Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 3313–3336 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -902A evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -902A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3886 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2914–4857 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -879A evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -879A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3787 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2840–4733 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -942A evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -942A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4058 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3044–5073 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1026A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1026A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4420 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3315–5525 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -982A evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -982A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4230 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3173–5288 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1082A evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1082A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4661 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3496–5827 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1160A evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1160A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4997 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3748–6247 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1075A evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1075A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4631 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3474–5789 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1170A evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1170A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5041 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3780–6301 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1252A evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1252A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4045–6742 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1321A evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1321A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5691 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 86.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4268–7114 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S870A evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S870A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3748 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2811–4685 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S932A evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S932A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4015 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 69.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3011–5019 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S972A evaporative condenser (4.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S972A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4187 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3141–5234 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S1071A evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S1071A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4614 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3461–5768 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S1019A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S1019A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4390 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3292–5487 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S1124A evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S1124A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4842 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3632–6053 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S1204A evaporative condenser (5.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S1204A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5187 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3890–6484 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -930A evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -930A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4007 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 13.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3005–5008 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1052A evaporative condenser (4.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1052A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4532 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 84.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3399–5665 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1162A evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1162A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5006 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 96.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3754–6257 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1246A evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1246A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5368 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 106.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4026–6710 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1284A evaporative condenser (5.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1284A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5532 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 94.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4149–6915 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1376A evaporative condenser (5.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1376A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5928 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4446–7410 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…137138139140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers