Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 2977–3000 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -1172-2424N060 evaporative condenser (7.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1172-2424N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7119 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5339–8899 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1236-2424N080 evaporative condenser (7.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1236-2424N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7508 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 144.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5631–9385 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1320-2424N100 evaporative condenser (8.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1320-2424N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8018 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 153.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6014–10023 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1384-2424N100 evaporative condenser (8.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1384-2424N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8407 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 145.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6305–10508 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1460-2424N120 evaporative condenser (8.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1460-2424N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8869 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 153.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6651–11086 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1584-2424N160 evaporative condenser (9.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1584-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9622 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 167.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 7216–12027 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1420-2424N100 evaporative condenser (8.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1420-2424N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8625 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 138.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6469–10782 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1500-2424N120 evaporative condenser (9.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1500-2424N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9112 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 146.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6834–11389 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1580-2424N160 evaporative condenser (9.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1580-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9597 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 166.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 7198–11997 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1624-2424N160 evaporative condenser (9.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1624-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9865 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 159.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 7399–12331 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1947-2436N160 evaporative condenser (11.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1947-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11825 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 259.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 8869–14781 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1501-2436N060 evaporative condenser (9.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1501-2436N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9120 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6840–11400 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1738-2436N080 evaporative condenser (10.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1738-2436N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 10556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 7917–13195 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2092-2436N160 evaporative condenser (12.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2092-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12710 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 241.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 9533–15888 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2223-2436N200 evaporative condenser (13.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2223-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13500 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 258.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 10125–16875 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1848-2436N080 evaporative condenser (11.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1848-2436N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11226 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 183.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 8420–14033 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2037-2436N120 evaporative condenser (12.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2037-2436N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12375 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 207.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 9281–15469 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2132-2436N160 evaporative condenser (12.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2132-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12950 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 240.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 9712–16187 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2254-2436N160 evaporative condenser (13.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2254-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13692 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 217.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 10269–17115 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2325-2436N200 evaporative condenser (14.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2325-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 241.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 10592–17654 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2400-2436N200 evaporative condenser (14.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2400-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14578 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 231.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 10933–18222 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2518-2436N240 evaporative condenser (15.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2518-2436N240 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 15296 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 244.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 179.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 11472–19120 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2159-2440N160 evaporative condenser (13.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2159-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13113 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 276.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 9834–16391 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1710-2440N060 evaporative condenser (10.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1710-2440N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 10389 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 209.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 7792–12986 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…123124125126127…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers