Published systems

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1054-1236N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6400 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1212N-4D2ES-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES15E-1218-09GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 365 nominal tons (1604 kW): rated to cool 1098 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-1222-10K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 489 nominal tons (2151 kW): rated to cool 1473 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VFL-012-02F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 4 nominal tons (18 kW): rated to cool 12 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-957A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0977B-1236N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5928 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1060-2424N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6439 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 141.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1212N-4D3DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 193 nominal tons (850 kW): rated to cool 582 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES15E-1218-09HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 429 nominal tons (1884 kW): rated to cool 1290 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-1222-10L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 557 nominal tons (2449 kW): rated to cool 1677 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VFL-012-02G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 5 nominal tons (22 kW): rated to cool 15 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-982A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4230 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1004B-1036N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6092 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1062-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6451 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1212N-4D3ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 175 nominal tons (771 kW): rated to cool 528 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES15E-1218-10EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-1222-10M — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 609 nominal tons (2677 kW): rated to cool 1833 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VFL-012-12F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 7 nominal tons (31 kW): rated to cool 21 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-S1019A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4390 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-1020B-1236N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 6186 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1071-1240N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6508 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 117.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1212N-4D4ES-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 187 nominal tons (824 kW): rated to cool 564 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES15E-1218-10FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 334 nominal tons (1468 kW): rated to cool 1005 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.