Published systems

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1501-2436N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9120 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4DS-O1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 264 nominal tons (1161 kW): rated to cool 795 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-8518-07G — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 215 nominal tons (946 kW): rated to cool 648 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1580-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9597 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 166.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4DS-P1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 285 nominal tons (1253 kW): rated to cool 858 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-8518-07H — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 255 nominal tons (1122 kW): rated to cool 768 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1584-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9622 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 167.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4ES-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-8518-07J — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 291 nominal tons (1279 kW): rated to cool 876 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1624-2424N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 9865 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 159.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1218N-4D4ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 333 nominal tons (1463 kW): rated to cool 1002 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-8518-07K — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 319 nominal tons (1402 kW): rated to cool 960 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1710-2440N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 10389 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 209.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1218N-5D2ES-Q1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 329 nominal tons (1446 kW): rated to cool 990 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's XES3E-8518-07L — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 364 nominal tons (1599 kW): rated to cool 1095 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1738-2436N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 10556 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1218N-6D1ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 359 nominal tons (1577 kW): rated to cool 1080 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1848-2436N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11226 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 183.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1218N-6D3ES-R1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1947-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11825 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 259.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 198 nominal tons (872 kW): rated to cool 597 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-1948-2440N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 11835 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 208.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2037-2436N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12375 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 207.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.