Published systems

EVAPCO's 212-4M28 — an AT cooling tower, 1046 nominal tons (4596 kW): rated to cool 3147 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 100.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VT1-M515-N — a Series V cooling tower, 513 nominal tons (2256 kW): rated to cool 1545 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 48.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 9-5L14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 262 nominal tons (1151 kW): rated to cool 657 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 33.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VF1-1018N-4D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 219 nominal tons (964 kW): rated to cool 660 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 62.5 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 212-4M36 — an AT cooling tower, 1279 nominal tons (5621 kW): rated to cool 3849 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 125.3 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VCA-375A — a VCA evaporative condenser rejecting 1616 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 29.9 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 9-5L21 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 453 nominal tons (1992 kW): rated to cool 1137 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 53.6 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's VRC-0476B-1018N-HB — a Vertex VRC evaporative condenser rejecting 2886 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 41.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 25.7 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 212-4M40 — an AT cooling tower, 1306 nominal tons (5740 kW): rated to cool 3930 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 127.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's CXVB-360-1218-15 — a CXVB evaporative condenser rejecting 2181 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 51.3 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 11.2 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 9-5M14 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 278 nominal tons (1221 kW): rated to cool 697 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 34.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's FXV-1212B-24T-O — an FXV closed-circuit cooler, 216 nominal tons (951 kW): rated to cool 651 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 45.2 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 212-4N24 — an AT cooling tower, 1027 nominal tons (4513 kW): rated to cool 3090 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 101.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

Baltimore Aircoil's PCC-0498-2412N020 — a PCC evaporative condenser rejecting 3025 kW at a 40.6 °C condensing temperature and a 25.6 °C entering wet bulb, on 60.5 m³/s of the maker's own printed air, with a 14.9 kW fan. The heat comes from outside the drawing, because that is what this machine is: heat rejection, and the plant that sends it the heat is the customer's. Given exactly the rejection BAC certify, the model solves the condensing temperature the machine settles at — which is the reading, and the only figure here that is ours rather than theirs. The rating condition is an inference and the listing says so: BAC's sheets never define the condition of their Base Heat Rejection.

EVAPCO's 9-6H8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 131 nominal tons (578 kW): rated to cool 330 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 14.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's PFI-0718N-6D1ES-K2 — a PFi closed-circuit cooler, 182 nominal tons (802 kW): rated to cool 549 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 32.4 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 212-4N28 — an AT cooling tower, 1143 nominal tons (5025 kW): rated to cool 3441 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 109.9 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's S15E-1218-11LC-2 — a Series 1500 cooling tower, 1246 nominal tons (5477 kW): rated to cool 3750 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 133.0 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 9-6I18 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 322 nominal tons (1416 kW): rated to cool 808 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 35.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's S3E-1222-14T-2 — a Series 3000 cooling tower, 2286 nominal tons (10051 kW): rated to cool 6882 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 250.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 212-4N36 — an AT cooling tower, 1404 nominal tons (6173 kW): rated to cool 4227 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 137.1 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VT1-M533-N — a Series V cooling tower, 531 nominal tons (2335 kW): rated to cool 1599 USGPM of water from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 47.7 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. Open fill: the water meets the air directly — Braun's enthalpy-basis tower model. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving water exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

EVAPCO's 9-6I8 — an ATWB closed-circuit cooler, 145 nominal tons (637 kW): rated to cool 363 USGPM of process fluid from 102 to 90 °F at a 75 °F entering wet bulb on 15.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with an induced-draft fan on the leaving air, pulling through the fill. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by EVAPCO. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.

BAC's VF1-1018N-5D — a Series V closed circuit closed-circuit cooler, 248 nominal tons (1091 kW): rated to cool 747 USGPM of process fluid from 95 to 85 °F at a 78 °F entering wet bulb on 61.8 m³/s of air, the maker's own printed airflow, and drawn at those flows with a forced-draft fan on the leaving air, where its nameplate cannot be counted twice against a certified point. The process fluid runs inside a coil under the spray — the evaporative wet-coil model, its two conductances split as the range's own coil volumes say. The model derives the machine's NTU from that one certified point, so it reproduces the rated leaving process fluid exactly and predicts nothing else — one point per model is an input, not a validation. Modelled from the manufacturer's published data — not verified by Baltimore Aircoil. Published as an example; the figures below are solved from this model.