Published systems
Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.
Showing 2,785–2,808 of 3,474
| Name | Company | Category | Capacity | Markets | Open in the builder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVAPCO AT 39-3H36 cooling tower (680 tons, 3.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3H36 — an AT cooling tower, 680 nominal tons (2988 kW): rated to cool 2046 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 70.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2241–3735 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-245-P cooling tower (244 tons, 1.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VTL-245-P — a Series V cooling tower, 244 nominal tons (1073 kW): rated to cool 735 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 27.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 805–1342 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-3H42 cooling tower (746 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3H42 — an AT cooling tower, 746 nominal tons (3277 kW): rated to cool 2244 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 78.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2458–4097 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288-41Q closed-circuit cooler (298 tons, 1.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-288-41Q — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 298 nominal tons (1310 kW): rated to cool 897 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 75.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 983–1638 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-3I36 cooling tower (760 tons, 3.3 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3I36 — an AT cooling tower, 760 nominal tons (3343 kW): rated to cool 2289 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 76.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2507–4179 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-760A evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-760A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3274 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2456–4093 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-3I42 cooling tower (836 tons, 3.7 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3I42 — an AT cooling tower, 836 nominal tons (3676 kW): rated to cool 2517 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2757–4595 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0796B-1036N-JA evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0796B-1036N-JA — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4825 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 90.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3619–6031 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-3J36 cooling tower (859 tons, 3.8 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3J36 — an AT cooling tower, 859 nominal tons (3777 kW): rated to cool 2586 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 87.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2833–4721 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PCC-0792-1224N080 evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0792-1224N080 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 4811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3608–6013 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-3J42 cooling tower (942 tons, 4.1 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3J42 — an AT cooling tower, 942 nominal tons (4140 kW): rated to cool 2835 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3105–5176 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil PFI-1212N-2D4ES-M1 closed-circuit cooler (120 tons, 526 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data BAC's PFI-1212N-2D4ES-M1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 120 nominal tons (526 kW): rated to cool 360 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 394–657 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-3K36 cooling tower (948 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3K36 — an AT cooling tower, 948 nominal tons (4167 kW): rated to cool 2853 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 95.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3125–5208 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 1500 XES15E-1212-11EN cooling tower (210 tons, 924 kW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's XES15E-1212-11EN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 210 nominal tons (924 kW): rated to cool 633 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 693–1156 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-3K42 cooling tower (1039 tons, 4.6 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3K42 — an AT cooling tower, 1039 nominal tons (4565 kW): rated to cool 3126 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 106.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3424–5707 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series 3000 S3E-8518-07P-2 cooling tower (965 tons, 4.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) ✓ BAC's S3E-8518-07P-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 965 nominal tons (4241 kW): rated to cool 2904 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 115.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3181–5301 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-3L36 cooling tower (1013 tons, 4.5 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3L36 — an AT cooling tower, 1013 nominal tons (4451 kW): rated to cool 3048 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 102.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3339–5564 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V VTL-272-P cooling tower (271 tons, 1.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) ✓ BAC's VTL-272-P — a Series V cooling tower, 271 nominal tons (1192 kW): rated to cool 816 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 894–1490 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-3L42 cooling tower (1126 tons, 5.0 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3L42 — an AT cooling tower, 1126 nominal tons (4951 kW): rated to cool 3390 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 113.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3713–6189 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil Series V closed circuit VF1-288-41R closed-circuit cooler (324 tons, 1.4 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) ✓ BAC's VF1-288-41R — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 324 nominal tons (1424 kW): rated to cool 975 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 80.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 1068–1780 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-3M42 cooling tower (1193 tons, 5.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-3M42 — an AT cooling tower, 1193 nominal tons (5245 kW): rated to cool 3591 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 120.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3933–6556 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VCA-762A evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-762A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 3283 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2462–4103 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| EVAPCO AT 39-4H36 cooling tower (723 tons, 3.2 MW) — modelled Example modelled from published data CTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) ✓ EVAPCO's 39-4H36 — an AT cooling tower, 723 nominal tons (3177 kW): rated to cool 2175 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 69.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 2382–3971 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
| Baltimore Aircoil VRC-0798B-1036N-HB evaporative condenser (4.8 MW rejection) — modelled Example modelled from published data Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0798B-1036N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 4838 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 108.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 51.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection. | HVAC Builder | Cooling tower / heat rejection | 3629–6048 kW | EU | Open in the builder |
Publishing here
Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers