Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 46Systems 3,474Components 15,410Accessories 3

Showing 2,881–2,904 of 3,474

NameCompanyCategoryCapacityMarketsOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3K24 cooling tower (1600 tons, 7.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 1600 nominal tons (7032 kW): rated to cool 4815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 163.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection5274–8790 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0835B-1224N-JB evaporative condenser (5.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0835B-1224N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5066 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection3800–6333 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3K28 cooling tower (1739 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3K28 — an AT cooling tower, 1739 nominal tons (7646 kW): rated to cool 5235 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 173.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection5734–9557 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0875-1236N040 evaporative condenser (5.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0875-1236N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5315 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection3986–6644 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3K36 cooling tower (2101 tons, 9.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 2101 nominal tons (9236 kW): rated to cool 6324 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 215.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection6927–11545 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D2DS-K1 closed-circuit cooler (123 tons, 539 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2DS-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 123 nominal tons (539 kW): rated to cool 369 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection404–674 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3K40 cooling tower (2031 tons, 8.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3K40 — an AT cooling tower, 2031 nominal tons (8929 kW): rated to cool 6114 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 219.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection6697–11162 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-11JN cooling tower (354 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-11JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 354 nominal tons (1555 kW): rated to cool 1065 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1167–1944 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3L24 cooling tower (1721 tons, 7.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 1721 nominal tons (7567 kW): rated to cool 5181 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 175.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection5675–9458 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-07G cooling tower (227 tons, 999 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-07G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 227 nominal tons (999 kW): rated to cool 684 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection749–1249 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3L28 cooling tower (1867 tons, 8.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3L28 — an AT cooling tower, 1867 nominal tons (8206 kW): rated to cool 5619 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 185.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection6155–10258 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288N-31R closed-circuit cooler (294 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-288N-31R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 294 nominal tons (1293 kW): rated to cool 885 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection969–1616 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3L36 cooling tower (2239 tons, 9.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3L36 — an AT cooling tower, 2239 nominal tons (9841 kW): rated to cool 6738 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 231.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection7380–12301 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-827A evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-827A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3563 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2672–4454 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3L40 cooling tower (2223 tons, 9.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3L40 — an AT cooling tower, 2223 nominal tons (9770 kW): rated to cool 6690 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 235.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection7328–12213 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0853B-1036N-KA evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0853B-1036N-KA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 5170 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection3877–6462 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3M24 cooling tower (1829 tons, 8.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3M24 — an AT cooling tower, 1829 nominal tons (8040 kW): rated to cool 5505 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 186.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection6030–10050 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0882-2418N040 evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0882-2418N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5358 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection4018–6697 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3M28 cooling tower (1986 tons, 8.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 424-3M28 — an AT cooling tower, 1986 nominal tons (8732 kW): rated to cool 5979 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 196.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection6549–10915 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-3D2DS-L1 closed-circuit cooler (133 tons, 583 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1212N-3D2DS-L1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 133 nominal tons (583 kW): rated to cool 399 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection437–728 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3M36 cooling tower (2365 tons, 10.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3M36 — an AT cooling tower, 2365 nominal tons (10397 kW): rated to cool 7119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 244.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection7798–12996 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-12FN cooling tower (238 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES15E-1212-12FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection785–1309 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 424-3M40 cooling tower (2372 tons, 10.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
EVAPCO's 424-3M40 — an AT cooling tower, 2372 nominal tons (10428 kW): rated to cool 7140 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 249.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection7821–13035 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 XES3E-1020-07H cooling tower (270 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's XES3E-1020-07H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 270 nominal tons (1187 kW): rated to cool 813 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection891–1484 kWEUOpen in the builder
‹ Previous1…119120121122123…145Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers