Published systems
Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.
Showing 2,545–2,568 of 3,474
| Name | Company | Category | Capacity | Markets | Open in the builder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVAPCO AT 310-2I36 cooling tower (670 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-2I36 — an AT cooling tower, 670 nominal tons (2944 kW): rated to cool 2016 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2208–3680 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0660-2412N050 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0660-2412N050 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4009 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3007–5011 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-2J36 cooling tower (814 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-2J36 — an AT cooling tower, 814 nominal tons (3580 kW): rated to cool 2451 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 104.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2685–4474 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D4ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (293 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's PFI-1024N-3D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 293 nominal tons (1288 kW): rated to cool 882 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 966–1610 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-2K36 cooling tower (900 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-2K36 — an AT cooling tower, 900 nominal tons (3956 kW): rated to cool 2709 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 114.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2967–4945 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-07HN cooling tower (246 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's XES15E-1212-07HN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 246 nominal tons (1082 kW): rated to cool 741 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 812–1353 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-2L36 cooling tower (960 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-2L36 — an AT cooling tower, 960 nominal tons (4219 kW): rated to cool 2889 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3164–5274 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-06L-2 cooling tower (656 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S3E-8518-06L-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 656 nominal tons (2883 kW): rated to cool 1974 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2162–3604 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-2M36 cooling tower (1009 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-2M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1009 nominal tons (4434 kW): rated to cool 3036 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 130.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3325–5542 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-082-K cooling tower (82 tons, 359 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VTL-082-K — a Series V cooling tower, 82 nominal tons (359 kW): rated to cool 246 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 269–449 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-3I36 cooling tower (779 tons, 3.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-3I36 — an AT cooling tower, 779 nominal tons (3426 kW): rated to cool 2346 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2570–4283 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-216-21P closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-216-21P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 713–1188 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-3J36 cooling tower (911 tons, 4.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-3J36 — an AT cooling tower, 911 nominal tons (4005 kW): rated to cool 2742 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3003–5006 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-642A evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-642A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2766 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2074–3457 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-3K36 cooling tower (997 tons, 4.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 997 nominal tons (4381 kW): rated to cool 3000 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 112.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3286–5477 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0695B-1224N-JB evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0695B-1224N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4211 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 60.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3158–5264 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-3L36 cooling tower (1064 tons, 4.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-3L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1064 nominal tons (4679 kW): rated to cool 3204 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3509–5849 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-806-1236-30 evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-806-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4883 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 102.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3662–6104 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-3M36 cooling tower (1122 tons, 4.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-3M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1122 nominal tons (4933 kW): rated to cool 3378 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3700–6167 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0689-1220N060 evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0689-1220N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4185 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3139–5231 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-4I36 cooling tower (818 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-4I36 — an AT cooling tower, 818 nominal tons (3597 kW): rated to cool 2463 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2698–4496 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-4D1DS-J2 closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's PFI-1024N-4D1DS-J2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 713–1188 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 310-4J36 cooling tower (950 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 310-4J36 — an AT cooling tower, 950 nominal tons (4175 kW): rated to cool 2859 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3132–5219 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-09EN cooling tower (194 tons, 854 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's XES15E-1212-09EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 194 nominal tons (854 kW): rated to cool 585 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 641–1068 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
Publishing here
Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers