Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 3217–3240 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -356A evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -356A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1534 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1150–1917 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -382A evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -382A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1231–2052 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -424A evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -424A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1370–2283 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -416A evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -416A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1792 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1344–2240 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -446A evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -446A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1921 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1441–2402 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -300A evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -300A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1292 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 969–1616 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -331A evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -331A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1070–1783 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -340A evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -340A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1465 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1099–1831 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -375A evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -375A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1616 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1212–2020 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -402A evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -402A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1732 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1299–2165 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -407A evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -407A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1753 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1315–2192 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -401A evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -401A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1728 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1296–2160 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -429A evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -429A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1848 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1386–2310 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -473A evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -473A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2038 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1528–2547 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -393A evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -393A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1693 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1270–2116 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -433A evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -433A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1865 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1399–2332 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -464A evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -464A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1999 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1499–2499 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -512A evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -512A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2206 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1654–2757 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -460A evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -460A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1982 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1486–2477 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -507A evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -507A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2184 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1638–2730 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -543A evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -543A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2339 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1754–2924 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -510A evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -510A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2197 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1648–2746 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -560A evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -560A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2413 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1809–3016 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -600A evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -600A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2585 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1939–3231 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…133134135136137…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers