Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 2761–2784 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -650-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -650-1224-20 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 3946 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2959–4932 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -676-1224-25 evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -676-1224-25 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4107 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3080–5134 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -700-1224-40 evaporative condenser (4.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -700-1224-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4250 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 86.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3188–5313 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -731-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -731-1224-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4443 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 92.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3332–5553 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -754-1224-60 evaporative condenser (4.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -754-1224-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4579 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3434–5724 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -778-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -778-1224-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4728 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 92.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3546–5909 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -813-1224-50 evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -813-1224-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4936 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 92.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3702–6170 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -843-1224-60 evaporative condenser (5.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -843-1224-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5124 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 98.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3843–6405 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -887-1224-60 evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -887-1224-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5388 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 95.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4041–6736 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -712-1426-20 evaporative condenser (4.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -712-1426-20 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4326 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3245–5408 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -741-1426-25 evaporative condenser (4.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -741-1426-25 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3377–5629 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -766-1426-30 evaporative condenser (4.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -766-1426-30 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4654 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 85.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3490–5817 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -807-1426-40 evaporative condenser (4.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -807-1426-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4901 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 93.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3676–6126 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -844-1426-50 evaporative condenser (5.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -844-1426-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5124 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3843–6405 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -894-1426-50 evaporative condenser (5.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -894-1426-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5428 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4071–6785 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -933-1426-50 evaporative condenser (5.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -933-1426-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5667 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 100.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4250–7084 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -965-1426-60 evaporative condenser (5.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -965-1426-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 5861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 106.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4396–7326 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1005-1426-75 evaporative condenser (6.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1005-1426-75 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 6107 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 114.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4580–7634 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1057-1426-75 evaporative condenser (6.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1057-1426-75 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 6422 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 112.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 55.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 4817–8028 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1234-2424-30 evaporative condenser (7.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1234-2424-30 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 7496 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 123.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5622–9370 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1300-2424-40 evaporative condenser (7.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1300-2424-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 7897 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 135.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 5923–9871 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1352-2424-50 evaporative condenser (8.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1352-2424-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8213 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 146.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6160–10266 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1400-2424-80 evaporative condenser (8.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1400-2424-80 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8504 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 172.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6378–10630 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1462-2424-100 evaporative condenser (8.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1462-2424-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8881 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 185.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6660–11101 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…114115116117118…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers