Published systems
Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.
Showing 2,473–2,496 of 3,474
| Name | Company | Category | Capacity | Markets | Open in the builder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVAPCO AT 29-3I21 cooling tower (447 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3I21 — an AT cooling tower, 447 nominal tons (1963 kW): rated to cool 1344 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1472–2454 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0656-1024N060 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0656-1024N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3985 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2989–4981 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3I24 cooling tower (504 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3I24 — an AT cooling tower, 504 nominal tons (2217 kW): rated to cool 1518 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1663–2771 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D2ES-O2 closed-circuit cooler (278 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's PFI-1024N-3D2ES-O2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1222 kW): rated to cool 837 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 77.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 917–1528 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3I28 cooling tower (561 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3I28 — an AT cooling tower, 561 nominal tons (2467 kW): rated to cool 1689 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1850–3083 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-07FN cooling tower (182 tons, 802 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's XES15E-1212-07FN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 182 nominal tons (802 kW): rated to cool 549 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 20.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 601–1002 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3J18 cooling tower (469 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3J18 — an AT cooling tower, 469 nominal tons (2064 kW): rated to cool 1413 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1548–2580 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-05L-2 cooling tower (583 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S3E-8518-05L-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 583 nominal tons (2563 kW): rated to cool 1755 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1922–3204 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3J21 cooling tower (516 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3J21 — an AT cooling tower, 516 nominal tons (2270 kW): rated to cool 1554 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 53.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1702–2837 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-059-H cooling tower (59 tons, 259 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VTL-059-H — a Series V cooling tower, 59 nominal tons (259 kW): rated to cool 177 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 7.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 194–323 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3J24 cooling tower (569 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3J24 — an AT cooling tower, 569 nominal tons (2502 kW): rated to cool 1713 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 57.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1876–3127 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-51P closed-circuit cooler (206 tons, 907 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-192-51P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 206 nominal tons (907 kW): rated to cool 621 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 680–1134 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3J28 cooling tower (631 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3J28 — an AT cooling tower, 631 nominal tons (2773 kW): rated to cool 1899 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 65.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2080–3467 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-609A evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-609A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1968–3279 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3K21 cooling tower (576 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3K21 — an AT cooling tower, 576 nominal tons (2532 kW): rated to cool 1734 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1899–3166 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0672B-1024N-LA evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0672B-1024N-LA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4075 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3057–5094 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3K24 cooling tower (628 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 628 nominal tons (2760 kW): rated to cool 1890 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 63.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2070–3450 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-739-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-739-1224-50 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4477 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3358–5597 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3K28 cooling tower (696 tons, 3.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3K28 — an AT cooling tower, 696 nominal tons (3058 kW): rated to cool 2094 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2294–3823 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0656-2012N060 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0656-2012N060 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3985 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2989–4981 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3L24 cooling tower (672 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 672 nominal tons (2953 kW): rated to cool 2022 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2215–3691 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-3D3DS-N2 closed-circuit cooler (259 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's PFI-1024N-3D3DS-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 259 nominal tons (1139 kW): rated to cool 780 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 854–1424 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 29-3L28 cooling tower (754 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 29-3L28 — an AT cooling tower, 754 nominal tons (3317 kW): rated to cool 2271 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2488–4146 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-07GC cooling tower (196 tons, 863 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's XES15E-1212-07GC — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 196 nominal tons (863 kW): rated to cool 591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 22.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 647–1079 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
Publishing here
Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers