Published systems

BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 249 nominal tons (1095 kW): rated to cool 750 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2060-2440N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12510 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 195.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-2D4ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 89.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2092-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12710 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 241.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D1DS-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 84.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2132-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 12950 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 240.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D1DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 284 nominal tons (1249 kW): rated to cool 855 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 90.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2143-2440N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13016 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 235.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D1DS-P2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 313 nominal tons (1376 kW): rated to cool 942 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 105.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2159-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13113 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 276.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 245 nominal tons (1078 kW): rated to cool 738 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2210-2440N100 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13426 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 199.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 265 nominal tons (1165 kW): rated to cool 798 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 74.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2223-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13500 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 258.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 295 nominal tons (1297 kW): rated to cool 888 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2250-2440N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13667 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 220.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2DS-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 306 nominal tons (1345 kW): rated to cool 921 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 92.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2254-2436N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13692 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 217.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 287 nominal tons (1262 kW): rated to cool 864 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2302-2440N120 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 13980 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 211.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D2ES-M2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1336 kW): rated to cool 915 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2306-2440N160 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14005 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 257.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 119.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

BAC's PFI-1224N-3D3ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 323 nominal tons (1420 kW): rated to cool 972 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 81.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-2325-2436N200 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 14123 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 241.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 149.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.