G11 — a AT cooling tower, 189 nominal tons (832 kW): rated to cool 570 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4G6 — a AT cooling tower, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4G8 — a AT cooling tower, 158 nominal tons (697 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 14.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4G9 — a AT cooling tower, 164 nominal tons (723 kW): rated to cool 495 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4H11 — a AT cooling tower, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4H12 — a AT cooling tower, 242 nominal tons (1065 kW): rated to cool 729 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4H14 — a AT cooling tower, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4H6 — a AT cooling tower, 143 nominal tons (627 kW): rated to cool 429 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 13.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4H8 — a AT cooling tower, 172 nominal tons (758 kW): rated to cool 519 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4H9 — a AT cooling tower, 190 nominal tons (837 kW): rated to cool 573 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4I11 — a AT cooling tower, 237 nominal tons (1043 kW): rated to cool 714 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4I12 — a AT cooling tower, 267 nominal tons (1174 kW): rated to cool 804 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4I14 — a AT cooling tower, 294 nominal tons (1293 kW): rated to cool 885 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4I6 — a AT cooling tower, 156 nominal tons (688 kW): rated to cool 471 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4I8 — a AT cooling tower, 186 nominal tons (819 kW): rated to cool 561 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4I9 — a AT cooling tower, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4J11 — a AT cooling tower, 269 nominal tons (1183 kW): rated to cool 810 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4J12 — a AT cooling tower, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4J14 — a AT cooling tower, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4J6 — a AT cooling tower, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4J8 — a AT cooling tower, 206 nominal tons (907 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4J9 — a AT cooling tower, 241 nominal tons (1060 kW): rated to cool 726 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4K11 — a AT cooling tower, 297 nominal tons (1306 kW): rated to cool 894 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4K12 — a AT cooling tower, 329 nominal tons (1446 kW): rated to cool 990 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4K14 — a AT cooling tower, 360 nominal tons (1582 kW): rated to cool 1083 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4K9 — a AT cooling tower, 264 nominal tons (1161 kW): rated to cool 795 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4L11 — a AT cooling tower, 313 nominal tons (1376 kW): rated to cool 942 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4L12 — a AT cooling tower, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4L14 — a AT cooling tower, 390 nominal tons (1713 kW): rated to cool 1173 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4M12 — a AT cooling tower, 362 nominal tons (1590 kW): rated to cool 1089 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 19-4M14 — a AT cooling tower, 412 nominal tons (1810 kW): rated to cool 1239 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-2I24 — a AT cooling tower, 453 nominal tons (1994 kW): rated to cool 1365 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-2I36 — a AT cooling tower, 578 nominal tons (2541 kW): rated to cool 1740 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-2J24 — a AT cooling tower, 551 nominal tons (2423 kW): rated to cool 1659 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-2J36 — a AT cooling tower, 699 nominal tons (3071 kW): rated to cool 2103 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-2K24 — a AT cooling tower, 609 nominal tons (2677 kW): rated to cool 1833 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-2K36 — a AT cooling tower, 776 nominal tons (3413 kW): rated to cool 2337 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-2L24 — a AT cooling tower, 649 nominal tons (2852 kW): rated to cool 1953 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-2L36 — a AT cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-2M24 — a AT cooling tower, 682 nominal tons (2997 kW): rated to cool 2052 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-2M36 — a AT cooling tower, 887 nominal tons (3899 kW): rated to cool 2670 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3I24 — a AT cooling tower, 527 nominal tons (2318 kW): rated to cool 1587 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3I36 — a AT cooling tower, 665 nominal tons (2922 kW): rated to cool 2001 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3J24 — a AT cooling tower, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3J36 — a AT cooling tower, 787 nominal tons (3461 kW): rated to cool 2370 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3K24 — a AT cooling tower, 674 nominal tons (2962 kW): rated to cool 2028 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3K36 — a AT cooling tower, 870 nominal tons (3825 kW): rated to cool 2619 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3L24 — a AT cooling tower, 720 nominal tons (3163 kW): rated to cool 2166 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3L36 — a AT cooling tower, 938 nominal tons (4123 kW): rated to cool 2823 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3M24 — a AT cooling tower, 757 nominal tons (3330 kW): rated to cool 2280 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3M36 — a AT cooling tower, 994 nominal tons (4368 kW): rated to cool 2991 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-3N36 — a AT cooling tower, 1089 nominal tons (4789 kW): rated to cool 3279 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4I24 — a AT cooling tower, 553 nominal tons (2432 kW): rated to cool 1665 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4I36 — a AT cooling tower, 725 nominal tons (3185 kW): rated to cool 2181 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4J24 — a AT cooling tower, 642 nominal tons (2822 kW): rated to cool 1932 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4J36 — a AT cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4K24 — a AT cooling tower, 699 nominal tons (3071 kW): rated to cool 2103 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4K36 — a AT cooling tower, 918 nominal tons (4035 kW): rated to cool 2763 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4L24 — a AT cooling tower, 744 nominal tons (3269 kW): rated to cool 2238 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4L36 — a AT cooling tower, 984 nominal tons (4324 kW): rated to cool 2961 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4M24 — a AT cooling tower, 782 nominal tons (3439 kW): rated to cool 2355 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1041 nominal tons (4574 kW): rated to cool 3132 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4N24 — a AT cooling tower, 817 nominal tons (3593 kW): rated to cool 2460 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 210-4N36 — a AT cooling tower, 1136 nominal tons (4995 kW): rated to cool 3420 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 121.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2F9 — a AT cooling tower, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2G9 — a AT cooling tower, 224 nominal tons (986 kW): rated to cool 675 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2H9 — a AT cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2I24 — a AT cooling tower, 558 nominal tons (2454 kW): rated to cool 1680 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2I28 — a AT cooling tower, 596 nominal tons (2620 kW): rated to cool 1794 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2J24 — a AT cooling tower, 665 nominal tons (2922 kW): rated to cool 2001 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2J28 — a AT cooling tower, 715 nominal tons (3141 kW): rated to cool 2151 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2J36 — a AT cooling tower, 874 nominal tons (3842 kW): rated to cool 2631 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 103.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2K24 — a AT cooling tower, 727 nominal tons (3194 kW): rated to cool 2187 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2K28 — a AT cooling tower, 784 nominal tons (3448 kW): rated to cool 2361 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2K36 — a AT cooling tower, 991 nominal tons (4355 kW): rated to cool 2982 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2K40 — a AT cooling tower, 915 nominal tons (4022 kW): rated to cool 2754 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2L24 — a AT cooling tower, 779 nominal tons (3426 kW): rated to cool 2346 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2L28 — a AT cooling tower, 847 nominal tons (3724 kW): rated to cool 2550 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2L36 — a AT cooling tower, 1048 nominal tons (4605 kW): rated to cool 3153 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2L40 — a AT cooling tower, 1010 nominal tons (4438 kW): rated to cool 3039 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2M24 — a AT cooling tower, 825 nominal tons (3628 kW): rated to cool 2484 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2M28 — a AT cooling tower, 897 nominal tons (3943 kW): rated to cool 2700 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1103 nominal tons (4850 kW): rated to cool 3321 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2M40 — a AT cooling tower, 1084 nominal tons (4767 kW): rated to cool 3264 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 132.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2N36 — a AT cooling tower, 1215 nominal tons (5341 kW): rated to cool 3657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 142.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2N40 — a AT cooling tower, 1246 nominal tons (5477 kW): rated to cool 3750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 144.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-2O40 — a AT cooling tower, 1352 nominal tons (5946 kW): rated to cool 4071 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3F9 — a AT cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3G9 — a AT cooling tower, 249 nominal tons (1095 kW): rated to cool 750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3H9 — a AT cooling tower, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3I28 — a AT cooling tower, 685 nominal tons (3010 kW): rated to cool 2061 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3I9 — a AT cooling tower, 301 nominal tons (1323 kW): rated to cool 906 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3J24 — a AT cooling tower, 738 nominal tons (3242 kW): rated to cool 2220 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3J28 — a AT cooling tower, 807 nominal tons (3549 kW): rated to cool 2430 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3J36 — a AT cooling tower, 974 nominal tons (4281 kW): rated to cool 2931 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3K24 — a AT cooling tower, 804 nominal tons (3536 kW): rated to cool 2421 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3K28 — a AT cooling tower, 874 nominal tons (3842 kW): rated to cool 2631 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3K36 — a AT cooling tower, 1088 nominal tons (4784 kW): rated to cool 3276 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3K40 — a AT cooling tower, 1069 nominal tons (4701 kW): rated to cool 3219 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3L24 — a AT cooling tower, 865 nominal tons (3803 kW): rated to cool 2604 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3L28 — a AT cooling tower, 939 nominal tons (4127 kW): rated to cool 2826 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 96.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3L36 — a AT cooling tower, 1157 nominal tons (5087 kW): rated to cool 3483 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3L40 — a AT cooling tower, 1166 nominal tons (5126 kW): rated to cool 3510 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3M24 — a AT cooling tower, 919 nominal tons (4040 kW): rated to cool 2766 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3M28 — a AT cooling tower, 999 nominal tons (4390 kW): rated to cool 3006 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1223 nominal tons (5376 kW): rated to cool 3681 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3M40 — a AT cooling tower, 1242 nominal tons (5459 kW): rated to cool 3738 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3N28 — a AT cooling tower, 1093 nominal tons (4806 kW): rated to cool 3291 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3N36 — a AT cooling tower, 1346 nominal tons (5915 kW): rated to cool 4050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 139.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3N40 — a AT cooling tower, 1391 nominal tons (6116 kW): rated to cool 4188 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 142.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3O36 — a AT cooling tower, 1443 nominal tons (6344 kW): rated to cool 4344 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-3O40 — a AT cooling tower, 1510 nominal tons (6638 kW): rated to cool 4545 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4F9 — a AT cooling tower, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4G9 — a AT cooling tower, 261 nominal tons (1148 kW): rated to cool 786 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4H9 — a AT cooling tower, 286 nominal tons (1257 kW): rated to cool 861 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4I24 — a AT cooling tower, 672 nominal tons (2953 kW): rated to cool 2022 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4I28 — a AT cooling tower, 739 nominal tons (3247 kW): rated to cool 2223 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4I9 — a AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4J24 — a AT cooling tower, 772 nominal tons (3396 kW): rated to cool 2325 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4J28 — a AT cooling tower, 850 nominal tons (3737 kW): rated to cool 2559 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4J36 — a AT cooling tower, 1032 nominal tons (4535 kW): rated to cool 3105 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4J9 — a AT cooling tower, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4K24 — a AT cooling tower, 840 nominal tons (3694 kW): rated to cool 2529 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4K28 — a AT cooling tower, 918 nominal tons (4035 kW): rated to cool 2763 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4K36 — a AT cooling tower, 1141 nominal tons (5017 kW): rated to cool 3435 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4K40 — a AT cooling tower, 1139 nominal tons (5008 kW): rated to cool 3429 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4L24 — a AT cooling tower, 905 nominal tons (3978 kW): rated to cool 2724 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4L28 — a AT cooling tower, 984 nominal tons (4324 kW): rated to cool 2961 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4L36 — a AT cooling tower, 1209 nominal tons (5315 kW): rated to cool 3639 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4L40 — a AT cooling tower, 1231 nominal tons (5411 kW): rated to cool 3705 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4M24 — a AT cooling tower, 960 nominal tons (4219 kW): rated to cool 2889 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4M28 — a AT cooling tower, 1046 nominal tons (4596 kW): rated to cool 3147 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1279 nominal tons (5621 kW): rated to cool 3849 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4M40 — a AT cooling tower, 1306 nominal tons (5740 kW): rated to cool 3930 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4N24 — a AT cooling tower, 1027 nominal tons (4513 kW): rated to cool 3090 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4N28 — a AT cooling tower, 1143 nominal tons (5025 kW): rated to cool 3441 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4N36 — a AT cooling tower, 1404 nominal tons (6173 kW): rated to cool 4227 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 137.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4N40 — a AT cooling tower, 1452 nominal tons (6384 kW): rated to cool 4371 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 139.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4O36 — a AT cooling tower, 1508 nominal tons (6629 kW): rated to cool 4539 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 146.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4O40 — a AT cooling tower, 1571 nominal tons (6905 kW): rated to cool 4728 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4P36 — a AT cooling tower, 1565 nominal tons (6879 kW): rated to cool 4710 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 212-4P40 — a AT cooling tower, 1630 nominal tons (7164 kW): rated to cool 4905 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 158.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2G18 — a AT cooling tower, 440 nominal tons (1932 kW): rated to cool 1323 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2G9 — a AT cooling tower, 224 nominal tons (986 kW): rated to cool 675 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2H12 — a AT cooling tower, 316 nominal tons (1389 kW): rated to cool 951 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2H14 — a AT cooling tower, 341 nominal tons (1498 kW): rated to cool 1026 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2H18 — a AT cooling tower, 526 nominal tons (2313 kW): rated to cool 1584 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2H9 — a AT cooling tower, 268 nominal tons (1179 kW): rated to cool 807 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2I12 — a AT cooling tower, 349 nominal tons (1533 kW): rated to cool 1050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2I14 — a AT cooling tower, 483 nominal tons (2125 kW): rated to cool 1455 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2I18 — a AT cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2I9 — a AT cooling tower, 297 nominal tons (1306 kW): rated to cool 894 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2J12 — a AT cooling tower, 403 nominal tons (1770 kW): rated to cool 1212 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2J14 — a AT cooling tower, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2J18 — a AT cooling tower, 671 nominal tons (2949 kW): rated to cool 2019 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2J9 — a AT cooling tower, 341 nominal tons (1498 kW): rated to cool 1026 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2K12 — a AT cooling tower, 445 nominal tons (1954 kW): rated to cool 1338 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2K14 — a AT cooling tower, 591 nominal tons (2598 kW): rated to cool 1779 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2K48 — a AT cooling tower, 1201 nominal tons (5280 kW): rated to cool 3615 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 148.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2L14 — a AT cooling tower, 469 nominal tons (2064 kW): rated to cool 1413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2L48 — a AT cooling tower, 1332 nominal tons (5854 kW): rated to cool 4008 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 158.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2M48 — a AT cooling tower, 1405 nominal tons (6178 kW): rated to cool 4230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 168.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2N48 — a AT cooling tower, 1522 nominal tons (6690 kW): rated to cool 4581 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 184.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-2O48 — a AT cooling tower, 1636 nominal tons (7190 kW): rated to cool 4923 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 198.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3G18 — a AT cooling tower, 506 nominal tons (2226 kW): rated to cool 1524 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3G9 — a AT cooling tower, 258 nominal tons (1135 kW): rated to cool 777 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3H12 — a AT cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3H14 — a AT cooling tower, 379 nominal tons (1665 kW): rated to cool 1140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3H18 — a AT cooling tower, 595 nominal tons (2616 kW): rated to cool 1791 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3H9 — a AT cooling tower, 302 nominal tons (1328 kW): rated to cool 909 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3I12 — a AT cooling tower, 395 nominal tons (1735 kW): rated to cool 1188 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3I14 — a AT cooling tower, 522 nominal tons (2296 kW): rated to cool 1572 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3I18 — a AT cooling tower, 659 nominal tons (2896 kW): rated to cool 1983 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3I9 — a AT cooling tower, 335 nominal tons (1472 kW): rated to cool 1008 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3J12 — a AT cooling tower, 454 nominal tons (1998 kW): rated to cool 1368 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3J14 — a AT cooling tower, 495 nominal tons (2178 kW): rated to cool 1491 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3J18 — a AT cooling tower, 757 nominal tons (3330 kW): rated to cool 2280 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3J9 — a AT cooling tower, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3K12 — a AT cooling tower, 502 nominal tons (2208 kW): rated to cool 1512 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3K14 — a AT cooling tower, 631 nominal tons (2773 kW): rated to cool 1899 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3K18 — a AT cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3K48 — a AT cooling tower, 1378 nominal tons (6059 kW): rated to cool 4149 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 145.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3K9 — a AT cooling tower, 425 nominal tons (1866 kW): rated to cool 1278 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3L12 — a AT cooling tower, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3L14 — a AT cooling tower, 532 nominal tons (2340 kW): rated to cool 1602 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3L48 — a AT cooling tower, 1512 nominal tons (6647 kW): rated to cool 4551 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 156.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3M14 — a AT cooling tower, 621 nominal tons (2730 kW): rated to cool 1869 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3M48 — a AT cooling tower, 1584 nominal tons (6962 kW): rated to cool 4767 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 165.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3N48 — a AT cooling tower, 1742 nominal tons (7659 kW): rated to cool 5244 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 181.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3O48 — a AT cooling tower, 1857 nominal tons (8163 kW): rated to cool 5589 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 194.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-3P48 — a AT cooling tower, 1971 nominal tons (8666 kW): rated to cool 5934 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 206.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4G18 — a AT cooling tower, 563 nominal tons (2475 kW): rated to cool 1695 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4G9 — a AT cooling tower, 286 nominal tons (1257 kW): rated to cool 861 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4H12 — a AT cooling tower, 392 nominal tons (1722 kW): rated to cool 1179 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4H14 — a AT cooling tower, 437 nominal tons (1919 kW): rated to cool 1314 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4H18 — a AT cooling tower, 646 nominal tons (2839 kW): rated to cool 1944 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4H9 — a AT cooling tower, 327 nominal tons (1437 kW): rated to cool 984 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4I12 — a AT cooling tower, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4I14 — a AT cooling tower, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4I18 — a AT cooling tower, 705 nominal tons (3098 kW): rated to cool 2121 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4I9 — a AT cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4J12 — a AT cooling tower, 484 nominal tons (2129 kW): rated to cool 1458 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4J14 — a AT cooling tower, 547 nominal tons (2405 kW): rated to cool 1647 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4J18 — a AT cooling tower, 796 nominal tons (3501 kW): rated to cool 2397 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4J9 — a AT cooling tower, 403 nominal tons (1770 kW): rated to cool 1212 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4K12 — a AT cooling tower, 528 nominal tons (2322 kW): rated to cool 1590 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4K14 — a AT cooling tower, 430 nominal tons (1888 kW): rated to cool 1293 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4K18 — a AT cooling tower, 868 nominal tons (3816 kW): rated to cool 2613 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4K48 — a AT cooling tower, 1509 nominal tons (6633 kW): rated to cool 4542 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 143.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4K9 — a AT cooling tower, 440 nominal tons (1932 kW): rated to cool 1323 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4L12 — a AT cooling tower, 565 nominal tons (2484 kW): rated to cool 1701 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4L14 — a AT cooling tower, 580 nominal tons (2550 kW): rated to cool 1746 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4L48 — a AT cooling tower, 1632 nominal tons (7172 kW): rated to cool 4911 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 153.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4M14 — a AT cooling tower, 656 nominal tons (2883 kW): rated to cool 1974 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4M48 — a AT cooling tower, 1707 nominal tons (7505 kW): rated to cool 5139 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 162.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4N48 — a AT cooling tower, 1854 nominal tons (8149 kW): rated to cool 5580 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 178.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4O48 — a AT cooling tower, 1953 nominal tons (8588 kW): rated to cool 5880 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 191.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4P48 — a AT cooling tower, 2068 nominal tons (9091 kW): rated to cool 6225 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 202.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-4Q48 — a AT cooling tower, 2223 nominal tons (9770 kW): rated to cool 6690 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 217.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-5K52 — a AT cooling tower, 1964 nominal tons (8636 kW): rated to cool 5913 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 185.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-5L52 — a AT cooling tower, 2112 nominal tons (9284 kW): rated to cool 6357 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 199.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-5M52 — a AT cooling tower, 2238 nominal tons (9836 kW): rated to cool 6735 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 210.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-5N52 — a AT cooling tower, 2444 nominal tons (10743 kW): rated to cool 7356 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 230.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 214-5O52 — a AT cooling tower, 2613 nominal tons (11488 kW): rated to cool 7866 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 247.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-2F9 — a AT cooling tower, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-2G9 — a AT cooling tower, 273 nominal tons (1200 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-2H9 — a AT cooling tower, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-2I9 — a AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-3F9 — a AT cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-3G9 — a AT cooling tower, 303 nominal tons (1332 kW): rated to cool 912 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-3H9 — a AT cooling tower, 330 nominal tons (1450 kW): rated to cool 993 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-3I9 — a AT cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-3J9 — a AT cooling tower, 392 nominal tons (1722 kW): rated to cool 1179 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-4F9 — a AT cooling tower, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-4G9 — a AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-4H9 — a AT cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-4I9 — a AT cooling tower, 372 nominal tons (1634 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 215-4J9 — a AT cooling tower, 413 nominal tons (1814 kW): rated to cool 1242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2G11 — a AT cooling tower, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2G9 — a AT cooling tower, 269 nominal tons (1183 kW): rated to cool 810 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2H11 — a AT cooling tower, 378 nominal tons (1661 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2H12 — a AT cooling tower, 393 nominal tons (1726 kW): rated to cool 1182 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2H14 — a AT cooling tower, 434 nominal tons (1906 kW): rated to cool 1305 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2H9 — a AT cooling tower, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2I11 — a AT cooling tower, 407 nominal tons (1788 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2I12 — a AT cooling tower, 446 nominal tons (1958 kW): rated to cool 1341 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2I14 — a AT cooling tower, 492 nominal tons (2164 kW): rated to cool 1482 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2I9 — a AT cooling tower, 355 nominal tons (1560 kW): rated to cool 1068 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2J11 — a AT cooling tower, 465 nominal tons (2046 kW): rated to cool 1401 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2J12 — a AT cooling tower, 497 nominal tons (2186 kW): rated to cool 1497 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2J14 — a AT cooling tower, 549 nominal tons (2414 kW): rated to cool 1653 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2J9 — a AT cooling tower, 415 nominal tons (1823 kW): rated to cool 1248 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2K12 — a AT cooling tower, 548 nominal tons (2410 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2K14 — a AT cooling tower, 606 nominal tons (2664 kW): rated to cool 1824 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-2L14 — a AT cooling tower, 662 nominal tons (2909 kW): rated to cool 1992 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3G11 — a AT cooling tower, 346 nominal tons (1520 kW): rated to cool 1041 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3G9 — a AT cooling tower, 307 nominal tons (1349 kW): rated to cool 924 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3H11 — a AT cooling tower, 408 nominal tons (1792 kW): rated to cool 1227 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3H12 — a AT cooling tower, 445 nominal tons (1954 kW): rated to cool 1338 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3H14 — a AT cooling tower, 488 nominal tons (2147 kW): rated to cool 1470 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3H9 — a AT cooling tower, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3I11 — a AT cooling tower, 446 nominal tons (1958 kW): rated to cool 1341 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3I12 — a AT cooling tower, 497 nominal tons (2186 kW): rated to cool 1497 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3I14 — a AT cooling tower, 549 nominal tons (2414 kW): rated to cool 1653 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3I9 — a AT cooling tower, 398 nominal tons (1748 kW): rated to cool 1197 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3J11 — a AT cooling tower, 514 nominal tons (2261 kW): rated to cool 1548 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3J12 — a AT cooling tower, 562 nominal tons (2471 kW): rated to cool 1692 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3J14 — a AT cooling tower, 619 nominal tons (2721 kW): rated to cool 1863 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3J9 — a AT cooling tower, 462 nominal tons (2033 kW): rated to cool 1392 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3K11 — a AT cooling tower, 574 nominal tons (2524 kW): rated to cool 1728 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3K12 — a AT cooling tower, 620 nominal tons (2725 kW): rated to cool 1866 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3K14 — a AT cooling tower, 683 nominal tons (3001 kW): rated to cool 2055 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3L12 — a AT cooling tower, 663 nominal tons (2914 kW): rated to cool 1995 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3L14 — a AT cooling tower, 742 nominal tons (3260 kW): rated to cool 2232 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-3M14 — a AT cooling tower, 784 nominal tons (3448 kW): rated to cool 2361 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4G11 — a AT cooling tower, 384 nominal tons (1687 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4G9 — a AT cooling tower, 329 nominal tons (1446 kW): rated to cool 990 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4H11 — a AT cooling tower, 443 nominal tons (1945 kW): rated to cool 1332 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4H12 — a AT cooling tower, 472 nominal tons (2077 kW): rated to cool 1422 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4H14 — a AT cooling tower, 523 nominal tons (2300 kW): rated to cool 1575 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4H9 — a AT cooling tower, 380 nominal tons (1669 kW): rated to cool 1143 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4I11 — a AT cooling tower, 478 nominal tons (2103 kW): rated to cool 1440 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4I12 — a AT cooling tower, 522 nominal tons (2296 kW): rated to cool 1572 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4I14 — a AT cooling tower, 579 nominal tons (2546 kW): rated to cool 1743 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4I9 — a AT cooling tower, 417 nominal tons (1831 kW): rated to cool 1254 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4J11 — a AT cooling tower, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4J12 — a AT cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4J14 — a AT cooling tower, 647 nominal tons (2844 kW): rated to cool 1947 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4J9 — a AT cooling tower, 482 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1452 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4K11 — a AT cooling tower, 600 nominal tons (2638 kW): rated to cool 1806 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4K12 — a AT cooling tower, 643 nominal tons (2826 kW): rated to cool 1935 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4K14 — a AT cooling tower, 712 nominal tons (3128 kW): rated to cool 2142 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4K9 — a AT cooling tower, 528 nominal tons (2322 kW): rated to cool 1590 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4L11 — a AT cooling tower, 632 nominal tons (2778 kW): rated to cool 1902 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4L12 — a AT cooling tower, 686 nominal tons (3014 kW): rated to cool 2064 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4L14 — a AT cooling tower, 770 nominal tons (3387 kW): rated to cool 2319 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4M12 — a AT cooling tower, 707 nominal tons (3106 kW): rated to cool 2127 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 217-4M14 — a AT cooling tower, 812 nominal tons (3571 kW): rated to cool 2445 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-2I12 — a AT cooling tower, 453 nominal tons (1994 kW): rated to cool 1365 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-2I18 — a AT cooling tower, 578 nominal tons (2541 kW): rated to cool 1740 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-2J12 — a AT cooling tower, 551 nominal tons (2423 kW): rated to cool 1659 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-2J18 — a AT cooling tower, 699 nominal tons (3071 kW): rated to cool 2103 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-2K12 — a AT cooling tower, 609 nominal tons (2677 kW): rated to cool 1833 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-2K18 — a AT cooling tower, 776 nominal tons (3413 kW): rated to cool 2337 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-2L12 — a AT cooling tower, 649 nominal tons (2852 kW): rated to cool 1953 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-2L18 — a AT cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-2M12 — a AT cooling tower, 682 nominal tons (2997 kW): rated to cool 2052 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-2M18 — a AT cooling tower, 887 nominal tons (3899 kW): rated to cool 2670 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3I12 — a AT cooling tower, 527 nominal tons (2318 kW): rated to cool 1587 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3I18 — a AT cooling tower, 665 nominal tons (2922 kW): rated to cool 2001 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3J12 — a AT cooling tower, 616 nominal tons (2708 kW): rated to cool 1854 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3J18 — a AT cooling tower, 787 nominal tons (3461 kW): rated to cool 2370 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3K12 — a AT cooling tower, 674 nominal tons (2962 kW): rated to cool 2028 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3K18 — a AT cooling tower, 870 nominal tons (3825 kW): rated to cool 2619 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3L12 — a AT cooling tower, 720 nominal tons (3163 kW): rated to cool 2166 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3L18 — a AT cooling tower, 938 nominal tons (4123 kW): rated to cool 2823 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3M12 — a AT cooling tower, 757 nominal tons (3330 kW): rated to cool 2280 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3M18 — a AT cooling tower, 994 nominal tons (4368 kW): rated to cool 2991 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-3N18 — a AT cooling tower, 1089 nominal tons (4789 kW): rated to cool 3279 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4I12 — a AT cooling tower, 553 nominal tons (2432 kW): rated to cool 1665 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4I18 — a AT cooling tower, 725 nominal tons (3185 kW): rated to cool 2181 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4J12 — a AT cooling tower, 642 nominal tons (2822 kW): rated to cool 1932 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4J18 — a AT cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4K12 — a AT cooling tower, 699 nominal tons (3071 kW): rated to cool 2103 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4K18 — a AT cooling tower, 918 nominal tons (4035 kW): rated to cool 2763 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4L12 — a AT cooling tower, 744 nominal tons (3269 kW): rated to cool 2238 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4L18 — a AT cooling tower, 984 nominal tons (4324 kW): rated to cool 2961 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4M12 — a AT cooling tower, 782 nominal tons (3439 kW): rated to cool 2355 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4M18 — a AT cooling tower, 1041 nominal tons (4574 kW): rated to cool 3132 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4N12 — a AT cooling tower, 817 nominal tons (3593 kW): rated to cool 2460 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 220-4N18 — a AT cooling tower, 1136 nominal tons (4995 kW): rated to cool 3420 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 121.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-2J18 — a AT cooling tower, 874 nominal tons (3842 kW): rated to cool 2631 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 103.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-2K18 — a AT cooling tower, 991 nominal tons (4355 kW): rated to cool 2982 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-2K20 — a AT cooling tower, 890 nominal tons (3913 kW): rated to cool 2679 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-2L18 — a AT cooling tower, 1048 nominal tons (4605 kW): rated to cool 3153 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 121.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-2L20 — a AT cooling tower, 983 nominal tons (4320 kW): rated to cool 2958 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-2M18 — a AT cooling tower, 1103 nominal tons (4850 kW): rated to cool 3321 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-2M20 — a AT cooling tower, 1057 nominal tons (4649 kW): rated to cool 3183 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-2N18 — a AT cooling tower, 1215 nominal tons (5341 kW): rated to cool 3657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 141.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-2N20 — a AT cooling tower, 1216 nominal tons (5345 kW): rated to cool 3660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 143.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-2O20 — a AT cooling tower, 1320 nominal tons (5801 kW): rated to cool 3972 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 153.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3J18 — a AT cooling tower, 974 nominal tons (4281 kW): rated to cool 2931 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3K18 — a AT cooling tower, 1088 nominal tons (4784 kW): rated to cool 3276 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3K20 — a AT cooling tower, 1043 nominal tons (4583 kW): rated to cool 3138 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3L18 — a AT cooling tower, 1157 nominal tons (5087 kW): rated to cool 3483 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 119.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3L20 — a AT cooling tower, 1138 nominal tons (5004 kW): rated to cool 3426 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 121.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3M18 — a AT cooling tower, 1223 nominal tons (5376 kW): rated to cool 3681 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3M20 — a AT cooling tower, 1215 nominal tons (5341 kW): rated to cool 3657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 128.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3N18 — a AT cooling tower, 1346 nominal tons (5915 kW): rated to cool 4050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 138.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3N20 — a AT cooling tower, 1361 nominal tons (5985 kW): rated to cool 4098 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 140.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3O18 — a AT cooling tower, 1443 nominal tons (6344 kW): rated to cool 4344 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-3O20 — a AT cooling tower, 1477 nominal tons (6493 kW): rated to cool 4446 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 150.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4J18 — a AT cooling tower, 1032 nominal tons (4535 kW): rated to cool 3105 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4K18 — a AT cooling tower, 1141 nominal tons (5017 kW): rated to cool 3435 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4K20 — a AT cooling tower, 1115 nominal tons (4903 kW): rated to cool 3357 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4L18 — a AT cooling tower, 1209 nominal tons (5315 kW): rated to cool 3639 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 117.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4L20 — a AT cooling tower, 1206 nominal tons (5301 kW): rated to cool 3630 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 119.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4M18 — a AT cooling tower, 1279 nominal tons (5621 kW): rated to cool 3849 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4M20 — a AT cooling tower, 1280 nominal tons (5626 kW): rated to cool 3852 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4N18 — a AT cooling tower, 1404 nominal tons (6173 kW): rated to cool 4227 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 136.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4N20 — a AT cooling tower, 1423 nominal tons (6257 kW): rated to cool 4284 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 138.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4O18 — a AT cooling tower, 1508 nominal tons (6629 kW): rated to cool 4539 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 146.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4O20 — a AT cooling tower, 1540 nominal tons (6769 kW): rated to cool 4635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 148.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4P18 — a AT cooling tower, 1565 nominal tons (6879 kW): rated to cool 4710 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 224-4P20 — a AT cooling tower, 1598 nominal tons (7023 kW): rated to cool 4809 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 157.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-2K24 — a AT cooling tower, 1194 nominal tons (5249 kW): rated to cool 3594 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 147.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-2L24 — a AT cooling tower, 1325 nominal tons (5823 kW): rated to cool 3987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 158.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-2M24 — a AT cooling tower, 1397 nominal tons (6143 kW): rated to cool 4206 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 167.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-2N24 — a AT cooling tower, 1515 nominal tons (6660 kW): rated to cool 4560 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 184.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-2O24 — a AT cooling tower, 1628 nominal tons (7155 kW): rated to cool 4899 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 197.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-3K24 — a AT cooling tower, 1371 nominal tons (6029 kW): rated to cool 4128 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 145.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-3L24 — a AT cooling tower, 1505 nominal tons (6616 kW): rated to cool 4530 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-3M24 — a AT cooling tower, 1577 nominal tons (6931 kW): rated to cool 4746 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 165.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-3N24 — a AT cooling tower, 1734 nominal tons (7624 kW): rated to cool 5220 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 180.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-3O24 — a AT cooling tower, 1849 nominal tons (8127 kW): rated to cool 5565 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 194.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-3P24 — a AT cooling tower, 1962 nominal tons (8627 kW): rated to cool 5907 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 205.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-4K24 — a AT cooling tower, 1503 nominal tons (6607 kW): rated to cool 4524 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 142.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-4L24 — a AT cooling tower, 1625 nominal tons (7142 kW): rated to cool 4890 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 153.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-4M24 — a AT cooling tower, 1700 nominal tons (7475 kW): rated to cool 5118 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 162.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-4N24 — a AT cooling tower, 1847 nominal tons (8119 kW): rated to cool 5559 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 177.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-4O24 — a AT cooling tower, 1946 nominal tons (8552 kW): rated to cool 5856 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 190.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-4P24 — a AT cooling tower, 2060 nominal tons (9056 kW): rated to cool 6201 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 202.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-4Q24 — a AT cooling tower, 2214 nominal tons (9731 kW): rated to cool 6663 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 216.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-5K26 — a AT cooling tower, 1956 nominal tons (8601 kW): rated to cool 5889 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 185.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-5L26 — a AT cooling tower, 2104 nominal tons (9249 kW): rated to cool 6333 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 198.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-5M26 — a AT cooling tower, 2229 nominal tons (9797 kW): rated to cool 6708 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 210.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-5N26 — a AT cooling tower, 2435 nominal tons (10704 kW): rated to cool 7329 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 229.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 228-5O26 — a AT cooling tower, 2604 nominal tons (11449 kW): rated to cool 7839 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 246.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-2F17 — a AT cooling tower, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-2G17 — a AT cooling tower, 224 nominal tons (986 kW): rated to cool 675 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-2H17 — a AT cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-3F17 — a AT cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-3G17 — a AT cooling tower, 249 nominal tons (1095 kW): rated to cool 750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-3H17 — a AT cooling tower, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-3I17 — a AT cooling tower, 301 nominal tons (1323 kW): rated to cool 906 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-4F17 — a AT cooling tower, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-4G17 — a AT cooling tower, 261 nominal tons (1148 kW): rated to cool 786 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-4H17 — a AT cooling tower, 286 nominal tons (1257 kW): rated to cool 861 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-4I17 — a AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 26-4J17 — a AT cooling tower, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2G36 — a AT cooling tower, 443 nominal tons (1945 kW): rated to cool 1332 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2H24 — a AT cooling tower, 322 nominal tons (1415 kW): rated to cool 969 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2H28 — a AT cooling tower, 342 nominal tons (1503 kW): rated to cool 1029 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2H36 — a AT cooling tower, 529 nominal tons (2327 kW): rated to cool 1593 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2I24 — a AT cooling tower, 355 nominal tons (1560 kW): rated to cool 1068 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2I28 — a AT cooling tower, 485 nominal tons (2134 kW): rated to cool 1461 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2I36 — a AT cooling tower, 586 nominal tons (2576 kW): rated to cool 1764 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2J24 — a AT cooling tower, 409 nominal tons (1796 kW): rated to cool 1230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2J28 — a AT cooling tower, 431 nominal tons (1893 kW): rated to cool 1296 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2J36 — a AT cooling tower, 674 nominal tons (2962 kW): rated to cool 2028 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2K24 — a AT cooling tower, 451 nominal tons (1985 kW): rated to cool 1359 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2K28 — a AT cooling tower, 593 nominal tons (2607 kW): rated to cool 1785 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-2L28 — a AT cooling tower, 470 nominal tons (2068 kW): rated to cool 1416 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3G36 — a AT cooling tower, 509 nominal tons (2239 kW): rated to cool 1533 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3H24 — a AT cooling tower, 362 nominal tons (1590 kW): rated to cool 1089 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3H28 — a AT cooling tower, 381 nominal tons (1674 kW): rated to cool 1146 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3H36 — a AT cooling tower, 598 nominal tons (2629 kW): rated to cool 1800 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3I24 — a AT cooling tower, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1206 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3I28 — a AT cooling tower, 524 nominal tons (2305 kW): rated to cool 1578 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3I36 — a AT cooling tower, 662 nominal tons (2909 kW): rated to cool 1992 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3J24 — a AT cooling tower, 461 nominal tons (2029 kW): rated to cool 1389 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3J28 — a AT cooling tower, 496 nominal tons (2182 kW): rated to cool 1494 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3J36 — a AT cooling tower, 760 nominal tons (3343 kW): rated to cool 2289 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3K24 — a AT cooling tower, 509 nominal tons (2239 kW): rated to cool 1533 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3K28 — a AT cooling tower, 633 nominal tons (2782 kW): rated to cool 1905 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3K36 — a AT cooling tower, 841 nominal tons (3698 kW): rated to cool 2532 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3L24 — a AT cooling tower, 551 nominal tons (2423 kW): rated to cool 1659 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3L28 — a AT cooling tower, 533 nominal tons (2344 kW): rated to cool 1605 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-3M28 — a AT cooling tower, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4G36 — a AT cooling tower, 566 nominal tons (2489 kW): rated to cool 1704 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4H24 — a AT cooling tower, 397 nominal tons (1744 kW): rated to cool 1194 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4H28 — a AT cooling tower, 439 nominal tons (1928 kW): rated to cool 1320 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4H36 — a AT cooling tower, 649 nominal tons (2852 kW): rated to cool 1953 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4I24 — a AT cooling tower, 435 nominal tons (1910 kW): rated to cool 1308 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4I28 — a AT cooling tower, 389 nominal tons (1709 kW): rated to cool 1170 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4I36 — a AT cooling tower, 708 nominal tons (3111 kW): rated to cool 2130 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4J24 — a AT cooling tower, 490 nominal tons (2156 kW): rated to cool 1476 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4J28 — a AT cooling tower, 549 nominal tons (2414 kW): rated to cool 1653 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4J36 — a AT cooling tower, 799 nominal tons (3514 kW): rated to cool 2406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4K24 — a AT cooling tower, 535 nominal tons (2353 kW): rated to cool 1611 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4K28 — a AT cooling tower, 432 nominal tons (1897 kW): rated to cool 1299 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4K36 — a AT cooling tower, 872 nominal tons (3834 kW): rated to cool 2625 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4L24 — a AT cooling tower, 572 nominal tons (2515 kW): rated to cool 1722 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4L28 — a AT cooling tower, 582 nominal tons (2559 kW): rated to cool 1752 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 27-4M28 — a AT cooling tower, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1980 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-2F17 — a AT cooling tower, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-2G17 — a AT cooling tower, 273 nominal tons (1200 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-2H17 — a AT cooling tower, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-2I17 — a AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-3F17 — a AT cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-3G17 — a AT cooling tower, 303 nominal tons (1332 kW): rated to cool 912 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-3H17 — a AT cooling tower, 330 nominal tons (1450 kW): rated to cool 993 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-3I17 — a AT cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-3J17 — a AT cooling tower, 392 nominal tons (1722 kW): rated to cool 1179 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-4F17 — a AT cooling tower, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-4G17 — a AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-4H17 — a AT cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-4I17 — a AT cooling tower, 372 nominal tons (1634 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 28-4J17 — a AT cooling tower, 413 nominal tons (1814 kW): rated to cool 1242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2G18 — a AT cooling tower, 273 nominal tons (1200 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2G21 — a AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2H18 — a AT cooling tower, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2H21 — a AT cooling tower, 378 nominal tons (1661 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2H24 — a AT cooling tower, 399 nominal tons (1753 kW): rated to cool 1200 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2H28 — a AT cooling tower, 445 nominal tons (1954 kW): rated to cool 1338 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2I18 — a AT cooling tower, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2I21 — a AT cooling tower, 407 nominal tons (1788 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2I24 — a AT cooling tower, 452 nominal tons (1989 kW): rated to cool 1362 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2I28 — a AT cooling tower, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2J18 — a AT cooling tower, 421 nominal tons (1849 kW): rated to cool 1266 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2J21 — a AT cooling tower, 465 nominal tons (2046 kW): rated to cool 1401 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2J24 — a AT cooling tower, 505 nominal tons (2221 kW): rated to cool 1521 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2J28 — a AT cooling tower, 561 nominal tons (2467 kW): rated to cool 1689 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2K24 — a AT cooling tower, 557 nominal tons (2449 kW): rated to cool 1677 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2K28 — a AT cooling tower, 620 nominal tons (2725 kW): rated to cool 1866 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-2L28 — a AT cooling tower, 676 nominal tons (2971 kW): rated to cool 2034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3G18 — a AT cooling tower, 311 nominal tons (1367 kW): rated to cool 936 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3G21 — a AT cooling tower, 346 nominal tons (1520 kW): rated to cool 1041 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3H18 — a AT cooling tower, 367 nominal tons (1612 kW): rated to cool 1104 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3H21 — a AT cooling tower, 409 nominal tons (1796 kW): rated to cool 1230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3H24 — a AT cooling tower, 450 nominal tons (1980 kW): rated to cool 1356 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3H28 — a AT cooling tower, 500 nominal tons (2199 kW): rated to cool 1506 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3I18 — a AT cooling tower, 403 nominal tons (1770 kW): rated to cool 1212 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3I21 — a AT cooling tower, 447 nominal tons (1963 kW): rated to cool 1344 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3I24 — a AT cooling tower, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3I28 — a AT cooling tower, 561 nominal tons (2467 kW): rated to cool 1689 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3J18 — a AT cooling tower, 469 nominal tons (2064 kW): rated to cool 1413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3J21 — a AT cooling tower, 516 nominal tons (2270 kW): rated to cool 1554 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3J24 — a AT cooling tower, 569 nominal tons (2502 kW): rated to cool 1713 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3J28 — a AT cooling tower, 631 nominal tons (2773 kW): rated to cool 1899 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3K21 — a AT cooling tower, 576 nominal tons (2532 kW): rated to cool 1734 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3K24 — a AT cooling tower, 628 nominal tons (2760 kW): rated to cool 1890 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3K28 — a AT cooling tower, 696 nominal tons (3058 kW): rated to cool 2094 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3L24 — a AT cooling tower, 672 nominal tons (2953 kW): rated to cool 2022 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3L28 — a AT cooling tower, 754 nominal tons (3317 kW): rated to cool 2271 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-3M28 — a AT cooling tower, 799 nominal tons (3514 kW): rated to cool 2406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4G18 — a AT cooling tower, 334 nominal tons (1468 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4G21 — a AT cooling tower, 382 nominal tons (1678 kW): rated to cool 1149 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4H18 — a AT cooling tower, 386 nominal tons (1696 kW): rated to cool 1161 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4H21 — a AT cooling tower, 444 nominal tons (1950 kW): rated to cool 1335 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4H24 — a AT cooling tower, 479 nominal tons (2107 kW): rated to cool 1443 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4H28 — a AT cooling tower, 533 nominal tons (2344 kW): rated to cool 1605 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4I18 — a AT cooling tower, 424 nominal tons (1862 kW): rated to cool 1275 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4I21 — a AT cooling tower, 480 nominal tons (2112 kW): rated to cool 1446 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4I24 — a AT cooling tower, 529 nominal tons (2327 kW): rated to cool 1593 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4I28 — a AT cooling tower, 590 nominal tons (2594 kW): rated to cool 1776 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4J18 — a AT cooling tower, 489 nominal tons (2151 kW): rated to cool 1473 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4J21 — a AT cooling tower, 545 nominal tons (2397 kW): rated to cool 1641 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4J24 — a AT cooling tower, 591 nominal tons (2598 kW): rated to cool 1779 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4J28 — a AT cooling tower, 659 nominal tons (2896 kW): rated to cool 1983 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4K18 — a AT cooling tower, 536 nominal tons (2357 kW): rated to cool 1614 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4K21 — a AT cooling tower, 602 nominal tons (2646 kW): rated to cool 1812 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4K24 — a AT cooling tower, 651 nominal tons (2861 kW): rated to cool 1959 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4K28 — a AT cooling tower, 724 nominal tons (3181 kW): rated to cool 2178 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4L21 — a AT cooling tower, 634 nominal tons (2787 kW): rated to cool 1908 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4L24 — a AT cooling tower, 694 nominal tons (3049 kW): rated to cool 2088 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4L28 — a AT cooling tower, 784 nominal tons (3448 kW): rated to cool 2361 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4M24 — a AT cooling tower, 716 nominal tons (3146 kW): rated to cool 2154 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 29-4M28 — a AT cooling tower, 827 nominal tons (3637 kW): rated to cool 2490 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-2I36 — a AT cooling tower, 670 nominal tons (2944 kW): rated to cool 2016 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-2J36 — a AT cooling tower, 814 nominal tons (3580 kW): rated to cool 2451 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-2K36 — a AT cooling tower, 900 nominal tons (3956 kW): rated to cool 2709 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-2L36 — a AT cooling tower, 960 nominal tons (4219 kW): rated to cool 2889 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-2M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1009 nominal tons (4434 kW): rated to cool 3036 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-3I36 — a AT cooling tower, 779 nominal tons (3426 kW): rated to cool 2346 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-3J36 — a AT cooling tower, 911 nominal tons (4005 kW): rated to cool 2742 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-3K36 — a AT cooling tower, 997 nominal tons (4381 kW): rated to cool 3000 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-3L36 — a AT cooling tower, 1064 nominal tons (4679 kW): rated to cool 3204 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-3M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1122 nominal tons (4933 kW): rated to cool 3378 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-4I36 — a AT cooling tower, 818 nominal tons (3597 kW): rated to cool 2463 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-4J36 — a AT cooling tower, 950 nominal tons (4175 kW): rated to cool 2859 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-4K36 — a AT cooling tower, 1035 nominal tons (4548 kW): rated to cool 3114 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 110.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-4L36 — a AT cooling tower, 1102 nominal tons (4846 kW): rated to cool 3318 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-4M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1160 nominal tons (5100 kW): rated to cool 3492 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 310-4N36 — a AT cooling tower, 1212 nominal tons (5328 kW): rated to cool 3648 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2I36 — a AT cooling tower, 848 nominal tons (3729 kW): rated to cool 2553 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2I42 — a AT cooling tower, 907 nominal tons (3987 kW): rated to cool 2730 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2J36 — a AT cooling tower, 1011 nominal tons (4443 kW): rated to cool 3042 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2J42 — a AT cooling tower, 1087 nominal tons (4780 kW): rated to cool 3273 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 126.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2J54 — a AT cooling tower, 1320 nominal tons (5801 kW): rated to cool 3972 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 156.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2K36 — a AT cooling tower, 1102 nominal tons (4846 kW): rated to cool 3318 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2K42 — a AT cooling tower, 1191 nominal tons (5236 kW): rated to cool 3585 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 138.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2K54 — a AT cooling tower, 1494 nominal tons (6568 kW): rated to cool 4497 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 170.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2K60 — a AT cooling tower, 1363 nominal tons (5994 kW): rated to cool 4104 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 174.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2L36 — a AT cooling tower, 1183 nominal tons (5201 kW): rated to cool 3561 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 136.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2L42 — a AT cooling tower, 1285 nominal tons (5648 kW): rated to cool 3867 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 148.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2L54 — a AT cooling tower, 1581 nominal tons (6949 kW): rated to cool 4758 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 183.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2L60 — a AT cooling tower, 1503 nominal tons (6607 kW): rated to cool 4524 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 187.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1253 nominal tons (5507 kW): rated to cool 3771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 145.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2M42 — a AT cooling tower, 1361 nominal tons (5985 kW): rated to cool 4098 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 157.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2M54 — a AT cooling tower, 1664 nominal tons (7317 kW): rated to cool 5010 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 194.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2M60 — a AT cooling tower, 1617 nominal tons (7107 kW): rated to cool 4866 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 198.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2N54 — a AT cooling tower, 1834 nominal tons (8062 kW): rated to cool 5520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 213.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2N60 — a AT cooling tower, 1859 nominal tons (8171 kW): rated to cool 5595 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 217.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-2O60 — a AT cooling tower, 2016 nominal tons (8864 kW): rated to cool 6069 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 233.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3I36 — a AT cooling tower, 957 nominal tons (4206 kW): rated to cool 2880 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3I42 — a AT cooling tower, 1042 nominal tons (4579 kW): rated to cool 3135 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3J36 — a AT cooling tower, 1118 nominal tons (4916 kW): rated to cool 3366 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3J42 — a AT cooling tower, 1225 nominal tons (5385 kW): rated to cool 3687 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3J54 — a AT cooling tower, 1468 nominal tons (6454 kW): rated to cool 4419 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 153.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3K36 — a AT cooling tower, 1220 nominal tons (5363 kW): rated to cool 3672 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3K42 — a AT cooling tower, 1326 nominal tons (5827 kW): rated to cool 3990 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 136.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3K54 — a AT cooling tower, 1643 nominal tons (7221 kW): rated to cool 4944 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 168.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3K60 — a AT cooling tower, 1595 nominal tons (7010 kW): rated to cool 4800 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 171.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3L36 — a AT cooling tower, 1312 nominal tons (5766 kW): rated to cool 3948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3L42 — a AT cooling tower, 1423 nominal tons (6257 kW): rated to cool 4284 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 146.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3L54 — a AT cooling tower, 1746 nominal tons (7676 kW): rated to cool 5256 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 180.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3L60 — a AT cooling tower, 1739 nominal tons (7646 kW): rated to cool 5235 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 184.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1393 nominal tons (6125 kW): rated to cool 4194 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 142.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3M42 — a AT cooling tower, 1514 nominal tons (6655 kW): rated to cool 4557 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 154.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3M54 — a AT cooling tower, 1845 nominal tons (8110 kW): rated to cool 5553 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 191.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3M60 — a AT cooling tower, 1853 nominal tons (8145 kW): rated to cool 5577 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 194.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3N42 — a AT cooling tower, 1656 nominal tons (7282 kW): rated to cool 4986 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 169.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3N54 — a AT cooling tower, 2029 nominal tons (8920 kW): rated to cool 6108 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 209.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3N60 — a AT cooling tower, 2076 nominal tons (9126 kW): rated to cool 6249 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 213.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3O54 — a AT cooling tower, 2175 nominal tons (9560 kW): rated to cool 6546 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 224.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-3O60 — a AT cooling tower, 2252 nominal tons (9902 kW): rated to cool 6780 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 228.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4I36 — a AT cooling tower, 1018 nominal tons (4473 kW): rated to cool 3063 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4I42 — a AT cooling tower, 1119 nominal tons (4920 kW): rated to cool 3369 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 107.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4J36 — a AT cooling tower, 1170 nominal tons (5144 kW): rated to cool 3522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4J42 — a AT cooling tower, 1289 nominal tons (5665 kW): rated to cool 3879 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4J54 — a AT cooling tower, 1555 nominal tons (6835 kW): rated to cool 4680 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 151.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4K36 — a AT cooling tower, 1273 nominal tons (5595 kW): rated to cool 3831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 123.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4K42 — a AT cooling tower, 1390 nominal tons (6112 kW): rated to cool 4185 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 134.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4K54 — a AT cooling tower, 1719 nominal tons (7558 kW): rated to cool 5175 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 165.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4K60 — a AT cooling tower, 1701 nominal tons (7479 kW): rated to cool 5121 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 168.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4L36 — a AT cooling tower, 1370 nominal tons (6024 kW): rated to cool 4125 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 132.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4L42 — a AT cooling tower, 1490 nominal tons (6550 kW): rated to cool 4485 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 143.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4L54 — a AT cooling tower, 1822 nominal tons (8009 kW): rated to cool 5484 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 177.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4L60 — a AT cooling tower, 1838 nominal tons (8079 kW): rated to cool 5532 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 181.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1453 nominal tons (6388 kW): rated to cool 4374 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 139.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4M42 — a AT cooling tower, 1584 nominal tons (6962 kW): rated to cool 4767 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4M54 — a AT cooling tower, 1929 nominal tons (8478 kW): rated to cool 5805 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 188.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4M60 — a AT cooling tower, 1948 nominal tons (8566 kW): rated to cool 5865 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 191.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4N36 — a AT cooling tower, 1555 nominal tons (6835 kW): rated to cool 4680 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 153.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4N42 — a AT cooling tower, 1732 nominal tons (7615 kW): rated to cool 5214 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 166.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4N54 — a AT cooling tower, 2117 nominal tons (9306 kW): rated to cool 6372 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 205.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4N60 — a AT cooling tower, 2167 nominal tons (9525 kW): rated to cool 6522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 209.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4O54 — a AT cooling tower, 2273 nominal tons (9994 kW): rated to cool 6843 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 220.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4O60 — a AT cooling tower, 2344 nominal tons (10305 kW): rated to cool 7056 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 224.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4P54 — a AT cooling tower, 2359 nominal tons (10371 kW): rated to cool 7101 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 233.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 312-4P60 — a AT cooling tower, 2432 nominal tons (10691 kW): rated to cool 7320 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 238.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-2K72 — a AT cooling tower, 1783 nominal tons (7838 kW): rated to cool 5367 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 220.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-2L72 — a AT cooling tower, 1979 nominal tons (8701 kW): rated to cool 5958 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 236.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-2M72 — a AT cooling tower, 2088 nominal tons (9179 kW): rated to cool 6285 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 250.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-2N72 — a AT cooling tower, 2263 nominal tons (9950 kW): rated to cool 6813 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 275.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-2O72 — a AT cooling tower, 2431 nominal tons (10686 kW): rated to cool 7317 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 295.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-3K72 — a AT cooling tower, 2049 nominal tons (9008 kW): rated to cool 6168 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 217.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-3L72 — a AT cooling tower, 2249 nominal tons (9889 kW): rated to cool 6771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 232.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-3M72 — a AT cooling tower, 2356 nominal tons (10358 kW): rated to cool 7092 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 246.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-3N72 — a AT cooling tower, 2592 nominal tons (11396 kW): rated to cool 7803 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 270.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-3O72 — a AT cooling tower, 2764 nominal tons (12150 kW): rated to cool 8319 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 290.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-3P72 — a AT cooling tower, 2934 nominal tons (12899 kW): rated to cool 8832 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 307.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-4K72 — a AT cooling tower, 2248 nominal tons (9880 kW): rated to cool 6765 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 213.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-4L72 — a AT cooling tower, 2429 nominal tons (10677 kW): rated to cool 7311 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 228.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-4M72 — a AT cooling tower, 2543 nominal tons (11177 kW): rated to cool 7653 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 242.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-4N72 — a AT cooling tower, 2761 nominal tons (12136 kW): rated to cool 8310 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 265.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-4O72 — a AT cooling tower, 2909 nominal tons (12789 kW): rated to cool 8757 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 285.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-4P72 — a AT cooling tower, 3081 nominal tons (13543 kW): rated to cool 9273 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 302.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-4Q72 — a AT cooling tower, 3311 nominal tons (14555 kW): rated to cool 9966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 323.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-5K78 — a AT cooling tower, 2926 nominal tons (12864 kW): rated to cool 8808 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 276.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-5L78 — a AT cooling tower, 3147 nominal tons (13832 kW): rated to cool 9471 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 296.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-5M78 — a AT cooling tower, 3333 nominal tons (14651 kW): rated to cool 10032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 314.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-5N78 — a AT cooling tower, 3643 nominal tons (16014 kW): rated to cool 10965 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 343.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 314-5O78 — a AT cooling tower, 3895 nominal tons (17122 kW): rated to cool 11724 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 368.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 342-5K26 — a AT cooling tower, 2872 nominal tons (12627 kW): rated to cool 8646 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 277.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 342-5L26 — a AT cooling tower, 3090 nominal tons (13582 kW): rated to cool 9300 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 298.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 342-5M26 — a AT cooling tower, 3275 nominal tons (14397 kW): rated to cool 9858 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 315.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 342-5N26 — a AT cooling tower, 3581 nominal tons (15742 kW): rated to cool 10779 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 345.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 342-5O26 — a AT cooling tower, 3831 nominal tons (16842 kW): rated to cool 11532 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 369.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-2H36 — a AT cooling tower, 603 nominal tons (2651 kW): rated to cool 1815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-2H42 — a AT cooling tower, 662 nominal tons (2909 kW): rated to cool 1992 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-2I36 — a AT cooling tower, 684 nominal tons (3006 kW): rated to cool 2058 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-2I42 — a AT cooling tower, 751 nominal tons (3304 kW): rated to cool 2262 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 86.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-2J36 — a AT cooling tower, 762 nominal tons (3352 kW): rated to cool 2295 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-2J42 — a AT cooling tower, 837 nominal tons (3680 kW): rated to cool 2520 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 98.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-2K36 — a AT cooling tower, 840 nominal tons (3694 kW): rated to cool 2529 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-2K42 — a AT cooling tower, 924 nominal tons (4062 kW): rated to cool 2781 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 108.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-2L42 — a AT cooling tower, 1008 nominal tons (4430 kW): rated to cool 3033 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 116.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3H36 — a AT cooling tower, 680 nominal tons (2988 kW): rated to cool 2046 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3H42 — a AT cooling tower, 746 nominal tons (3277 kW): rated to cool 2244 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3I36 — a AT cooling tower, 760 nominal tons (3343 kW): rated to cool 2289 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3I42 — a AT cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3J36 — a AT cooling tower, 859 nominal tons (3777 kW): rated to cool 2586 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3J42 — a AT cooling tower, 942 nominal tons (4140 kW): rated to cool 2835 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3K36 — a AT cooling tower, 948 nominal tons (4167 kW): rated to cool 2853 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3K42 — a AT cooling tower, 1039 nominal tons (4565 kW): rated to cool 3126 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3L36 — a AT cooling tower, 1013 nominal tons (4451 kW): rated to cool 3048 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3L42 — a AT cooling tower, 1126 nominal tons (4951 kW): rated to cool 3390 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-3M42 — a AT cooling tower, 1193 nominal tons (5245 kW): rated to cool 3591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4H36 — a AT cooling tower, 723 nominal tons (3177 kW): rated to cool 2175 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4H42 — a AT cooling tower, 796 nominal tons (3501 kW): rated to cool 2397 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4I36 — a AT cooling tower, 797 nominal tons (3505 kW): rated to cool 2400 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4I42 — a AT cooling tower, 881 nominal tons (3873 kW): rated to cool 2652 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4J36 — a AT cooling tower, 890 nominal tons (3913 kW): rated to cool 2679 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4J42 — a AT cooling tower, 983 nominal tons (4320 kW): rated to cool 2958 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4K36 — a AT cooling tower, 981 nominal tons (4311 kW): rated to cool 2952 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4K42 — a AT cooling tower, 1080 nominal tons (4749 kW): rated to cool 3252 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4L36 — a AT cooling tower, 1047 nominal tons (4600 kW): rated to cool 3150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4L42 — a AT cooling tower, 1170 nominal tons (5144 kW): rated to cool 3522 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4M36 — a AT cooling tower, 1078 nominal tons (4741 kW): rated to cool 3246 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 39-4M42 — a AT cooling tower, 1235 nominal tons (5429 kW): rated to cool 3717 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 118.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2I24 — a AT cooling tower, 1110 nominal tons (4881 kW): rated to cool 3342 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 133.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2I28 — a AT cooling tower, 1155 nominal tons (5078 kW): rated to cool 3477 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 141.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2J24 — a AT cooling tower, 1323 nominal tons (5814 kW): rated to cool 3981 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 152.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2J28 — a AT cooling tower, 1400 nominal tons (6156 kW): rated to cool 4215 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 160.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2J36 — a AT cooling tower, 1681 nominal tons (7391 kW): rated to cool 5061 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 199.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2K24 — a AT cooling tower, 1444 nominal tons (6349 kW): rated to cool 4347 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 166.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2K28 — a AT cooling tower, 1559 nominal tons (6852 kW): rated to cool 4692 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 176.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2K36 — a AT cooling tower, 1908 nominal tons (8386 kW): rated to cool 5742 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 218.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2K40 — a AT cooling tower, 1727 nominal tons (7593 kW): rated to cool 5199 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 222.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2L24 — a AT cooling tower, 1550 nominal tons (6813 kW): rated to cool 4665 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 179.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2L28 — a AT cooling tower, 1683 nominal tons (7400 kW): rated to cool 5067 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 188.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2L36 — a AT cooling tower, 2016 nominal tons (8864 kW): rated to cool 6069 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 235.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2L40 — a AT cooling tower, 1913 nominal tons (8408 kW): rated to cool 5757 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 239.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2M24 — a AT cooling tower, 1642 nominal tons (7216 kW): rated to cool 4941 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 189.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2M28 — a AT cooling tower, 1832 nominal tons (8053 kW): rated to cool 5514 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 200.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2M36 — a AT cooling tower, 2126 nominal tons (9345 kW): rated to cool 6399 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 249.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2M40 — a AT cooling tower, 2057 nominal tons (9043 kW): rated to cool 6192 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 253.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2N36 — a AT cooling tower, 2342 nominal tons (10296 kW): rated to cool 7050 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 273.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2N40 — a AT cooling tower, 2371 nominal tons (10423 kW): rated to cool 7137 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 277.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-2O40 — a AT cooling tower, 2575 nominal tons (11321 kW): rated to cool 7752 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 297.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3I24 — a AT cooling tower, 1253 nominal tons (5507 kW): rated to cool 3771 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 131.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3I28 — a AT cooling tower, 1318 nominal tons (5792 kW): rated to cool 3966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 139.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3J24 — a AT cooling tower, 1466 nominal tons (6445 kW): rated to cool 4413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3J28 — a AT cooling tower, 1558 nominal tons (6848 kW): rated to cool 4689 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 158.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3J36 — a AT cooling tower, 1877 nominal tons (8250 kW): rated to cool 5649 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 196.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3K24 — a AT cooling tower, 1600 nominal tons (7032 kW): rated to cool 4815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 163.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3K28 — a AT cooling tower, 1739 nominal tons (7646 kW): rated to cool 5235 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 173.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3K36 — a AT cooling tower, 2101 nominal tons (9236 kW): rated to cool 6324 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 215.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3K40 — a AT cooling tower, 2031 nominal tons (8929 kW): rated to cool 6114 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 219.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3L24 — a AT cooling tower, 1721 nominal tons (7567 kW): rated to cool 5181 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 175.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3L28 — a AT cooling tower, 1867 nominal tons (8206 kW): rated to cool 5619 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 185.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3L36 — a AT cooling tower, 2239 nominal tons (9841 kW): rated to cool 6738 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 231.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3L40 — a AT cooling tower, 2223 nominal tons (9770 kW): rated to cool 6690 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 235.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3M24 — a AT cooling tower, 1829 nominal tons (8040 kW): rated to cool 5505 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 186.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3M28 — a AT cooling tower, 1986 nominal tons (8732 kW): rated to cool 5979 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 196.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3M36 — a AT cooling tower, 2365 nominal tons (10397 kW): rated to cool 7119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 244.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3M40 — a AT cooling tower, 2372 nominal tons (10428 kW): rated to cool 7140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 249.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3N28 — a AT cooling tower, 2192 nominal tons (9635 kW): rated to cool 6597 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 215.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3N36 — a AT cooling tower, 2605 nominal tons (11453 kW): rated to cool 7842 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 267.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3N40 — a AT cooling tower, 2661 nominal tons (11698 kW): rated to cool 8010 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 272.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3O36 — a AT cooling tower, 2797 nominal tons (12294 kW): rated to cool 8418 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 287.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-3O40 — a AT cooling tower, 2890 nominal tons (12706 kW): rated to cool 8700 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 291.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4I24 — a AT cooling tower, 1336 nominal tons (5871 kW): rated to cool 4020 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 129.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4I28 — a AT cooling tower, 1429 nominal tons (6283 kW): rated to cool 4302 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 136.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4J24 — a AT cooling tower, 1537 nominal tons (6756 kW): rated to cool 4626 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 147.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4J28 — a AT cooling tower, 1648 nominal tons (7247 kW): rated to cool 4962 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4J36 — a AT cooling tower, 1998 nominal tons (8785 kW): rated to cool 6015 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 193.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4K24 — a AT cooling tower, 1672 nominal tons (7352 kW): rated to cool 5034 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 161.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4K28 — a AT cooling tower, 1827 nominal tons (8031 kW): rated to cool 5499 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 170.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4K36 — a AT cooling tower, 2214 nominal tons (9731 kW): rated to cool 6663 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 211.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4K40 — a AT cooling tower, 2183 nominal tons (9595 kW): rated to cool 6570 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 215.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4L24 — a AT cooling tower, 1801 nominal tons (7917 kW): rated to cool 5421 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 172.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4L28 — a AT cooling tower, 1958 nominal tons (8609 kW): rated to cool 5895 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 182.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4L36 — a AT cooling tower, 2345 nominal tons (10309 kW): rated to cool 7059 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 227.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4L40 — a AT cooling tower, 2361 nominal tons (10379 kW): rated to cool 7107 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 231.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4M24 — a AT cooling tower, 1910 nominal tons (8395 kW): rated to cool 5748 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 182.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4M28 — a AT cooling tower, 2081 nominal tons (9148 kW): rated to cool 6264 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 193.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4M36 — a AT cooling tower, 2483 nominal tons (10914 kW): rated to cool 7473 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 240.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4M40 — a AT cooling tower, 2507 nominal tons (11019 kW): rated to cool 7545 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 244.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4N24 — a AT cooling tower, 2043 nominal tons (8982 kW): rated to cool 6150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 200.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4N28 — a AT cooling tower, 2275 nominal tons (10003 kW): rated to cool 6849 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 211.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4N36 — a AT cooling tower, 2727 nominal tons (11987 kW): rated to cool 8208 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 263.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4N40 — a AT cooling tower, 2789 nominal tons (12259 kW): rated to cool 8394 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 267.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4O36 — a AT cooling tower, 2928 nominal tons (12872 kW): rated to cool 8814 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 282.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4O40 — a AT cooling tower, 3018 nominal tons (13267 kW): rated to cool 9084 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 287.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4P36 — a AT cooling tower, 3039 nominal tons (13359 kW): rated to cool 9147 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 299.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 424-4P40 — a AT cooling tower, 3131 nominal tons (13762 kW): rated to cool 9423 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 304.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 428-5K52 — a AT cooling tower, 3844 nominal tons (16899 kW): rated to cool 11571 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 352.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 428-5L52 — a AT cooling tower, 4134 nominal tons (18174 kW): rated to cool 12444 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 377.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 428-5M52 — a AT cooling tower, 4380 nominal tons (19256 kW): rated to cool 13185 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 400.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 428-5N52 — a AT cooling tower, 4790 nominal tons (21057 kW): rated to cool 14418 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 437.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 428-5O52 — a AT cooling tower, 5124 nominal tons (22525 kW): rated to cool 15423 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 468.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 456-5K26 — a AT cooling tower, 3789 nominal tons (16658 kW): rated to cool 11406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 352.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 456-5L26 — a AT cooling tower, 4076 nominal tons (17920 kW): rated to cool 12270 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 378.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 456-5M26 — a AT cooling tower, 4321 nominal tons (18993 kW): rated to cool 13005 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 400.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 456-5N26 — a AT cooling tower, 4727 nominal tons (20781 kW): rated to cool 14229 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 437.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 456-5O26 — a AT cooling tower, 5058 nominal tons (22236 kW): rated to cool 15225 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 469.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-3I12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 155 nominal tons (681 kW): rated to cool 389 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 26.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-3I36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 461 nominal tons (2025 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-3J36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 529 nominal tons (2326 kW): rated to cool 1327 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-3K12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (871 kW): rated to cool 497 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-3K36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 583 nominal tons (2561 kW): rated to cool 1462 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-3L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 627 nominal tons (2758 kW): rated to cool 1574 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 93.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-3M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 666 nominal tons (2929 kW): rated to cool 1671 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 98.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-3N36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 732 nominal tons (3216 kW): rated to cool 1835 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-4I12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 169 nominal tons (744 kW): rated to cool 425 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 25.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-4I36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 488 nominal tons (2146 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-4J12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 195 nominal tons (857 kW): rated to cool 489 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 29.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-4J36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 560 nominal tons (2460 kW): rated to cool 1404 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 76.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-4K36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2706 kW): rated to cool 1544 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-4L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 662 nominal tons (2912 kW): rated to cool 1661 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-4M24 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 493 nominal tons (2169 kW): rated to cool 1238 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 71.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-4M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3090 kW): rated to cool 1763 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 95.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-4N36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 771 nominal tons (3390 kW): rated to cool 1934 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-5I24 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1650 kW): rated to cool 942 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 49.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-5I36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 523 nominal tons (2301 kW): rated to cool 1313 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-5J36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 599 nominal tons (2633 kW): rated to cool 1502 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 74.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-5K36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-5L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 707 nominal tons (3109 kW): rated to cool 1774 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-5M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 750 nominal tons (3297 kW): rated to cool 1881 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 92.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-5N36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 822 nominal tons (3614 kW): rated to cool 2062 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 100.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-6I12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 527 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-6I36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 567 nominal tons (2491 kW): rated to cool 1422 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-6J12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 241 nominal tons (1058 kW): rated to cool 604 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 27.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-6J36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 647 nominal tons (2844 kW): rated to cool 1623 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 72.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-6K36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 710 nominal tons (3121 kW): rated to cool 1781 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-6L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 762 nominal tons (3352 kW): rated to cool 1912 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 85.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-6M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 808 nominal tons (3551 kW): rated to cool 2026 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-6N36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 885 nominal tons (3888 kW): rated to cool 2219 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 97.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-7I36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 618 nominal tons (2717 kW): rated to cool 1550 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 61.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-7J36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 704 nominal tons (3095 kW): rated to cool 1766 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-7K36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 772 nominal tons (3392 kW): rated to cool 1935 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 76.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-7L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 828 nominal tons (3639 kW): rated to cool 2076 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 82.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-7M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 876 nominal tons (3853 kW): rated to cool 2199 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 10-7N36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 959 nominal tons (4214 kW): rated to cool 2405 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 94.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1137 kW): rated to cool 649 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 41.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3K28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 517 nominal tons (2273 kW): rated to cool 1297 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 279 nominal tons (1228 kW): rated to cool 701 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 44.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3L20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 387 nominal tons (1699 kW): rated to cool 970 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 58.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3L28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 559 nominal tons (2456 kW): rated to cool 1402 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3L40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 768 nominal tons (3374 kW): rated to cool 1925 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 117.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 297 nominal tons (1307 kW): rated to cool 746 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 47.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3M20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 411 nominal tons (1806 kW): rated to cool 1031 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 62.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3M28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 595 nominal tons (2615 kW): rated to cool 1492 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 94.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 748 nominal tons (3290 kW): rated to cool 1877 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 116.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3M40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 816 nominal tons (3586 kW): rated to cool 2046 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 125.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3N14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3N20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 452 nominal tons (1986 kW): rated to cool 1133 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 68.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3N28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 656 nominal tons (2883 kW): rated to cool 1645 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 102.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3N36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 823 nominal tons (3620 kW): rated to cool 2066 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 126.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3N40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 897 nominal tons (3944 kW): rated to cool 2251 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 136.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3O20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 486 nominal tons (2137 kW): rated to cool 1219 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 72.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-3O40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 965 nominal tons (4243 kW): rated to cool 2421 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 145.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1224 kW): rated to cool 699 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 40.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4K28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 557 nominal tons (2448 kW): rated to cool 1397 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4K36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 691 nominal tons (3039 kW): rated to cool 1734 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 99.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 300 nominal tons (1321 kW): rated to cool 754 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4L20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 407 nominal tons (1789 kW): rated to cool 1021 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 57.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4L28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 601 nominal tons (2642 kW): rated to cool 1508 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 745 nominal tons (3275 kW): rated to cool 1869 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4L40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 808 nominal tons (3553 kW): rated to cool 2027 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 114.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 320 nominal tons (1405 kW): rated to cool 802 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 45.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4M20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 432 nominal tons (1900 kW): rated to cool 1084 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4M28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 639 nominal tons (2810 kW): rated to cool 1603 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 792 nominal tons (3480 kW): rated to cool 1986 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 113.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4M40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 858 nominal tons (3773 kW): rated to cool 2153 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 121.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4N14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 352 nominal tons (1546 kW): rated to cool 882 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 49.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4N20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 475 nominal tons (2088 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 66.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4N28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3093 kW): rated to cool 1765 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 99.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4N36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 870 nominal tons (3825 kW): rated to cool 2182 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 123.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4N40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 943 nominal tons (4146 kW): rated to cool 2366 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 132.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4O20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 511 nominal tons (2244 kW): rated to cool 1281 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 70.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4O36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 936 nominal tons (4113 kW): rated to cool 2347 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 130.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-4O40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1014 nominal tons (4457 kW): rated to cool 2543 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 141.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 328 nominal tons (1440 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 42.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5L28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 655 nominal tons (2881 kW): rated to cool 1644 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 798 nominal tons (3508 kW): rated to cool 2002 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 348 nominal tons (1530 kW): rated to cool 873 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 44.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5M20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 460 nominal tons (2021 kW): rated to cool 1153 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5M28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 696 nominal tons (3060 kW): rated to cool 1746 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 847 nominal tons (3724 kW): rated to cool 2125 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 109.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5M40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 913 nominal tons (4014 kW): rated to cool 2291 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 117.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5N14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 382 nominal tons (1681 kW): rated to cool 959 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 48.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5N20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 505 nominal tons (2218 kW): rated to cool 1266 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 64.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5N28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 765 nominal tons (3363 kW): rated to cool 1919 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 96.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5N36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 930 nominal tons (4089 kW): rated to cool 2333 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 119.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5N40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1002 nominal tons (4406 kW): rated to cool 2514 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 128.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5O20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 542 nominal tons (2383 kW): rated to cool 1360 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 68.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5O36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 999 nominal tons (4393 kW): rated to cool 2506 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 127.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5O40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1077 nominal tons (4733 kW): rated to cool 2700 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 137.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5P20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 574 nominal tons (2525 kW): rated to cool 1441 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 72.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-5P40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1141 nominal tons (5015 kW): rated to cool 2862 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 144.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 361 nominal tons (1587 kW): rated to cool 905 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 40.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6L28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 722 nominal tons (3174 kW): rated to cool 1811 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 383 nominal tons (1684 kW): rated to cool 961 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6M28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 766 nominal tons (3367 kW): rated to cool 1921 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 86.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 915 nominal tons (4024 kW): rated to cool 2296 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6N14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 420 nominal tons (1847 kW): rated to cool 1054 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6N20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 541 nominal tons (2378 kW): rated to cool 1357 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 62.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6N28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 840 nominal tons (3694 kW): rated to cool 2108 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6N36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1004 nominal tons (4412 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 115.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6N40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1075 nominal tons (4724 kW): rated to cool 2695 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 124.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6O20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 581 nominal tons (2552 kW): rated to cool 1456 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 66.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6O36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1077 nominal tons (4735 kW): rated to cool 2702 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 123.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6O40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1153 nominal tons (5070 kW): rated to cool 2893 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 132.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6P20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 615 nominal tons (2703 kW): rated to cool 1542 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6P36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1141 nominal tons (5016 kW): rated to cool 2862 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 129.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-6P40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1221 nominal tons (5369 kW): rated to cool 3064 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 139.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 39.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7L28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 801 nominal tons (3521 kW): rated to cool 2009 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 425 nominal tons (1866 kW): rated to cool 1065 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 41.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7M28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 849 nominal tons (3732 kW): rated to cool 2130 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 996 nominal tons (4379 kW): rated to cool 2499 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7N14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 465 nominal tons (2044 kW): rated to cool 1166 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7N20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 584 nominal tons (2568 kW): rated to cool 1465 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7N28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 930 nominal tons (4088 kW): rated to cool 2333 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7N36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1091 nominal tons (4795 kW): rated to cool 2736 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 111.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7N40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1160 nominal tons (5101 kW): rated to cool 2911 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 120.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7O20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 626 nominal tons (2753 kW): rated to cool 1571 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 64.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7O36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1170 nominal tons (5142 kW): rated to cool 2934 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 119.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7O40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1244 nominal tons (5470 kW): rated to cool 3121 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 128.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7P20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 663 nominal tons (2914 kW): rated to cool 1663 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 12-7P40 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1317 nominal tons (5789 kW): rated to cool 3303 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 135.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-3H9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 176 nominal tons (775 kW): rated to cool 442 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-3I9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 196 nominal tons (862 kW): rated to cool 492 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-4I9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 220 nominal tons (967 kW): rated to cool 552 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-4J9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 254 nominal tons (1115 kW): rated to cool 636 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 38.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-5I9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 250 nominal tons (1101 kW): rated to cool 628 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 37.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-5J9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1264 kW): rated to cool 721 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 37.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-6J9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 329 nominal tons (1447 kW): rated to cool 826 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 36.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-7J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 733 nominal tons (3222 kW): rated to cool 1839 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 70.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 14-7J9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 379 nominal tons (1666 kW): rated to cool 950 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3I14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 810 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 52.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3J14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 372 nominal tons (1633 kW): rated to cool 932 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 410 nominal tons (1801 kW): rated to cool 1028 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-3L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 441 nominal tons (1941 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 70.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4J14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 399 nominal tons (1753 kW): rated to cool 1000 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 58.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4K12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 376 nominal tons (1655 kW): rated to cool 944 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 57.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 439 nominal tons (1930 kW): rated to cool 1101 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 63.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4L12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 406 nominal tons (1784 kW): rated to cool 1018 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 473 nominal tons (2077 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-4M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 502 nominal tons (2205 kW): rated to cool 1258 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 71.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-5J12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 377 nominal tons (1655 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 51.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-5J14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 434 nominal tons (1907 kW): rated to cool 1088 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 56.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-5K12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 414 nominal tons (1822 kW): rated to cool 1040 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 55.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-5K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 477 nominal tons (2096 kW): rated to cool 1196 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-5L12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 446 nominal tons (1961 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 59.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-5L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 513 nominal tons (2254 kW): rated to cool 1286 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-5M12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 473 nominal tons (2081 kW): rated to cool 1187 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 62.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-5M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 544 nominal tons (2390 kW): rated to cool 1364 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-6K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 523 nominal tons (2299 kW): rated to cool 1312 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-6L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 562 nominal tons (2470 kW): rated to cool 1409 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 63.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-6M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 595 nominal tons (2617 kW): rated to cool 1493 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-7K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 578 nominal tons (2542 kW): rated to cool 1450 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 58.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-7L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 620 nominal tons (2727 kW): rated to cool 1556 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 61.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 17-7M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 657 nominal tons (2887 kW): rated to cool 1647 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-3I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 461 nominal tons (2025 kW): rated to cool 1155 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-3I36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 876 nominal tons (3853 kW): rated to cool 2198 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 138.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-3J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 529 nominal tons (2326 kW): rated to cool 1327 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-3J36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1008 nominal tons (4430 kW): rated to cool 2528 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 158.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-3K18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 583 nominal tons (2561 kW): rated to cool 1462 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-3K36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1111 nominal tons (4882 kW): rated to cool 2786 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 173.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-3L18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 627 nominal tons (2758 kW): rated to cool 1574 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 93.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-3L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1197 nominal tons (5260 kW): rated to cool 3001 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 187.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-3M18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 666 nominal tons (2929 kW): rated to cool 1671 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 98.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-3N18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 732 nominal tons (3216 kW): rated to cool 1835 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-4I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 488 nominal tons (2146 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-4I36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 929 nominal tons (4086 kW): rated to cool 2331 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 134.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-4J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 560 nominal tons (2460 kW): rated to cool 1404 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 76.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-4J36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1067 nominal tons (4689 kW): rated to cool 2675 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 153.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-4K18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2706 kW): rated to cool 1544 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-4K36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1174 nominal tons (5161 kW): rated to cool 2945 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 168.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-4L18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 662 nominal tons (2912 kW): rated to cool 1661 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-4L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1264 nominal tons (5556 kW): rated to cool 3170 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 181.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-4M18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3090 kW): rated to cool 1763 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 95.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-4N18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 771 nominal tons (3390 kW): rated to cool 1934 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 523 nominal tons (2301 kW): rated to cool 1313 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5I36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 998 nominal tons (4385 kW): rated to cool 2502 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 130.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 599 nominal tons (2633 kW): rated to cool 1502 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 74.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5J36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1142 nominal tons (5021 kW): rated to cool 2865 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 148.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5K18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5K36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1256 nominal tons (5520 kW): rated to cool 3150 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 163.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5L12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 511 nominal tons (2247 kW): rated to cool 1282 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5L18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 707 nominal tons (3109 kW): rated to cool 1774 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1350 nominal tons (5936 kW): rated to cool 3387 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 176.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5M12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 543 nominal tons (2385 kW): rated to cool 1361 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5M18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 750 nominal tons (3297 kW): rated to cool 1881 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 92.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5M24 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1078 nominal tons (4737 kW): rated to cool 2703 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 138.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1432 nominal tons (6297 kW): rated to cool 3593 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 185.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-5N18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 822 nominal tons (3614 kW): rated to cool 2062 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 100.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 567 nominal tons (2491 kW): rated to cool 1422 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6I24 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 835 nominal tons (3670 kW): rated to cool 2094 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 95.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6I36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1081 nominal tons (4751 kW): rated to cool 2711 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 126.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 647 nominal tons (2844 kW): rated to cool 1623 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 72.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6J36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1235 nominal tons (5429 kW): rated to cool 3098 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 144.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6K18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 710 nominal tons (3121 kW): rated to cool 1781 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6K36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1356 nominal tons (5960 kW): rated to cool 3401 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 158.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6L18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 762 nominal tons (3352 kW): rated to cool 1912 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 85.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6L36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1456 nominal tons (6403 kW): rated to cool 3653 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 171.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6M18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 808 nominal tons (3551 kW): rated to cool 2026 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6M36 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1544 nominal tons (6786 kW): rated to cool 3872 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 180.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-6N18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 885 nominal tons (3888 kW): rated to cool 2219 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 97.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-7I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 618 nominal tons (2717 kW): rated to cool 1550 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 61.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-7J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 704 nominal tons (3095 kW): rated to cool 1766 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-7K18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 772 nominal tons (3392 kW): rated to cool 1935 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 76.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-7L18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 828 nominal tons (3639 kW): rated to cool 2076 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 82.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-7M18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 876 nominal tons (3853 kW): rated to cool 2199 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 20-7N18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 959 nominal tons (4214 kW): rated to cool 2405 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 94.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3J12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1768 kW): rated to cool 1009 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 68.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3K12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 446 nominal tons (1961 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 75.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 517 nominal tons (2273 kW): rated to cool 1297 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3K28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 987 nominal tons (4340 kW): rated to cool 2476 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 167.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3L12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 483 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1211 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 80.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 559 nominal tons (2456 kW): rated to cool 1402 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3L20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 762 nominal tons (3349 kW): rated to cool 1911 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 117.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3L28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1067 nominal tons (4692 kW): rated to cool 2677 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 179.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3M12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 514 nominal tons (2261 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 595 nominal tons (2615 kW): rated to cool 1492 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 94.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3M18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 748 nominal tons (3290 kW): rated to cool 1877 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 116.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3M20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 810 nominal tons (3560 kW): rated to cool 2031 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 125.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3N14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 656 nominal tons (2883 kW): rated to cool 1645 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 102.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3N18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 823 nominal tons (3620 kW): rated to cool 2066 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 126.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3N20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 891 nominal tons (3916 kW): rated to cool 2234 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 136.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-3O20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 958 nominal tons (4213 kW): rated to cool 2404 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 145.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4K12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 487 nominal tons (2139 kW): rated to cool 1221 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 557 nominal tons (2448 kW): rated to cool 1397 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4K18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 691 nominal tons (3039 kW): rated to cool 1734 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 99.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4K28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1064 nominal tons (4679 kW): rated to cool 2670 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 162.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4L12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 526 nominal tons (2310 kW): rated to cool 1318 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 77.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 601 nominal tons (2642 kW): rated to cool 1508 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 87.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4L18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 745 nominal tons (3275 kW): rated to cool 1869 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4L20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 802 nominal tons (3527 kW): rated to cool 2012 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 114.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4L28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1149 nominal tons (5051 kW): rated to cool 2882 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 174.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4M12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 559 nominal tons (2458 kW): rated to cool 1403 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 82.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 639 nominal tons (2810 kW): rated to cool 1603 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4M18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 792 nominal tons (3480 kW): rated to cool 1986 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 113.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4M20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 852 nominal tons (3746 kW): rated to cool 2138 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 121.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4M28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1222 nominal tons (5374 kW): rated to cool 3066 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 183.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4N12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2709 kW): rated to cool 1546 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4N14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3093 kW): rated to cool 1765 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 99.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4N18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 870 nominal tons (3825 kW): rated to cool 2182 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 123.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4N20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 936 nominal tons (4116 kW): rated to cool 2349 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 132.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4O18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 936 nominal tons (4113 kW): rated to cool 2347 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 130.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-4O20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1007 nominal tons (4426 kW): rated to cool 2525 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 141.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5K12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 539 nominal tons (2368 kW): rated to cool 1351 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 70.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5L12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 581 nominal tons (2553 kW): rated to cool 1457 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 75.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 655 nominal tons (2881 kW): rated to cool 1644 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5L18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 798 nominal tons (3508 kW): rated to cool 2002 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5L28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1254 nominal tons (5513 kW): rated to cool 3146 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 169.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5M12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 617 nominal tons (2713 kW): rated to cool 1548 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 696 nominal tons (3060 kW): rated to cool 1746 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5M18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 847 nominal tons (3724 kW): rated to cool 2125 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 109.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5M20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 907 nominal tons (3985 kW): rated to cool 2274 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 117.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5M28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1333 nominal tons (5858 kW): rated to cool 3343 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 177.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5N12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 679 nominal tons (2984 kW): rated to cool 1703 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 86.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5N14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 765 nominal tons (3363 kW): rated to cool 1919 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 96.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5N18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 930 nominal tons (4089 kW): rated to cool 2333 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 119.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5N20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 995 nominal tons (4375 kW): rated to cool 2496 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 128.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5O18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 999 nominal tons (4393 kW): rated to cool 2506 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 127.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5O20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1069 nominal tons (4699 kW): rated to cool 2681 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 137.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-5P20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1133 nominal tons (4980 kW): rated to cool 2842 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 144.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6L12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 648 nominal tons (2850 kW): rated to cool 1626 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 73.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 722 nominal tons (3174 kW): rated to cool 1811 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6L28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1383 nominal tons (6078 kW): rated to cool 3468 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 163.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6M12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 688 nominal tons (3025 kW): rated to cool 1726 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 77.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 766 nominal tons (3367 kW): rated to cool 1921 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 86.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6M18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 915 nominal tons (4024 kW): rated to cool 2296 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 106.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6M28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1468 nominal tons (6451 kW): rated to cool 3681 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 172.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6N12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 755 nominal tons (3321 kW): rated to cool 1895 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6N14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 840 nominal tons (3694 kW): rated to cool 2108 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6N18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1004 nominal tons (4412 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 115.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6N20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1067 nominal tons (4691 kW): rated to cool 2677 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 124.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6N28 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1611 nominal tons (7081 kW): rated to cool 4040 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 186.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6O18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1077 nominal tons (4735 kW): rated to cool 2702 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 123.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6O20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1145 nominal tons (5035 kW): rated to cool 2873 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 132.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6P18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1141 nominal tons (5016 kW): rated to cool 2862 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 129.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-6P20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1213 nominal tons (5332 kW): rated to cool 3043 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 139.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-7L12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 729 nominal tons (3203 kW): rated to cool 1828 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 70.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-7L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 801 nominal tons (3521 kW): rated to cool 2009 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-7M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 849 nominal tons (3732 kW): rated to cool 2130 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-7M18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 996 nominal tons (4379 kW): rated to cool 2499 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 103.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-7N14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 930 nominal tons (4088 kW): rated to cool 2333 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-7N18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1091 nominal tons (4795 kW): rated to cool 2736 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 111.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-7N20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1152 nominal tons (5066 kW): rated to cool 2890 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 120.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-7O18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1170 nominal tons (5142 kW): rated to cool 2934 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 119.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-7O20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1236 nominal tons (5432 kW): rated to cool 3100 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 128.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 24-7P20 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 1308 nominal tons (5750 kW): rated to cool 3281 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 135.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-3E12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 66 nominal tons (288 kW): rated to cool 165 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 10.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-3E9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 50 nominal tons (219 kW): rated to cool 125 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 8.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-3F12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (326 kW): rated to cool 186 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 11.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-3F9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 56 nominal tons (247 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 9.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-3G12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 86 nominal tons (380 kW): rated to cool 217 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-4E12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 75 nominal tons (331 kW): rated to cool 189 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 10.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-4E9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 57 nominal tons (251 kW): rated to cool 143 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 8.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-4F12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 85 nominal tons (374 kW): rated to cool 213 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 11.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-4F9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 64 nominal tons (283 kW): rated to cool 162 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 9.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-4G12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 248 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-5E12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 81 nominal tons (357 kW): rated to cool 204 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 9.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-5E9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 62 nominal tons (271 kW): rated to cool 154 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 8.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-5F12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 92 nominal tons (402 kW): rated to cool 230 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 11.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-5F6 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 38 nominal tons (167 kW): rated to cool 96 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 5.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-5F9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 69 nominal tons (305 kW): rated to cool 174 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 9.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 4-5G12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 106 nominal tons (467 kW): rated to cool 267 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-3H18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 225 nominal tons (990 kW): rated to cool 565 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-3I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 247 nominal tons (1088 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-3J12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 152 nominal tons (667 kW): rated to cool 381 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-3J24 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1335 kW): rated to cool 762 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 48.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-4H18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 238 nominal tons (1044 kW): rated to cool 596 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 31.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-4I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 261 nominal tons (1146 kW): rated to cool 654 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-4J12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 165 nominal tons (723 kW): rated to cool 413 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-4J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 297 nominal tons (1304 kW): rated to cool 744 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 38.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-5H18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 253 nominal tons (1113 kW): rated to cool 635 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 30.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-5I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1221 kW): rated to cool 697 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 33.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-5J12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 181 nominal tons (796 kW): rated to cool 454 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-5J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 316 nominal tons (1388 kW): rated to cool 792 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-5J9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 144 nominal tons (632 kW): rated to cool 361 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 18.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-5K12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 199 nominal tons (874 kW): rated to cool 499 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-6H18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 273 nominal tons (1198 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-6I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 299 nominal tons (1312 kW): rated to cool 749 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-6J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 339 nominal tons (1490 kW): rated to cool 850 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 36.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-6J9 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 165 nominal tons (724 kW): rated to cool 413 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 18.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-6K12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 221 nominal tons (970 kW): rated to cool 554 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-7I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1421 kW): rated to cool 811 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-7J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 366 nominal tons (1611 kW): rated to cool 919 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 7-7K12 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 247 nominal tons (1084 kW): rated to cool 619 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3G8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 185 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3H11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 111 nominal tons (488 kW): rated to cool 279 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 19.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3H18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 242 nominal tons (1063 kW): rated to cool 607 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3H21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 279 nominal tons (1228 kW): rated to cool 701 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 39.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3H8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 86 nominal tons (380 kW): rated to cool 217 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 15.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3I11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 124 nominal tons (543 kW): rated to cool 310 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 21.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3I14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 165 nominal tons (726 kW): rated to cool 414 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 26.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1169 kW): rated to cool 667 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 39.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3I21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 307 nominal tons (1349 kW): rated to cool 770 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3I8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 96 nominal tons (424 kW): rated to cool 242 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 17.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3J11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 143 nominal tons (628 kW): rated to cool 358 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3J14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 190 nominal tons (835 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 30.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1334 kW): rated to cool 761 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 44.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3J21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 350 nominal tons (1538 kW): rated to cool 877 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 49.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3J8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 112 nominal tons (492 kW): rated to cool 281 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 19.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3K11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 158 nominal tons (695 kW): rated to cool 396 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 26.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 209 nominal tons (921 kW): rated to cool 525 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3K18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 333 nominal tons (1464 kW): rated to cool 835 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 47.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3K21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 383 nominal tons (1685 kW): rated to cool 962 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 53.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-3L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 226 nominal tons (992 kW): rated to cool 566 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4G8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 84 nominal tons (370 kW): rated to cool 211 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4H11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 123 nominal tons (541 kW): rated to cool 309 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 19.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4H18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 640 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4H21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 293 nominal tons (1287 kW): rated to cool 734 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 38.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4H8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 98 nominal tons (431 kW): rated to cool 246 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 15.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4I11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 136 nominal tons (599 kW): rated to cool 342 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 21.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 281 nominal tons (1233 kW): rated to cool 704 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4I21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 321 nominal tons (1412 kW): rated to cool 806 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 42.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4I8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 109 nominal tons (479 kW): rated to cool 273 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 16.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4J11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 157 nominal tons (691 kW): rated to cool 394 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4J14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 204 nominal tons (896 kW): rated to cool 511 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 29.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 320 nominal tons (1405 kW): rated to cool 802 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 42.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4J21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 366 nominal tons (1608 kW): rated to cool 917 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 47.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4J8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 126 nominal tons (553 kW): rated to cool 316 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 18.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4K11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 435 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 25.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 224 nominal tons (986 kW): rated to cool 563 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 31.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4K18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 350 nominal tons (1540 kW): rated to cool 879 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 46.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4K21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 51.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 241 nominal tons (1061 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-4M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 256 nominal tons (1127 kW): rated to cool 643 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5H18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 273 nominal tons (1199 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5H8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 113 nominal tons (497 kW): rated to cool 284 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 14.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5I11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 153 nominal tons (672 kW): rated to cool 383 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 20.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 299 nominal tons (1315 kW): rated to cool 751 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5I21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 340 nominal tons (1493 kW): rated to cool 852 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 41.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5I8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 125 nominal tons (550 kW): rated to cool 314 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 16.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5J11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 440 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5J14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 222 nominal tons (974 kW): rated to cool 556 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 28.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 341 nominal tons (1497 kW): rated to cool 854 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 41.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5J21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 386 nominal tons (1698 kW): rated to cool 969 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 46.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5J8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 144 nominal tons (632 kW): rated to cool 360 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 18.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5K11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 193 nominal tons (849 kW): rated to cool 485 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 244 nominal tons (1071 kW): rated to cool 611 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 31.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5K18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 373 nominal tons (1639 kW): rated to cool 935 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 45.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5K21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 423 nominal tons (1858 kW): rated to cool 1060 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 50.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5L11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 208 nominal tons (914 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 26.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 262 nominal tons (1151 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5L21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 453 nominal tons (1992 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 53.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-5M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1221 kW): rated to cool 697 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6H8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 131 nominal tons (578 kW): rated to cool 330 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 14.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 322 nominal tons (1416 kW): rated to cool 808 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6I8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 145 nominal tons (637 kW): rated to cool 363 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 15.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6J11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (870 kW): rated to cool 497 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 22.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 366 nominal tons (1609 kW): rated to cool 918 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 40.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6J21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 411 nominal tons (1808 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 45.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6J8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 166 nominal tons (729 kW): rated to cool 416 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 17.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6K11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 218 nominal tons (956 kW): rated to cool 546 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 267 nominal tons (1174 kW): rated to cool 670 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 30.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6K18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 401 nominal tons (1761 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6K21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 450 nominal tons (1978 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 48.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6L11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 234 nominal tons (1028 kW): rated to cool 587 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 25.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1261 kW): rated to cool 720 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 31.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6L21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 482 nominal tons (2118 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 52.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-6M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 762 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7H8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 153 nominal tons (673 kW): rated to cool 384 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 13.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7I18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 349 nominal tons (1536 kW): rated to cool 877 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7I8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 168 nominal tons (740 kW): rated to cool 422 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 15.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7J11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 225 nominal tons (988 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 21.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7J18 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1743 kW): rated to cool 995 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 39.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7J21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 441 nominal tons (1940 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7J8 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 192 nominal tons (844 kW): rated to cool 482 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 17.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7K11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 246 nominal tons (1084 kW): rated to cool 618 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 23.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7K14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 295 nominal tons (1297 kW): rated to cool 740 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 29.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7K21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 482 nominal tons (2119 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 47.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7L11 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 265 nominal tons (1163 kW): rated to cool 664 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7L14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 317 nominal tons (1392 kW): rated to cool 794 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 30.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7L21 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 516 nominal tons (2269 kW): rated to cool 1295 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 50.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
EVAPCO's 9-7M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 335 nominal tons (1473 kW): rated to cool 841 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Baltimore Aircoil's -75-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 454 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 10.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -87-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 527 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -94-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 569 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 9.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -95-0806-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 576 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -102-0806-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 618 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -106-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 642 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -111-0806-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 673 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -117-0806-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 709 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -123-0806-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 745 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -137-0806-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 830 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 18.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -113-0809-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 685 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -124-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 751 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -126-0809-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 763 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 12.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -134-0809-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 812 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -138-0809-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 836 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -138-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 836 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -144-0809-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 872 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -152-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 921 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -158-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 957 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -163-0809-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 988 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -190-0809-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1151 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 24.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -207-0809-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1254 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -172-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1042 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -195-0812-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 27.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -204-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1236 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 21.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -207-0812-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1254 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -216-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1309 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 24.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -217-0812-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1315 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -221-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1339 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 24.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -227-0812-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1375 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -237-0812-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1436 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -238-0812-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1442 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -241-0812-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1460 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -259-0812-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1569 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -270-0812-25 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1636 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -284-0812-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1721 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -248-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -268-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -281-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1702 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -310-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1878 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -321-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1945 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -327-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1981 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -342-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2072 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -345-0818-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2090 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -357-0818-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2163 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -373-0818-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2260 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -387-0818-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2345 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -409-0818-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2478 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 58.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -237-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1436 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -264-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1599 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -285-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1727 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -297-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1799 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -299-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -302-1212-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1830 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -306-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1854 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -314-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1902 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 37.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -315-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1908 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -327-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1981 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 37.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -341-1212-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2066 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -341-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2066 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -355-1212-25 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2151 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -370-1212-25 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2242 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -381-1212-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2308 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -393-1212-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2381 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -411-1212-40 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2490 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -360-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -403-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2442 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -437-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2648 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 58.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -444-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2690 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -457-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2769 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -459-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2781 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -467-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2829 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -482-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2920 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -483-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2926 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -513-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3108 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -525-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 55.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -525-1218-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 62.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -545-1218-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3302 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -567-1218-37.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3435 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -581-1218-37.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -601-1218-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -628-1218-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3805 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 78.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -643-1218-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3896 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -473-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2866 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -528-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3199 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -571-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3459 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -595-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3605 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -598-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3623 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -604-1224-40 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3659 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -612-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3708 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -629-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 75.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -630-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3817 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -655-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3968 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -682-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4132 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -682-1224-40 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4132 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -711-1224-50 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4308 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -739-1224-50 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4477 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -762-1224-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4616 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -786-1224-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4762 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -821-1224-80 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4974 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -719-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4356 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 102.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -806-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4883 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 102.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -875-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5301 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 116.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -888-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5380 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -914-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5537 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -918-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5562 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -933-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5652 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -964-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5840 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 113.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -966-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1027-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6222 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 112.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1049-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6355 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 111.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1049-1236-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6355 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 125.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1089-1236-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6598 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1134-1236-75 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6870 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 133.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1161-1236-75 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7034 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 131.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1202-1236-90 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7282 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 140.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1257-1236-120 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7615 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 156.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1287-1236-120 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7797 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 154.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -617-1224-15 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 3746 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -650-1224-20 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 3946 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -676-1224-25 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4107 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -700-1224-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4250 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 86.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -731-1224-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4443 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 92.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -754-1224-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4579 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -778-1224-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4728 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 92.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -813-1224-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4936 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 92.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -843-1224-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5124 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -887-1224-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5388 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 95.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -712-1426-20 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4326 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -741-1426-25 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -766-1426-30 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4654 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 85.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -807-1426-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4901 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -844-1426-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5124 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -894-1426-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5428 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -933-1426-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5667 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -965-1426-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 106.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1005-1426-75 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 6107 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 114.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1057-1426-75 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 6422 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 112.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1234-2424-30 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 7496 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1300-2424-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 7897 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 135.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1352-2424-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8213 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 146.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1400-2424-80 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8504 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 172.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1462-2424-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8881 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 185.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1508-2424-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9160 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1556-2424-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9452 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 184.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1626-2424-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9877 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 184.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1686-2424-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10241 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1774-2424-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10776 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 191.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1424-2826-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8650 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 148.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1482-2826-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9002 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 160.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1532-2826-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9306 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 170.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1614-2826-80 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9804 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 187.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1688-2826-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10254 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 201.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1788-2826-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 200.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1866-2826-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 11335 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 200.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1930-2826-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 11723 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 213.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2010-2826-150 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 12210 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 229.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2114-2826-150 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 12841 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 225.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0048-0406N005 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 292 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0046-0406N003 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 279 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 6.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0067-0406N7.5 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 407 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0078-0412N006 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 474 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 4.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0090-0412N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 547 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0106-0412N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 644 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 0.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0128-0412N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 778 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0118-0412N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 717 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 0.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0134-0412N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 814 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0113-0709N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 686 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0117-0709N7.5 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 711 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0142-0709N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 863 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0122-0709N7.5 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 741 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0154-0709N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 935 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0160-0709N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 972 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0166-0709N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1008 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0175-0709N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1063 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0130-0709N7.5 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 790 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0184-0709N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1118 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0177-0718N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1075 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0214-0718N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1300 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 39.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0222-0718N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1348 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0267-0718N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1622 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0232-0718N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1409 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0278-0718N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1689 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0300-0718N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1822 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0324-0718N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1968 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0349-0718N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2120 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0269-1012N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1634 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0208-1012N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1263 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 27.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0233-1012N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1415 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0272-1012N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1652 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0281-1012N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1707 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0295-1012N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1792 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 37.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0315-1012N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1913 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 43.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0323-1012N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1962 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0246-1012N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1494 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0328-1012N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1992 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0538-1024N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3268 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0416-1024N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2527 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0466-1024N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2831 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0544-1024N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3304 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0562-1024N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3414 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0590-1024N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3584 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0630-1024N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 87.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0646-1024N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3924 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0492-1024N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2988 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0656-1024N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3985 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0538-2012N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3268 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0416-2012N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2527 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0466-2012N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2831 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0544-2012N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3304 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0562-2012N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3414 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0590-2012N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3584 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0630-2012N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 87.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0646-2012N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3924 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0492-2012N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2988 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0656-2012N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3985 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0249-1212N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1513 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0265-1212N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1610 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0293-1212N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1780 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0309-1212N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1877 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0330-1212N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2005 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0346-1212N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2102 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0365-1212N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2217 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0396-1212N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2406 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0355-1212N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2156 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0375-1212N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2278 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0395-1212N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2399 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0406-1212N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2466 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 39.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0494-1218N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3001 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0381-1218N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2314 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0441-1218N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2679 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0531-1218N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3226 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0564-1218N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0469-1218N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2849 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0517-1218N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3141 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0541-1218N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3286 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0572-1218N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3475 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0590-1218N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3584 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0609-1218N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3699 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 58.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0639-1218N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3881 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0544-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3304 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0431-1220N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2618 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0491-1220N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2983 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0540-1220N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3280 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0581-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3529 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0614-1220N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3730 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 68.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0519-1220N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3153 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0557-1220N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3384 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0567-1220N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3444 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 55.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0580-1220N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3523 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0591-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3590 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0622-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3778 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0640-1220N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3888 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0659-1220N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4003 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0689-1220N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4185 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0498-1224N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3025 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0530-1224N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3219 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0586-1224N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3560 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0618-1224N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3754 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0660-1224N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4009 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0692-1224N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4204 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0730-1224N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4434 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0792-1224N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0710-1224N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4313 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0750-1224N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0790-1224N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4799 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0812-1224N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4932 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 79.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0980-1236N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5954 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0756-1236N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4592 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0875-1236N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5315 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1054-1236N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6400 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1119-1236N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6797 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0931-1236N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5652 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 91.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1026-1236N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1073-1236N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1135-1236N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6894 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1171-1236N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7111 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1208-1236N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7340 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1268-1236N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7701 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 122.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1079-1240N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 138.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0855-1240N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5194 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0974-1240N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5918 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1071-1240N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6508 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 117.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1153-1240N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7002 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1218-1240N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7400 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 137.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1030-1240N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6255 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1105-1240N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6713 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1125-1240N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6834 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 110.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1151-1240N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6990 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 105.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1173-1240N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 127.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1234-1240N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7496 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1270-1240N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7713 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1308-1240N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7942 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1367-1240N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8304 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 130.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0498-2412N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3025 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0530-2412N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3219 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0586-2412N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3560 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0618-2412N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3754 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0660-2412N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4009 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0692-2412N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4204 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0730-2412N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4434 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0792-2412N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0710-2412N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4313 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0750-2412N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0790-2412N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4799 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0812-2412N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4932 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 79.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0988-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6002 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0762-2418N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4629 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0882-2418N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5358 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1062-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6451 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1128-2418N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0938-2418N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5698 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 91.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1034-2418N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6281 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1082-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6572 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1144-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6949 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1180-2418N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7168 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1218-2418N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7399 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1278-2418N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7763 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 122.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1088-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6609 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 138.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0862-2420N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5236 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0982-2420N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5965 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1080-2420N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6560 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 117.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1162-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7058 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1228-2420N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7459 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 137.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1038-2420N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6305 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1114-2420N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6767 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1134-2420N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6888 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 110.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1160-2420N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7046 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 105.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1182-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7180 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 127.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1244-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7557 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1280-2420N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7775 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1318-2420N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8006 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1378-2420N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8370 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 130.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -0996-2424N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6050 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1060-2424N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6439 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 141.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1172-2424N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7119 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1236-2424N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7508 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 144.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1320-2424N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8018 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 153.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1384-2424N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8407 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 145.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1460-2424N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8869 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 153.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1584-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9622 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 167.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1420-2424N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8625 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 138.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1500-2424N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9112 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 146.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1580-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9597 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 166.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1624-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9865 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 159.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1947-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11825 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 259.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1501-2436N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9120 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1738-2436N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 10556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2092-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12710 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 241.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2223-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13500 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 258.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1848-2436N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11226 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 183.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2037-2436N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12375 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 207.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2132-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12950 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 240.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2254-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13692 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 217.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2325-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 241.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2400-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14578 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 231.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2518-2436N240 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 15296 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 244.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 179.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2159-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13113 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 276.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1710-2440N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 10389 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 209.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1948-2440N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11835 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 208.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2143-2440N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13016 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 235.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2306-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14005 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 257.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2436-2440N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14800 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 275.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2060-2440N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12510 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 195.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2210-2440N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 199.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2250-2440N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13667 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 220.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2302-2440N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13980 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 211.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2345-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14246 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 255.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2468-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14993 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 230.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2540-2440N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 15427 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 257.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2615-2440N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 15885 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 246.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2734-2440N240 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 16608 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 260.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 179.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0269B-1012N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1632 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 39.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0297B-1012N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1804 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0301B-1012N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1824 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0332B-1012N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2016 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0323B-1012N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1955 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0356B-1012N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2161 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0346B-1012N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2101 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0383B-1012N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2323 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0213B-1012N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1292 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0235B-1012N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0242B-1012N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1465 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0266B-1012N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1616 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0285B-1012N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1732 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0286B-1012N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1728 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0305B-1012N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1848 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0336B-1012N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2038 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0279B-1012N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1693 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0307B-1012N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1865 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0330B-1012N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1999 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0364B-1012N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2206 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0399B-1018N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2419 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0441B-1018N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2675 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 62.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0435B-1018N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0481B-1018N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2920 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 58.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0476B-1018N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2886 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0526B-1018N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3191 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0511B-1018N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3102 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0565B-1018N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3430 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0327B-1018N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1982 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0360B-1018N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2184 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0386B-1018N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2339 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0362B-1018N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2197 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0399B-1018N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2413 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0427B-1018N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2585 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0347B-1018N-GA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2102 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 6.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0432B-1018N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0464B-1018N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2813 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0502B-1018N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3046 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0553B-1018N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3356 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0314B-1212N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1905 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0348B-1212N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2105 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0347B-1212N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2105 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0383B-1212N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2326 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0378B-1212N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2292 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0418B-1212N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2533 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0405B-1212N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2457 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0448B-1212N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2716 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 39.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0214B-1212N-GA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1301 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 4.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0243B-1212N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1473 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0268B-1212N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0287B-1212N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1741 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0271B-1212N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0298B-1212N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1809 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0320B-1212N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1943 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0349B-1212N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2115 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0384B-1212N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2331 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0412B-1212N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2499 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0381B-1212N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2314 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0415B-1212N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0445B-1212N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2697 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0469B-1212N-NA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2848 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 43.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0467B-1218N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2829 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0516B-1218N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3126 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0510B-1218N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3093 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0564B-1218N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3419 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0555B-1218N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3369 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0614B-1218N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3723 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0599B-1218N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3633 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0662B-1218N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4015 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0374B-1218N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2266 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0413B-1218N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0442B-1218N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2684 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0414B-1218N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2507 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0456B-1218N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2766 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0489B-1218N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2964 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0533B-1218N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0587B-1218N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3563 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0630B-1218N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3821 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0636B-1218N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3856 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0680B-1218N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0717B-1218N-NA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4351 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0538B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3264 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 78.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0595B-1024N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3608 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 91.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0601B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3648 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0665B-1024N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4032 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0646B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3910 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0713B-1024N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4323 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 68.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0693B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4202 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0766B-1024N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4645 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0470B-1024N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0484B-1024N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2930 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0533B-1024N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0571B-1024N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3464 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0609B-1024N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3696 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0672B-1024N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4075 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0615B-1024N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3731 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0659B-1024N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3998 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0727B-1024N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4411 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0798B-1036N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4838 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0882B-1036N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5350 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 125.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0871B-1036N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5281 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0963B-1036N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5839 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 116.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0952B-1036N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5773 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1052B-1036N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6383 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 95.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1023B-1036N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6205 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1131B-1036N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0653B-1036N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3963 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0771B-1036N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4679 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0724B-1036N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0796B-1036N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4825 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 90.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0853B-1036N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5170 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0865B-1036N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5247 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0927B-1036N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5626 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 85.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1004B-1036N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6092 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1106B-1036N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6712 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 101.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0628B-1224N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3810 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0695B-1224N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4211 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0694B-1224N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4209 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0767B-1224N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4653 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 89.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0755B-1224N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4583 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0835B-1224N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5066 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0810B-1224N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4914 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0895B-1224N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5432 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 78.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0429B-1224N-GA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2602 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 8.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0486B-1224N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2947 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0535B-1224N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3248 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0574B-1224N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3481 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0541B-1224N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3283 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0597B-1224N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3619 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0641B-1224N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3886 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0697B-1224N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0768B-1224N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4662 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0824B-1224N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4997 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0763B-1224N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4627 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0831B-1224N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5041 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0889B-1224N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0939B-1224N-NA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5696 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 86.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0934B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5658 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 113.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1032B-1236N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6253 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 131.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1020B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6186 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1127B-1236N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6837 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 126.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1111B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6737 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 102.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1227B-1236N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7446 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 119.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1198B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7266 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1324B-1236N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 8031 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 109.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0661B-1236N-GA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4008 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 13.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0747B-1236N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4532 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0825B-1236N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5006 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 96.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0885B-1236N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5368 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 106.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0912B-1236N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5531 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0977B-1236N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5928 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1065B-1236N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6462 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1175B-1236N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7126 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1260B-1236N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7643 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 127.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1271B-1236N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 7712 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1359B-1236N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 8246 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 119.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1434B-1236N-NA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 8702 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-016 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 69 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 0.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-019 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 82 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 1.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-029 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 125 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 1.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-035 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 151 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-038 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 164 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 6.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-044 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 190 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 6.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 1.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-048 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 207 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 6.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-054 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 233 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-065 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 280 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-073 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 314 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-079 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 340 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-087 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 375 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 9.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-096 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 414 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 10.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-102 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 439 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-115 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 496 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 10.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-120 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 517 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 10.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-134 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 577 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-155 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 668 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-167 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 719 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-185 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 797 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-223 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 961 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-234 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1008 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-257 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1107 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-271 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1168 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-299 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1288 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -122A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 525 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -138A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 595 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 12.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -150A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 646 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -161A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 694 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -170A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 732 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -182A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 784 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -178A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 767 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 12.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -191A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 823 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -174A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 750 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -192A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -206A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 887 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 18.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -227A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 978 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 21.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -215A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 926 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -235A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1013 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 18.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -259A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1116 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 21.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -261A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1125 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -288A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1241 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -308A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1327 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -301A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1297 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -322A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1387 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -323A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1392 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 27.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -356A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1534 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -382A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -424A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -416A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1792 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -446A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1921 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -300A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1292 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -331A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -340A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1465 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -375A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1616 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -402A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1732 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -407A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1753 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -401A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1728 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -429A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1848 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -473A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2038 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -393A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1693 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -433A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1865 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -464A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1999 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -512A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2206 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -460A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1982 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -507A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2184 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -543A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2339 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -510A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2197 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -560A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2413 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -600A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2585 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -585A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -620A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2671 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -488A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2102 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 6.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -609A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -653A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2813 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -707A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3046 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -779A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3356 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -662A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -680A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2930 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -750A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -804A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3464 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -760A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3274 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -814A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3507 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -858A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3697 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -946A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4075 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -866A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3731 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -928A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3998 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1024A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4412 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S700A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3017 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S828A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3568 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S838A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3612 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S884A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3807 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -920A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3963 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1086A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4679 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1020A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1120A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4825 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 90.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1200A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5170 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1062A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4575 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1169A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5041 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1240A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5342 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1218A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5247 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1306A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5626 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 85.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1414A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6092 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1558A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6712 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 101.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -302A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1301 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 4.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -342A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1473 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -377A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -404A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1741 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -381A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -420A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1809 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -451A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1943 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -471A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2029 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -513A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2210 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -491A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2115 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -541A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2331 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -580A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2499 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -537A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2314 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -584A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -626A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2697 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -661A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2848 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 43.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -526A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2266 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -581A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -623A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2684 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -582A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2507 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -642A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2766 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -688A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2964 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -602A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2593 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -664A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -711A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3063 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -785A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3382 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -751A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -827A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3563 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -887A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3821 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -895A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3856 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -957A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1010A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4351 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -605A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2607 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 8.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -684A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2947 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -754A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3248 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -808A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3481 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -762A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3283 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -840A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3619 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -902A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3886 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -879A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3787 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -942A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4058 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1026A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4420 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -982A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4230 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1082A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4661 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1160A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4997 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1075A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4631 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1170A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5041 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1252A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1321A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5691 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 86.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S870A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3748 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S932A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4015 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S972A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4187 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S1071A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4614 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S1019A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4390 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S1124A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4842 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -S1204A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5187 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -930A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4007 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 13.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1052A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4532 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1162A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5006 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 96.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1246A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5368 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 106.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1284A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5532 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1376A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5928 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1204A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5187 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1327A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5717 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 91.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1422A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6126 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 101.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1570A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6764 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1501A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6467 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1654A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 7126 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1774A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 7643 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 127.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1790A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 7712 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -1914A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 8246 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 119.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -2019A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 8698 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Showing 1–3 of 3
Fin-and-tube coil, 600 × 600 mm face, 3 rows at 12.0 fpi, 0.90 m³/s design air flow.
R410A compressor — 11.9 kW cooling, 3.86 kW input, COP 3.09 at the AHRI 7.2/54.4 °C rating point.
Open any system or component above and send the request from its page — it arrives with the item, and with your design when you send it from the builder.