Published systems

Complete machines published by their suppliers — each with a public spec page whose design-point performance is solved live from the actual model, not copied from a brochure. Open one in the builder to run it against your own climate, or request a quote right here.

Suppliers 26Systems 3346Components 10248
All categoriesCooling tower / heat rejection 3307VRF / multi-split 8Air handler 7Plant / central 5Fan coil / terminal 4Condensing unit 3Rooftop / packaged 3Split system 3Chiller 2Heat recovery / DOAS 2Evaporative air cooler 1Unit cooler / refrigeration 1
All manufacturersBaltimore Aircoil 1900EVAPCO 1408Midea 2Gree 1Hitachi 1Samsung 1
All seriesAT 992ATWB 416PFi 359PCC 214Series 3000 189Series 1500 173Series V closed circuit 173Vertex VRC 157VCA 151Series V 122CXVB 118FXV 100PT2 46CXVT 40Series V EC 26FXT 20Nexus 12DVM S 1GMV5 1Set Free FSXN 1V4+ 1V6 1
Any capacity500 kW and up 3088100–500 kW 39125–100 kW 76up to 25 kW 25
Any certificationCTI STD-201 (validation C13A-99R28) 822CTI STD-201 (validation C13F-09R12) 416CTI STD-201 (validation C11F-92R20) 362CTI STD-201 (validation C11K-00R03) 153CTI STD-201 (validation C11J-98R12) 100CTI STD-201 (validation C11B-92R07) 90CTI STD-201 (validation C11L-07R05) 46CTI STD-201 (validation C11Q-18R02) 2
All marketsEU 3346
All tagsexample 3346
All suppliersHVAC Builder 3345Aeronim Systems (fictional) 1
SortNewestName A–ZSupplier A–ZCapacity ↑Capacity ↓

Showing 2665–2688 of 3346

Baltimore Aircoil -195-0812-10 evaporative condenser (1.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -195-0812-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 27.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 886–1477 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -204-0812-7.5 evaporative condenser (1.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -204-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1236 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 21.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 927–1545 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -207-0812-15 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -207-0812-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1254 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 941–1568 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -216-0812-7.5 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -216-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1309 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 24.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 981–1636 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -217-0812-15 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -217-0812-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1315 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 31.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 986–1643 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -221-0812-7.5 evaporative condenser (1.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -221-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1339 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 24.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1004–1674 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -227-0812-20 evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -227-0812-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1375 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1032–1719 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -237-0812-10 evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -237-0812-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1436 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1077–1795 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -238-0812-15 evaporative condenser (1.4 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -238-0812-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1442 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 30.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1081–1802 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -241-0812-10 evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -241-0812-10 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1460 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 26.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 7.5 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1095–1825 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -259-0812-20 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -259-0812-20 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1569 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 33.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1177–1961 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -270-0812-25 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -270-0812-25 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1636 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 35.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 18.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1227–2045 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -284-0812-30 evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -284-0812-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1721 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 38.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1290–2151 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -248-0818-15 evaporative condenser (1.5 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -248-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1503 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 42.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1127–1878 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -268-0818-15 evaporative condenser (1.6 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -268-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1624 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1218–2030 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -281-0818-15 evaporative condenser (1.7 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -281-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1702 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1277–2128 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -310-0818-15 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -310-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1878 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1409–2348 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -321-0818-15 evaporative condenser (1.9 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -321-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1945 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1459–2431 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -327-0818-15 evaporative condenser (2.0 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -327-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1981 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1486–2476 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -342-0818-15 evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -342-0818-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2072 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 40.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1554–2590 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -345-0818-30 evaporative condenser (2.1 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -345-0818-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2090 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.7 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1568–2613 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -357-0818-22.5 evaporative condenser (2.2 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -357-0818-22.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2163 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 46.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 16.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1622–2704 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -373-0818-30 evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -373-0818-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2260 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1695–2825 kW · EU

Baltimore Aircoil -387-0818-30 evaporative condenser (2.3 MW rejection) — modelled

Baltimore Aircoil's -387-0818-30 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2345 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 50.6 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

Examplemodelled from published data
Cooling tower / heat rejection · 1758–2931 kW · EU
‹ Previous1…110111112113114…140Next ›

Publishing here

Suppliers publish from the builder's supplier portal — free to register, free to publish. How it works for system suppliers