Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 3241–3264 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -585A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -585A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1890–3151 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -620A evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -620A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2671 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 47.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2003–3339 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -488A evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -488A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2102 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 28.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 6.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1577–2628 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -609A evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -609A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1968–3279 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -653A evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -653A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2813 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2110–3516 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -707A evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -707A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3046 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2284–3807 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -779A evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -779A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3356 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2517–4195 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -662A evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -662A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2139–3565 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -680A evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -680A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2930 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2197–3662 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -750A evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -750A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3231 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2423–4039 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -804A evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -804A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3464 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2598–4330 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -760A evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -760A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3274 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2456–4093 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -814A evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -814A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3507 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2630–4384 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -858A evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -858A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3697 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2772–4621 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -946A evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -946A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4075 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3057–5094 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -866A evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -866A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3731 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 53.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2798–4663 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -928A evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -928A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3998 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2999–4998 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1024A evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1024A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4412 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3309–5515 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S700A evaporative condenser (3.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S700A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3017 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2263–3772 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S828A evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S828A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3568 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2676–4459 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S838A evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S838A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3612 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2709–4515 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -S884A evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -S884A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3807 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2855–4759 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -920A evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -920A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3963 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2973–4954 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1086A evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1086A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 4679 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 104.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3509–5848 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…134135136137138…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers