Published systems

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 276 nominal tons (1214 kW): rated to cool 831 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2345-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14246 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 255.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2400-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14578 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 231.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2436-2440N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14800 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 275.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 368 nominal tons (1617 kW): rated to cool 1107 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2468-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14993 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 230.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-4D2DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2518-2436N240 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 15296 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 244.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 179.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-4D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 340 nominal tons (1494 kW): rated to cool 1023 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 83.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2540-2440N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 15427 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 257.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-4D2ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 406 nominal tons (1783 kW): rated to cool 1221 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2615-2440N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 15885 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 246.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-4D3DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 388 nominal tons (1704 kW): rated to cool 1167 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 91.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2734-2440N240 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 16608 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 260.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 179.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-4D3ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-1224N-4D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-1224N-5D1DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 375 nominal tons (1647 kW): rated to cool 1128 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-1224N-5D2ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 396 nominal tons (1739 kW): rated to cool 1191 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-1224N-5D4DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 394 nominal tons (1731 kW): rated to cool 1185 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-1224N-5D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 418 nominal tons (1836 kW): rated to cool 1257 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-1224N-5D4ES-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 446 nominal tons (1958 kW): rated to cool 1341 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 82.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-1224N-6D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 369 nominal tons (1621 kW): rated to cool 1110 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.