Published systems
Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.
Showing 2,929–2,952 of 3,474
| Name | Company | Category | Capacity | Markets | Open in the builder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVAPCO AT 424-4K36 cooling tower (2214 tons, 9.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data EVAPCO's 424-4K36 — an AT cooling tower, 2214 nominal tons (9731 kW): rated to cool 6663 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 211.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 7298–12164 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-12GN cooling tower (271 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's XES15E-1212-12GN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 894–1490 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4K40 cooling tower (2183 tons, 9.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data EVAPCO's 424-4K40 — an AT cooling tower, 2183 nominal tons (9595 kW): rated to cool 6570 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 215.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 7196–11994 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-07K cooling tower (339 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's XES3E-1020-07K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 339 nominal tons (1490 kW): rated to cool 1020 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1117–1862 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4L24 cooling tower (1801 tons, 7.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 424-4L24 — an AT cooling tower, 1801 nominal tons (7917 kW): rated to cool 5421 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 172.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 5938–9896 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-41R closed-circuit cooler (312 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-288N-41R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 312 nominal tons (1371 kW): rated to cool 939 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1029–1714 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4L28 cooling tower (1958 tons, 8.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 424-4L28 — an AT cooling tower, 1958 nominal tons (8609 kW): rated to cool 5895 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 182.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 6457–10762 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-866A evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-866A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3731 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2798–4663 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4L36 cooling tower (2345 tons, 10.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data EVAPCO's 424-4L36 — an AT cooling tower, 2345 nominal tons (10309 kW): rated to cool 7059 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 227.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 7732–12887 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0882B-1036N-JB evaporative condenser (5.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0882B-1036N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5350 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 125.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 79.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 4012–6687 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4L40 cooling tower (2361 tons, 10.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data EVAPCO's 424-4L40 — an AT cooling tower, 2361 nominal tons (10379 kW): rated to cool 7107 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 231.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 7785–12974 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0974-1240N040 evaporative condenser (5.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0974-1240N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5918 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 4438–7397 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4M24 cooling tower (1910 tons, 8.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 424-4M24 — an AT cooling tower, 1910 nominal tons (8395 kW): rated to cool 5748 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 182.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 6296–10493 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D2ES-L1 closed-circuit cooler (144 tons, 631 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2ES-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 144 nominal tons (631 kW): rated to cool 432 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 473–789 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4M28 cooling tower (2081 tons, 9.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 424-4M28 — an AT cooling tower, 2081 nominal tons (9148 kW): rated to cool 6264 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 193.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 6861–11435 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-12HC cooling tower (294 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's XES15E-1212-12HC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 294 nominal tons (1293 kW): rated to cool 885 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 969–1616 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4M36 cooling tower (2483 tons, 10.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data EVAPCO's 424-4M36 — an AT cooling tower, 2483 nominal tons (10914 kW): rated to cool 7473 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 240.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 8186–13643 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-07L cooling tower (387 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's XES3E-1020-07L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 387 nominal tons (1700 kW): rated to cool 1164 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1275–2125 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4M40 cooling tower (2507 tons, 11.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data EVAPCO's 424-4M40 — an AT cooling tower, 2507 nominal tons (11019 kW): rated to cool 7545 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 244.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 8264–13774 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-432-21N closed-circuit cooler (342 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-432-21N — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 342 nominal tons (1503 kW): rated to cool 1029 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 111.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1127–1879 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4N24 cooling tower (2043 tons, 9.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 424-4N24 — an AT cooling tower, 2043 nominal tons (8982 kW): rated to cool 6150 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 200.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 6736–11227 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-879A evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-879A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3787 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2840–4733 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 424-4N28 cooling tower (2275 tons, 10.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 424-4N28 — an AT cooling tower, 2275 nominal tons (10003 kW): rated to cool 6849 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 211.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 7502–12503 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0885B-1236N-KA evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0885B-1236N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5368 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 106.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 4026–6710 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
Publishing here
Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers