Published systems

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1065B-1236N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6462 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1082-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6572 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1212N-5D4ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES15E-1218-11EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 317 nominal tons (1393 kW): rated to cool 954 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-1222-12M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 655 nominal tons (2879 kW): rated to cool 1971 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VFL-012-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 14 nominal tons (61 kW): rated to cool 42 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S828A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3568 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1106B-1036N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6712 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 101.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1088-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6609 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 138.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1212N-5D4ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 222 nominal tons (977 kW): rated to cool 669 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES15E-1218-11FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 347 nominal tons (1525 kW): rated to cool 1044 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-1222-12N — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 701 nominal tons (3080 kW): rated to cool 2109 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VFL-024-12H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 17 nominal tons (74 kW): rated to cool 51 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S838A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3612 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1111B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6737 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 102.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1105-1240N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6713 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1212N-6D1DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES15E-1218-11GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-1222-12O — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 742 nominal tons (3260 kW): rated to cool 2232 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VFL-024-22H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 21 nominal tons (92 kW): rated to cool 63 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S870A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3748 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1127B-1236N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6837 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 126.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1114-2420N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6767 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1212N-6D1ES-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 217 nominal tons (955 kW): rated to cool 654 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.