Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 3289–3312 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -626A evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -626A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2697 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2023–3371 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -661A evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -661A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2848 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 43.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2136–3560 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -526A evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -526A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2266 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1700–2833 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -581A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -581A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1877–3129 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -623A evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -623A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2684 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2013–3355 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -582A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -582A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2507 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1880–3134 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -642A evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -642A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2766 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2074–3457 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -688A evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -688A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2964 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2223–3705 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -602A evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -602A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2593 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1945–3242 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -664A evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -664A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2146–3576 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -711A evaporative condenser (3.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -711A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3063 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2297–3829 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -785A evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -785A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3382 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2537–4228 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -751A evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -751A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2423–4039 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -827A evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -827A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3563 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 57.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2672–4454 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -887A evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -887A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3821 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2866–4777 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -895A evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -895A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3856 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2892–4820 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -957A evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -957A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3092–5154 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1010A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1010A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4351 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3263–5439 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -605A evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -605A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2607 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 8.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1955–3258 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -684A evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -684A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2947 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2210–3684 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -754A evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -754A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3248 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2436–4061 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -808A evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -808A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3481 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2611–4351 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -762A evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -762A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3283 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2462–4103 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -840A evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -840A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3619 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2714–4524 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…136137138139140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers