Published systems

EVAPCO's 215-3I9 — an AT cooling tower, 357 nominal tons (1569 kW): rated to cool 1074 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-433A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1865 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 215-3J9 — an AT cooling tower, 392 nominal tons (1722 kW): rated to cool 1179 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0538B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3264 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 78.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 215-4F9 — an AT cooling tower, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 24.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-467-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2829 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 215-4G9 — an AT cooling tower, 318 nominal tons (1398 kW): rated to cool 957 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's FXV-1212C-32D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 234 nominal tons (1030 kW): rated to cool 705 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 215-4H9 — an AT cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0557-1220N025 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3384 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 215-4I9 — an AT cooling tower, 372 nominal tons (1634 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 35.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-1012N-3D3DS-N1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 36.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 215-4J9 — an AT cooling tower, 413 nominal tons (1814 kW): rated to cool 1242 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's S15E-1285-06JN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 157 nominal tons (692 kW): rated to cool 474 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 17.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 217-2G11 — an AT cooling tower, 315 nominal tons (1385 kW): rated to cool 948 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's S3E-1424-12S — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1117 nominal tons (4912 kW): rated to cool 3363 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 124.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 217-2G9 — an AT cooling tower, 269 nominal tons (1183 kW): rated to cool 810 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VT1-M796-Q — a Series V cooling tower, 793 nominal tons (3488 kW): rated to cool 2388 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 217-2H11 — an AT cooling tower, 378 nominal tons (1661 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VF1-1036N-8D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 612 nominal tons (2690 kW): rated to cool 1842 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 217-2H12 — an AT cooling tower, 393 nominal tons (1726 kW): rated to cool 1182 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-446A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1921 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 217-2H14 — an AT cooling tower, 434 nominal tons (1906 kW): rated to cool 1305 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0541B-1224N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3283 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.