Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 2689–2712 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -409-0818-45 evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -409-0818-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2478 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 58.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1858–3097 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -237-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -237-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1436 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1077–1795 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -264-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -264-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1599 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1199–1999 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -285-1212-15 evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -285-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1727 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1295–2158 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -297-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -297-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1799 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1350–2249 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -299-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -299-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1359–2264 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -302-1212-20 evaporative condenser (1.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -302-1212-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1830 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1372–2287 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -306-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -306-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1854 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1390–2317 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -314-1212-15 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -314-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1902 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 37.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1427–2378 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -315-1212-10 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -315-1212-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1908 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 32.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1431–2386 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -327-1212-15 evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -327-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1981 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 37.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1486–2476 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -341-1212-20 evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -341-1212-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2066 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1549–2582 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -341-1212-15 evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -341-1212-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2066 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 36.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1549–2582 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -355-1212-25 evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -355-1212-25 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2151 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1613–2689 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -370-1212-25 evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -370-1212-25 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2242 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 44.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1681–2802 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -381-1212-30 evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -381-1212-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2308 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1731–2885 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -393-1212-30 evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -393-1212-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2381 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1786–2976 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -411-1212-40 evaporative condenser (2.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -411-1212-40 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2490 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1867–3112 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -360-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -360-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1636–2726 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -403-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -403-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2442 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1831–3052 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -437-1218-22.5 evaporative condenser (2.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -437-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2648 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 58.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1986–3310 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -444-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -444-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2690 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2017–3362 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -457-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -457-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2769 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2076–3461 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -459-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -459-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2781 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 49.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2085–3476 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…111112113114115…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers