Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 2881–2904 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -0639-1218N060 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0639-1218N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3881 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2911–4852 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0544-1220N040 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0544-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3304 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2478–4130 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0431-1220N015 evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0431-1220N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2618 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1964–3273 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0491-1220N020 evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0491-1220N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2983 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2237–3728 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0540-1220N030 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0540-1220N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3280 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2460–4100 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0581-1220N040 evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0581-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3529 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2647–4411 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0614-1220N050 evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0614-1220N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3730 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 68.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2797–4662 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0519-1220N020 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0519-1220N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3153 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2364–3941 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0557-1220N025 evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0557-1220N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3384 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2538–4229 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0567-1220N030 evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0567-1220N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3444 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 55.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2583–4305 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0580-1220N030 evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0580-1220N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3523 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2642–4404 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0591-1220N040 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0591-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3590 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2692–4487 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0622-1220N040 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0622-1220N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3778 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2834–4723 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0640-1220N050 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0640-1220N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3888 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2916–4859 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0659-1220N050 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0659-1220N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4003 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3002–5004 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0689-1220N060 evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0689-1220N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4185 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3139–5231 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0498-1224N020 evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0498-1224N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3025 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2269–3781 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0530-1224N030 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0530-1224N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3219 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2415–4024 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0586-1224N030 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0586-1224N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3560 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2670–4450 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0618-1224N040 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0618-1224N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3754 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2815–4692 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0660-1224N050 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0660-1224N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4009 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3007–5011 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0692-1224N050 evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0692-1224N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4204 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3153–5254 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0730-1224N060 evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0730-1224N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4434 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3326–5543 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0792-1224N080 evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0792-1224N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3608–6013 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…119120121122123…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers