Published systems

EVAPCO's 212-2M40 — an AT cooling tower, 1084 nominal tons (4767 kW): rated to cool 3264 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 132.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-315-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1908 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 9-3I21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 307 nominal tons (1349 kW): rated to cool 770 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 43.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's FXV-0818B-24T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 274 nominal tons (1205 kW): rated to cool 825 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 212-2N36 — an AT cooling tower, 1215 nominal tons (5341 kW): rated to cool 3657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 142.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0431-1220N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 2618 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 52.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 9-3I8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 96 nominal tons (424 kW): rated to cool 242 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 17.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-0718N-4D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 179 nominal tons (789 kW): rated to cool 540 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 212-2N40 — an AT cooling tower, 1246 nominal tons (5477 kW): rated to cool 3750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 144.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's S15E-1218-10KN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1118 nominal tons (4916 kW): rated to cool 3366 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 9-3J11 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 143 nominal tons (628 kW): rated to cool 358 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 24.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's S3E-1222-13S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2018 nominal tons (8872 kW): rated to cool 6075 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 222.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 212-2O40 — an AT cooling tower, 1352 nominal tons (5946 kW): rated to cool 4071 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 155.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VT1-M352-P — a Series V cooling tower, 351 nominal tons (1542 kW): rated to cool 1056 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 9-3J14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 190 nominal tons (835 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 30.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VF1-096-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 99 nominal tons (434 kW): rated to cool 297 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 212-3F9 — an AT cooling tower, 202 nominal tons (889 kW): rated to cool 609 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-301A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1297 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 22.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 9-3J18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 304 nominal tons (1334 kW): rated to cool 761 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 44.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0441B-1018N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2675 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 62.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 212-3G9 — an AT cooling tower, 249 nominal tons (1095 kW): rated to cool 750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-321-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1945 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 9-3J21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 350 nominal tons (1538 kW): rated to cool 877 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 49.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's FXV-0818B-30T-K — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 226 nominal tons (995 kW): rated to cool 681 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.