Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 2713–2736 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -467-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -467-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2829 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2122–3537 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -482-1218-22.5 evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -482-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2920 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2190–3650 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -483-1218-15 evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -483-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2926 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 48.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2195–3658 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -513-1218-22.5 evaporative condenser (3.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -513-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3108 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 56.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2331–3885 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -525-1218-22.5 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -525-1218-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 55.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2386–3976 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -525-1218-30 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -525-1218-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 62.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2386–3976 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -545-1218-30 evaporative condenser (3.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -545-1218-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3302 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 61.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2476–4127 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -567-1218-37.5 evaporative condenser (3.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -567-1218-37.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3435 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2576–4294 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -581-1218-37.5 evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -581-1218-37.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3520 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2640–4400 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -601-1218-45 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -601-1218-45 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3641 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 70.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 33.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2731–4551 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -628-1218-60 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -628-1218-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3805 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 78.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2853–4756 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -643-1218-60 evaporative condenser (3.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -643-1218-60 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3896 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 77.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 44.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2922–4869 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -473-1224-20 evaporative condenser (2.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -473-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2866 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 67.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2149–3582 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -528-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -528-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3199 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 66.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2399–3999 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -571-1224-30 evaporative condenser (3.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -571-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3459 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 76.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2595–4324 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -595-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -595-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3605 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2704–4506 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -598-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -598-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3623 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2717–4529 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -604-1224-40 evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -604-1224-40 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3659 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 83.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2744–4574 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -612-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -612-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3708 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 65.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2781–4635 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -629-1224-30 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -629-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3811 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 75.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2858–4764 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -630-1224-20 evaporative condenser (3.8 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -630-1224-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3817 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 64.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2862–4771 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -655-1224-30 evaporative condenser (4.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -655-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 3968 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 74.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 2976–4960 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -682-1224-30 evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -682-1224-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4132 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 73.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3099–5165 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -682-1224-40 evaporative condenser (4.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -682-1224-40 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 4132 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 82.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 29.8 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 3099–5165 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…112113114115116…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers