Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 3193–3216 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil VCL-257 evaporative condenser (1.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-257 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1107 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 830–1384 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil VCL-271 evaporative condenser (1.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-271 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1168 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 876–1460 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil VCL-299 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-299 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 1288 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 966–1610 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -122A evaporative condenser (525 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -122A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 525 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 394–657 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -138A evaporative condenser (595 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -138A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 595 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 12.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 446–743 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -150A evaporative condenser (646 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -150A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 646 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 485–808 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -161A evaporative condenser (694 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -161A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 694 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 520–867 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -170A evaporative condenser (732 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -170A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 732 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 549–915 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -182A evaporative condenser (784 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -182A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 784 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 588–980 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -178A evaporative condenser (767 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -178A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 767 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 12.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 575–959 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -191A evaporative condenser (823 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -191A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 823 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 617–1029 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -174A evaporative condenser (750 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -174A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 750 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 562–937 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -192A evaporative condenser (827 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -192A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 620–1034 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -206A evaporative condenser (887 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -206A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 887 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 18.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 666–1109 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -227A evaporative condenser (978 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -227A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 978 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 21.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 733–1222 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -215A evaporative condenser (926 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -215A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 926 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 695–1158 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -235A evaporative condenser (1.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -235A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1013 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 18.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 759–1266 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -259A evaporative condenser (1.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -259A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1116 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 21.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 837–1395 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -261A evaporative condenser (1.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -261A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1125 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 843–1406 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -288A evaporative condenser (1.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -288A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1241 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 931–1551 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -308A evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -308A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1327 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 995–1659 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -301A evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -301A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1297 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 973–1621 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -322A evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -322A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1387 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1040–1734 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -323A evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -323A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1392 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 27.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1044–1739 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…132133134135136…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers