Published systems

EVAPCO's 17-2J14 — an AT cooling tower, 218 nominal tons (960 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VF1-027-32H — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 26 nominal tons (114 kW): rated to cool 78 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 6.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 17-5L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 513 nominal tons (2254 kW): rated to cool 1286 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 65.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCL-223 — a Series V EC evaporative condenser rejecting 961 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 20.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 17-2J18 — an AT cooling tower, 345 nominal tons (1516 kW): rated to cool 1038 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 43.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-1252A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 5394 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 80.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 59.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 17-5M12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 473 nominal tons (2081 kW): rated to cool 1187 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 62.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0323B-1012N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 1955 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 19.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 17-2J9 — an AT cooling tower, 170 nominal tons (749 kW): rated to cool 513 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-144-0809-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 872 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 19.8 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 17-5M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 544 nominal tons (2390 kW): rated to cool 1364 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 69.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-2114-2826-150 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 12841 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 225.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 111.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 17-2K12 — an AT cooling tower, 228 nominal tons (1003 kW): rated to cool 687 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 29.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's FXV-0809B-32D-M — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 140 nominal tons (613 kW): rated to cool 420 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 17-6K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 523 nominal tons (2299 kW): rated to cool 1312 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 60.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0214-0718N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1300 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 39.1 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 17-2K14 — an AT cooling tower, 300 nominal tons (1319 kW): rated to cool 903 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-0709N-2D3DS-H1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 39 nominal tons (171 kW): rated to cool 117 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 15.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 17-6L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 562 nominal tons (2470 kW): rated to cool 1409 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 63.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PT2-0814A-3O — a PT2 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 17-2L14 — an AT cooling tower, 238 nominal tons (1047 kW): rated to cool 717 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 34.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's S15E-1212-10MN-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 915 nominal tons (4022 kW): rated to cool 2754 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 97.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 17-6M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 595 nominal tons (2617 kW): rated to cool 1493 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 67.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's S3E-1222-07N-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 1043 nominal tons (4583 kW): rated to cool 3138 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 122.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.