Published systems

EVAPCO's 19-2I11 — an AT cooling tower, 201 nominal tons (885 kW): rated to cool 606 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 23.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-0709N-4D2ES-K1 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 74 nominal tons (324 kW): rated to cool 222 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 16.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 20-7N18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 959 nominal tons (4214 kW): rated to cool 2405 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 94.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PT2-1012A-2O — a PT2 cooling tower, 367 nominal tons (1612 kW): rated to cool 1104 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 40.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 19-2I12 — an AT cooling tower, 229 nominal tons (1008 kW): rated to cool 690 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's S15E-1212-12KN — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 400 nominal tons (1757 kW): rated to cool 1203 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 24-3J12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 402 nominal tons (1768 kW): rated to cool 1009 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 68.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's S3E-1222-10P — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 754 nominal tons (3317 kW): rated to cool 2271 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 85.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 19-2I14 — an AT cooling tower, 250 nominal tons (1100 kW): rated to cool 753 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 28.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VT1-415-R — a Series V cooling tower, 414 nominal tons (1818 kW): rated to cool 1245 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 42.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 24-3K12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 446 nominal tons (1961 kW): rated to cool 1119 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 75.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VF1-036-31L — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 44 nominal tons (193 kW): rated to cool 132 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 11.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 19-2I8 — an AT cooling tower, 158 nominal tons (697 kW): rated to cool 477 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 18.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-150A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 646 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 13.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 24-3K14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 517 nominal tons (2273 kW): rated to cool 1297 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 83.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0356B-1012N-JB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2161 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 34.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 30.0 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 19-2I9 — an AT cooling tower, 177 nominal tons (780 kW): rated to cool 534 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 21.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-216-0812-7.5 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 1309 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 24.4 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 5.6 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 24-3K28 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 987 nominal tons (4340 kW): rated to cool 2476 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 167.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's CXVT-778-1224-50 — a CXVT evaporative condenser rejecting 4728 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 92.0 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 37.3 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 19-2J11 — an AT cooling tower, 230 nominal tons (1012 kW): rated to cool 693 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 26.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's FXV-0812B-16D-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 149 nominal tons (653 kW): rated to cool 447 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 39.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 24-3L12 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 483 nominal tons (2121 kW): rated to cool 1211 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 80.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0278-0718N030 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 1689 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.2 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 22.4 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.