Published systems

American Cooling Tower's ACX-1066-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 735 nominal tons (3229 kW): rated to cool 2211 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VF1-009-22F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 6 nominal tons (26 kW): rated to cool 18 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 110-4L18 — an AT cooling tower, 491 nominal tons (2160 kW): rated to cool 1479 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

American Cooling Tower's ACX-1067-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 780 nominal tons (3431 kW): rated to cool 2349 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 96.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-035 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 151 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 10-6K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 710 nominal tons (3121 kW): rated to cool 1781 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 79.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

American Cooling Tower's ACX-1068-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 838 nominal tons (3685 kW): rated to cool 2523 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 99.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1026A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4420 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 110-4M12 — an AT cooling tower, 392 nominal tons (1722 kW): rated to cool 1179 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

American Cooling Tower's ACX-2070-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 539 nominal tons (2370 kW): rated to cool 1623 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0242B-1012N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1465 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 10-6L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 762 nominal tons (3352 kW): rated to cool 1912 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 85.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

American Cooling Tower's ACX-2071-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 594 nominal tons (2611 kW): rated to cool 1788 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-106-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 642 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 110-4M18 — an AT cooling tower, 520 nominal tons (2287 kW): rated to cool 1566 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

American Cooling Tower's ACX-2072-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 639 nominal tons (2808 kW): rated to cool 1923 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1352-2424-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8213 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 146.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 10-6M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 808 nominal tons (3551 kW): rated to cool 2026 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

American Cooling Tower's ACX-2073-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 679 nominal tons (2984 kW): rated to cool 2043 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's FXT-0706B-F — an FXT cooling tower, 64 nominal tons (280 kW): rated to cool 192 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 110-4N12 — an AT cooling tower, 409 nominal tons (1796 kW): rated to cool 1230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

American Cooling Tower's ACX-2074-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 748 nominal tons (3286 kW): rated to cool 2250 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's FXV-0806B-12D-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 47 nominal tons (206 kW): rated to cool 141 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 19.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 10-6N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 885 nominal tons (3888 kW): rated to cool 2219 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 97.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.