Published systems
Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.
Showing 2,305–2,328 of 3,474
| Name | Company | Category | Capacity | Markets | Open in the builder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVAPCO AT 26-4J17 cooling tower (343 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 26-4J17 — an AT cooling tower, 343 nominal tons (1507 kW): rated to cool 1032 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1130–1884 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VT1-N510-P cooling tower (508 tons, 2.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's VT1-N510-P — a Series V cooling tower, 508 nominal tons (2235 kW): rated to cool 1530 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1676–2793 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2G36 cooling tower (443 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2G36 — an AT cooling tower, 443 nominal tons (1945 kW): rated to cool 1332 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1459–2432 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-41P closed-circuit cooler (130 tons, 570 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-144N-41P — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 130 nominal tons (570 kW): rated to cool 390 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 31.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 427–712 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2H24 cooling tower (322 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2H24 — an AT cooling tower, 322 nominal tons (1415 kW): rated to cool 969 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1061–1769 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-560A evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-560A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 2413 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 45.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1809–3016 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2H28 cooling tower (342 tons, 1.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2H28 — an AT cooling tower, 342 nominal tons (1503 kW): rated to cool 1029 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1127–1879 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0630B-1218N-MA evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0630B-1218N-MA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 3821 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 63.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2866–4777 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2H36 cooling tower (529 tons, 2.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2H36 — an AT cooling tower, 529 nominal tons (2327 kW): rated to cool 1593 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 71.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1745–2908 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil CXVB-628-1218-60 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-628-1218-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3805 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 78.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2853–4756 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2I24 cooling tower (355 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2I24 — an AT cooling tower, 355 nominal tons (1560 kW): rated to cool 1068 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1170–1950 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil FXV-1218C-23Q-P closed-circuit cooler (361 tons, 1.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) ✓ BAC's FXV-1218C-23Q-P — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 361 nominal tons (1586 kW): rated to cool 1086 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1190–1983 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2I28 cooling tower (485 tons, 2.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2I28 — an AT cooling tower, 485 nominal tons (2134 kW): rated to cool 1461 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 52.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1600–2667 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0618-2412N040 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0618-2412N040 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3754 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 72.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2815–4692 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2I36 cooling tower (586 tons, 2.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2I36 — an AT cooling tower, 586 nominal tons (2576 kW): rated to cool 1764 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1932–3220 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1024N-2D2ES-L2 closed-circuit cooler (178 tons, 784 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's PFI-1024N-2D2ES-L2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 178 nominal tons (784 kW): rated to cool 537 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 64.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 588–980 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2J24 cooling tower (409 tons, 1.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2J24 — an AT cooling tower, 409 nominal tons (1796 kW): rated to cool 1230 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 54.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1347–2245 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 S15E-1285-09MN-2 cooling tower (550 tons, 2.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S15E-1285-09MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 550 nominal tons (2419 kW): rated to cool 1656 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 58.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1814–3023 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2J28 cooling tower (431 tons, 1.9 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2J28 — an AT cooling tower, 431 nominal tons (1893 kW): rated to cool 1296 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 60.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1420–2366 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-1424-14S-2 cooling tower (2423 tons, 10.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S3E-1424-14S-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2423 nominal tons (10651 kW): rated to cool 7293 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 265.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 7988–13314 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2J36 cooling tower (674 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2J36 — an AT cooling tower, 674 nominal tons (2962 kW): rated to cool 2028 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 88.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2221–3702 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-016-E cooling tower (16 tons, 70 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VTL-016-E — a Series V cooling tower, 16 nominal tons (70 kW): rated to cool 48 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 3.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 53–88 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 27-2K24 cooling tower (451 tons, 2.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 27-2K24 — an AT cooling tower, 451 nominal tons (1985 kW): rated to cool 1359 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 59.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1489–2481 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-144N-41Q closed-circuit cooler (144 tons, 631 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-144N-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 144 nominal tons (631 kW): rated to cool 432 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 33.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 473–789 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
Publishing here
Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers