Published systems
Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.
Showing 2,065–2,088 of 3,474
| Name | Company | Category | Capacity | Markets | Open in the builder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVAPCO AT 217-4H14 cooling tower (523 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4H14 — an AT cooling tower, 523 nominal tons (2300 kW): rated to cool 1575 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1725–2875 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N209-P cooling tower (208 tons, 916 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VT1-N209-P — a Series V cooling tower, 208 nominal tons (916 kW): rated to cool 627 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 687–1145 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4H9 cooling tower (380 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4H9 — an AT cooling tower, 380 nominal tons (1669 kW): rated to cool 1143 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1252–2087 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-31P closed-circuit cooler (127 tons, 556 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-144-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 127 nominal tons (556 kW): rated to cool 381 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 37.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 417–696 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4I11 cooling tower (478 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4I11 — an AT cooling tower, 478 nominal tons (2103 kW): rated to cool 1440 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1577–2629 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-471A evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-471A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2029 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1522–2537 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4I12 cooling tower (522 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4I12 — an AT cooling tower, 522 nominal tons (2296 kW): rated to cool 1572 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1722–2870 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0565B-1018N-JB evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0565B-1018N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3430 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 40.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2573–4288 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4I14 cooling tower (579 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4I14 — an AT cooling tower, 579 nominal tons (2546 kW): rated to cool 1743 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1909–3182 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-525-1218-22.5 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-525-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 55.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2386–3976 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4I9 cooling tower (417 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4I9 — an AT cooling tower, 417 nominal tons (1831 kW): rated to cool 1254 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1374–2289 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218B-12D-O closed-circuit cooler (266 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓ BAC's FXV-1218B-12D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 266 nominal tons (1170 kW): rated to cool 801 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 877–1462 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4J11 cooling tower (543 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4J11 — an AT cooling tower, 543 nominal tons (2388 kW): rated to cool 1635 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1791–2985 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0572-1218N040 evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0572-1218N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3475 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 54.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2606–4343 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4J12 cooling tower (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4J12 — an AT cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1922–3204 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1012N-4D1DS-M1 closed-circuit cooler (134 tons, 587 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's PFI-1012N-4D1DS-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 134 nominal tons (587 kW): rated to cool 402 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 440–734 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4J14 cooling tower (647 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4J14 — an AT cooling tower, 647 nominal tons (2844 kW): rated to cool 1947 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2133–3554 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-06LN-2 cooling tower (395 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S15E-1285-06LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 395 nominal tons (1735 kW): rated to cool 1188 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 44.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1301–2169 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4J9 cooling tower (482 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4J9 — an AT cooling tower, 482 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1452 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1590–2651 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-13Q-2 cooling tower (2055 tons, 9.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S3E-1424-13Q-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2055 nominal tons (9034 kW): rated to cool 6186 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 228.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 6776–11293 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4K11 cooling tower (600 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4K11 — an AT cooling tower, 600 nominal tons (2638 kW): rated to cool 1806 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1978–3297 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N220-O cooling tower (219 tons, 964 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VT1-N220-O — a Series V cooling tower, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 723–1205 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 217-4K12 cooling tower (643 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 217-4K12 — an AT cooling tower, 643 nominal tons (2826 kW): rated to cool 1935 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2119–3532 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144-31Q closed-circuit cooler (140 tons, 613 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-144-31Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 140 nominal tons (613 kW): rated to cool 420 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 460–767 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
Publishing here
Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers