Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 2929–2952 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -1125-1240N060 evaporative condenser (6.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1125-1240N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6834 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 110.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5125–8542 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1151-1240N060 evaporative condenser (7.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1151-1240N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6990 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 105.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5243–8738 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1173-1240N080 evaporative condenser (7.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1173-1240N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 127.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5342–8904 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1234-1240N080 evaporative condenser (7.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1234-1240N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7496 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5622–9371 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1270-1240N100 evaporative condenser (7.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1270-1240N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7713 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5785–9642 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1308-1240N100 evaporative condenser (7.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1308-1240N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7942 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5957–9928 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1367-1240N120 evaporative condenser (8.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1367-1240N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8304 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 130.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6228–10380 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0498-2412N020 evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0498-2412N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3025 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2269–3781 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0530-2412N030 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0530-2412N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3219 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2415–4024 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0586-2412N030 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0586-2412N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3560 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2670–4450 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0618-2412N040 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0618-2412N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3754 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2815–4692 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0660-2412N050 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0660-2412N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4009 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3007–5011 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0692-2412N050 evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0692-2412N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4204 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3153–5254 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0730-2412N060 evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0730-2412N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4434 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3326–5543 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0792-2412N080 evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0792-2412N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3608–6013 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0710-2412N050 evaporative condenser (4.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0710-2412N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4313 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3235–5391 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0750-2412N060 evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0750-2412N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3417–5695 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0790-2412N080 evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0790-2412N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4799 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3599–5998 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0812-2412N080 evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0812-2412N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4932 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 79.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3699–6165 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0988-2418N080 evaporative condenser (6.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0988-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6002 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4501–7502 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0762-2418N030 evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0762-2418N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4629 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3472–5786 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0882-2418N040 evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0882-2418N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5358 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4018–6697 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1062-2418N080 evaporative condenser (6.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1062-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6451 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4838–8063 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1128-2418N100 evaporative condenser (6.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1128-2418N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 129.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5139–8565 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…121122123124125…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers