Published systems
Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.
Showing 2,353–2,376 of 3,474
| Name | Company | Category | Capacity | Markets | Open in the builder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVAPCO AT 27-3K24 cooling tower (509 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 509 nominal tons (2239 kW): rated to cool 1533 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1679–2799 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-630-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-630-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3817 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2862–4771 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-3K28 cooling tower (633 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-3K28 — an AT cooling tower, 633 nominal tons (2782 kW): rated to cool 1905 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2087–3478 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-24T-P closed-circuit cooler (402 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓ BAC's FXV-1218C-24T-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1766 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1324–2207 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-3K36 cooling tower (841 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 841 nominal tons (3698 kW): rated to cool 2532 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2773–4622 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0630-1024N080 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0630-1024N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 87.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2870–4784 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-3L24 cooling tower (551 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 551 nominal tons (2423 kW): rated to cool 1659 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1817–3029 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-2D4ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (210 tons, 924 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's PFI-1024N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 633 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 693–1156 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-3L28 cooling tower (533 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-3L28 — an AT cooling tower, 533 nominal tons (2344 kW): rated to cool 1605 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1758–2930 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-10LN-2 cooling tower (526 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S15E-1285-10LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 526 nominal tons (2313 kW): rated to cool 1584 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1735–2892 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-3M28 cooling tower (623 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-3M28 — an AT cooling tower, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2054–3423 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14T-2 cooling tower (2596 tons, 11.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S3E-1424-14T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2596 nominal tons (11413 kW): rated to cool 7815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 283.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 8560–14267 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-4G36 cooling tower (566 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-4G36 — an AT cooling tower, 566 nominal tons (2489 kW): rated to cool 1704 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1866–3111 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-027-F cooling tower (27 tons, 118 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VTL-027-F — a Series V cooling tower, 27 nominal tons (118 kW): rated to cool 81 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 89–148 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-4H24 cooling tower (397 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-4H24 — an AT cooling tower, 397 nominal tons (1744 kW): rated to cool 1194 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1308–2180 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-31O closed-circuit cooler (162 tons, 714 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-192-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 162 nominal tons (714 kW): rated to cool 489 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 536–893 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-4H28 cooling tower (439 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-4H28 — an AT cooling tower, 439 nominal tons (1928 kW): rated to cool 1320 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1446–2410 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-582A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-582A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2507 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1880–3134 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-4H36 cooling tower (649 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-4H36 — an AT cooling tower, 649 nominal tons (2852 kW): rated to cool 1953 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2139–3565 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0646B-1024N-HB evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0646B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3910 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2933–4888 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-4I24 cooling tower (435 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-4I24 — an AT cooling tower, 435 nominal tons (1910 kW): rated to cool 1308 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1433–2388 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-643-1218-60 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-643-1218-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3896 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2922–4869 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-4I28 cooling tower (389 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-4I28 — an AT cooling tower, 389 nominal tons (1709 kW): rated to cool 1170 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1282–2136 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-30T-O closed-circuit cooler (390 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓ BAC's FXV-1218C-30T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 390 nominal tons (1713 kW): rated to cool 1173 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1285–2141 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
Publishing here
Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers