Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 2953–2976 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -0938-2418N040 evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0938-2418N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5698 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 91.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4273–7122 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1034-2418N060 evaporative condenser (6.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1034-2418N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6281 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4711–7851 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1082-2418N080 evaporative condenser (6.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1082-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6572 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4929–8216 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1144-2418N080 evaporative condenser (6.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1144-2418N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6949 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5212–8686 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1180-2418N100 evaporative condenser (7.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1180-2418N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7168 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5376–8960 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1218-2418N100 evaporative condenser (7.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1218-2418N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7399 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5549–9248 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1278-2418N120 evaporative condenser (7.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1278-2418N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7763 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 122.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5822–9704 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1088-2420N080 evaporative condenser (6.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1088-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6609 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 138.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4957–8261 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0862-2420N030 evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0862-2420N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5236 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3927–6545 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0982-2420N040 evaporative condenser (6.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0982-2420N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 5965 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4474–7456 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1080-2420N060 evaporative condenser (6.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1080-2420N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6560 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 117.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4920–8201 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1162-2420N080 evaporative condenser (7.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1162-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7058 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5294–8823 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1228-2420N100 evaporative condenser (7.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1228-2420N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7459 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 137.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5594–9324 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1038-2420N040 evaporative condenser (6.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1038-2420N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6305 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4729–7881 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1114-2420N050 evaporative condenser (6.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1114-2420N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6767 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5075–8458 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1134-2420N060 evaporative condenser (6.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1134-2420N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6888 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 110.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5166–8610 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1160-2420N060 evaporative condenser (7.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1160-2420N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7046 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 105.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5285–8808 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1182-2420N080 evaporative condenser (7.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1182-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7180 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 127.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5385–8975 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1244-2420N080 evaporative condenser (7.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1244-2420N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7557 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 115.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5667–9446 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1280-2420N100 evaporative condenser (7.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1280-2420N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 7775 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 128.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5831–9719 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1318-2420N100 evaporative condenser (8.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1318-2420N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8006 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6004–10007 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1378-2420N120 evaporative condenser (8.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1378-2420N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 8370 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 130.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6278–10463 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0996-2424N040 evaporative condenser (6.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0996-2424N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6050 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 120.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4537–7562 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1060-2424N060 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1060-2424N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 6439 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 141.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4829–8048 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…122123124125126…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers