Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 46Systems 3,474Components 15,410Accessories 3

Showing 2,353–2,376 of 3,474

NameCompanyCategoryCapacityMarketsOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3K24 cooling tower (509 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3K24 — an AT cooling tower, 509 nominal tons (2239 kW): rated to cool 1533 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1679–2799 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-630-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-630-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3817 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2862–4771 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3K28 cooling tower (633 tons, 2.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3K28 — an AT cooling tower, 633 nominal tons (2782 kW): rated to cool 1905 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2087–3478 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-24T-P closed-circuit cooler (402 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-24T-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1766 kW): rated to cool 1209 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1324–2207 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3K36 cooling tower (841 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 841 nominal tons (3698 kW): rated to cool 2532 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2773–4622 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0630-1024N080 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0630-1024N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3827 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 87.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2870–4784 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3L24 cooling tower (551 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3L24 — an AT cooling tower, 551 nominal tons (2423 kW): rated to cool 1659 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1817–3029 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-2D4ES-N2 closed-circuit cooler (210 tons, 924 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data
BAC's PFI-1024N-2D4ES-N2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 633 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection693–1156 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3L28 cooling tower (533 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3L28 — an AT cooling tower, 533 nominal tons (2344 kW): rated to cool 1605 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1758–2930 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-10LN-2 cooling tower (526 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S15E-1285-10LN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 526 nominal tons (2313 kW): rated to cool 1584 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 56.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1735–2892 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-3M28 cooling tower (623 tons, 2.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-3M28 — an AT cooling tower, 623 nominal tons (2738 kW): rated to cool 1875 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 73.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2054–3423 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14T-2 cooling tower (2596 tons, 11.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓
BAC's S3E-1424-14T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2596 nominal tons (11413 kW): rated to cool 7815 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 283.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection8560–14267 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4G36 cooling tower (566 tons, 2.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4G36 — an AT cooling tower, 566 nominal tons (2489 kW): rated to cool 1704 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1866–3111 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-027-F cooling tower (27 tons, 118 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓
BAC's VTL-027-F — a Series V cooling tower, 27 nominal tons (118 kW): rated to cool 81 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection89–148 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4H24 cooling tower (397 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4H24 — an AT cooling tower, 397 nominal tons (1744 kW): rated to cool 1194 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 41.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1308–2180 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-192-31O closed-circuit cooler (162 tons, 714 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓
BAC's VF1-192-31O — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 162 nominal tons (714 kW): rated to cool 489 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 50.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection536–893 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4H28 cooling tower (439 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4H28 — an AT cooling tower, 439 nominal tons (1928 kW): rated to cool 1320 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 46.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1446–2410 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VCA-582A evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-582A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2507 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1880–3134 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4H36 cooling tower (649 tons, 2.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4H36 — an AT cooling tower, 649 nominal tons (2852 kW): rated to cool 1953 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 68.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2139–3565 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0646B-1024N-HB evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0646B-1024N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3910 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 59.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 38.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2933–4888 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4I24 cooling tower (435 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4I24 — an AT cooling tower, 435 nominal tons (1910 kW): rated to cool 1308 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1433–2388 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-643-1218-60 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data
Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-643-1218-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3896 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection2922–4869 kWEUOpen in the builder
EVAPCO AT 27-4I28 cooling tower (389 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓
EVAPCO's 27-4I28 — an AT cooling tower, 389 nominal tons (1709 kW): rated to cool 1170 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 51.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1282–2136 kWEUOpen in the builder
Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-30T-O closed-circuit cooler (390 tons, 1.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓
BAC's FXV-1218C-30T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 390 nominal tons (1713 kW): rated to cool 1173 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
HVAC BuilderCooling tower / heat rejection1285–2141 kWEUOpen in the builder
‹ Previous1…979899100101…145Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers