Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 46Systems 3,474Components 15,410Accessories 3

Showing 193–216 of 3,474

NameCompanyCategoryCapacityMarketsOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1050-1 cooling tower (299 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1050-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 299 nominal tons (1314 kW): rated to cool 900 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection986–1643 kWNAOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-116-M cooling tower (116 tons, 508 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VT0-116-M — a Series V cooling tower, 116 nominal tons (508 kW): rated to cool 348 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 12.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection381–635 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-3N18 cooling tower (545 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-3N18 — an AT cooling tower, 545 nominal tons (2397 kW): rated to cool 1641 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1797–2996 kWEUOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1051-1 cooling tower (342 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1051-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 342 nominal tons (1503 kW): rated to cool 1029 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1127–1879 kWNAOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-009-12G closed-circuit cooler (5 tons, 22 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-009-12G — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 5 nominal tons (22 kW): rated to cool 15 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection16–27 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5K36 closed-circuit cooler (658 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1650 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 81.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2169–3616 kWEUOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1052-1 cooling tower (377 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1052-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 377 nominal tons (1656 kW): rated to cool 1134 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1242–2070 kWNAOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCL-029 evaporative condenser (125 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-029 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 125 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 1.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection94–156 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4I12 cooling tower (276 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4I12 — an AT cooling tower, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection910–1517 kWEUOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1053-1 cooling tower (431 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1053-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 431 nominal tons (1893 kW): rated to cool 1296 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1420–2366 kWNAOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1024A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1024A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4412 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection3309–5515 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5L36 closed-circuit cooler (707 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 707 nominal tons (3109 kW): rated to cool 1774 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 88.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2332–3887 kWEUOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1054-1 cooling tower (473 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1054-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 473 nominal tons (2081 kW): rated to cool 1425 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1561–2601 kWNAOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0235B-1012N-JA evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0235B-1012N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1070–1783 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4I18 cooling tower (363 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4I18 — an AT cooling tower, 363 nominal tons (1595 kW): rated to cool 1092 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1196–1994 kWEUOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1055-1 cooling tower (510 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1055-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 510 nominal tons (2243 kW): rated to cool 1536 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1682–2804 kWNAOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1049-1236-60 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1049-1236-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6355 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 125.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection4766–7944 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5M36 closed-circuit cooler (750 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 750 nominal tons (3297 kW): rated to cool 1881 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 92.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2473–4121 kWEUOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1056-1 cooling tower (542 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1056-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 542 nominal tons (2383 kW): rated to cool 1632 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 67.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1788–2979 kWNAOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1300-2424-40 evaporative condenser (7.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1300-2424-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 7897 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 135.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection5923–9871 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 110-4J12 cooling tower (321 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 110-4J12 — an AT cooling tower, 321 nominal tons (1411 kW): rated to cool 966 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1058–1764 kWEUOpen in the builder
American Cooling Tower ACX-1057-1 cooling tower (596 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓
American Cooling Tower's ACX-1057-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 596 nominal tons (2620 kW): rated to cool 1794 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1965–3275 kWNAOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXT-0506A-H cooling tower (68 tons, 298 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's FXT-0506A-H — an FXT cooling tower, 68 nominal tons (298 kW): rated to cool 204 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 10.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection223–372 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO ATWB 10-5N36 closed-circuit cooler (822 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓
EVAPCO's 10-5N36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 822 nominal tons (3614 kW): rated to cool 2062 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 100.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2710–4517 kWEUOpen in the builder
‹ Previous1…7891011…145Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers