Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.
Showing 2641–2664 of 3346
EVAPCO's 9-7M14 — a ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 335 nominal tons (1473 kW): rated to cool 841 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 32.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.
Baltimore Aircoil's -75-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 454 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 10.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -87-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 527 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -94-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 569 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 9.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -95-0806-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 576 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -102-0806-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 618 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -106-0806-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 642 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 11.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -111-0806-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 673 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -117-0806-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 709 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -123-0806-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 745 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -137-0806-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 830 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 18.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -113-0809-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 685 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -124-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 751 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -126-0809-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 763 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 12.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -134-0809-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 812 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -138-0809-3 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 836 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -138-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 836 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 17.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -144-0809-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 872 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -152-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 921 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -158-0809-5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 957 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 16.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -163-0809-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 988 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -190-0809-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1151 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 24.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -207-0809-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1254 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Baltimore Aircoil's -172-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1042 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 25.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.
Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers