Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 3265–3288 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -1020A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1020A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3296–5493 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1120A evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1120A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4825 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 90.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3619–6031 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1200A evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1200A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5170 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3877–6462 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1062A evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1062A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4575 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3431–5719 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1169A evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1169A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5041 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3780–6301 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1240A evaporative condenser (5.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1240A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5342 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4007–6678 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1218A evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1218A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5247 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3936–6559 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1306A evaporative condenser (5.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1306A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5626 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 85.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4220–7033 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1414A evaporative condenser (6.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1414A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6092 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4569–7615 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1558A evaporative condenser (6.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1558A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 6712 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 101.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5034–8390 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -302A evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -302A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1301 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 23.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 4.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 976–1626 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -342A evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -342A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1473 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1105–1842 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -377A evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -377A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1218–2030 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -404A evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -404A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1741 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1305–2176 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -381A evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -381A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1231–2052 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -420A evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -420A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1809 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1357–2262 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -451A evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -451A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1943 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1457–2429 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -471A evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -471A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2029 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1522–2537 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -513A evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -513A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2210 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1658–2763 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -491A evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -491A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2115 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1587–2644 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -541A evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -541A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2331 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1748–2913 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -580A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -580A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2499 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1874–3123 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -537A evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -537A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2314 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1735–2892 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -584A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -584A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1890–3151 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…135136137138139140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers