Published systems
Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.
Showing 2,425–2,448 of 3,474
| Name | Company | Category | Capacity | Markets | Open in the builder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVAPCO AT 29-2G18 cooling tower (273 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2G18 — an AT cooling tower, 273 nominal tons (1200 kW): rated to cool 822 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 900–1501 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-039-H cooling tower (39 tons, 171 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VTL-039-H — a Series V cooling tower, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 4.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 128–214 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2G21 cooling tower (314 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2G21 — an AT cooling tower, 314 nominal tons (1380 kW): rated to cool 945 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1035–1725 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-41O closed-circuit cooler (173 tons, 762 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-192-41O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 173 nominal tons (762 kW): rated to cool 522 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 49.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 572–953 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2H18 cooling tower (328 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2H18 — an AT cooling tower, 328 nominal tons (1441 kW): rated to cool 987 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 38.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1081–1802 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-600A evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-600A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2585 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1939–3231 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2H21 cooling tower (378 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2H21 — an AT cooling tower, 378 nominal tons (1661 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1245–2076 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0661B-1236N-GA evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0661B-1236N-GA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4008 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 71.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 13.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3006–5010 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2H24 cooling tower (399 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2H24 — an AT cooling tower, 399 nominal tons (1753 kW): rated to cool 1200 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1314–2191 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-682-1224-40 evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-682-1224-40 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4132 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3099–5165 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2H28 cooling tower (445 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2H28 — an AT cooling tower, 445 nominal tons (1954 kW): rated to cool 1338 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1466–2443 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-36T-L closed-circuit cooler (332 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓ BAC's FXV-1218C-36T-L — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 332 nominal tons (1459 kW): rated to cool 999 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1094–1824 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2I18 cooling tower (361 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2I18 — an AT cooling tower, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1190–1983 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0646-1024N060 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0646-1024N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3924 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2943–4905 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2I21 cooling tower (407 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2I21 — an AT cooling tower, 407 nominal tons (1788 kW): rated to cool 1224 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1341–2235 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D2ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (242 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 242 nominal tons (1065 kW): rated to cool 729 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 799–1331 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2I24 cooling tower (452 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2I24 — an AT cooling tower, 452 nominal tons (1989 kW): rated to cool 1362 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1492–2486 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-10NN-2 cooling tower (618 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S15E-1285-10NN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 618 nominal tons (2716 kW): rated to cool 1860 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2037–3396 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2I28 cooling tower (504 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2I28 — an AT cooling tower, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1663–2771 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14W-2 cooling tower (2778 tons, 12.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S3E-1424-14W-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2778 nominal tons (12211 kW): rated to cool 8361 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 303.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 9158–15264 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2J18 cooling tower (421 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2J18 — an AT cooling tower, 421 nominal tons (1849 kW): rated to cool 1266 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1387–2311 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-045-H cooling tower (45 tons, 197 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VTL-045-H — a Series V cooling tower, 45 nominal tons (197 kW): rated to cool 135 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 8.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 148–246 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-2J21 cooling tower (465 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-2J21 — an AT cooling tower, 465 nominal tons (2046 kW): rated to cool 1401 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1535–2558 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-41P closed-circuit cooler (197 tons, 868 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-192-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 197 nominal tons (868 kW): rated to cool 594 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 651–1084 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
Publishing here
Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers