Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 2785–2808 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -1508-2424-120 evaporative condenser (9.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1508-2424-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9160 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6870–11450 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1556-2424-100 evaporative condenser (9.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1556-2424-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9452 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 184.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 7089–11815 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1626-2424-100 evaporative condenser (9.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1626-2424-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9877 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 184.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 7408–12346 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1686-2424-120 evaporative condenser (10.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1686-2424-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10241 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 196.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 7681–12802 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1774-2424-120 evaporative condenser (10.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1774-2424-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10776 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 191.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 8082–13470 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1424-2826-40 evaporative condenser (8.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1424-2826-40 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 8650 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 148.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6487–10812 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1482-2826-50 evaporative condenser (9.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1482-2826-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9002 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 160.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6752–11253 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1532-2826-60 evaporative condenser (9.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1532-2826-60 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9306 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 170.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 6979–11632 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1614-2826-80 evaporative condenser (9.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1614-2826-80 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 9804 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 187.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 7353–12255 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1688-2826-100 evaporative condenser (10.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1688-2826-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10254 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 201.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 7690–12817 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1788-2826-100 evaporative condenser (10.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1788-2826-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 10861 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 200.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 8146–13576 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1866-2826-100 evaporative condenser (11.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1866-2826-100 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 11335 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 200.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 74.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 8501–14169 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -1930-2826-120 evaporative condenser (11.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -1930-2826-120 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 11723 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 213.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 89.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 8793–14654 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2010-2826-150 evaporative condenser (12.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2010-2826-150 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 12210 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 229.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 9157–15262 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -2114-2826-150 evaporative condenser (12.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -2114-2826-150 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 12841 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 225.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 9631–16052 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0048-0406N005 evaporative condenser (292 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0048-0406N005 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 292 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 3.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 219–365 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0046-0406N003 evaporative condenser (279 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0046-0406N003 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 279 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 6.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 2.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 209–349 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0067-0406N7.5 evaporative condenser (407 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0067-0406N7.5 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 407 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 7.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 305–509 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0078-0412N006 evaporative condenser (474 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0078-0412N006 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 474 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 4.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 355–592 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0090-0412N010 evaporative condenser (547 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0090-0412N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 547 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 410–683 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0106-0412N010 evaporative condenser (644 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0106-0412N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 644 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 0.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 483–805 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0128-0412N015 evaporative condenser (778 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0128-0412N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 778 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 15.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 583–972 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0118-0412N010 evaporative condenser (717 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0118-0412N010 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 717 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 0.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 538–896 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -0134-0412N015 evaporative condenser (814 kW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -0134-0412N015 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 814 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 14.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 610–1017 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…115116117118119…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers