Published systems
Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.
Showing 145–168 of 3,474
| Name | Company | Category | Capacity | Markets | Open in the builder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVAPCO AT 110-3J12 cooling tower (308 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 110-3J12 — an AT cooling tower, 308 nominal tons (1354 kW): rated to cool 927 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1015–1692 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| American Cooling Tower ACX-1032-1 cooling tower (235 tons, 1.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓ American Cooling Tower's ACX-1032-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 235 nominal tons (1034 kW): rated to cool 708 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 776–1293 kW | NA | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT0-107-L cooling tower (107 tons, 469 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VT0-107-L — a Series V cooling tower, 107 nominal tons (469 kW): rated to cool 321 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 352–586 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Cooling Tower Systems T-2800 cooling tower (623 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTS's T-2800 — a T-2 cooling tower, 623 tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2054–3423 kW | NA | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO ATWB 10-4K36 closed-circuit cooler (616 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓ EVAPCO's 10-4K36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 616 nominal tons (2706 kW): rated to cool 1544 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 84.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2030–3383 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| American Cooling Tower ACX-1033-1 cooling tower (259 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓ American Cooling Tower's ACX-1033-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 854–1424 kW | NA | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-009-12F closed-circuit cooler (5 tons, 22 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-009-12F — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 5 nominal tons (22 kW): rated to cool 15 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 2.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 16–27 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Cooling Tower Systems T-3000 cooling tower (825 tons, 3.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTS's T-3000 — a T-2 cooling tower, 825 tons (3628 kW): rated to cool 2484 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one rated point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Cooling Tower Systems. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2721–4535 kW | NA | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 110-3J18 cooling tower (394 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 110-3J18 — an AT cooling tower, 394 nominal tons (1731 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1298–2163 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| American Cooling Tower ACX-1034-1 cooling tower (296 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓ American Cooling Tower's ACX-1034-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 296 nominal tons (1301 kW): rated to cool 891 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 976–1627 kW | NA | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCL-019 evaporative condenser (82 kW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-019 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 82 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 3.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 1.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 61–102 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO ATWB 10-4L36 closed-circuit cooler (662 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓ EVAPCO's 10-4L36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 662 nominal tons (2912 kW): rated to cool 1661 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 90.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2184–3640 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| American Cooling Tower ACX-1035-1 cooling tower (330 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓ American Cooling Tower's ACX-1035-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 330 nominal tons (1450 kW): rated to cool 993 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1088–1813 kW | NA | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-1020A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1020A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3296–5493 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 110-3K12 cooling tower (337 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 110-3K12 — an AT cooling tower, 337 nominal tons (1481 kW): rated to cool 1014 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1111–1851 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| American Cooling Tower ACX-1036-1 cooling tower (351 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓ American Cooling Tower's ACX-1036-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1157–1928 kW | NA | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0214B-1212N-GA evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0214B-1212N-GA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1301 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 4.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 976–1626 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO ATWB 10-4M24 closed-circuit cooler (493 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓ EVAPCO's 10-4M24 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 493 nominal tons (2169 kW): rated to cool 1238 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 71.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1627–2711 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| American Cooling Tower ACX-1037-1 cooling tower (373 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓ American Cooling Tower's ACX-1037-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 373 nominal tons (1639 kW): rated to cool 1122 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1229–2048 kW | NA | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-1049-1236-45 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-1049-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6355 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 111.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 4766–7944 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 110-3K18 cooling tower (436 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 110-3K18 — an AT cooling tower, 436 nominal tons (1915 kW): rated to cool 1311 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1436–2393 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| American Cooling Tower ACX-1038-1 cooling tower (410 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C38C-18R02) ✓ American Cooling Tower's ACX-1038-1 — an ACX cooling tower, 410 nominal tons (1801 kW): rated to cool 1233 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by American Cooling Tower. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1351–2251 kW | NA | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil CXVT-1234-2424-30 evaporative condenser (7.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-1234-2424-30 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 7496 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 5622–9370 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO ATWB 10-4M36 closed-circuit cooler (703 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) ✓ EVAPCO's 10-4M36 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 703 nominal tons (3090 kW): rated to cool 1763 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 95.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2317–3862 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
Publishing here
Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers