Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 2737–2760 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -711-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -711-1224-50 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4308 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3231–5384 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -739-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -739-1224-50 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4477 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 88.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3358–5597 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -762-1224-60 evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -762-1224-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4616 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3462–5771 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -786-1224-60 evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -786-1224-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4762 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3571–5952 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -821-1224-80 evaporative condenser (5.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -821-1224-80 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4974 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 103.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3731–6218 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -719-1236-30 evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -719-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4356 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 102.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3267–5445 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -806-1236-30 evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -806-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4883 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 102.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3662–6104 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -875-1236-45 evaporative condenser (5.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -875-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5301 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 116.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3976–6626 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -888-1236-30 evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -888-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5380 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4035–6725 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -914-1236-30 evaporative condenser (5.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -914-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5537 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 99.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4153–6922 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -918-1236-30 evaporative condenser (5.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -918-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5562 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4171–6952 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -933-1236-30 evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -933-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5652 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4239–7066 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -964-1236-45 evaporative condenser (5.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -964-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5840 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 113.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4380–7300 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -966-1236-30 evaporative condenser (5.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -966-1236-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 5852 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 97.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4389–7315 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1027-1236-45 evaporative condenser (6.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1027-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6222 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 112.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4666–7777 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1049-1236-45 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1049-1236-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6355 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 111.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4766–7944 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1049-1236-60 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1049-1236-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6355 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 125.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4766–7944 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1089-1236-60 evaporative condenser (6.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1089-1236-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6598 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4948–8247 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1134-1236-75 evaporative condenser (6.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1134-1236-75 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 6870 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 133.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5153–8588 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1161-1236-75 evaporative condenser (7.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1161-1236-75 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7034 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 131.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5275–8792 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1202-1236-90 evaporative condenser (7.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1202-1236-90 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7282 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 140.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 67.1 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5462–9103 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1257-1236-120 evaporative condenser (7.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1257-1236-120 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7615 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 156.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5712–9519 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1287-1236-120 evaporative condenser (7.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1287-1236-120 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 7797 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 154.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5848–9746 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -617-1224-15 evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -617-1224-15 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 3746 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2810–4683 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…113114115116117…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers