Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 46Systems 3,474Components 15,410Accessories 3

Showing 2,377–2,400 of 3,474

NameCompanyCategoryCapacityMarketsOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4I36 cooling tower (708 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4I36 — an AT cooling tower, 708 nominal tons (3111 kW): rated to cool 2130 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2333–3888 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0630-2012N080 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0630-2012N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 87.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2870–4784 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4J24 cooling tower (490 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4J24 — an AT cooling tower, 490 nominal tons (2156 kW): rated to cool 1476 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1617–2695 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D1DS-L2 closed-circuit cooler (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D1DS-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 66.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4J28 cooling tower (549 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4J28 — an AT cooling tower, 549 nominal tons (2414 kW): rated to cool 1653 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1811–3018 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-10MN cooling tower (288 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-10MN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 288 nominal tons (1266 kW): rated to cool 867 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 30.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection950–1583 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4J36 cooling tower (799 tons, 3.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4J36 — an AT cooling tower, 799 nominal tons (3514 kW): rated to cool 2406 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2635–4392 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14U cooling tower (1369 tons, 6.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14U — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1369 nominal tons (6020 kW): rated to cool 4122 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 149.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection4515–7525 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4K24 cooling tower (535 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4K24 — an AT cooling tower, 535 nominal tons (2353 kW): rated to cool 1611 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1765–2941 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-030-G cooling tower (30 tons, 131 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-030-G — a Series V cooling tower, 30 nominal tons (131 kW): rated to cool 90 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection99–164 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4K28 cooling tower (432 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4K28 — an AT cooling tower, 432 nominal tons (1897 kW): rated to cool 1299 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1423–2371 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-31P closed-circuit cooler (184 tons, 811 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-192-31P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 184 nominal tons (811 kW): rated to cool 555 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 55.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection608–1013 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4K36 cooling tower (872 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4K36 — an AT cooling tower, 872 nominal tons (3834 kW): rated to cool 2625 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 93.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2875–4792 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-584A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-584A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1890–3151 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4L24 cooling tower (572 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4L24 — an AT cooling tower, 572 nominal tons (2515 kW): rated to cool 1722 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1886–3144 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0653B-1036N-HA evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0653B-1036N-HA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3963 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2973–4954 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4L28 cooling tower (582 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4L28 — an AT cooling tower, 582 nominal tons (2559 kW): rated to cool 1752 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1919–3198 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-655-1224-30 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-655-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3968 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2976–4960 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4M28 cooling tower (658 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4M28 — an AT cooling tower, 658 nominal tons (2892 kW): rated to cool 1980 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 72.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2169–3615 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-32Q-P closed-circuit cooler (423 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-32Q-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 423 nominal tons (1858 kW): rated to cool 1272 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1393–2322 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-2F17 cooling tower (216 tons, 951 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-2F17 — an AT cooling tower, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 25.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection713–1188 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0639-1218N060 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0639-1218N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3881 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2911–4852 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 28-2G17 cooling tower (273 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 28-2G17 — an AT cooling tower, 273 nominal tons (1200 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection900–1501 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D2DS-K2 closed-circuit cooler (206 tons, 907 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2DS-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 206 nominal tons (907 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection680–1134 kWEUOpen in the builder
‹ Previous1…9899100101102…145Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers